Determinants of Different Types of Positive Environmental Behaviors: An Analysis of Public and Private Sphere Actions
A survey of 1206 participants investigated determinants of positive environmental behaviors (PEBs) in Switzerland. Based on a principle component analysis on data for 23 different PEBs, three behavior types were distinguished: (i) public sphere PEBs with politically mediated impacts; (ii) socially s...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sustainability 2020-10, Vol.12 (20), p.8547 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 20 |
container_start_page | 8547 |
container_title | Sustainability |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Hansmann, Ralph Binder, Claudia R. |
description | A survey of 1206 participants investigated determinants of positive environmental behaviors (PEBs) in Switzerland. Based on a principle component analysis on data for 23 different PEBs, three behavior types were distinguished: (i) public sphere PEBs with politically mediated impacts; (ii) socially salient private “lighthouse” PEBs that convey a pro-environmental message; and (iii) less socially salient private PEBs. An environmental behavior model identified general environmental knowledge and attitudes as the strongest predictors of PEBs, followed by green self-identity, justifications, assumed consequences, prescriptive social norms, gender, age, and perceived behavioral control (PBC), respectively. To promote sustainability-oriented behaviors and achieve corresponding societal and economic changes, the identified psychological factors need to be promoted by education and communication strategies as well as complementary measures ranging from policy changes to technology development and systems design. Green self-identity turned out to be significantly more influential for private PEBs than for public sphere PEBs, whereas prescriptive social norms and environmental knowledge were more important for public sphere PEBs. These findings indicate that promoting different types of sustainability-oriented behaviors may require distinct strategies. Public sphere PEBs may be enhanced well by conveying social practices and norms, whereas the promotion of a pro-environmental green self-identity may increase private sphere PEBs effectively. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/su12208547 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2548847537</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2548847537</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-80f8bbf429a00fa282a108dc1b6f1a208c77f617fac4ddffea0ad598024a59653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUN9LwzAQDqLgmHvxLwj4JlSTtGlT3-Y2f8DAgfO5XNuEZXRJTdLC_nujE_Q4uOPuu4_vPoSuKblL05Lc-4EyRgTPijM0YaSgCSWcnP_rL9HM-z2Jkaa0pPkEDUsZpDtoAyZ4bBVeaqWkkybg7bGXP6ON9TroUeKVGbWz5hC30OFHuYNRW-cf8NzEhO7o9elgqDvdYDAt3jg9QpD4vd9FVjxvgrbGX6ELBZ2Xs986RR9Pq-3iJVm_Pb8u5uukYSUPiSBK1LXKWAmEKGCCASWibWidKwrx1aYoVE4LBU3WtlE3EGh5KQjLgJc5T6fo5sTbO_s5SB-qvR1cVOorxjMhsoKnRUTdnlCNs947qare6QO4Y0VJ9e1s9eds-gW332xB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2548847537</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Determinants of Different Types of Positive Environmental Behaviors: An Analysis of Public and Private Sphere Actions</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Hansmann, Ralph ; Binder, Claudia R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hansmann, Ralph ; Binder, Claudia R.</creatorcontrib><description>A survey of 1206 participants investigated determinants of positive environmental behaviors (PEBs) in Switzerland. Based on a principle component analysis on data for 23 different PEBs, three behavior types were distinguished: (i) public sphere PEBs with politically mediated impacts; (ii) socially salient private “lighthouse” PEBs that convey a pro-environmental message; and (iii) less socially salient private PEBs. An environmental behavior model identified general environmental knowledge and attitudes as the strongest predictors of PEBs, followed by green self-identity, justifications, assumed consequences, prescriptive social norms, gender, age, and perceived behavioral control (PBC), respectively. To promote sustainability-oriented behaviors and achieve corresponding societal and economic changes, the identified psychological factors need to be promoted by education and communication strategies as well as complementary measures ranging from policy changes to technology development and systems design. Green self-identity turned out to be significantly more influential for private PEBs than for public sphere PEBs, whereas prescriptive social norms and environmental knowledge were more important for public sphere PEBs. These findings indicate that promoting different types of sustainability-oriented behaviors may require distinct strategies. Public sphere PEBs may be enhanced well by conveying social practices and norms, whereas the promotion of a pro-environmental green self-identity may increase private sphere PEBs effectively.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su12208547</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Attitudes ; Behavior ; Climate change ; Consumption ; Decision making ; Economic change ; Environmental behavior ; Identity ; Lighthouses ; Norms ; Political activism ; Power ; Principal components analysis ; Psychological factors ; Social norms ; Society ; Sustainability ; Sustainable development ; Systems design ; Values ; Variables</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2020-10, Vol.12 (20), p.8547</ispartof><rights>2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-80f8bbf429a00fa282a108dc1b6f1a208c77f617fac4ddffea0ad598024a59653</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-80f8bbf429a00fa282a108dc1b6f1a208c77f617fac4ddffea0ad598024a59653</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8488-2669 ; 0000-0002-2921-9896</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hansmann, Ralph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Binder, Claudia R.</creatorcontrib><title>Determinants of Different Types of Positive Environmental Behaviors: An Analysis of Public and Private Sphere Actions</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>A survey of 1206 participants investigated determinants of positive environmental behaviors (PEBs) in Switzerland. Based on a principle component analysis on data for 23 different PEBs, three behavior types were distinguished: (i) public sphere PEBs with politically mediated impacts; (ii) socially salient private “lighthouse” PEBs that convey a pro-environmental message; and (iii) less socially salient private PEBs. An environmental behavior model identified general environmental knowledge and attitudes as the strongest predictors of PEBs, followed by green self-identity, justifications, assumed consequences, prescriptive social norms, gender, age, and perceived behavioral control (PBC), respectively. To promote sustainability-oriented behaviors and achieve corresponding societal and economic changes, the identified psychological factors need to be promoted by education and communication strategies as well as complementary measures ranging from policy changes to technology development and systems design. Green self-identity turned out to be significantly more influential for private PEBs than for public sphere PEBs, whereas prescriptive social norms and environmental knowledge were more important for public sphere PEBs. These findings indicate that promoting different types of sustainability-oriented behaviors may require distinct strategies. Public sphere PEBs may be enhanced well by conveying social practices and norms, whereas the promotion of a pro-environmental green self-identity may increase private sphere PEBs effectively.</description><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Economic change</subject><subject>Environmental behavior</subject><subject>Identity</subject><subject>Lighthouses</subject><subject>Norms</subject><subject>Political activism</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Principal components analysis</subject><subject>Psychological factors</subject><subject>Social norms</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Systems design</subject><subject>Values</subject><subject>Variables</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUN9LwzAQDqLgmHvxLwj4JlSTtGlT3-Y2f8DAgfO5XNuEZXRJTdLC_nujE_Q4uOPuu4_vPoSuKblL05Lc-4EyRgTPijM0YaSgCSWcnP_rL9HM-z2Jkaa0pPkEDUsZpDtoAyZ4bBVeaqWkkybg7bGXP6ON9TroUeKVGbWz5hC30OFHuYNRW-cf8NzEhO7o9elgqDvdYDAt3jg9QpD4vd9FVjxvgrbGX6ELBZ2Xs986RR9Pq-3iJVm_Pb8u5uukYSUPiSBK1LXKWAmEKGCCASWibWidKwrx1aYoVE4LBU3WtlE3EGh5KQjLgJc5T6fo5sTbO_s5SB-qvR1cVOorxjMhsoKnRUTdnlCNs947qare6QO4Y0VJ9e1s9eds-gW332xB</recordid><startdate>20201015</startdate><enddate>20201015</enddate><creator>Hansmann, Ralph</creator><creator>Binder, Claudia R.</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8488-2669</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2921-9896</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201015</creationdate><title>Determinants of Different Types of Positive Environmental Behaviors: An Analysis of Public and Private Sphere Actions</title><author>Hansmann, Ralph ; Binder, Claudia R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-80f8bbf429a00fa282a108dc1b6f1a208c77f617fac4ddffea0ad598024a59653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Economic change</topic><topic>Environmental behavior</topic><topic>Identity</topic><topic>Lighthouses</topic><topic>Norms</topic><topic>Political activism</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Principal components analysis</topic><topic>Psychological factors</topic><topic>Social norms</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Systems design</topic><topic>Values</topic><topic>Variables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hansmann, Ralph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Binder, Claudia R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hansmann, Ralph</au><au>Binder, Claudia R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Determinants of Different Types of Positive Environmental Behaviors: An Analysis of Public and Private Sphere Actions</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2020-10-15</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>20</issue><spage>8547</spage><pages>8547-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>A survey of 1206 participants investigated determinants of positive environmental behaviors (PEBs) in Switzerland. Based on a principle component analysis on data for 23 different PEBs, three behavior types were distinguished: (i) public sphere PEBs with politically mediated impacts; (ii) socially salient private “lighthouse” PEBs that convey a pro-environmental message; and (iii) less socially salient private PEBs. An environmental behavior model identified general environmental knowledge and attitudes as the strongest predictors of PEBs, followed by green self-identity, justifications, assumed consequences, prescriptive social norms, gender, age, and perceived behavioral control (PBC), respectively. To promote sustainability-oriented behaviors and achieve corresponding societal and economic changes, the identified psychological factors need to be promoted by education and communication strategies as well as complementary measures ranging from policy changes to technology development and systems design. Green self-identity turned out to be significantly more influential for private PEBs than for public sphere PEBs, whereas prescriptive social norms and environmental knowledge were more important for public sphere PEBs. These findings indicate that promoting different types of sustainability-oriented behaviors may require distinct strategies. Public sphere PEBs may be enhanced well by conveying social practices and norms, whereas the promotion of a pro-environmental green self-identity may increase private sphere PEBs effectively.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su12208547</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8488-2669</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2921-9896</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2071-1050 |
ispartof | Sustainability, 2020-10, Vol.12 (20), p.8547 |
issn | 2071-1050 2071-1050 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2548847537 |
source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Attitudes Behavior Climate change Consumption Decision making Economic change Environmental behavior Identity Lighthouses Norms Political activism Power Principal components analysis Psychological factors Social norms Society Sustainability Sustainable development Systems design Values Variables |
title | Determinants of Different Types of Positive Environmental Behaviors: An Analysis of Public and Private Sphere Actions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T20%3A18%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Determinants%20of%20Different%20Types%20of%20Positive%20Environmental%20Behaviors:%20An%20Analysis%20of%20Public%20and%20Private%20Sphere%20Actions&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Hansmann,%20Ralph&rft.date=2020-10-15&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=20&rft.spage=8547&rft.pages=8547-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su12208547&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2548847537%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2548847537&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |