Efficiency of Methods for Determining the Relevance of Criteria in Sustainable Transport Problems: A Comparative Case Study
Problems related to sustainable urban transport have gained in importance with the rapid growth of urban agglomerations. There is, therefore, a need to support decision-making processes in this area, a trend that is visible in the literature. Many methods have already been presented as a useful deci...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sustainability 2020-10, Vol.12 (19), p.7915 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 19 |
container_start_page | 7915 |
container_title | Sustainability |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Shekhovtsov, Andrii Kozlov, Volodymyr Nosov, Viktor Sałabun, Wojciech |
description | Problems related to sustainable urban transport have gained in importance with the rapid growth of urban agglomerations. There is, therefore, a need to support decision-making processes in this area, a trend that is visible in the literature. Many methods have already been presented as a useful decision-making tool in this field. However, it is still a significant challenge to properly determine the relevance of the criteria because it is one of the most critical points of many presented techniques to solve decision problems. In this work, we propose two new approaches to determining the relevance of particular decision criteria effectively in sustainable transport problems. For this purpose, we examine a study case for the evaluation of electric bikes evaluated against eight criteria, which have been taken from earlier work. We calculate the relevance of each criterion using four different approaches and then evaluate their effectiveness using a reference ranking and popular multi-criteria decision analysis methods. The results are compared with each other by using similarity coefficients. Finally, we summarize the results obtained and set out further methods of development. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/su12197915 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2548736978</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2548736978</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-58aae529ec7a05ad7ffaf0f4de218ef69e0409ebdd19f063236fc5521706a5833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkFtLw0AQhYMoWGpf_AULvgnRvXSTrG8l1gtUFFufwzSZtVua3bq7KRT_vCkV9LzM4czHDJwkuWT0RghFb0PHOFO5YvIkGXCas5RRSU__-fNkFMKa9hKCKZYNku-p1qY2aOs9cZq8YFy5JhDtPLnHiL411thPEldI3nGDO7A1HsDSm35rgBhL5l2IYCwsN0gWHmzYOh_Jm3d90IY7MiGla7fgIZodkhICknnsmv1FcqZhE3D0O4fJx8N0UT6ls9fH53IyS2uuZExlAYCSK6xzoBKaXGvQVI8b5KxAnSmkY6pw2TRMaZoJLjJdS8lZTjOQhRDD5Op4d-vdV4chVmvXedu_rLgcF7nIVF701PWRqr0LwaOutt604PcVo9Wh3-qvX_EDgPVuPw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2548736978</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficiency of Methods for Determining the Relevance of Criteria in Sustainable Transport Problems: A Comparative Case Study</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Shekhovtsov, Andrii ; Kozlov, Volodymyr ; Nosov, Viktor ; Sałabun, Wojciech</creator><creatorcontrib>Shekhovtsov, Andrii ; Kozlov, Volodymyr ; Nosov, Viktor ; Sałabun, Wojciech</creatorcontrib><description>Problems related to sustainable urban transport have gained in importance with the rapid growth of urban agglomerations. There is, therefore, a need to support decision-making processes in this area, a trend that is visible in the literature. Many methods have already been presented as a useful decision-making tool in this field. However, it is still a significant challenge to properly determine the relevance of the criteria because it is one of the most critical points of many presented techniques to solve decision problems. In this work, we propose two new approaches to determining the relevance of particular decision criteria effectively in sustainable transport problems. For this purpose, we examine a study case for the evaluation of electric bikes evaluated against eight criteria, which have been taken from earlier work. We calculate the relevance of each criterion using four different approaches and then evaluate their effectiveness using a reference ranking and popular multi-criteria decision analysis methods. The results are compared with each other by using similarity coefficients. Finally, we summarize the results obtained and set out further methods of development.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su12197915</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Alternative energy sources ; Bicycles ; Bicycling ; Case studies ; Cities ; Critical point ; Decision making ; Electric bicycles ; Energy industry ; Energy resources ; Evaluation ; Fuzzy sets ; Logistics ; Multiple criterion ; Renewable resources ; Research methodology ; Set theory ; Sustainability ; Sustainable transportation ; Urban areas ; Urban transportation</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2020-10, Vol.12 (19), p.7915</ispartof><rights>2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-58aae529ec7a05ad7ffaf0f4de218ef69e0409ebdd19f063236fc5521706a5833</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-58aae529ec7a05ad7ffaf0f4de218ef69e0409ebdd19f063236fc5521706a5833</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7076-2519 ; 0000-0003-1612-9362 ; 0000-0002-0834-2019</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shekhovtsov, Andrii</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kozlov, Volodymyr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nosov, Viktor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sałabun, Wojciech</creatorcontrib><title>Efficiency of Methods for Determining the Relevance of Criteria in Sustainable Transport Problems: A Comparative Case Study</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>Problems related to sustainable urban transport have gained in importance with the rapid growth of urban agglomerations. There is, therefore, a need to support decision-making processes in this area, a trend that is visible in the literature. Many methods have already been presented as a useful decision-making tool in this field. However, it is still a significant challenge to properly determine the relevance of the criteria because it is one of the most critical points of many presented techniques to solve decision problems. In this work, we propose two new approaches to determining the relevance of particular decision criteria effectively in sustainable transport problems. For this purpose, we examine a study case for the evaluation of electric bikes evaluated against eight criteria, which have been taken from earlier work. We calculate the relevance of each criterion using four different approaches and then evaluate their effectiveness using a reference ranking and popular multi-criteria decision analysis methods. The results are compared with each other by using similarity coefficients. Finally, we summarize the results obtained and set out further methods of development.</description><subject>Alternative energy sources</subject><subject>Bicycles</subject><subject>Bicycling</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Critical point</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Electric bicycles</subject><subject>Energy industry</subject><subject>Energy resources</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Fuzzy sets</subject><subject>Logistics</subject><subject>Multiple criterion</subject><subject>Renewable resources</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Set theory</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable transportation</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Urban transportation</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkFtLw0AQhYMoWGpf_AULvgnRvXSTrG8l1gtUFFufwzSZtVua3bq7KRT_vCkV9LzM4czHDJwkuWT0RghFb0PHOFO5YvIkGXCas5RRSU__-fNkFMKa9hKCKZYNku-p1qY2aOs9cZq8YFy5JhDtPLnHiL411thPEldI3nGDO7A1HsDSm35rgBhL5l2IYCwsN0gWHmzYOh_Jm3d90IY7MiGla7fgIZodkhICknnsmv1FcqZhE3D0O4fJx8N0UT6ls9fH53IyS2uuZExlAYCSK6xzoBKaXGvQVI8b5KxAnSmkY6pw2TRMaZoJLjJdS8lZTjOQhRDD5Op4d-vdV4chVmvXedu_rLgcF7nIVF701PWRqr0LwaOutt604PcVo9Wh3-qvX_EDgPVuPw</recordid><startdate>20201001</startdate><enddate>20201001</enddate><creator>Shekhovtsov, Andrii</creator><creator>Kozlov, Volodymyr</creator><creator>Nosov, Viktor</creator><creator>Sałabun, Wojciech</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7076-2519</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1612-9362</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0834-2019</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201001</creationdate><title>Efficiency of Methods for Determining the Relevance of Criteria in Sustainable Transport Problems: A Comparative Case Study</title><author>Shekhovtsov, Andrii ; Kozlov, Volodymyr ; Nosov, Viktor ; Sałabun, Wojciech</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-58aae529ec7a05ad7ffaf0f4de218ef69e0409ebdd19f063236fc5521706a5833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Alternative energy sources</topic><topic>Bicycles</topic><topic>Bicycling</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Critical point</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Electric bicycles</topic><topic>Energy industry</topic><topic>Energy resources</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Fuzzy sets</topic><topic>Logistics</topic><topic>Multiple criterion</topic><topic>Renewable resources</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Set theory</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable transportation</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Urban transportation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shekhovtsov, Andrii</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kozlov, Volodymyr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nosov, Viktor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sałabun, Wojciech</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shekhovtsov, Andrii</au><au>Kozlov, Volodymyr</au><au>Nosov, Viktor</au><au>Sałabun, Wojciech</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficiency of Methods for Determining the Relevance of Criteria in Sustainable Transport Problems: A Comparative Case Study</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2020-10-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>19</issue><spage>7915</spage><pages>7915-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>Problems related to sustainable urban transport have gained in importance with the rapid growth of urban agglomerations. There is, therefore, a need to support decision-making processes in this area, a trend that is visible in the literature. Many methods have already been presented as a useful decision-making tool in this field. However, it is still a significant challenge to properly determine the relevance of the criteria because it is one of the most critical points of many presented techniques to solve decision problems. In this work, we propose two new approaches to determining the relevance of particular decision criteria effectively in sustainable transport problems. For this purpose, we examine a study case for the evaluation of electric bikes evaluated against eight criteria, which have been taken from earlier work. We calculate the relevance of each criterion using four different approaches and then evaluate their effectiveness using a reference ranking and popular multi-criteria decision analysis methods. The results are compared with each other by using similarity coefficients. Finally, we summarize the results obtained and set out further methods of development.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su12197915</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7076-2519</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1612-9362</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0834-2019</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2071-1050 |
ispartof | Sustainability, 2020-10, Vol.12 (19), p.7915 |
issn | 2071-1050 2071-1050 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2548736978 |
source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Alternative energy sources Bicycles Bicycling Case studies Cities Critical point Decision making Electric bicycles Energy industry Energy resources Evaluation Fuzzy sets Logistics Multiple criterion Renewable resources Research methodology Set theory Sustainability Sustainable transportation Urban areas Urban transportation |
title | Efficiency of Methods for Determining the Relevance of Criteria in Sustainable Transport Problems: A Comparative Case Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T10%3A55%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficiency%20of%20Methods%20for%20Determining%20the%20Relevance%20of%20Criteria%20in%20Sustainable%20Transport%20Problems:%20A%20Comparative%20Case%20Study&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Shekhovtsov,%20Andrii&rft.date=2020-10-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=19&rft.spage=7915&rft.pages=7915-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su12197915&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2548736978%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2548736978&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |