Different strategies for finite element simulations of static mechanical surface treatment processes—a comparative analysis
Static mechanical surface treatment (MST) processes based on the severe plastic deformation of the surface and subsurface layers improve the surface integrity (SI) of a metal component dramatically and thus its operational properties. The finite element method (FEM) is a basic simulation method used...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 2021-08, Vol.43 (8), Article 371 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | Maximov, J. T. Duncheva, G. V. Dunchev, V. P. Anchev, A. P. |
description | Static mechanical surface treatment (MST) processes based on the severe plastic deformation of the surface and subsurface layers improve the surface integrity (SI) of a metal component dramatically and thus its operational properties. The finite element method (FEM) is a basic simulation method used in the numerical investigations of MST processes. Although FEM always requires experimental verification of the results so obtained and an experiment to establish an adequate material constitutive model, this method saves of the researcher significant time and resources. Based on an analysis of the published studies devoted to FE simulations of static MST processes, five basic conditions have been found to be essential in order to build an adequate FE model. The theoretical formulations are then illustrated by creating FE models of the slide diamond burnishing (SDB) process using different strategies to make a comparative analysis between them. SDB is a static MST process with a thermomechanical nature. The adequacy of each FE model, respectively, strategy, is then assessed by comparing the FE results for the residual stresses with the experimental results obtained via the X-ray diffraction technique. It has been shown that a fully coupled thermal-stress 3D FE analysis of an SDB process with nonlinear kinematic hardening should be carried out. When the burnishing velocity is relatively small, the thermal effect can be neglected. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s40430-021-03085-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2548419329</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2548419329</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-55551ca0ac7a989bc53e64dafc767b7b6a66e4440e9531a4ca9040a8880c18bc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMtqHDEQHEwMcRz_QE4CnydpjTQazdGsHduw4ItzFr1ya61lHmu11rCHQD4iX5gvsbJryC196YKuqi6qqr5I-CoBum-sQSuooZE1KLBtrU6qM2nB1Mr08kPBprN1azv7sfrEvAFQTWvas-rndQyBEk1ZcE6YaR2JRZiTCHGKmQQNNB6ucdwNmOM8sZhDIRfsxUj-GafocRC8SwE9iZwI80GyTbMnZuI_v36j8PO4xfIhvpLACYc9R_5cnQYcmC7e93n14_vN4-KuXj7c3i-ulrVvdJ_rtoz0COg77G2_8q0io58w-M50q25l0BjSWgP1rZKoPfagAa214KVdeXVeXR59S6SXHXF2m3mXSgh2Tautlr1q-sJqjiyfZuZEwW1THDHtnQT3t2Z3rNmVmt2hZqeKSB1FXMjTmtI_6_-o3gBVEoQ6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2548419329</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Different strategies for finite element simulations of static mechanical surface treatment processes—a comparative analysis</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Maximov, J. T. ; Duncheva, G. V. ; Dunchev, V. P. ; Anchev, A. P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Maximov, J. T. ; Duncheva, G. V. ; Dunchev, V. P. ; Anchev, A. P.</creatorcontrib><description>Static mechanical surface treatment (MST) processes based on the severe plastic deformation of the surface and subsurface layers improve the surface integrity (SI) of a metal component dramatically and thus its operational properties. The finite element method (FEM) is a basic simulation method used in the numerical investigations of MST processes. Although FEM always requires experimental verification of the results so obtained and an experiment to establish an adequate material constitutive model, this method saves of the researcher significant time and resources. Based on an analysis of the published studies devoted to FE simulations of static MST processes, five basic conditions have been found to be essential in order to build an adequate FE model. The theoretical formulations are then illustrated by creating FE models of the slide diamond burnishing (SDB) process using different strategies to make a comparative analysis between them. SDB is a static MST process with a thermomechanical nature. The adequacy of each FE model, respectively, strategy, is then assessed by comparing the FE results for the residual stresses with the experimental results obtained via the X-ray diffraction technique. It has been shown that a fully coupled thermal-stress 3D FE analysis of an SDB process with nonlinear kinematic hardening should be carried out. When the burnishing velocity is relatively small, the thermal effect can be neglected.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1678-5878</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1806-3691</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s40430-021-03085-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Adequacy ; Burnishing ; Comparative analysis ; Constitutive models ; Diamond burnishing ; Diamonds ; Engineering ; Finite element method ; Mathematical analysis ; Mathematical models ; Mechanical Engineering ; Plastic deformation ; Residual stress ; Simulation ; Surface treatment ; Technical Paper ; Temperature effects ; Thermomechanical treatment</subject><ispartof>Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 2021-08, Vol.43 (8), Article 371</ispartof><rights>The Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 2021</rights><rights>The Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 2021.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-55551ca0ac7a989bc53e64dafc767b7b6a66e4440e9531a4ca9040a8880c18bc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-55551ca0ac7a989bc53e64dafc767b7b6a66e4440e9531a4ca9040a8880c18bc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40430-021-03085-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40430-021-03085-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maximov, J. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duncheva, G. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunchev, V. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anchev, A. P.</creatorcontrib><title>Different strategies for finite element simulations of static mechanical surface treatment processes—a comparative analysis</title><title>Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering</title><addtitle>J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng</addtitle><description>Static mechanical surface treatment (MST) processes based on the severe plastic deformation of the surface and subsurface layers improve the surface integrity (SI) of a metal component dramatically and thus its operational properties. The finite element method (FEM) is a basic simulation method used in the numerical investigations of MST processes. Although FEM always requires experimental verification of the results so obtained and an experiment to establish an adequate material constitutive model, this method saves of the researcher significant time and resources. Based on an analysis of the published studies devoted to FE simulations of static MST processes, five basic conditions have been found to be essential in order to build an adequate FE model. The theoretical formulations are then illustrated by creating FE models of the slide diamond burnishing (SDB) process using different strategies to make a comparative analysis between them. SDB is a static MST process with a thermomechanical nature. The adequacy of each FE model, respectively, strategy, is then assessed by comparing the FE results for the residual stresses with the experimental results obtained via the X-ray diffraction technique. It has been shown that a fully coupled thermal-stress 3D FE analysis of an SDB process with nonlinear kinematic hardening should be carried out. When the burnishing velocity is relatively small, the thermal effect can be neglected.</description><subject>Adequacy</subject><subject>Burnishing</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Constitutive models</subject><subject>Diamond burnishing</subject><subject>Diamonds</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Finite element method</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Mechanical Engineering</subject><subject>Plastic deformation</subject><subject>Residual stress</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Surface treatment</subject><subject>Technical Paper</subject><subject>Temperature effects</subject><subject>Thermomechanical treatment</subject><issn>1678-5878</issn><issn>1806-3691</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UMtqHDEQHEwMcRz_QE4CnydpjTQazdGsHduw4ItzFr1ya61lHmu11rCHQD4iX5gvsbJryC196YKuqi6qqr5I-CoBum-sQSuooZE1KLBtrU6qM2nB1Mr08kPBprN1azv7sfrEvAFQTWvas-rndQyBEk1ZcE6YaR2JRZiTCHGKmQQNNB6ucdwNmOM8sZhDIRfsxUj-GafocRC8SwE9iZwI80GyTbMnZuI_v36j8PO4xfIhvpLACYc9R_5cnQYcmC7e93n14_vN4-KuXj7c3i-ulrVvdJ_rtoz0COg77G2_8q0io58w-M50q25l0BjSWgP1rZKoPfagAa214KVdeXVeXR59S6SXHXF2m3mXSgh2Tautlr1q-sJqjiyfZuZEwW1THDHtnQT3t2Z3rNmVmt2hZqeKSB1FXMjTmtI_6_-o3gBVEoQ6</recordid><startdate>20210801</startdate><enddate>20210801</enddate><creator>Maximov, J. T.</creator><creator>Duncheva, G. V.</creator><creator>Dunchev, V. P.</creator><creator>Anchev, A. P.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210801</creationdate><title>Different strategies for finite element simulations of static mechanical surface treatment processes—a comparative analysis</title><author>Maximov, J. T. ; Duncheva, G. V. ; Dunchev, V. P. ; Anchev, A. P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-55551ca0ac7a989bc53e64dafc767b7b6a66e4440e9531a4ca9040a8880c18bc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adequacy</topic><topic>Burnishing</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Constitutive models</topic><topic>Diamond burnishing</topic><topic>Diamonds</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Finite element method</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Mechanical Engineering</topic><topic>Plastic deformation</topic><topic>Residual stress</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Surface treatment</topic><topic>Technical Paper</topic><topic>Temperature effects</topic><topic>Thermomechanical treatment</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maximov, J. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duncheva, G. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunchev, V. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anchev, A. P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maximov, J. T.</au><au>Duncheva, G. V.</au><au>Dunchev, V. P.</au><au>Anchev, A. P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Different strategies for finite element simulations of static mechanical surface treatment processes—a comparative analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering</jtitle><stitle>J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng</stitle><date>2021-08-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>8</issue><artnum>371</artnum><issn>1678-5878</issn><eissn>1806-3691</eissn><abstract>Static mechanical surface treatment (MST) processes based on the severe plastic deformation of the surface and subsurface layers improve the surface integrity (SI) of a metal component dramatically and thus its operational properties. The finite element method (FEM) is a basic simulation method used in the numerical investigations of MST processes. Although FEM always requires experimental verification of the results so obtained and an experiment to establish an adequate material constitutive model, this method saves of the researcher significant time and resources. Based on an analysis of the published studies devoted to FE simulations of static MST processes, five basic conditions have been found to be essential in order to build an adequate FE model. The theoretical formulations are then illustrated by creating FE models of the slide diamond burnishing (SDB) process using different strategies to make a comparative analysis between them. SDB is a static MST process with a thermomechanical nature. The adequacy of each FE model, respectively, strategy, is then assessed by comparing the FE results for the residual stresses with the experimental results obtained via the X-ray diffraction technique. It has been shown that a fully coupled thermal-stress 3D FE analysis of an SDB process with nonlinear kinematic hardening should be carried out. When the burnishing velocity is relatively small, the thermal effect can be neglected.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s40430-021-03085-3</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1678-5878 |
ispartof | Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 2021-08, Vol.43 (8), Article 371 |
issn | 1678-5878 1806-3691 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2548419329 |
source | SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Adequacy Burnishing Comparative analysis Constitutive models Diamond burnishing Diamonds Engineering Finite element method Mathematical analysis Mathematical models Mechanical Engineering Plastic deformation Residual stress Simulation Surface treatment Technical Paper Temperature effects Thermomechanical treatment |
title | Different strategies for finite element simulations of static mechanical surface treatment processes—a comparative analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T10%3A55%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Different%20strategies%20for%20finite%20element%20simulations%20of%20static%20mechanical%20surface%20treatment%20processes%E2%80%94a%20comparative%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20Brazilian%20Society%20of%20Mechanical%20Sciences%20and%20Engineering&rft.au=Maximov,%20J.%20T.&rft.date=2021-08-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=8&rft.artnum=371&rft.issn=1678-5878&rft.eissn=1806-3691&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s40430-021-03085-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2548419329%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2548419329&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |