Nonlinear Effect of Public Infrastructure on Energy Intensity in China: A Panel Smooth Transition Regression Approach

Public infrastructure not only promotes economic growth, but also influences energy intensity, which plays an important role in the strategies related to energy. Therefore, infrastructure policy can be used as an important instrument to reconcile the dilemma of energy, economy, and environment in Ch...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sustainability 2019-01, Vol.11 (3), p.629
Hauptverfasser: Bi, Chao, Jia, Minna, Zeng, Jingjing
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page 629
container_title Sustainability
container_volume 11
creator Bi, Chao
Jia, Minna
Zeng, Jingjing
description Public infrastructure not only promotes economic growth, but also influences energy intensity, which plays an important role in the strategies related to energy. Therefore, infrastructure policy can be used as an important instrument to reconcile the dilemma of energy, economy, and environment in China. However, few studies have been made to assess the effect of public infrastructure on energy intensity in China. This paper presents an analysis of how three typical types of public infrastructure (i.e., transportation, energy, and information infrastructure) affect energy intensity for 30 Chinese provinces, from 2001 to 2016. To account for nonlinearities, we adopt the panel smooth transition regression (PSTR) approach. The results show that transportation infrastructure has a significantly negative effect on energy intensity, and this negative effect gradually strengthens when the transportation infrastructure stock exceeds the threshold value. Adversely, energy infrastructure has a significantly positive effect on energy intensity, and this positive effect gradually strengthens with the development of energy infrastructure. Our results also suggest that the development of information infrastructure could not only strengthen its own significantly negative effect on energy intensity, but also could promote the negative effect of transportation infrastructure on energy intensity. Moreover, the positive impact of energy infrastructure on energy intensity gradually decreases when the stock of information infrastructure surpasses the larger threshold value. Our findings suggest that policy makers could reduce energy intensity by accelerating the development of transportation and information infrastructure. Furthermore, they could strengthen the negative effects of transportation and information infrastructure on energy intensity and weaken energy infrastructure’s positive effect on energy intensity by increasing their information infrastructure investment.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/su11030629
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2548734072</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2548734072</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-e6456b677d3f8c3ec8baebc40077642495a13e0e3a12a71fce2ac8fc4dc657263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkE9LAzEQxYMoWGovfoKAN2E1_zbZ9VZK1ULRovW8ZNNJu2Wb1CR72G_vlgo6l3nwfjMPHkK3lDxwXpLH2FFKOJGsvEAjRhTNKMnJ5T99jSYx7skwnNOSyhHq3rxrGwc64Lm1YBL2Fq-6um0MXjgbdEyhM6kLgL3Dcwdh2w9GAheb1OPG4dmucfoJT_FKO2jx58H7tMProE9EMxx9wDZAjCc5PR6D12Z3g66sbiNMfvcYfT3P17PXbPn-sphNl5nhXKYMpMhlLZXacFsYDqaoNdRGEKKUFEyUuaYcCHBNmVbUGmDaFNaIjZG5YpKP0d357xD73UFM1d53wQ2RFctFobggig3U_ZkywccYwFbH0Bx06CtKqlOz1V-z_AdhzWvq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2548734072</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nonlinear Effect of Public Infrastructure on Energy Intensity in China: A Panel Smooth Transition Regression Approach</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Bi, Chao ; Jia, Minna ; Zeng, Jingjing</creator><creatorcontrib>Bi, Chao ; Jia, Minna ; Zeng, Jingjing</creatorcontrib><description>Public infrastructure not only promotes economic growth, but also influences energy intensity, which plays an important role in the strategies related to energy. Therefore, infrastructure policy can be used as an important instrument to reconcile the dilemma of energy, economy, and environment in China. However, few studies have been made to assess the effect of public infrastructure on energy intensity in China. This paper presents an analysis of how three typical types of public infrastructure (i.e., transportation, energy, and information infrastructure) affect energy intensity for 30 Chinese provinces, from 2001 to 2016. To account for nonlinearities, we adopt the panel smooth transition regression (PSTR) approach. The results show that transportation infrastructure has a significantly negative effect on energy intensity, and this negative effect gradually strengthens when the transportation infrastructure stock exceeds the threshold value. Adversely, energy infrastructure has a significantly positive effect on energy intensity, and this positive effect gradually strengthens with the development of energy infrastructure. Our results also suggest that the development of information infrastructure could not only strengthen its own significantly negative effect on energy intensity, but also could promote the negative effect of transportation infrastructure on energy intensity. Moreover, the positive impact of energy infrastructure on energy intensity gradually decreases when the stock of information infrastructure surpasses the larger threshold value. Our findings suggest that policy makers could reduce energy intensity by accelerating the development of transportation and information infrastructure. Furthermore, they could strengthen the negative effects of transportation and information infrastructure on energy intensity and weaken energy infrastructure’s positive effect on energy intensity by increasing their information infrastructure investment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su11030629</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Economic activity ; Economic development ; Economic growth ; Energy consumption ; Energy efficiency ; Energy prices ; Energy utilization ; Foreign investment ; Industrial development ; Influence ; Information industry ; Infrastructure ; Nonlinearity ; Sustainability ; Transportation</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2019-01, Vol.11 (3), p.629</ispartof><rights>2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-e6456b677d3f8c3ec8baebc40077642495a13e0e3a12a71fce2ac8fc4dc657263</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-e6456b677d3f8c3ec8baebc40077642495a13e0e3a12a71fce2ac8fc4dc657263</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9441-3409</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bi, Chao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jia, Minna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Jingjing</creatorcontrib><title>Nonlinear Effect of Public Infrastructure on Energy Intensity in China: A Panel Smooth Transition Regression Approach</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>Public infrastructure not only promotes economic growth, but also influences energy intensity, which plays an important role in the strategies related to energy. Therefore, infrastructure policy can be used as an important instrument to reconcile the dilemma of energy, economy, and environment in China. However, few studies have been made to assess the effect of public infrastructure on energy intensity in China. This paper presents an analysis of how three typical types of public infrastructure (i.e., transportation, energy, and information infrastructure) affect energy intensity for 30 Chinese provinces, from 2001 to 2016. To account for nonlinearities, we adopt the panel smooth transition regression (PSTR) approach. The results show that transportation infrastructure has a significantly negative effect on energy intensity, and this negative effect gradually strengthens when the transportation infrastructure stock exceeds the threshold value. Adversely, energy infrastructure has a significantly positive effect on energy intensity, and this positive effect gradually strengthens with the development of energy infrastructure. Our results also suggest that the development of information infrastructure could not only strengthen its own significantly negative effect on energy intensity, but also could promote the negative effect of transportation infrastructure on energy intensity. Moreover, the positive impact of energy infrastructure on energy intensity gradually decreases when the stock of information infrastructure surpasses the larger threshold value. Our findings suggest that policy makers could reduce energy intensity by accelerating the development of transportation and information infrastructure. Furthermore, they could strengthen the negative effects of transportation and information infrastructure on energy intensity and weaken energy infrastructure’s positive effect on energy intensity by increasing their information infrastructure investment.</description><subject>Economic activity</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Economic growth</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Energy efficiency</subject><subject>Energy prices</subject><subject>Energy utilization</subject><subject>Foreign investment</subject><subject>Industrial development</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Information industry</subject><subject>Infrastructure</subject><subject>Nonlinearity</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Transportation</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkE9LAzEQxYMoWGovfoKAN2E1_zbZ9VZK1ULRovW8ZNNJu2Wb1CR72G_vlgo6l3nwfjMPHkK3lDxwXpLH2FFKOJGsvEAjRhTNKMnJ5T99jSYx7skwnNOSyhHq3rxrGwc64Lm1YBL2Fq-6um0MXjgbdEyhM6kLgL3Dcwdh2w9GAheb1OPG4dmucfoJT_FKO2jx58H7tMProE9EMxx9wDZAjCc5PR6D12Z3g66sbiNMfvcYfT3P17PXbPn-sphNl5nhXKYMpMhlLZXacFsYDqaoNdRGEKKUFEyUuaYcCHBNmVbUGmDaFNaIjZG5YpKP0d357xD73UFM1d53wQ2RFctFobggig3U_ZkywccYwFbH0Bx06CtKqlOz1V-z_AdhzWvq</recordid><startdate>20190125</startdate><enddate>20190125</enddate><creator>Bi, Chao</creator><creator>Jia, Minna</creator><creator>Zeng, Jingjing</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9441-3409</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190125</creationdate><title>Nonlinear Effect of Public Infrastructure on Energy Intensity in China: A Panel Smooth Transition Regression Approach</title><author>Bi, Chao ; Jia, Minna ; Zeng, Jingjing</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-e6456b677d3f8c3ec8baebc40077642495a13e0e3a12a71fce2ac8fc4dc657263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Economic activity</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Economic growth</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Energy efficiency</topic><topic>Energy prices</topic><topic>Energy utilization</topic><topic>Foreign investment</topic><topic>Industrial development</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Information industry</topic><topic>Infrastructure</topic><topic>Nonlinearity</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Transportation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bi, Chao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jia, Minna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Jingjing</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bi, Chao</au><au>Jia, Minna</au><au>Zeng, Jingjing</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nonlinear Effect of Public Infrastructure on Energy Intensity in China: A Panel Smooth Transition Regression Approach</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2019-01-25</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>629</spage><pages>629-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>Public infrastructure not only promotes economic growth, but also influences energy intensity, which plays an important role in the strategies related to energy. Therefore, infrastructure policy can be used as an important instrument to reconcile the dilemma of energy, economy, and environment in China. However, few studies have been made to assess the effect of public infrastructure on energy intensity in China. This paper presents an analysis of how three typical types of public infrastructure (i.e., transportation, energy, and information infrastructure) affect energy intensity for 30 Chinese provinces, from 2001 to 2016. To account for nonlinearities, we adopt the panel smooth transition regression (PSTR) approach. The results show that transportation infrastructure has a significantly negative effect on energy intensity, and this negative effect gradually strengthens when the transportation infrastructure stock exceeds the threshold value. Adversely, energy infrastructure has a significantly positive effect on energy intensity, and this positive effect gradually strengthens with the development of energy infrastructure. Our results also suggest that the development of information infrastructure could not only strengthen its own significantly negative effect on energy intensity, but also could promote the negative effect of transportation infrastructure on energy intensity. Moreover, the positive impact of energy infrastructure on energy intensity gradually decreases when the stock of information infrastructure surpasses the larger threshold value. Our findings suggest that policy makers could reduce energy intensity by accelerating the development of transportation and information infrastructure. Furthermore, they could strengthen the negative effects of transportation and information infrastructure on energy intensity and weaken energy infrastructure’s positive effect on energy intensity by increasing their information infrastructure investment.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su11030629</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9441-3409</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2071-1050
ispartof Sustainability, 2019-01, Vol.11 (3), p.629
issn 2071-1050
2071-1050
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2548734072
source MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Economic activity
Economic development
Economic growth
Energy consumption
Energy efficiency
Energy prices
Energy utilization
Foreign investment
Industrial development
Influence
Information industry
Infrastructure
Nonlinearity
Sustainability
Transportation
title Nonlinear Effect of Public Infrastructure on Energy Intensity in China: A Panel Smooth Transition Regression Approach
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T07%3A31%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nonlinear%20Effect%20of%20Public%20Infrastructure%20on%20Energy%20Intensity%20in%20China:%20A%20Panel%20Smooth%20Transition%20Regression%20Approach&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Bi,%20Chao&rft.date=2019-01-25&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=629&rft.pages=629-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su11030629&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2548734072%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2548734072&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true