Survey to Determine Knowledge of Bioactive Forages Among Small Ruminant Producers
Abstract A short survey was conducted in 2019 to determine knowledge of bioactive forages for parasite control, including specifically Sericea Lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata), before or during small ruminant workshops (also available online via SurveyMonkey® - link sent to a small ruminant email list)...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of animal science 2021-05, Vol.99 (Supplement_2), p.43-44 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 44 |
---|---|
container_issue | Supplement_2 |
container_start_page | 43 |
container_title | Journal of animal science |
container_volume | 99 |
creator | Whitley, Niki C Pulsifer, Chelsea Terrill, Thomas H |
description | Abstract
A short survey was conducted in 2019 to determine knowledge of bioactive forages for parasite control, including specifically Sericea Lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata), before or during small ruminant workshops (also available online via SurveyMonkey® - link sent to a small ruminant email list). Questions also included livestock owned, hay grown and/or fed, and interest in bioactive forages, among others. Descriptive statistics were obtained by using weighted (by region for goat numbers) SURVEYMEANS procedures (SAS). A total of 151 surveys were completed, including paper (n = 45) and online responses (n = 106). Response rate for paper surveys was 90%. Twenty-six of the fifty states were represented and assigned to regions: Southeast (SE), Midwest (MW), Northeast (NE), and southwestern and western combined (SWW). The highest responses came from the SE (unweighted), but after weighting, the SWW region was represented at the highest level (P < 0.001). Nearly 100% of respondents had small ruminants on their farm, most fed both grass and legume hay (P < 0.001), 36.5 ± 8.6% raised hay, but very few sold hay (4.9 ± 1.5%; less than those that did not, P < 0.001). The most popular method of marketing for hay was “word of mouth” (P < 0.001). Prior knowledge of forage plants with bioactivity was noted for 78.0 ± 8.1% (P < 0.001) vs those without. Approximately a third of respondents had used or grown sericea lespedeza (32.8 ± 8.4%; P < 0.05) and most (tendency, P < 0.07) thought of it favorably. Almost half of respondents indicated they were willing to grow sericea lespedeza (P < 0.02). Other sericea lespedeza products of interest to respondents included primarily pellets (around 85.3 ± 8.3%), with little interest in silage (2.2 ± 1.1%; P < 0.0001). Producer surveys, such as this, help inform efforts for researchers and Extension staff. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/jas/skab096.080 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2548642871</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/jas/skab096.080</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2548642871</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1440-c2fc046a73501c1aa9729e187ce7ea4037df1776e67f2871de13f15cd4eb05143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkL1PwzAQRy0EEqUws1piQ0rrc-w4GUuhgKjER2G2XOdSpSRxsZOi_vekanemW977nfQIuQY2ApbF47UJ4_BtlixLRixlJ2QAkssohiQ-JQPGOERpCvycXISwZgy4zOSAvC86v8UdbR29xxZ9XTZIXxr3W2G-QuoKelc6Y9tyi3TmvFlhoJPaNSu6qE1V0Y-uN0zT0jfv8s6iD5fkrDBVwKvjHZKv2cPn9Cmavz4-TyfzyIIQLLK8sEwkRsWSgQVjMsUzhFRZVGgEi1VegFIJJqrgqYIcIS5A2lzgkkkQ8ZDcHHY33v10GFq9dp1v-peaS5EmYm_11PhAWe9C8FjojS9r43camN530303feym-269cXswXLf5F_4DzzJvlg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2548642871</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Survey to Determine Knowledge of Bioactive Forages Among Small Ruminant Producers</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Whitley, Niki C ; Pulsifer, Chelsea ; Terrill, Thomas H</creator><creatorcontrib>Whitley, Niki C ; Pulsifer, Chelsea ; Terrill, Thomas H</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Abstract
A short survey was conducted in 2019 to determine knowledge of bioactive forages for parasite control, including specifically Sericea Lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata), before or during small ruminant workshops (also available online via SurveyMonkey® - link sent to a small ruminant email list). Questions also included livestock owned, hay grown and/or fed, and interest in bioactive forages, among others. Descriptive statistics were obtained by using weighted (by region for goat numbers) SURVEYMEANS procedures (SAS). A total of 151 surveys were completed, including paper (n = 45) and online responses (n = 106). Response rate for paper surveys was 90%. Twenty-six of the fifty states were represented and assigned to regions: Southeast (SE), Midwest (MW), Northeast (NE), and southwestern and western combined (SWW). The highest responses came from the SE (unweighted), but after weighting, the SWW region was represented at the highest level (P < 0.001). Nearly 100% of respondents had small ruminants on their farm, most fed both grass and legume hay (P < 0.001), 36.5 ± 8.6% raised hay, but very few sold hay (4.9 ± 1.5%; less than those that did not, P < 0.001). The most popular method of marketing for hay was “word of mouth” (P < 0.001). Prior knowledge of forage plants with bioactivity was noted for 78.0 ± 8.1% (P < 0.001) vs those without. Approximately a third of respondents had used or grown sericea lespedeza (32.8 ± 8.4%; P < 0.05) and most (tendency, P < 0.07) thought of it favorably. Almost half of respondents indicated they were willing to grow sericea lespedeza (P < 0.02). Other sericea lespedeza products of interest to respondents included primarily pellets (around 85.3 ± 8.3%), with little interest in silage (2.2 ± 1.1%; P < 0.0001). Producer surveys, such as this, help inform efforts for researchers and Extension staff.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jas/skab096.080</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Biological activity ; Forage ; Hay ; Legumes ; Leguminous plants ; Livestock ; Parasite control ; Parasites ; Polls & surveys</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2021-05, Vol.99 (Supplement_2), p.43-44</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1578,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Whitley, Niki C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pulsifer, Chelsea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terrill, Thomas H</creatorcontrib><title>Survey to Determine Knowledge of Bioactive Forages Among Small Ruminant Producers</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><description><![CDATA[Abstract
A short survey was conducted in 2019 to determine knowledge of bioactive forages for parasite control, including specifically Sericea Lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata), before or during small ruminant workshops (also available online via SurveyMonkey® - link sent to a small ruminant email list). Questions also included livestock owned, hay grown and/or fed, and interest in bioactive forages, among others. Descriptive statistics were obtained by using weighted (by region for goat numbers) SURVEYMEANS procedures (SAS). A total of 151 surveys were completed, including paper (n = 45) and online responses (n = 106). Response rate for paper surveys was 90%. Twenty-six of the fifty states were represented and assigned to regions: Southeast (SE), Midwest (MW), Northeast (NE), and southwestern and western combined (SWW). The highest responses came from the SE (unweighted), but after weighting, the SWW region was represented at the highest level (P < 0.001). Nearly 100% of respondents had small ruminants on their farm, most fed both grass and legume hay (P < 0.001), 36.5 ± 8.6% raised hay, but very few sold hay (4.9 ± 1.5%; less than those that did not, P < 0.001). The most popular method of marketing for hay was “word of mouth” (P < 0.001). Prior knowledge of forage plants with bioactivity was noted for 78.0 ± 8.1% (P < 0.001) vs those without. Approximately a third of respondents had used or grown sericea lespedeza (32.8 ± 8.4%; P < 0.05) and most (tendency, P < 0.07) thought of it favorably. Almost half of respondents indicated they were willing to grow sericea lespedeza (P < 0.02). Other sericea lespedeza products of interest to respondents included primarily pellets (around 85.3 ± 8.3%), with little interest in silage (2.2 ± 1.1%; P < 0.0001). Producer surveys, such as this, help inform efforts for researchers and Extension staff.]]></description><subject>Biological activity</subject><subject>Forage</subject><subject>Hay</subject><subject>Legumes</subject><subject>Leguminous plants</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Parasite control</subject><subject>Parasites</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkL1PwzAQRy0EEqUws1piQ0rrc-w4GUuhgKjER2G2XOdSpSRxsZOi_vekanemW977nfQIuQY2ApbF47UJ4_BtlixLRixlJ2QAkssohiQ-JQPGOERpCvycXISwZgy4zOSAvC86v8UdbR29xxZ9XTZIXxr3W2G-QuoKelc6Y9tyi3TmvFlhoJPaNSu6qE1V0Y-uN0zT0jfv8s6iD5fkrDBVwKvjHZKv2cPn9Cmavz4-TyfzyIIQLLK8sEwkRsWSgQVjMsUzhFRZVGgEi1VegFIJJqrgqYIcIS5A2lzgkkkQ8ZDcHHY33v10GFq9dp1v-peaS5EmYm_11PhAWe9C8FjojS9r43camN530303feym-269cXswXLf5F_4DzzJvlg</recordid><startdate>20210507</startdate><enddate>20210507</enddate><creator>Whitley, Niki C</creator><creator>Pulsifer, Chelsea</creator><creator>Terrill, Thomas H</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210507</creationdate><title>Survey to Determine Knowledge of Bioactive Forages Among Small Ruminant Producers</title><author>Whitley, Niki C ; Pulsifer, Chelsea ; Terrill, Thomas H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1440-c2fc046a73501c1aa9729e187ce7ea4037df1776e67f2871de13f15cd4eb05143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Biological activity</topic><topic>Forage</topic><topic>Hay</topic><topic>Legumes</topic><topic>Leguminous plants</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Parasite control</topic><topic>Parasites</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Whitley, Niki C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pulsifer, Chelsea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terrill, Thomas H</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Whitley, Niki C</au><au>Pulsifer, Chelsea</au><au>Terrill, Thomas H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Survey to Determine Knowledge of Bioactive Forages Among Small Ruminant Producers</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><date>2021-05-07</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>99</volume><issue>Supplement_2</issue><spage>43</spage><epage>44</epage><pages>43-44</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[Abstract
A short survey was conducted in 2019 to determine knowledge of bioactive forages for parasite control, including specifically Sericea Lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata), before or during small ruminant workshops (also available online via SurveyMonkey® - link sent to a small ruminant email list). Questions also included livestock owned, hay grown and/or fed, and interest in bioactive forages, among others. Descriptive statistics were obtained by using weighted (by region for goat numbers) SURVEYMEANS procedures (SAS). A total of 151 surveys were completed, including paper (n = 45) and online responses (n = 106). Response rate for paper surveys was 90%. Twenty-six of the fifty states were represented and assigned to regions: Southeast (SE), Midwest (MW), Northeast (NE), and southwestern and western combined (SWW). The highest responses came from the SE (unweighted), but after weighting, the SWW region was represented at the highest level (P < 0.001). Nearly 100% of respondents had small ruminants on their farm, most fed both grass and legume hay (P < 0.001), 36.5 ± 8.6% raised hay, but very few sold hay (4.9 ± 1.5%; less than those that did not, P < 0.001). The most popular method of marketing for hay was “word of mouth” (P < 0.001). Prior knowledge of forage plants with bioactivity was noted for 78.0 ± 8.1% (P < 0.001) vs those without. Approximately a third of respondents had used or grown sericea lespedeza (32.8 ± 8.4%; P < 0.05) and most (tendency, P < 0.07) thought of it favorably. Almost half of respondents indicated they were willing to grow sericea lespedeza (P < 0.02). Other sericea lespedeza products of interest to respondents included primarily pellets (around 85.3 ± 8.3%), with little interest in silage (2.2 ± 1.1%; P < 0.0001). Producer surveys, such as this, help inform efforts for researchers and Extension staff.]]></abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/jas/skab096.080</doi><tpages>2</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8812 |
ispartof | Journal of animal science, 2021-05, Vol.99 (Supplement_2), p.43-44 |
issn | 0021-8812 1525-3163 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2548642871 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Biological activity Forage Hay Legumes Leguminous plants Livestock Parasite control Parasites Polls & surveys |
title | Survey to Determine Knowledge of Bioactive Forages Among Small Ruminant Producers |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T14%3A41%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Survey%20to%20Determine%20Knowledge%20of%20Bioactive%20Forages%20Among%20Small%20Ruminant%20Producers&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Whitley,%20Niki%20C&rft.date=2021-05-07&rft.volume=99&rft.issue=Supplement_2&rft.spage=43&rft.epage=44&rft.pages=43-44&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jas/skab096.080&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2548642871%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2548642871&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jas/skab096.080&rfr_iscdi=true |