Improving Financial Service Innovation Strategies for Enhancing China’s Banking Industry Competitive Advantage during the Fintech Revolution: A Hybrid MCDM Model
The recent emergence and rapid growth of new financial services by financial technology (Fintech) companies have driven banking institutions towards operational innovation in order to gain sustainable competitive advantage. This study aims to conduct an in-depth investigation of the banking sector i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sustainability 2019-03, Vol.11 (5), p.1419 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1419 |
container_title | Sustainability |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Zhao, Qun Tsai, Pei-Hsuan Wang, Jin-Long |
description | The recent emergence and rapid growth of new financial services by financial technology (Fintech) companies have driven banking institutions towards operational innovation in order to gain sustainable competitive advantage. This study aims to conduct an in-depth investigation of the banking sector in response to the challenges brought by Fintech startups. Based on the service innovation theory, we propose a novel hybrid multiple criteria decision-making method (MCDM) to evaluate service innovation strategies for improving the sustainability of China’s banking industry during the Fintech revolution. A six-dimensional model comprising 20 sub-criteria is constructed and both the decision making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) technique and DEMATEL-based analytic network process (DANP) are used to explore interrelationships among the indices and their related weights. Finally, the modified VIšekriterijumsko KOmpromisno Rangiranje (VIKOR) method is employed to evaluate performance gaps in the four major types of commercial banks in China—state-owned, joint-stock, city commercial banks, and other credit cooperatives—in the field of service innovation. The improvement priorities, ranked from highest to lowest, are new business partners, new service concepts, organizational innovation, technological innovation, new customer interactions, and new revenue models. These results will provide strategies for the sustainable development of China’s banking industry and the implementation of changes in response to the impact of the Fintech revolution. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/su11051419 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2548830624</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2548830624</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-6fe898a49840e83152c1fdadf5a1e1c3f06fcafe63402500c49d4030c9d81b4e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkc9KAzEQxhdRsGgvPkHAm1BNNtl111tdW7vQIlg9L2kyaVPbpCbZhd58Dc--mU_iLhV0LvOH3zcfzETRBcHXlOb4xteE4IQwkh9FvRjfkkHb4uN_9WnU936N26CU5CTtRV_ldudso80SjbXhRmi-QXNwjRaASmNsw4O2Bs2D4wGWGjxS1qGRWXVsqypWrez749Oje27euklpZO2D26PCbncQdNANoKFsuAl8CUjWrqPCCjrHAGKFnqGxm7rzuUNDNNkvnJZoVjzM0MxK2JxHJ4pvPPR_81n0Oh69FJPB9OmxLIbTgYjzJAxSBVmecZZnDENGSRILoiSXKuEEiKAKp0pwBSllOE4wFiyXDFMscpmRBQN6Fl0e9rYXea_Bh2pta2dayypOWJZRnMaspa4OlHDWeweq2jm95W5fEVx1f6j-_kB_AH52fY0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2548830624</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improving Financial Service Innovation Strategies for Enhancing China’s Banking Industry Competitive Advantage during the Fintech Revolution: A Hybrid MCDM Model</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Zhao, Qun ; Tsai, Pei-Hsuan ; Wang, Jin-Long</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Qun ; Tsai, Pei-Hsuan ; Wang, Jin-Long</creatorcontrib><description>The recent emergence and rapid growth of new financial services by financial technology (Fintech) companies have driven banking institutions towards operational innovation in order to gain sustainable competitive advantage. This study aims to conduct an in-depth investigation of the banking sector in response to the challenges brought by Fintech startups. Based on the service innovation theory, we propose a novel hybrid multiple criteria decision-making method (MCDM) to evaluate service innovation strategies for improving the sustainability of China’s banking industry during the Fintech revolution. A six-dimensional model comprising 20 sub-criteria is constructed and both the decision making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) technique and DEMATEL-based analytic network process (DANP) are used to explore interrelationships among the indices and their related weights. Finally, the modified VIšekriterijumsko KOmpromisno Rangiranje (VIKOR) method is employed to evaluate performance gaps in the four major types of commercial banks in China—state-owned, joint-stock, city commercial banks, and other credit cooperatives—in the field of service innovation. The improvement priorities, ranked from highest to lowest, are new business partners, new service concepts, organizational innovation, technological innovation, new customer interactions, and new revenue models. These results will provide strategies for the sustainable development of China’s banking industry and the implementation of changes in response to the impact of the Fintech revolution.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su11051419</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Business competition ; Competition ; Competitive advantage ; Customer services ; Decision making ; Decision theory ; Innovations ; Multiple criterion ; Sustainability ; Sustainable development ; Technological change</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2019-03, Vol.11 (5), p.1419</ispartof><rights>2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-6fe898a49840e83152c1fdadf5a1e1c3f06fcafe63402500c49d4030c9d81b4e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-6fe898a49840e83152c1fdadf5a1e1c3f06fcafe63402500c49d4030c9d81b4e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2376-2000</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Qun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsai, Pei-Hsuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jin-Long</creatorcontrib><title>Improving Financial Service Innovation Strategies for Enhancing China’s Banking Industry Competitive Advantage during the Fintech Revolution: A Hybrid MCDM Model</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>The recent emergence and rapid growth of new financial services by financial technology (Fintech) companies have driven banking institutions towards operational innovation in order to gain sustainable competitive advantage. This study aims to conduct an in-depth investigation of the banking sector in response to the challenges brought by Fintech startups. Based on the service innovation theory, we propose a novel hybrid multiple criteria decision-making method (MCDM) to evaluate service innovation strategies for improving the sustainability of China’s banking industry during the Fintech revolution. A six-dimensional model comprising 20 sub-criteria is constructed and both the decision making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) technique and DEMATEL-based analytic network process (DANP) are used to explore interrelationships among the indices and their related weights. Finally, the modified VIšekriterijumsko KOmpromisno Rangiranje (VIKOR) method is employed to evaluate performance gaps in the four major types of commercial banks in China—state-owned, joint-stock, city commercial banks, and other credit cooperatives—in the field of service innovation. The improvement priorities, ranked from highest to lowest, are new business partners, new service concepts, organizational innovation, technological innovation, new customer interactions, and new revenue models. These results will provide strategies for the sustainable development of China’s banking industry and the implementation of changes in response to the impact of the Fintech revolution.</description><subject>Business competition</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Competitive advantage</subject><subject>Customer services</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Decision theory</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Multiple criterion</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Technological change</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkc9KAzEQxhdRsGgvPkHAm1BNNtl111tdW7vQIlg9L2kyaVPbpCbZhd58Dc--mU_iLhV0LvOH3zcfzETRBcHXlOb4xteE4IQwkh9FvRjfkkHb4uN_9WnU936N26CU5CTtRV_ldudso80SjbXhRmi-QXNwjRaASmNsw4O2Bs2D4wGWGjxS1qGRWXVsqypWrez749Oje27euklpZO2D26PCbncQdNANoKFsuAl8CUjWrqPCCjrHAGKFnqGxm7rzuUNDNNkvnJZoVjzM0MxK2JxHJ4pvPPR_81n0Oh69FJPB9OmxLIbTgYjzJAxSBVmecZZnDENGSRILoiSXKuEEiKAKp0pwBSllOE4wFiyXDFMscpmRBQN6Fl0e9rYXea_Bh2pta2dayypOWJZRnMaspa4OlHDWeweq2jm95W5fEVx1f6j-_kB_AH52fY0</recordid><startdate>20190301</startdate><enddate>20190301</enddate><creator>Zhao, Qun</creator><creator>Tsai, Pei-Hsuan</creator><creator>Wang, Jin-Long</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7X5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2376-2000</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190301</creationdate><title>Improving Financial Service Innovation Strategies for Enhancing China’s Banking Industry Competitive Advantage during the Fintech Revolution: A Hybrid MCDM Model</title><author>Zhao, Qun ; Tsai, Pei-Hsuan ; Wang, Jin-Long</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-6fe898a49840e83152c1fdadf5a1e1c3f06fcafe63402500c49d4030c9d81b4e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Business competition</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Competitive advantage</topic><topic>Customer services</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Decision theory</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Multiple criterion</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Technological change</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Qun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsai, Pei-Hsuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jin-Long</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Entrepreneurship</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhao, Qun</au><au>Tsai, Pei-Hsuan</au><au>Wang, Jin-Long</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Improving Financial Service Innovation Strategies for Enhancing China’s Banking Industry Competitive Advantage during the Fintech Revolution: A Hybrid MCDM Model</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2019-03-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1419</spage><pages>1419-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>The recent emergence and rapid growth of new financial services by financial technology (Fintech) companies have driven banking institutions towards operational innovation in order to gain sustainable competitive advantage. This study aims to conduct an in-depth investigation of the banking sector in response to the challenges brought by Fintech startups. Based on the service innovation theory, we propose a novel hybrid multiple criteria decision-making method (MCDM) to evaluate service innovation strategies for improving the sustainability of China’s banking industry during the Fintech revolution. A six-dimensional model comprising 20 sub-criteria is constructed and both the decision making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) technique and DEMATEL-based analytic network process (DANP) are used to explore interrelationships among the indices and their related weights. Finally, the modified VIšekriterijumsko KOmpromisno Rangiranje (VIKOR) method is employed to evaluate performance gaps in the four major types of commercial banks in China—state-owned, joint-stock, city commercial banks, and other credit cooperatives—in the field of service innovation. The improvement priorities, ranked from highest to lowest, are new business partners, new service concepts, organizational innovation, technological innovation, new customer interactions, and new revenue models. These results will provide strategies for the sustainable development of China’s banking industry and the implementation of changes in response to the impact of the Fintech revolution.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su11051419</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2376-2000</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2071-1050 |
ispartof | Sustainability, 2019-03, Vol.11 (5), p.1419 |
issn | 2071-1050 2071-1050 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2548830624 |
source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Business competition Competition Competitive advantage Customer services Decision making Decision theory Innovations Multiple criterion Sustainability Sustainable development Technological change |
title | Improving Financial Service Innovation Strategies for Enhancing China’s Banking Industry Competitive Advantage during the Fintech Revolution: A Hybrid MCDM Model |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T23%3A47%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improving%20Financial%20Service%20Innovation%20Strategies%20for%20Enhancing%20China%E2%80%99s%20Banking%20Industry%20Competitive%20Advantage%20during%20the%20Fintech%20Revolution:%20A%20Hybrid%20MCDM%20Model&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Zhao,%20Qun&rft.date=2019-03-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1419&rft.pages=1419-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su11051419&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2548830624%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2548830624&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |