Freeze–Thaw Durability of Cement-Stabilized Soil Reinforced with Polypropylene/Basalt Fibers

AbstractMany studies have been carried out on the influence of freeze–thaw cycles on the mechanical behavior of cement- or lime-stabilized soils. However, very limited studies have considered the effects of freeze–thaw cycles on cement-stabilized soil reinforced with fibers. The main objective of th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of materials in civil engineering 2021-09, Vol.33 (9)
Hauptverfasser: Hadi Sahlabadi, Seyed, Bayat, Meysam, Mousivand, Mohsen, Saadat, Mohsen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 9
container_start_page
container_title Journal of materials in civil engineering
container_volume 33
creator Hadi Sahlabadi, Seyed
Bayat, Meysam
Mousivand, Mohsen
Saadat, Mohsen
description AbstractMany studies have been carried out on the influence of freeze–thaw cycles on the mechanical behavior of cement- or lime-stabilized soils. However, very limited studies have considered the effects of freeze–thaw cycles on cement-stabilized soil reinforced with fibers. The main objective of this study is to determine the effects of polypropylene fiber (PPF) and basalt fiber (BF) content (0%, 0.5%, 1%, 2%, and 5%), cement content (0%, 3%, and 9%), number of freeze–thaw cycles (0, 2, 4, 8, and 10), and initial moisture content on the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of clay soil. The study reveals that adding cement, PPF, or BF to soil causes a remarkable increase in strength, where the strength of the PPF-reinforced specimens is significantly more than that of BF-reinforced ones. The UCS values of the specimens compacted at optimum moisture content (OMC) are almost more than those that were prepared at a molding moisture content of 0.8 OMC or 1.2 OMC. The strength of specimens increases with increases in cement content and curing time. However, the axial strain at failure for cement-stabilized specimens decreased with increasing cement content or curing time. Furthermore, it is concluded that the increase in the UCS of combined PPF or BF with cement inclusion is more than that caused by each fiber without cement. A regression model is developed to predict the UCS in terms of four effective agents for each case of stabilization by BF or PPF. Results indicate a satisfactory performance of the model where the Pearson correlation coefficient above 0.95 for UCS prediction is obtained.
doi_str_mv 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003905
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2548337844</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2548337844</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a337t-16d01dd4f43ce844fbb217e67167a6b9f75e487a6a5d2eea5a4232abbf61f5393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1OwkAUhSdGExF9h0Y3uijMdH7ausMKagLRSN06mbZ3QkmhOFNCysp38A19EltBXbm6Pznn3JsPoXOCewQL0r8cTKPh1STukZBRl3NKexhjGmJ-gDq_u0PUwUEYuoQLcoxOrJ23IsxwB72ODMAWPt8_4pnaOLdro5K8yKvaKbUTwQKWlTutvndbyJxpmRfOM-RLXZq0mTd5NXOeyqJemXJVF7CE_o2yqqicUZ6AsafoSKvCwtm-dtHLaBhH9-748e4hGoxdRalfuURkmGQZ04ymEDCmk8QjPgifCF-JJNQ-BxY0reKZB6C4Yh71VJJoQTSnIe2ii11u88fbGmwl5-XaLJuT0uMsaI40qY3qeqdKTWmtAS1XJl8oU0uCZctTypannMSyZSdbdnLPszGLnVnZFP7if5z_G78AUgV7sw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2548337844</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Freeze–Thaw Durability of Cement-Stabilized Soil Reinforced with Polypropylene/Basalt Fibers</title><source>American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014</source><creator>Hadi Sahlabadi, Seyed ; Bayat, Meysam ; Mousivand, Mohsen ; Saadat, Mohsen</creator><creatorcontrib>Hadi Sahlabadi, Seyed ; Bayat, Meysam ; Mousivand, Mohsen ; Saadat, Mohsen</creatorcontrib><description>AbstractMany studies have been carried out on the influence of freeze–thaw cycles on the mechanical behavior of cement- or lime-stabilized soils. However, very limited studies have considered the effects of freeze–thaw cycles on cement-stabilized soil reinforced with fibers. The main objective of this study is to determine the effects of polypropylene fiber (PPF) and basalt fiber (BF) content (0%, 0.5%, 1%, 2%, and 5%), cement content (0%, 3%, and 9%), number of freeze–thaw cycles (0, 2, 4, 8, and 10), and initial moisture content on the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of clay soil. The study reveals that adding cement, PPF, or BF to soil causes a remarkable increase in strength, where the strength of the PPF-reinforced specimens is significantly more than that of BF-reinforced ones. The UCS values of the specimens compacted at optimum moisture content (OMC) are almost more than those that were prepared at a molding moisture content of 0.8 OMC or 1.2 OMC. The strength of specimens increases with increases in cement content and curing time. However, the axial strain at failure for cement-stabilized specimens decreased with increasing cement content or curing time. Furthermore, it is concluded that the increase in the UCS of combined PPF or BF with cement inclusion is more than that caused by each fiber without cement. A regression model is developed to predict the UCS in terms of four effective agents for each case of stabilization by BF or PPF. Results indicate a satisfactory performance of the model where the Pearson correlation coefficient above 0.95 for UCS prediction is obtained.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0899-1561</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-5533</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003905</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: American Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>Axial strain ; Basalt ; Building materials ; Cement ; Cement reinforcements ; Civil engineering ; Clay soils ; Compressive strength ; Correlation coefficients ; Curing ; Lime soil stabilization ; Mechanical properties ; Moisture content ; Polypropylene ; Regression models ; Soil compaction ; Soil lime ; Soil mechanics ; Soil moisture ; Soil stabilization ; Technical Papers</subject><ispartof>Journal of materials in civil engineering, 2021-09, Vol.33 (9)</ispartof><rights>2021 American Society of Civil Engineers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a337t-16d01dd4f43ce844fbb217e67167a6b9f75e487a6a5d2eea5a4232abbf61f5393</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a337t-16d01dd4f43ce844fbb217e67167a6b9f75e487a6a5d2eea5a4232abbf61f5393</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5525-5199</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003905$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003905$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,75942,75950</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hadi Sahlabadi, Seyed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayat, Meysam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mousivand, Mohsen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saadat, Mohsen</creatorcontrib><title>Freeze–Thaw Durability of Cement-Stabilized Soil Reinforced with Polypropylene/Basalt Fibers</title><title>Journal of materials in civil engineering</title><description>AbstractMany studies have been carried out on the influence of freeze–thaw cycles on the mechanical behavior of cement- or lime-stabilized soils. However, very limited studies have considered the effects of freeze–thaw cycles on cement-stabilized soil reinforced with fibers. The main objective of this study is to determine the effects of polypropylene fiber (PPF) and basalt fiber (BF) content (0%, 0.5%, 1%, 2%, and 5%), cement content (0%, 3%, and 9%), number of freeze–thaw cycles (0, 2, 4, 8, and 10), and initial moisture content on the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of clay soil. The study reveals that adding cement, PPF, or BF to soil causes a remarkable increase in strength, where the strength of the PPF-reinforced specimens is significantly more than that of BF-reinforced ones. The UCS values of the specimens compacted at optimum moisture content (OMC) are almost more than those that were prepared at a molding moisture content of 0.8 OMC or 1.2 OMC. The strength of specimens increases with increases in cement content and curing time. However, the axial strain at failure for cement-stabilized specimens decreased with increasing cement content or curing time. Furthermore, it is concluded that the increase in the UCS of combined PPF or BF with cement inclusion is more than that caused by each fiber without cement. A regression model is developed to predict the UCS in terms of four effective agents for each case of stabilization by BF or PPF. Results indicate a satisfactory performance of the model where the Pearson correlation coefficient above 0.95 for UCS prediction is obtained.</description><subject>Axial strain</subject><subject>Basalt</subject><subject>Building materials</subject><subject>Cement</subject><subject>Cement reinforcements</subject><subject>Civil engineering</subject><subject>Clay soils</subject><subject>Compressive strength</subject><subject>Correlation coefficients</subject><subject>Curing</subject><subject>Lime soil stabilization</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Moisture content</subject><subject>Polypropylene</subject><subject>Regression models</subject><subject>Soil compaction</subject><subject>Soil lime</subject><subject>Soil mechanics</subject><subject>Soil moisture</subject><subject>Soil stabilization</subject><subject>Technical Papers</subject><issn>0899-1561</issn><issn>1943-5533</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM1OwkAUhSdGExF9h0Y3uijMdH7ausMKagLRSN06mbZ3QkmhOFNCysp38A19EltBXbm6Pznn3JsPoXOCewQL0r8cTKPh1STukZBRl3NKexhjGmJ-gDq_u0PUwUEYuoQLcoxOrJ23IsxwB72ODMAWPt8_4pnaOLdro5K8yKvaKbUTwQKWlTutvndbyJxpmRfOM-RLXZq0mTd5NXOeyqJemXJVF7CE_o2yqqicUZ6AsafoSKvCwtm-dtHLaBhH9-748e4hGoxdRalfuURkmGQZ04ymEDCmk8QjPgifCF-JJNQ-BxY0reKZB6C4Yh71VJJoQTSnIe2ii11u88fbGmwl5-XaLJuT0uMsaI40qY3qeqdKTWmtAS1XJl8oU0uCZctTypannMSyZSdbdnLPszGLnVnZFP7if5z_G78AUgV7sw</recordid><startdate>20210901</startdate><enddate>20210901</enddate><creator>Hadi Sahlabadi, Seyed</creator><creator>Bayat, Meysam</creator><creator>Mousivand, Mohsen</creator><creator>Saadat, Mohsen</creator><general>American Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5525-5199</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210901</creationdate><title>Freeze–Thaw Durability of Cement-Stabilized Soil Reinforced with Polypropylene/Basalt Fibers</title><author>Hadi Sahlabadi, Seyed ; Bayat, Meysam ; Mousivand, Mohsen ; Saadat, Mohsen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a337t-16d01dd4f43ce844fbb217e67167a6b9f75e487a6a5d2eea5a4232abbf61f5393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Axial strain</topic><topic>Basalt</topic><topic>Building materials</topic><topic>Cement</topic><topic>Cement reinforcements</topic><topic>Civil engineering</topic><topic>Clay soils</topic><topic>Compressive strength</topic><topic>Correlation coefficients</topic><topic>Curing</topic><topic>Lime soil stabilization</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Moisture content</topic><topic>Polypropylene</topic><topic>Regression models</topic><topic>Soil compaction</topic><topic>Soil lime</topic><topic>Soil mechanics</topic><topic>Soil moisture</topic><topic>Soil stabilization</topic><topic>Technical Papers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hadi Sahlabadi, Seyed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayat, Meysam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mousivand, Mohsen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saadat, Mohsen</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of materials in civil engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hadi Sahlabadi, Seyed</au><au>Bayat, Meysam</au><au>Mousivand, Mohsen</au><au>Saadat, Mohsen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Freeze–Thaw Durability of Cement-Stabilized Soil Reinforced with Polypropylene/Basalt Fibers</atitle><jtitle>Journal of materials in civil engineering</jtitle><date>2021-09-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>9</issue><issn>0899-1561</issn><eissn>1943-5533</eissn><abstract>AbstractMany studies have been carried out on the influence of freeze–thaw cycles on the mechanical behavior of cement- or lime-stabilized soils. However, very limited studies have considered the effects of freeze–thaw cycles on cement-stabilized soil reinforced with fibers. The main objective of this study is to determine the effects of polypropylene fiber (PPF) and basalt fiber (BF) content (0%, 0.5%, 1%, 2%, and 5%), cement content (0%, 3%, and 9%), number of freeze–thaw cycles (0, 2, 4, 8, and 10), and initial moisture content on the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of clay soil. The study reveals that adding cement, PPF, or BF to soil causes a remarkable increase in strength, where the strength of the PPF-reinforced specimens is significantly more than that of BF-reinforced ones. The UCS values of the specimens compacted at optimum moisture content (OMC) are almost more than those that were prepared at a molding moisture content of 0.8 OMC or 1.2 OMC. The strength of specimens increases with increases in cement content and curing time. However, the axial strain at failure for cement-stabilized specimens decreased with increasing cement content or curing time. Furthermore, it is concluded that the increase in the UCS of combined PPF or BF with cement inclusion is more than that caused by each fiber without cement. A regression model is developed to predict the UCS in terms of four effective agents for each case of stabilization by BF or PPF. Results indicate a satisfactory performance of the model where the Pearson correlation coefficient above 0.95 for UCS prediction is obtained.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>American Society of Civil Engineers</pub><doi>10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003905</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5525-5199</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0899-1561
ispartof Journal of materials in civil engineering, 2021-09, Vol.33 (9)
issn 0899-1561
1943-5533
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2548337844
source American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014
subjects Axial strain
Basalt
Building materials
Cement
Cement reinforcements
Civil engineering
Clay soils
Compressive strength
Correlation coefficients
Curing
Lime soil stabilization
Mechanical properties
Moisture content
Polypropylene
Regression models
Soil compaction
Soil lime
Soil mechanics
Soil moisture
Soil stabilization
Technical Papers
title Freeze–Thaw Durability of Cement-Stabilized Soil Reinforced with Polypropylene/Basalt Fibers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T22%3A44%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Freeze%E2%80%93Thaw%20Durability%20of%20Cement-Stabilized%20Soil%20Reinforced%20with%20Polypropylene/Basalt%20Fibers&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20materials%20in%20civil%20engineering&rft.au=Hadi%20Sahlabadi,%20Seyed&rft.date=2021-09-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=9&rft.issn=0899-1561&rft.eissn=1943-5533&rft_id=info:doi/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003905&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2548337844%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2548337844&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true