The Digitalization Sustainability Matrix: A Participatory Research Tool for Investigating Digitainability
Rapidly increasing applications of Digitalization and Artificial Intelligence (D&AI) are already impacting our day-to-day life substantially, along with social and economic prospects worldwide. The accelerating utilization of D&AI has stirred the discussion concerning the responsible applica...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sustainability 2020-11, Vol.12 (21), p.9283 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 21 |
container_start_page | 9283 |
container_title | Sustainability |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Gupta, Shivam Motlagh, Mahsa Rhyner, Jakob |
description | Rapidly increasing applications of Digitalization and Artificial Intelligence (D&AI) are already impacting our day-to-day life substantially, along with social and economic prospects worldwide. The accelerating utilization of D&AI has stirred the discussion concerning the responsible application of technologies for assisting the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). D&AI can raise productivity, lower costs, reduce resource intensity, and enable efficient public services. However, there are also risks and downsides that we all must identify and tackle to address any potential short-/long-term undesired impact. Notably, there exists a gap in knowledge about the mutual relationships between D&AI and the 17 SDGs. To address this gap and gather broader perspectives of experts on the potential uses and pitfalls of D&AI for SDGs and their respective indicators, we propose a participatory research approach: the Digitalization–Sustainability Matrix (DSM). The DSM serves as a means for collaborative methods, such as participatory action research (PAR), for the knowledge production process. We exercised the DSM in the Digitainable Thinkathon event, a gathering of experts from diverse sectors and backgrounds for capturing the action-oriented dialogues concerning the use of D&AI technologies for the indicators of SDGs 4 (Education) and 13 (Climate Action). As a tool, the DSM aided in the discussion by systematically capturing transdisciplinary knowledge generated on several aspects, such as: (1) the need for research–practice nexus action; (2) data-capturing efforts and social considerations; (3) collaborative planning for utilizing the power of D (4) lessons from the diverse community to encourage the purposeful use of technologies. Overall, the proposed approach effectively triggered a discussion on the crucial aspects that need to be considered for D&AI’s practices, a step towards deep-rooting the transdisciplinary perspectives for meaningful use of D&AI for SDGs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/su12219283 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2548738392</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2548738392</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-227b3f2311073c7aefe76b43802744f8e9e7692055217ed7611cc23adc66bfb33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkF9LwzAUxYMoOOZe_AQB34Rqkts2rW9j_htMFJ3PJc2S7Y7azCQV56e3sqHel3svHH7ncAg55ewCoGSXoeNC8FIUcEAGgkmecJaxw3_3MRmFsGb9APCS5wOC85Wh17jEqBr8UhFdS1-6EBW2qsYG45Y-qOjx84qO6ZPyETVuVHR-S59NMMrrFZ0711DrPJ22HyZEXPaYdrmn_nJOyJFVTTCj_R6S19ub-eQ-mT3eTSfjWaIB8pgIIWuwAjhnErRUxhqZ1ykUTMg0tYUp-78ULMsEl2Yhc861FqAWOs9rWwMMydmOu_HuvevzVGvX-ba3rESWFhIKKEWvOt-ptHcheGOrjcc35bcVZ9VPm9Vfm_ANRjZnxw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2548738392</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Digitalization Sustainability Matrix: A Participatory Research Tool for Investigating Digitainability</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Gupta, Shivam ; Motlagh, Mahsa ; Rhyner, Jakob</creator><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Shivam ; Motlagh, Mahsa ; Rhyner, Jakob</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Rapidly increasing applications of Digitalization and Artificial Intelligence (D&AI) are already impacting our day-to-day life substantially, along with social and economic prospects worldwide. The accelerating utilization of D&AI has stirred the discussion concerning the responsible application of technologies for assisting the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). D&AI can raise productivity, lower costs, reduce resource intensity, and enable efficient public services. However, there are also risks and downsides that we all must identify and tackle to address any potential short-/long-term undesired impact. Notably, there exists a gap in knowledge about the mutual relationships between D&AI and the 17 SDGs. To address this gap and gather broader perspectives of experts on the potential uses and pitfalls of D&AI for SDGs and their respective indicators, we propose a participatory research approach: the Digitalization–Sustainability Matrix (DSM). The DSM serves as a means for collaborative methods, such as participatory action research (PAR), for the knowledge production process. We exercised the DSM in the Digitainable Thinkathon event, a gathering of experts from diverse sectors and backgrounds for capturing the action-oriented dialogues concerning the use of D&AI technologies for the indicators of SDGs 4 (Education) and 13 (Climate Action). As a tool, the DSM aided in the discussion by systematically capturing transdisciplinary knowledge generated on several aspects, such as: (1) the need for research–practice nexus action; (2) data-capturing efforts and social considerations; (3) collaborative planning for utilizing the power of D (4) lessons from the diverse community to encourage the purposeful use of technologies. Overall, the proposed approach effectively triggered a discussion on the crucial aspects that need to be considered for D&AI’s practices, a step towards deep-rooting the transdisciplinary perspectives for meaningful use of D&AI for SDGs.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su12219283</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Artificial intelligence ; Digital divide ; Digitization ; Environmental education ; Indicators ; Investigations ; Participatory research ; Rooting ; Stakeholders ; Sustainability ; Sustainable development</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2020-11, Vol.12 (21), p.9283</ispartof><rights>2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-227b3f2311073c7aefe76b43802744f8e9e7692055217ed7611cc23adc66bfb33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-227b3f2311073c7aefe76b43802744f8e9e7692055217ed7611cc23adc66bfb33</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1450-5435 ; 0000-0002-4504-6956</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Shivam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Motlagh, Mahsa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rhyner, Jakob</creatorcontrib><title>The Digitalization Sustainability Matrix: A Participatory Research Tool for Investigating Digitainability</title><title>Sustainability</title><description><![CDATA[Rapidly increasing applications of Digitalization and Artificial Intelligence (D&AI) are already impacting our day-to-day life substantially, along with social and economic prospects worldwide. The accelerating utilization of D&AI has stirred the discussion concerning the responsible application of technologies for assisting the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). D&AI can raise productivity, lower costs, reduce resource intensity, and enable efficient public services. However, there are also risks and downsides that we all must identify and tackle to address any potential short-/long-term undesired impact. Notably, there exists a gap in knowledge about the mutual relationships between D&AI and the 17 SDGs. To address this gap and gather broader perspectives of experts on the potential uses and pitfalls of D&AI for SDGs and their respective indicators, we propose a participatory research approach: the Digitalization–Sustainability Matrix (DSM). The DSM serves as a means for collaborative methods, such as participatory action research (PAR), for the knowledge production process. We exercised the DSM in the Digitainable Thinkathon event, a gathering of experts from diverse sectors and backgrounds for capturing the action-oriented dialogues concerning the use of D&AI technologies for the indicators of SDGs 4 (Education) and 13 (Climate Action). As a tool, the DSM aided in the discussion by systematically capturing transdisciplinary knowledge generated on several aspects, such as: (1) the need for research–practice nexus action; (2) data-capturing efforts and social considerations; (3) collaborative planning for utilizing the power of D (4) lessons from the diverse community to encourage the purposeful use of technologies. Overall, the proposed approach effectively triggered a discussion on the crucial aspects that need to be considered for D&AI’s practices, a step towards deep-rooting the transdisciplinary perspectives for meaningful use of D&AI for SDGs.]]></description><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Digital divide</subject><subject>Digitization</subject><subject>Environmental education</subject><subject>Indicators</subject><subject>Investigations</subject><subject>Participatory research</subject><subject>Rooting</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkF9LwzAUxYMoOOZe_AQB34Rqkts2rW9j_htMFJ3PJc2S7Y7azCQV56e3sqHel3svHH7ncAg55ewCoGSXoeNC8FIUcEAGgkmecJaxw3_3MRmFsGb9APCS5wOC85Wh17jEqBr8UhFdS1-6EBW2qsYG45Y-qOjx84qO6ZPyETVuVHR-S59NMMrrFZ0711DrPJ22HyZEXPaYdrmn_nJOyJFVTTCj_R6S19ub-eQ-mT3eTSfjWaIB8pgIIWuwAjhnErRUxhqZ1ykUTMg0tYUp-78ULMsEl2Yhc861FqAWOs9rWwMMydmOu_HuvevzVGvX-ba3rESWFhIKKEWvOt-ptHcheGOrjcc35bcVZ9VPm9Vfm_ANRjZnxw</recordid><startdate>20201101</startdate><enddate>20201101</enddate><creator>Gupta, Shivam</creator><creator>Motlagh, Mahsa</creator><creator>Rhyner, Jakob</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1450-5435</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4504-6956</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201101</creationdate><title>The Digitalization Sustainability Matrix: A Participatory Research Tool for Investigating Digitainability</title><author>Gupta, Shivam ; Motlagh, Mahsa ; Rhyner, Jakob</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-227b3f2311073c7aefe76b43802744f8e9e7692055217ed7611cc23adc66bfb33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Digital divide</topic><topic>Digitization</topic><topic>Environmental education</topic><topic>Indicators</topic><topic>Investigations</topic><topic>Participatory research</topic><topic>Rooting</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Shivam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Motlagh, Mahsa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rhyner, Jakob</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gupta, Shivam</au><au>Motlagh, Mahsa</au><au>Rhyner, Jakob</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Digitalization Sustainability Matrix: A Participatory Research Tool for Investigating Digitainability</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2020-11-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>21</issue><spage>9283</spage><pages>9283-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[Rapidly increasing applications of Digitalization and Artificial Intelligence (D&AI) are already impacting our day-to-day life substantially, along with social and economic prospects worldwide. The accelerating utilization of D&AI has stirred the discussion concerning the responsible application of technologies for assisting the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). D&AI can raise productivity, lower costs, reduce resource intensity, and enable efficient public services. However, there are also risks and downsides that we all must identify and tackle to address any potential short-/long-term undesired impact. Notably, there exists a gap in knowledge about the mutual relationships between D&AI and the 17 SDGs. To address this gap and gather broader perspectives of experts on the potential uses and pitfalls of D&AI for SDGs and their respective indicators, we propose a participatory research approach: the Digitalization–Sustainability Matrix (DSM). The DSM serves as a means for collaborative methods, such as participatory action research (PAR), for the knowledge production process. We exercised the DSM in the Digitainable Thinkathon event, a gathering of experts from diverse sectors and backgrounds for capturing the action-oriented dialogues concerning the use of D&AI technologies for the indicators of SDGs 4 (Education) and 13 (Climate Action). As a tool, the DSM aided in the discussion by systematically capturing transdisciplinary knowledge generated on several aspects, such as: (1) the need for research–practice nexus action; (2) data-capturing efforts and social considerations; (3) collaborative planning for utilizing the power of D (4) lessons from the diverse community to encourage the purposeful use of technologies. Overall, the proposed approach effectively triggered a discussion on the crucial aspects that need to be considered for D&AI’s practices, a step towards deep-rooting the transdisciplinary perspectives for meaningful use of D&AI for SDGs.]]></abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su12219283</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1450-5435</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4504-6956</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2071-1050 |
ispartof | Sustainability, 2020-11, Vol.12 (21), p.9283 |
issn | 2071-1050 2071-1050 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2548738392 |
source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Artificial intelligence Digital divide Digitization Environmental education Indicators Investigations Participatory research Rooting Stakeholders Sustainability Sustainable development |
title | The Digitalization Sustainability Matrix: A Participatory Research Tool for Investigating Digitainability |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T01%3A51%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Digitalization%20Sustainability%20Matrix:%20A%20Participatory%20Research%20Tool%20for%20Investigating%20Digitainability&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Gupta,%20Shivam&rft.date=2020-11-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=21&rft.spage=9283&rft.pages=9283-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su12219283&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2548738392%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2548738392&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |