Efficiency of Methods for Determining the Relevance of Criteria in Sustainable Transport Problems: A Comparative Case Study

Problems related to sustainable urban transport have gained in importance with the rapid growth of urban agglomerations. There is, therefore, a need to support decision-making processes in this area, a trend that is visible in the literature. Many methods have already been presented as a useful deci...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sustainability 2020-10, Vol.12 (19), p.7915
Hauptverfasser: Shekhovtsov, Andrii, Kozlov, Volodymyr, Nosov, Viktor, Sałabun, Wojciech
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 19
container_start_page 7915
container_title Sustainability
container_volume 12
creator Shekhovtsov, Andrii
Kozlov, Volodymyr
Nosov, Viktor
Sałabun, Wojciech
description Problems related to sustainable urban transport have gained in importance with the rapid growth of urban agglomerations. There is, therefore, a need to support decision-making processes in this area, a trend that is visible in the literature. Many methods have already been presented as a useful decision-making tool in this field. However, it is still a significant challenge to properly determine the relevance of the criteria because it is one of the most critical points of many presented techniques to solve decision problems. In this work, we propose two new approaches to determining the relevance of particular decision criteria effectively in sustainable transport problems. For this purpose, we examine a study case for the evaluation of electric bikes evaluated against eight criteria, which have been taken from earlier work. We calculate the relevance of each criterion using four different approaches and then evaluate their effectiveness using a reference ranking and popular multi-criteria decision analysis methods. The results are compared with each other by using similarity coefficients. Finally, we summarize the results obtained and set out further methods of development.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/su12197915
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2548736978</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2548736978</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-58aae529ec7a05ad7ffaf0f4de218ef69e0409ebdd19f063236fc5521706a5833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkFtLw0AQhYMoWGpf_AULvgnRvXSTrG8l1gtUFFufwzSZtVua3bq7KRT_vCkV9LzM4czHDJwkuWT0RghFb0PHOFO5YvIkGXCas5RRSU__-fNkFMKa9hKCKZYNku-p1qY2aOs9cZq8YFy5JhDtPLnHiL411thPEldI3nGDO7A1HsDSm35rgBhL5l2IYCwsN0gWHmzYOh_Jm3d90IY7MiGla7fgIZodkhICknnsmv1FcqZhE3D0O4fJx8N0UT6ls9fH53IyS2uuZExlAYCSK6xzoBKaXGvQVI8b5KxAnSmkY6pw2TRMaZoJLjJdS8lZTjOQhRDD5Op4d-vdV4chVmvXedu_rLgcF7nIVF701PWRqr0LwaOutt604PcVo9Wh3-qvX_EDgPVuPw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2548736978</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficiency of Methods for Determining the Relevance of Criteria in Sustainable Transport Problems: A Comparative Case Study</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Shekhovtsov, Andrii ; Kozlov, Volodymyr ; Nosov, Viktor ; Sałabun, Wojciech</creator><creatorcontrib>Shekhovtsov, Andrii ; Kozlov, Volodymyr ; Nosov, Viktor ; Sałabun, Wojciech</creatorcontrib><description>Problems related to sustainable urban transport have gained in importance with the rapid growth of urban agglomerations. There is, therefore, a need to support decision-making processes in this area, a trend that is visible in the literature. Many methods have already been presented as a useful decision-making tool in this field. However, it is still a significant challenge to properly determine the relevance of the criteria because it is one of the most critical points of many presented techniques to solve decision problems. In this work, we propose two new approaches to determining the relevance of particular decision criteria effectively in sustainable transport problems. For this purpose, we examine a study case for the evaluation of electric bikes evaluated against eight criteria, which have been taken from earlier work. We calculate the relevance of each criterion using four different approaches and then evaluate their effectiveness using a reference ranking and popular multi-criteria decision analysis methods. The results are compared with each other by using similarity coefficients. Finally, we summarize the results obtained and set out further methods of development.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su12197915</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Alternative energy sources ; Bicycles ; Bicycling ; Case studies ; Cities ; Critical point ; Decision making ; Electric bicycles ; Energy industry ; Energy resources ; Evaluation ; Fuzzy sets ; Logistics ; Multiple criterion ; Renewable resources ; Research methodology ; Set theory ; Sustainability ; Sustainable transportation ; Urban areas ; Urban transportation</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2020-10, Vol.12 (19), p.7915</ispartof><rights>2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-58aae529ec7a05ad7ffaf0f4de218ef69e0409ebdd19f063236fc5521706a5833</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-58aae529ec7a05ad7ffaf0f4de218ef69e0409ebdd19f063236fc5521706a5833</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7076-2519 ; 0000-0003-1612-9362 ; 0000-0002-0834-2019</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shekhovtsov, Andrii</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kozlov, Volodymyr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nosov, Viktor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sałabun, Wojciech</creatorcontrib><title>Efficiency of Methods for Determining the Relevance of Criteria in Sustainable Transport Problems: A Comparative Case Study</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>Problems related to sustainable urban transport have gained in importance with the rapid growth of urban agglomerations. There is, therefore, a need to support decision-making processes in this area, a trend that is visible in the literature. Many methods have already been presented as a useful decision-making tool in this field. However, it is still a significant challenge to properly determine the relevance of the criteria because it is one of the most critical points of many presented techniques to solve decision problems. In this work, we propose two new approaches to determining the relevance of particular decision criteria effectively in sustainable transport problems. For this purpose, we examine a study case for the evaluation of electric bikes evaluated against eight criteria, which have been taken from earlier work. We calculate the relevance of each criterion using four different approaches and then evaluate their effectiveness using a reference ranking and popular multi-criteria decision analysis methods. The results are compared with each other by using similarity coefficients. Finally, we summarize the results obtained and set out further methods of development.</description><subject>Alternative energy sources</subject><subject>Bicycles</subject><subject>Bicycling</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Critical point</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Electric bicycles</subject><subject>Energy industry</subject><subject>Energy resources</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Fuzzy sets</subject><subject>Logistics</subject><subject>Multiple criterion</subject><subject>Renewable resources</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Set theory</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable transportation</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Urban transportation</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkFtLw0AQhYMoWGpf_AULvgnRvXSTrG8l1gtUFFufwzSZtVua3bq7KRT_vCkV9LzM4czHDJwkuWT0RghFb0PHOFO5YvIkGXCas5RRSU__-fNkFMKa9hKCKZYNku-p1qY2aOs9cZq8YFy5JhDtPLnHiL411thPEldI3nGDO7A1HsDSm35rgBhL5l2IYCwsN0gWHmzYOh_Jm3d90IY7MiGla7fgIZodkhICknnsmv1FcqZhE3D0O4fJx8N0UT6ls9fH53IyS2uuZExlAYCSK6xzoBKaXGvQVI8b5KxAnSmkY6pw2TRMaZoJLjJdS8lZTjOQhRDD5Op4d-vdV4chVmvXedu_rLgcF7nIVF701PWRqr0LwaOutt604PcVo9Wh3-qvX_EDgPVuPw</recordid><startdate>20201001</startdate><enddate>20201001</enddate><creator>Shekhovtsov, Andrii</creator><creator>Kozlov, Volodymyr</creator><creator>Nosov, Viktor</creator><creator>Sałabun, Wojciech</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7076-2519</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1612-9362</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0834-2019</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201001</creationdate><title>Efficiency of Methods for Determining the Relevance of Criteria in Sustainable Transport Problems: A Comparative Case Study</title><author>Shekhovtsov, Andrii ; Kozlov, Volodymyr ; Nosov, Viktor ; Sałabun, Wojciech</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-58aae529ec7a05ad7ffaf0f4de218ef69e0409ebdd19f063236fc5521706a5833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Alternative energy sources</topic><topic>Bicycles</topic><topic>Bicycling</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Critical point</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Electric bicycles</topic><topic>Energy industry</topic><topic>Energy resources</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Fuzzy sets</topic><topic>Logistics</topic><topic>Multiple criterion</topic><topic>Renewable resources</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Set theory</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable transportation</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Urban transportation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shekhovtsov, Andrii</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kozlov, Volodymyr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nosov, Viktor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sałabun, Wojciech</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shekhovtsov, Andrii</au><au>Kozlov, Volodymyr</au><au>Nosov, Viktor</au><au>Sałabun, Wojciech</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficiency of Methods for Determining the Relevance of Criteria in Sustainable Transport Problems: A Comparative Case Study</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2020-10-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>19</issue><spage>7915</spage><pages>7915-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>Problems related to sustainable urban transport have gained in importance with the rapid growth of urban agglomerations. There is, therefore, a need to support decision-making processes in this area, a trend that is visible in the literature. Many methods have already been presented as a useful decision-making tool in this field. However, it is still a significant challenge to properly determine the relevance of the criteria because it is one of the most critical points of many presented techniques to solve decision problems. In this work, we propose two new approaches to determining the relevance of particular decision criteria effectively in sustainable transport problems. For this purpose, we examine a study case for the evaluation of electric bikes evaluated against eight criteria, which have been taken from earlier work. We calculate the relevance of each criterion using four different approaches and then evaluate their effectiveness using a reference ranking and popular multi-criteria decision analysis methods. The results are compared with each other by using similarity coefficients. Finally, we summarize the results obtained and set out further methods of development.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su12197915</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7076-2519</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1612-9362</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0834-2019</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2071-1050
ispartof Sustainability, 2020-10, Vol.12 (19), p.7915
issn 2071-1050
2071-1050
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2548736978
source MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Alternative energy sources
Bicycles
Bicycling
Case studies
Cities
Critical point
Decision making
Electric bicycles
Energy industry
Energy resources
Evaluation
Fuzzy sets
Logistics
Multiple criterion
Renewable resources
Research methodology
Set theory
Sustainability
Sustainable transportation
Urban areas
Urban transportation
title Efficiency of Methods for Determining the Relevance of Criteria in Sustainable Transport Problems: A Comparative Case Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T10%3A55%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficiency%20of%20Methods%20for%20Determining%20the%20Relevance%20of%20Criteria%20in%20Sustainable%20Transport%20Problems:%20A%20Comparative%20Case%20Study&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Shekhovtsov,%20Andrii&rft.date=2020-10-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=19&rft.spage=7915&rft.pages=7915-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su12197915&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2548736978%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2548736978&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true