Stepping Out of the Shadows: Legacy of the European Capitals of Culture, Guimarães 2012 and Košice 2013
The European Capitals of Culture (ECOC) is the most ambitious cultural, collaborative programme in Europe. Up until 2000, ECOC projects were hosted by several national capitals and principal cultural cities in Europe. In the second phase, the programme also began to discover second-tier and less wel...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sustainability 2019-03, Vol.11 (5), p.1469 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1469 |
container_title | Sustainability |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Hudec, Oto Remoaldo, Paula Urbančíková, Nataša Cadima Ribeiro, José |
description | The European Capitals of Culture (ECOC) is the most ambitious cultural, collaborative programme in Europe. Up until 2000, ECOC projects were hosted by several national capitals and principal cultural cities in Europe. In the second phase, the programme also began to discover second-tier and less well-known cities hidden in the shadow of the cultural capitals. This paper focuses on assessing different ECOC strategies (traditional versus radical) and the corresponding legacies of two medium-sized cities: Guimarães (ECOC in 2012, Portugal) and Košice (ECOC in 2013, Slovakia). Cultural heritage is identified by the capacity of culture to change development trajectory and to boost the economy of cities. The strategies and legacies of Guimarães and Košice have revealed themselves to be comparatively different, especially due to their differences with respect to UNESCO cultural heritage. While Guimarães partially succeeded in enhancing its position as a tourist attraction and the visibility of its historical cultural heritage, the industrial city of Košice is an example of more radical and dynamic culture-led form of development, overcoming the provincialism of the city. Most importantly, and due to the strengthening pride of the locals, both ECOC cities have stepped out of the shadow of stronger cultural capitals in their countries. This joint research offers the possibility of a first-hand comparison of traditional and radical approaches and an in-depth interpretation of their legacies after a period of five years, explaining the mechanisms of forming different legacies in two types of ECOC cities. The results can help future ECOC cities to set their strategies in relation to their desired cultural and economic development. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/su11051469 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2548726550</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2548726550</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-c43b875702f19c6577bd6d24beef9dba557953270639553b803841f31c5e5af13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUMtOwzAQtBBIVKUXvsASN0TAjziOuaGoLYhKPRTOkePYbaoSBz-E-jmIT0H8F4kKgr3s7uzM7moAOMfomlKBbnzEGDGcZuIIjAjiOOlbdPyvPgUT77eoD0qxwNkINKugu65p13AZA7QGho2Gq42s7Zu_hQu9lmr_C0-js52WLSxk1wS588OgiLsQnb6C89i8SPf5oT0kCBMo2xo-2q_3RukBoGfgxPQaPfnJY_A8mz4V98liOX8o7haJogSFRKW0yjnjiBgsVMY4r-qsJmmltRF1JRnjglHCUUYFYz0X0TzFhmLFNJMG0zG4OOztnH2N2odya6Nr-5MlYWnOScYY6lmXB5Zy1nunTdm54f99iVE5uFn-uUm_AemUZOU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2548726550</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stepping Out of the Shadows: Legacy of the European Capitals of Culture, Guimarães 2012 and Košice 2013</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Hudec, Oto ; Remoaldo, Paula ; Urbančíková, Nataša ; Cadima Ribeiro, José</creator><creatorcontrib>Hudec, Oto ; Remoaldo, Paula ; Urbančíková, Nataša ; Cadima Ribeiro, José</creatorcontrib><description>The European Capitals of Culture (ECOC) is the most ambitious cultural, collaborative programme in Europe. Up until 2000, ECOC projects were hosted by several national capitals and principal cultural cities in Europe. In the second phase, the programme also began to discover second-tier and less well-known cities hidden in the shadow of the cultural capitals. This paper focuses on assessing different ECOC strategies (traditional versus radical) and the corresponding legacies of two medium-sized cities: Guimarães (ECOC in 2012, Portugal) and Košice (ECOC in 2013, Slovakia). Cultural heritage is identified by the capacity of culture to change development trajectory and to boost the economy of cities. The strategies and legacies of Guimarães and Košice have revealed themselves to be comparatively different, especially due to their differences with respect to UNESCO cultural heritage. While Guimarães partially succeeded in enhancing its position as a tourist attraction and the visibility of its historical cultural heritage, the industrial city of Košice is an example of more radical and dynamic culture-led form of development, overcoming the provincialism of the city. Most importantly, and due to the strengthening pride of the locals, both ECOC cities have stepped out of the shadow of stronger cultural capitals in their countries. This joint research offers the possibility of a first-hand comparison of traditional and radical approaches and an in-depth interpretation of their legacies after a period of five years, explaining the mechanisms of forming different legacies in two types of ECOC cities. The results can help future ECOC cities to set their strategies in relation to their desired cultural and economic development.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su11051469</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Awards & honors ; Cities ; Collaboration ; Cultural heritage ; Cultural resources ; Culture ; Economic development ; Multiculturalism & pluralism ; Shadows ; Tourism ; Tourist attractions ; Urban renewal ; Visibility</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2019-03, Vol.11 (5), p.1469</ispartof><rights>2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-c43b875702f19c6577bd6d24beef9dba557953270639553b803841f31c5e5af13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-c43b875702f19c6577bd6d24beef9dba557953270639553b803841f31c5e5af13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27926,27927</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hudec, Oto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Remoaldo, Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urbančíková, Nataša</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cadima Ribeiro, José</creatorcontrib><title>Stepping Out of the Shadows: Legacy of the European Capitals of Culture, Guimarães 2012 and Košice 2013</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>The European Capitals of Culture (ECOC) is the most ambitious cultural, collaborative programme in Europe. Up until 2000, ECOC projects were hosted by several national capitals and principal cultural cities in Europe. In the second phase, the programme also began to discover second-tier and less well-known cities hidden in the shadow of the cultural capitals. This paper focuses on assessing different ECOC strategies (traditional versus radical) and the corresponding legacies of two medium-sized cities: Guimarães (ECOC in 2012, Portugal) and Košice (ECOC in 2013, Slovakia). Cultural heritage is identified by the capacity of culture to change development trajectory and to boost the economy of cities. The strategies and legacies of Guimarães and Košice have revealed themselves to be comparatively different, especially due to their differences with respect to UNESCO cultural heritage. While Guimarães partially succeeded in enhancing its position as a tourist attraction and the visibility of its historical cultural heritage, the industrial city of Košice is an example of more radical and dynamic culture-led form of development, overcoming the provincialism of the city. Most importantly, and due to the strengthening pride of the locals, both ECOC cities have stepped out of the shadow of stronger cultural capitals in their countries. This joint research offers the possibility of a first-hand comparison of traditional and radical approaches and an in-depth interpretation of their legacies after a period of five years, explaining the mechanisms of forming different legacies in two types of ECOC cities. The results can help future ECOC cities to set their strategies in relation to their desired cultural and economic development.</description><subject>Awards & honors</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Cultural heritage</subject><subject>Cultural resources</subject><subject>Culture</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Multiculturalism & pluralism</subject><subject>Shadows</subject><subject>Tourism</subject><subject>Tourist attractions</subject><subject>Urban renewal</subject><subject>Visibility</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUMtOwzAQtBBIVKUXvsASN0TAjziOuaGoLYhKPRTOkePYbaoSBz-E-jmIT0H8F4kKgr3s7uzM7moAOMfomlKBbnzEGDGcZuIIjAjiOOlbdPyvPgUT77eoD0qxwNkINKugu65p13AZA7QGho2Gq42s7Zu_hQu9lmr_C0-js52WLSxk1wS588OgiLsQnb6C89i8SPf5oT0kCBMo2xo-2q_3RukBoGfgxPQaPfnJY_A8mz4V98liOX8o7haJogSFRKW0yjnjiBgsVMY4r-qsJmmltRF1JRnjglHCUUYFYz0X0TzFhmLFNJMG0zG4OOztnH2N2odya6Nr-5MlYWnOScYY6lmXB5Zy1nunTdm54f99iVE5uFn-uUm_AemUZOU</recordid><startdate>20190310</startdate><enddate>20190310</enddate><creator>Hudec, Oto</creator><creator>Remoaldo, Paula</creator><creator>Urbančíková, Nataša</creator><creator>Cadima Ribeiro, José</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190310</creationdate><title>Stepping Out of the Shadows: Legacy of the European Capitals of Culture, Guimarães 2012 and Košice 2013</title><author>Hudec, Oto ; Remoaldo, Paula ; Urbančíková, Nataša ; Cadima Ribeiro, José</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-c43b875702f19c6577bd6d24beef9dba557953270639553b803841f31c5e5af13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Awards & honors</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Cultural heritage</topic><topic>Cultural resources</topic><topic>Culture</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Multiculturalism & pluralism</topic><topic>Shadows</topic><topic>Tourism</topic><topic>Tourist attractions</topic><topic>Urban renewal</topic><topic>Visibility</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hudec, Oto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Remoaldo, Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urbančíková, Nataša</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cadima Ribeiro, José</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hudec, Oto</au><au>Remoaldo, Paula</au><au>Urbančíková, Nataša</au><au>Cadima Ribeiro, José</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stepping Out of the Shadows: Legacy of the European Capitals of Culture, Guimarães 2012 and Košice 2013</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2019-03-10</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1469</spage><pages>1469-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>The European Capitals of Culture (ECOC) is the most ambitious cultural, collaborative programme in Europe. Up until 2000, ECOC projects were hosted by several national capitals and principal cultural cities in Europe. In the second phase, the programme also began to discover second-tier and less well-known cities hidden in the shadow of the cultural capitals. This paper focuses on assessing different ECOC strategies (traditional versus radical) and the corresponding legacies of two medium-sized cities: Guimarães (ECOC in 2012, Portugal) and Košice (ECOC in 2013, Slovakia). Cultural heritage is identified by the capacity of culture to change development trajectory and to boost the economy of cities. The strategies and legacies of Guimarães and Košice have revealed themselves to be comparatively different, especially due to their differences with respect to UNESCO cultural heritage. While Guimarães partially succeeded in enhancing its position as a tourist attraction and the visibility of its historical cultural heritage, the industrial city of Košice is an example of more radical and dynamic culture-led form of development, overcoming the provincialism of the city. Most importantly, and due to the strengthening pride of the locals, both ECOC cities have stepped out of the shadow of stronger cultural capitals in their countries. This joint research offers the possibility of a first-hand comparison of traditional and radical approaches and an in-depth interpretation of their legacies after a period of five years, explaining the mechanisms of forming different legacies in two types of ECOC cities. The results can help future ECOC cities to set their strategies in relation to their desired cultural and economic development.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su11051469</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2071-1050 |
ispartof | Sustainability, 2019-03, Vol.11 (5), p.1469 |
issn | 2071-1050 2071-1050 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2548726550 |
source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | Awards & honors Cities Collaboration Cultural heritage Cultural resources Culture Economic development Multiculturalism & pluralism Shadows Tourism Tourist attractions Urban renewal Visibility |
title | Stepping Out of the Shadows: Legacy of the European Capitals of Culture, Guimarães 2012 and Košice 2013 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T20%3A47%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stepping%20Out%20of%20the%20Shadows:%20Legacy%20of%20the%20European%20Capitals%20of%20Culture,%20Guimar%C3%A3es%202012%20and%20Ko%C5%A1ice%202013&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Hudec,%20Oto&rft.date=2019-03-10&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1469&rft.pages=1469-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su11051469&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2548726550%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2548726550&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |