Survey to Determine Knowledge of Bioactive Forages Among Small Ruminant Producers

Abstract A short survey was conducted in 2019 to determine knowledge of bioactive forages for parasite control, including specifically Sericea Lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata), before or during small ruminant workshops (also available online via SurveyMonkey® - link sent to a small ruminant email list)...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of animal science 2021-05, Vol.99 (Supplement_2), p.43-44
Hauptverfasser: Whitley, Niki C, Pulsifer, Chelsea, Terrill, Thomas H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 44
container_issue Supplement_2
container_start_page 43
container_title Journal of animal science
container_volume 99
creator Whitley, Niki C
Pulsifer, Chelsea
Terrill, Thomas H
description Abstract A short survey was conducted in 2019 to determine knowledge of bioactive forages for parasite control, including specifically Sericea Lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata), before or during small ruminant workshops (also available online via SurveyMonkey® - link sent to a small ruminant email list). Questions also included livestock owned, hay grown and/or fed, and interest in bioactive forages, among others. Descriptive statistics were obtained by using weighted (by region for goat numbers) SURVEYMEANS procedures (SAS). A total of 151 surveys were completed, including paper (n = 45) and online responses (n = 106). Response rate for paper surveys was 90%. Twenty-six of the fifty states were represented and assigned to regions: Southeast (SE), Midwest (MW), Northeast (NE), and southwestern and western combined (SWW). The highest responses came from the SE (unweighted), but after weighting, the SWW region was represented at the highest level (P < 0.001). Nearly 100% of respondents had small ruminants on their farm, most fed both grass and legume hay (P < 0.001), 36.5 ± 8.6% raised hay, but very few sold hay (4.9 ± 1.5%; less than those that did not, P < 0.001). The most popular method of marketing for hay was “word of mouth” (P < 0.001). Prior knowledge of forage plants with bioactivity was noted for 78.0 ± 8.1% (P < 0.001) vs those without. Approximately a third of respondents had used or grown sericea lespedeza (32.8 ± 8.4%; P < 0.05) and most (tendency, P < 0.07) thought of it favorably. Almost half of respondents indicated they were willing to grow sericea lespedeza (P < 0.02). Other sericea lespedeza products of interest to respondents included primarily pellets (around 85.3 ± 8.3%), with little interest in silage (2.2 ± 1.1%; P < 0.0001). Producer surveys, such as this, help inform efforts for researchers and Extension staff.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jas/skab096.080
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2548642871</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/jas/skab096.080</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2548642871</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1440-c2fc046a73501c1aa9729e187ce7ea4037df1776e67f2871de13f15cd4eb05143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkL1PwzAQRy0EEqUws1piQ0rrc-w4GUuhgKjER2G2XOdSpSRxsZOi_vekanemW977nfQIuQY2ApbF47UJ4_BtlixLRixlJ2QAkssohiQ-JQPGOERpCvycXISwZgy4zOSAvC86v8UdbR29xxZ9XTZIXxr3W2G-QuoKelc6Y9tyi3TmvFlhoJPaNSu6qE1V0Y-uN0zT0jfv8s6iD5fkrDBVwKvjHZKv2cPn9Cmavz4-TyfzyIIQLLK8sEwkRsWSgQVjMsUzhFRZVGgEi1VegFIJJqrgqYIcIS5A2lzgkkkQ8ZDcHHY33v10GFq9dp1v-peaS5EmYm_11PhAWe9C8FjojS9r43camN530303feym-269cXswXLf5F_4DzzJvlg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2548642871</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Survey to Determine Knowledge of Bioactive Forages Among Small Ruminant Producers</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Whitley, Niki C ; Pulsifer, Chelsea ; Terrill, Thomas H</creator><creatorcontrib>Whitley, Niki C ; Pulsifer, Chelsea ; Terrill, Thomas H</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Abstract A short survey was conducted in 2019 to determine knowledge of bioactive forages for parasite control, including specifically Sericea Lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata), before or during small ruminant workshops (also available online via SurveyMonkey® - link sent to a small ruminant email list). Questions also included livestock owned, hay grown and/or fed, and interest in bioactive forages, among others. Descriptive statistics were obtained by using weighted (by region for goat numbers) SURVEYMEANS procedures (SAS). A total of 151 surveys were completed, including paper (n = 45) and online responses (n = 106). Response rate for paper surveys was 90%. Twenty-six of the fifty states were represented and assigned to regions: Southeast (SE), Midwest (MW), Northeast (NE), and southwestern and western combined (SWW). The highest responses came from the SE (unweighted), but after weighting, the SWW region was represented at the highest level (P < 0.001). Nearly 100% of respondents had small ruminants on their farm, most fed both grass and legume hay (P < 0.001), 36.5 ± 8.6% raised hay, but very few sold hay (4.9 ± 1.5%; less than those that did not, P < 0.001). The most popular method of marketing for hay was “word of mouth” (P < 0.001). Prior knowledge of forage plants with bioactivity was noted for 78.0 ± 8.1% (P < 0.001) vs those without. Approximately a third of respondents had used or grown sericea lespedeza (32.8 ± 8.4%; P < 0.05) and most (tendency, P < 0.07) thought of it favorably. Almost half of respondents indicated they were willing to grow sericea lespedeza (P < 0.02). Other sericea lespedeza products of interest to respondents included primarily pellets (around 85.3 ± 8.3%), with little interest in silage (2.2 ± 1.1%; P < 0.0001). Producer surveys, such as this, help inform efforts for researchers and Extension staff.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jas/skab096.080</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Biological activity ; Forage ; Hay ; Legumes ; Leguminous plants ; Livestock ; Parasite control ; Parasites ; Polls &amp; surveys</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2021-05, Vol.99 (Supplement_2), p.43-44</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1578,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Whitley, Niki C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pulsifer, Chelsea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terrill, Thomas H</creatorcontrib><title>Survey to Determine Knowledge of Bioactive Forages Among Small Ruminant Producers</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><description><![CDATA[Abstract A short survey was conducted in 2019 to determine knowledge of bioactive forages for parasite control, including specifically Sericea Lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata), before or during small ruminant workshops (also available online via SurveyMonkey® - link sent to a small ruminant email list). Questions also included livestock owned, hay grown and/or fed, and interest in bioactive forages, among others. Descriptive statistics were obtained by using weighted (by region for goat numbers) SURVEYMEANS procedures (SAS). A total of 151 surveys were completed, including paper (n = 45) and online responses (n = 106). Response rate for paper surveys was 90%. Twenty-six of the fifty states were represented and assigned to regions: Southeast (SE), Midwest (MW), Northeast (NE), and southwestern and western combined (SWW). The highest responses came from the SE (unweighted), but after weighting, the SWW region was represented at the highest level (P < 0.001). Nearly 100% of respondents had small ruminants on their farm, most fed both grass and legume hay (P < 0.001), 36.5 ± 8.6% raised hay, but very few sold hay (4.9 ± 1.5%; less than those that did not, P < 0.001). The most popular method of marketing for hay was “word of mouth” (P < 0.001). Prior knowledge of forage plants with bioactivity was noted for 78.0 ± 8.1% (P < 0.001) vs those without. Approximately a third of respondents had used or grown sericea lespedeza (32.8 ± 8.4%; P < 0.05) and most (tendency, P < 0.07) thought of it favorably. Almost half of respondents indicated they were willing to grow sericea lespedeza (P < 0.02). Other sericea lespedeza products of interest to respondents included primarily pellets (around 85.3 ± 8.3%), with little interest in silage (2.2 ± 1.1%; P < 0.0001). Producer surveys, such as this, help inform efforts for researchers and Extension staff.]]></description><subject>Biological activity</subject><subject>Forage</subject><subject>Hay</subject><subject>Legumes</subject><subject>Leguminous plants</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Parasite control</subject><subject>Parasites</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkL1PwzAQRy0EEqUws1piQ0rrc-w4GUuhgKjER2G2XOdSpSRxsZOi_vekanemW977nfQIuQY2ApbF47UJ4_BtlixLRixlJ2QAkssohiQ-JQPGOERpCvycXISwZgy4zOSAvC86v8UdbR29xxZ9XTZIXxr3W2G-QuoKelc6Y9tyi3TmvFlhoJPaNSu6qE1V0Y-uN0zT0jfv8s6iD5fkrDBVwKvjHZKv2cPn9Cmavz4-TyfzyIIQLLK8sEwkRsWSgQVjMsUzhFRZVGgEi1VegFIJJqrgqYIcIS5A2lzgkkkQ8ZDcHHY33v10GFq9dp1v-peaS5EmYm_11PhAWe9C8FjojS9r43camN530303feym-269cXswXLf5F_4DzzJvlg</recordid><startdate>20210507</startdate><enddate>20210507</enddate><creator>Whitley, Niki C</creator><creator>Pulsifer, Chelsea</creator><creator>Terrill, Thomas H</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210507</creationdate><title>Survey to Determine Knowledge of Bioactive Forages Among Small Ruminant Producers</title><author>Whitley, Niki C ; Pulsifer, Chelsea ; Terrill, Thomas H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1440-c2fc046a73501c1aa9729e187ce7ea4037df1776e67f2871de13f15cd4eb05143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Biological activity</topic><topic>Forage</topic><topic>Hay</topic><topic>Legumes</topic><topic>Leguminous plants</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Parasite control</topic><topic>Parasites</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Whitley, Niki C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pulsifer, Chelsea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terrill, Thomas H</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Whitley, Niki C</au><au>Pulsifer, Chelsea</au><au>Terrill, Thomas H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Survey to Determine Knowledge of Bioactive Forages Among Small Ruminant Producers</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><date>2021-05-07</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>99</volume><issue>Supplement_2</issue><spage>43</spage><epage>44</epage><pages>43-44</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[Abstract A short survey was conducted in 2019 to determine knowledge of bioactive forages for parasite control, including specifically Sericea Lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata), before or during small ruminant workshops (also available online via SurveyMonkey® - link sent to a small ruminant email list). Questions also included livestock owned, hay grown and/or fed, and interest in bioactive forages, among others. Descriptive statistics were obtained by using weighted (by region for goat numbers) SURVEYMEANS procedures (SAS). A total of 151 surveys were completed, including paper (n = 45) and online responses (n = 106). Response rate for paper surveys was 90%. Twenty-six of the fifty states were represented and assigned to regions: Southeast (SE), Midwest (MW), Northeast (NE), and southwestern and western combined (SWW). The highest responses came from the SE (unweighted), but after weighting, the SWW region was represented at the highest level (P < 0.001). Nearly 100% of respondents had small ruminants on their farm, most fed both grass and legume hay (P < 0.001), 36.5 ± 8.6% raised hay, but very few sold hay (4.9 ± 1.5%; less than those that did not, P < 0.001). The most popular method of marketing for hay was “word of mouth” (P < 0.001). Prior knowledge of forage plants with bioactivity was noted for 78.0 ± 8.1% (P < 0.001) vs those without. Approximately a third of respondents had used or grown sericea lespedeza (32.8 ± 8.4%; P < 0.05) and most (tendency, P < 0.07) thought of it favorably. Almost half of respondents indicated they were willing to grow sericea lespedeza (P < 0.02). Other sericea lespedeza products of interest to respondents included primarily pellets (around 85.3 ± 8.3%), with little interest in silage (2.2 ± 1.1%; P < 0.0001). Producer surveys, such as this, help inform efforts for researchers and Extension staff.]]></abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/jas/skab096.080</doi><tpages>2</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8812
ispartof Journal of animal science, 2021-05, Vol.99 (Supplement_2), p.43-44
issn 0021-8812
1525-3163
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2548642871
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Biological activity
Forage
Hay
Legumes
Leguminous plants
Livestock
Parasite control
Parasites
Polls & surveys
title Survey to Determine Knowledge of Bioactive Forages Among Small Ruminant Producers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T14%3A41%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Survey%20to%20Determine%20Knowledge%20of%20Bioactive%20Forages%20Among%20Small%20Ruminant%20Producers&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Whitley,%20Niki%20C&rft.date=2021-05-07&rft.volume=99&rft.issue=Supplement_2&rft.spage=43&rft.epage=44&rft.pages=43-44&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jas/skab096.080&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2548642871%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2548642871&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jas/skab096.080&rfr_iscdi=true