Determinants of Different Types of Positive Environmental Behaviors: An Analysis of Public and Private Sphere Actions

A survey of 1206 participants investigated determinants of positive environmental behaviors (PEBs) in Switzerland. Based on a principle component analysis on data for 23 different PEBs, three behavior types were distinguished: (i) public sphere PEBs with politically mediated impacts; (ii) socially s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sustainability 2020-10, Vol.12 (20), p.8547
Hauptverfasser: Hansmann, Ralph, Binder, Claudia R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 20
container_start_page 8547
container_title Sustainability
container_volume 12
creator Hansmann, Ralph
Binder, Claudia R.
description A survey of 1206 participants investigated determinants of positive environmental behaviors (PEBs) in Switzerland. Based on a principle component analysis on data for 23 different PEBs, three behavior types were distinguished: (i) public sphere PEBs with politically mediated impacts; (ii) socially salient private “lighthouse” PEBs that convey a pro-environmental message; and (iii) less socially salient private PEBs. An environmental behavior model identified general environmental knowledge and attitudes as the strongest predictors of PEBs, followed by green self-identity, justifications, assumed consequences, prescriptive social norms, gender, age, and perceived behavioral control (PBC), respectively. To promote sustainability-oriented behaviors and achieve corresponding societal and economic changes, the identified psychological factors need to be promoted by education and communication strategies as well as complementary measures ranging from policy changes to technology development and systems design. Green self-identity turned out to be significantly more influential for private PEBs than for public sphere PEBs, whereas prescriptive social norms and environmental knowledge were more important for public sphere PEBs. These findings indicate that promoting different types of sustainability-oriented behaviors may require distinct strategies. Public sphere PEBs may be enhanced well by conveying social practices and norms, whereas the promotion of a pro-environmental green self-identity may increase private sphere PEBs effectively.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/su12208547
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2548847537</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2548847537</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-80f8bbf429a00fa282a108dc1b6f1a208c77f617fac4ddffea0ad598024a59653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUN9LwzAQDqLgmHvxLwj4JlSTtGlT3-Y2f8DAgfO5XNuEZXRJTdLC_nujE_Q4uOPuu4_vPoSuKblL05Lc-4EyRgTPijM0YaSgCSWcnP_rL9HM-z2Jkaa0pPkEDUsZpDtoAyZ4bBVeaqWkkybg7bGXP6ON9TroUeKVGbWz5hC30OFHuYNRW-cf8NzEhO7o9elgqDvdYDAt3jg9QpD4vd9FVjxvgrbGX6ELBZ2Xs986RR9Pq-3iJVm_Pb8u5uukYSUPiSBK1LXKWAmEKGCCASWibWidKwrx1aYoVE4LBU3WtlE3EGh5KQjLgJc5T6fo5sTbO_s5SB-qvR1cVOorxjMhsoKnRUTdnlCNs947qare6QO4Y0VJ9e1s9eds-gW332xB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2548847537</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Determinants of Different Types of Positive Environmental Behaviors: An Analysis of Public and Private Sphere Actions</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Hansmann, Ralph ; Binder, Claudia R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hansmann, Ralph ; Binder, Claudia R.</creatorcontrib><description>A survey of 1206 participants investigated determinants of positive environmental behaviors (PEBs) in Switzerland. Based on a principle component analysis on data for 23 different PEBs, three behavior types were distinguished: (i) public sphere PEBs with politically mediated impacts; (ii) socially salient private “lighthouse” PEBs that convey a pro-environmental message; and (iii) less socially salient private PEBs. An environmental behavior model identified general environmental knowledge and attitudes as the strongest predictors of PEBs, followed by green self-identity, justifications, assumed consequences, prescriptive social norms, gender, age, and perceived behavioral control (PBC), respectively. To promote sustainability-oriented behaviors and achieve corresponding societal and economic changes, the identified psychological factors need to be promoted by education and communication strategies as well as complementary measures ranging from policy changes to technology development and systems design. Green self-identity turned out to be significantly more influential for private PEBs than for public sphere PEBs, whereas prescriptive social norms and environmental knowledge were more important for public sphere PEBs. These findings indicate that promoting different types of sustainability-oriented behaviors may require distinct strategies. Public sphere PEBs may be enhanced well by conveying social practices and norms, whereas the promotion of a pro-environmental green self-identity may increase private sphere PEBs effectively.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su12208547</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Attitudes ; Behavior ; Climate change ; Consumption ; Decision making ; Economic change ; Environmental behavior ; Identity ; Lighthouses ; Norms ; Political activism ; Power ; Principal components analysis ; Psychological factors ; Social norms ; Society ; Sustainability ; Sustainable development ; Systems design ; Values ; Variables</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2020-10, Vol.12 (20), p.8547</ispartof><rights>2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-80f8bbf429a00fa282a108dc1b6f1a208c77f617fac4ddffea0ad598024a59653</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-80f8bbf429a00fa282a108dc1b6f1a208c77f617fac4ddffea0ad598024a59653</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8488-2669 ; 0000-0002-2921-9896</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hansmann, Ralph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Binder, Claudia R.</creatorcontrib><title>Determinants of Different Types of Positive Environmental Behaviors: An Analysis of Public and Private Sphere Actions</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>A survey of 1206 participants investigated determinants of positive environmental behaviors (PEBs) in Switzerland. Based on a principle component analysis on data for 23 different PEBs, three behavior types were distinguished: (i) public sphere PEBs with politically mediated impacts; (ii) socially salient private “lighthouse” PEBs that convey a pro-environmental message; and (iii) less socially salient private PEBs. An environmental behavior model identified general environmental knowledge and attitudes as the strongest predictors of PEBs, followed by green self-identity, justifications, assumed consequences, prescriptive social norms, gender, age, and perceived behavioral control (PBC), respectively. To promote sustainability-oriented behaviors and achieve corresponding societal and economic changes, the identified psychological factors need to be promoted by education and communication strategies as well as complementary measures ranging from policy changes to technology development and systems design. Green self-identity turned out to be significantly more influential for private PEBs than for public sphere PEBs, whereas prescriptive social norms and environmental knowledge were more important for public sphere PEBs. These findings indicate that promoting different types of sustainability-oriented behaviors may require distinct strategies. Public sphere PEBs may be enhanced well by conveying social practices and norms, whereas the promotion of a pro-environmental green self-identity may increase private sphere PEBs effectively.</description><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Economic change</subject><subject>Environmental behavior</subject><subject>Identity</subject><subject>Lighthouses</subject><subject>Norms</subject><subject>Political activism</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Principal components analysis</subject><subject>Psychological factors</subject><subject>Social norms</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Systems design</subject><subject>Values</subject><subject>Variables</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUN9LwzAQDqLgmHvxLwj4JlSTtGlT3-Y2f8DAgfO5XNuEZXRJTdLC_nujE_Q4uOPuu4_vPoSuKblL05Lc-4EyRgTPijM0YaSgCSWcnP_rL9HM-z2Jkaa0pPkEDUsZpDtoAyZ4bBVeaqWkkybg7bGXP6ON9TroUeKVGbWz5hC30OFHuYNRW-cf8NzEhO7o9elgqDvdYDAt3jg9QpD4vd9FVjxvgrbGX6ELBZ2Xs986RR9Pq-3iJVm_Pb8u5uukYSUPiSBK1LXKWAmEKGCCASWibWidKwrx1aYoVE4LBU3WtlE3EGh5KQjLgJc5T6fo5sTbO_s5SB-qvR1cVOorxjMhsoKnRUTdnlCNs947qare6QO4Y0VJ9e1s9eds-gW332xB</recordid><startdate>20201015</startdate><enddate>20201015</enddate><creator>Hansmann, Ralph</creator><creator>Binder, Claudia R.</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8488-2669</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2921-9896</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201015</creationdate><title>Determinants of Different Types of Positive Environmental Behaviors: An Analysis of Public and Private Sphere Actions</title><author>Hansmann, Ralph ; Binder, Claudia R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-80f8bbf429a00fa282a108dc1b6f1a208c77f617fac4ddffea0ad598024a59653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Economic change</topic><topic>Environmental behavior</topic><topic>Identity</topic><topic>Lighthouses</topic><topic>Norms</topic><topic>Political activism</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Principal components analysis</topic><topic>Psychological factors</topic><topic>Social norms</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Systems design</topic><topic>Values</topic><topic>Variables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hansmann, Ralph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Binder, Claudia R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hansmann, Ralph</au><au>Binder, Claudia R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Determinants of Different Types of Positive Environmental Behaviors: An Analysis of Public and Private Sphere Actions</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2020-10-15</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>20</issue><spage>8547</spage><pages>8547-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>A survey of 1206 participants investigated determinants of positive environmental behaviors (PEBs) in Switzerland. Based on a principle component analysis on data for 23 different PEBs, three behavior types were distinguished: (i) public sphere PEBs with politically mediated impacts; (ii) socially salient private “lighthouse” PEBs that convey a pro-environmental message; and (iii) less socially salient private PEBs. An environmental behavior model identified general environmental knowledge and attitudes as the strongest predictors of PEBs, followed by green self-identity, justifications, assumed consequences, prescriptive social norms, gender, age, and perceived behavioral control (PBC), respectively. To promote sustainability-oriented behaviors and achieve corresponding societal and economic changes, the identified psychological factors need to be promoted by education and communication strategies as well as complementary measures ranging from policy changes to technology development and systems design. Green self-identity turned out to be significantly more influential for private PEBs than for public sphere PEBs, whereas prescriptive social norms and environmental knowledge were more important for public sphere PEBs. These findings indicate that promoting different types of sustainability-oriented behaviors may require distinct strategies. Public sphere PEBs may be enhanced well by conveying social practices and norms, whereas the promotion of a pro-environmental green self-identity may increase private sphere PEBs effectively.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su12208547</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8488-2669</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2921-9896</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2071-1050
ispartof Sustainability, 2020-10, Vol.12 (20), p.8547
issn 2071-1050
2071-1050
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2548847537
source MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Attitudes
Behavior
Climate change
Consumption
Decision making
Economic change
Environmental behavior
Identity
Lighthouses
Norms
Political activism
Power
Principal components analysis
Psychological factors
Social norms
Society
Sustainability
Sustainable development
Systems design
Values
Variables
title Determinants of Different Types of Positive Environmental Behaviors: An Analysis of Public and Private Sphere Actions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T20%3A18%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Determinants%20of%20Different%20Types%20of%20Positive%20Environmental%20Behaviors:%20An%20Analysis%20of%20Public%20and%20Private%20Sphere%20Actions&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Hansmann,%20Ralph&rft.date=2020-10-15&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=20&rft.spage=8547&rft.pages=8547-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su12208547&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2548847537%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2548847537&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true