Large predators can mitigate nutrient losses associated with off‐site removal of animals from a wildlife reserve

Animals concentrate key nutrients in their bodies. In fenced wildlife reserves where nutrient input and/or retention is low, the off‐site removal of animals may constitute a significant loss of nutrients for the ecosystem. Here we add wildlife capture and removal into the phosphorus (P) and calcium...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of applied ecology 2021-07, Vol.58 (7), p.1360-1369
Hauptverfasser: Abraham, Andrew J., Webster, Andrea B., Prys‐Jones, Tomos O., Roux, Elizabeth, Smith, Dylan, McFayden, Duncan, Jager, Pieter C., Clauss, Marcus, Doughty, Christopher E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1369
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1360
container_title The Journal of applied ecology
container_volume 58
creator Abraham, Andrew J.
Webster, Andrea B.
Prys‐Jones, Tomos O.
Roux, Elizabeth
Smith, Dylan
McFayden, Duncan
Jager, Pieter C.
Clauss, Marcus
Doughty, Christopher E.
description Animals concentrate key nutrients in their bodies. In fenced wildlife reserves where nutrient input and/or retention is low, the off‐site removal of animals may constitute a significant loss of nutrients for the ecosystem. Here we add wildlife capture and removal into the phosphorus (P) and calcium (Ca) budget for a 121,700 ha fenced game reserve located in the southern Kalahari. We then use faecal P concentrations from 11 mammal herbivores >10 kg as an indicator of potential nutrient stress in this system to investigate whether the implications of nutrient loss via off‐site wildlife removal may be cause for concern. Finally, we assess the role of natural predation as a mechanism to minimise the need for wildlife removal and concomitant nutrient loss. During the period 2009–2018, mean loss of P and Ca via wildlife removal was 2.9 and 6.2 kg km−2 year−1, respectively. This compares to 1.0 and 2.1 kg km−2 year−1 of P and Ca added via the provision of mineral licks. If it is assumed that natural fluxes of these elements are in steady state, then anthropogenic activities have resulted in a net deficit of 18.5 kg/km2 of P and 40.6 kg/km2 of Ca over the decade. We found that dry season herbivore faecal P concentrations are close to or below a widely cited minimum threshold of 2,000 mg/kg, below which most vertebrates begin suffering growth and reproductive issues. Large animals were more likely to be under this threshold. Prolonged continuation of off‐site wildlife removal may result in nutrient losses that can lead to long‐term ecological degradation. Natural predation levels were, however, found sufficient to mitigate the need for wildlife removal and present a management strategy whereby herbivore populations can be regulated without a loss of nutrients. Synthesis and applications. We find that the capture and permanent removal of large‐bodied animals from wildlife reserves can be a significant cause of nutrient loss. Over time, in sites where nutrient input and/or retention is low, this may contribute to nutritional stress for remaining resident animals. Where possible, holistic management strategies that promote the retention of animals and carcasses within the reserve—such as the reintroduction of large carnivores—should be preferred. Isicatshulwa Izilwanyana ziqokelela ndawonye izondlo ezingundoqo emizimbeni yazo. Kwithanga elibiyelweyo lokugcina izilwanyana zasendle apho igalelo lezondlo okanye ukugcinwa kwezondlo kuphantsi, ukususwa ngaphandle kwethanga
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1365-2664.13878
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2547828840</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2547828840</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3568-5582792e65340bdb9c70ab899d4cf16177db355c0e1805699226c7bcd253760d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkLlOAzEQhi0EEiFQ01qi3sTH-ipRFC5FggJqy2t7w0Z7BHsTlI5H4Bl5ErwsomWakWa-f44fgEuMZjjFHFPOMsJ5PsNUCnkEJn-VYzBBiOBMKoRPwVmMG4SQYpROQFiZsPZwG7wzfRcitKaFTdVXa9N72O76UPm2h3UXo4_QxNjZKnUcfK_6V9iV5dfHZ6wSGnzT7U2dStC0VWPqCMvQNdAksnZ1VQ5I9GHvz8FJmdr-4jdPwcvN8nlxl60eb-8X16vMUsZlxpgkQhHPGc1R4QplBTKFVMrltsQcC-EKyphFHkvEuFKEcCsK6wijgiNHp-BqnLsN3dvOx15vul1o00pNWC4kkTJHiZqPlA3px-BLvQ3p_HDQGOnBWD3YqAcb9Y-xScFGRXrMH_7D9cPTctR9A-ele-M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2547828840</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Large predators can mitigate nutrient losses associated with off‐site removal of animals from a wildlife reserve</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Abraham, Andrew J. ; Webster, Andrea B. ; Prys‐Jones, Tomos O. ; Roux, Elizabeth ; Smith, Dylan ; McFayden, Duncan ; Jager, Pieter C. ; Clauss, Marcus ; Doughty, Christopher E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Abraham, Andrew J. ; Webster, Andrea B. ; Prys‐Jones, Tomos O. ; Roux, Elizabeth ; Smith, Dylan ; McFayden, Duncan ; Jager, Pieter C. ; Clauss, Marcus ; Doughty, Christopher E.</creatorcontrib><description>Animals concentrate key nutrients in their bodies. In fenced wildlife reserves where nutrient input and/or retention is low, the off‐site removal of animals may constitute a significant loss of nutrients for the ecosystem. Here we add wildlife capture and removal into the phosphorus (P) and calcium (Ca) budget for a 121,700 ha fenced game reserve located in the southern Kalahari. We then use faecal P concentrations from 11 mammal herbivores &gt;10 kg as an indicator of potential nutrient stress in this system to investigate whether the implications of nutrient loss via off‐site wildlife removal may be cause for concern. Finally, we assess the role of natural predation as a mechanism to minimise the need for wildlife removal and concomitant nutrient loss. During the period 2009–2018, mean loss of P and Ca via wildlife removal was 2.9 and 6.2 kg km−2 year−1, respectively. This compares to 1.0 and 2.1 kg km−2 year−1 of P and Ca added via the provision of mineral licks. If it is assumed that natural fluxes of these elements are in steady state, then anthropogenic activities have resulted in a net deficit of 18.5 kg/km2 of P and 40.6 kg/km2 of Ca over the decade. We found that dry season herbivore faecal P concentrations are close to or below a widely cited minimum threshold of 2,000 mg/kg, below which most vertebrates begin suffering growth and reproductive issues. Large animals were more likely to be under this threshold. Prolonged continuation of off‐site wildlife removal may result in nutrient losses that can lead to long‐term ecological degradation. Natural predation levels were, however, found sufficient to mitigate the need for wildlife removal and present a management strategy whereby herbivore populations can be regulated without a loss of nutrients. Synthesis and applications. We find that the capture and permanent removal of large‐bodied animals from wildlife reserves can be a significant cause of nutrient loss. Over time, in sites where nutrient input and/or retention is low, this may contribute to nutritional stress for remaining resident animals. Where possible, holistic management strategies that promote the retention of animals and carcasses within the reserve—such as the reintroduction of large carnivores—should be preferred. Isicatshulwa Izilwanyana ziqokelela ndawonye izondlo ezingundoqo emizimbeni yazo. Kwithanga elibiyelweyo lokugcina izilwanyana zasendle apho igalelo lezondlo okanye ukugcinwa kwezondlo kuphantsi, ukususwa ngaphandle kwethanga kwezilwanyana kusenokwenza ilahleko ebalulekileyo yezondlo kwindalo. Apha sidibanisa ukubanjwa nokususwa kwezilwanyana zasendle kumyinge we‐ phosphorus (P) kunye necalcium (Ca) kwithanga lwezilwanyana zasendle elinesiza esiyi 121,700 ha elifumaneka emazantsi eKalahari. Sisebenzise ke iphosphorus efumaneka ebulongweni bezilwanyana ezanyisayo ezilishumi elinanye, ezibunzima bungaphezulu kweshumi lwekilograms njengesalathisi soxinizelelo lwezondlo olunokubakho koluhlobo lwethanga xa besiphanda ukuba ukuchaphazeleka koxinizelelo lwezondlo ngenxa yokususwa ngaphandle kwethanga kwezilwanyana kunokuba ngunobangela wenkxalabo. Okokugqibela, sivavanya indima yokutyiwa kwezilwanyana zezinye njengesixhobo esingasetyenziswa ukunciphisa isidingo sokususwa kwezilwanyana zasendle kumathanga wazo ehambelana kunye nokulahleka kwezondlo. Ngexesha lika 2009 ukuya kunyaka ka 2018, ilahleko yephosphorus necalcium ngenxa yokususwa kwezilwanyana zasendle kumathanga wazo ibingumlinganiselo ongangesithathu (2.9 kg km−2 year−1) kwiphosphorus nesithandathu (6.2 kg km−2 year−1) kwicalcium. Oku kuthelekiswa kumlinganiselo omnye (1.0 kg km−2 year−1) wephosphorus kunye nemibini (2.1 kg km−2 year−1) yecalcium ezongezwe lubonelelo lweemitha zezimbiwa. Ukuba kucingelwa ngaba ukubhobhoza ngokwendalo kwezizinto kukwimeko ezinzileyo, ithetha ukuthi lonto imisebenzi eyenziwa ngabantu ephazamisa indalo ibangele intsilelo eninzi, engumlinganiselo weshumi elinethoba (18.5 kg/km2) lwephosphorus namashumi amane ananye ecalcium (40. 6 kg/km2) kwiminyaka elishumi. SIfumanise ukuba iphosphorus kubulongwe bezilwanyana ezanyisayo obuqokelelwe ngexesha lonyaka ekome ngalo isondele okanye ingezantsi kumyinge obekiweyo ngokubanzi wamawaka amabini (2,000 mg/kg), myinge lowo ongezantsi othi wenze uninzi lwezilwanyana ezinomqolo ziqale ukukhula ngokubandezeleka kuchaphazeleke nemicimbi yokuzala. Izilwanyana ezinkulu bekusenzeka ukuba zibengezantsi kwalomyinge. Ukuqhubeka ixesha elide kokususwa kwezilwanyana zasendle kumathanga wazo kunobangela ilahleko yezondlo engakhokelela ekonakaleni kwendalo ixesha elide. Nangona kunjalo amanqanaba okutyiwa kwezilwanyana zezinye afunyenwe onele ukunciphisa isidingo sokususwa kwezilwanyana zasendle kumathanga wazo kwaye ivelisa iqhinga lolawulo apho izilwanyana zinokulawulwa ngaphandle kokulahleka kwezondlo. Indibanisela noncedo: Sifumanisa ukuba ukubanjwa nokususwa ngokusisigxina kwezilwanyana zasendle kumathanga wazo kunokuba ngunobangela wokulahleka kwezondlo. Emva kwexesha elide, emathangeni apho igalelo okanye ukugcinwa kwezondlo kuphantsi kungenza uxinizelelo lwezondlo kwizilwanyana ezishiyekileyo. Apho kunokwenzeka, izicwangciso zolawulo olubanzi olukhuthaza ukugcinwa kwezilwanyana kunye nezidumbu ngaphakathi emathangeni ‐ njengokungeniswa kwakhona kwezilwanyana ezitya ezinye‐ kokona kufanele kukhethwe. We find that the capture and permanent removal of large‐bodied animals from wildlife reserves can be a significant cause of nutrient loss. Over time, in sites where nutrient input and/or retention is low, this may contribute to nutritional stress for remaining resident animals. Where possible, holistic management strategies that promote the retention of animals and carcasses within the reserve—such as the reintroduction of large carnivores—should be preferred.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8901</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2664</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.13878</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Anthropogenic factors ; biogeochemistry ; Calcium ; carnivore ; Carnivores ; Dry season ; Ecological effects ; Environmental degradation ; Fluxes ; Game preserves ; Herbivores ; Hydroxyapatite ; Mineral licks ; nutrient cycles ; Nutrient deficiency ; Nutrient loss ; Nutrient removal ; Nutrient reserves ; Nutrient retention ; Nutrients ; Phosphorus ; Phosphorus removal ; Predation ; Predators ; Reintroduction ; Retention ; skeleton ; Vertebrates ; Wildlife ; Wildlife management ; Wildlife refuges</subject><ispartof>The Journal of applied ecology, 2021-07, Vol.58 (7), p.1360-1369</ispartof><rights>2021 British Ecological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3568-5582792e65340bdb9c70ab899d4cf16177db355c0e1805699226c7bcd253760d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3568-5582792e65340bdb9c70ab899d4cf16177db355c0e1805699226c7bcd253760d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7136-4421 ; 0000-0001-8468-8284 ; 0000-0002-7361-9002 ; 0000-0001-6472-302X ; 0000-0003-3985-7960 ; 0000-0001-8625-8851</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1365-2664.13878$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1365-2664.13878$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abraham, Andrew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Webster, Andrea B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prys‐Jones, Tomos O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roux, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Dylan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McFayden, Duncan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jager, Pieter C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clauss, Marcus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doughty, Christopher E.</creatorcontrib><title>Large predators can mitigate nutrient losses associated with off‐site removal of animals from a wildlife reserve</title><title>The Journal of applied ecology</title><description>Animals concentrate key nutrients in their bodies. In fenced wildlife reserves where nutrient input and/or retention is low, the off‐site removal of animals may constitute a significant loss of nutrients for the ecosystem. Here we add wildlife capture and removal into the phosphorus (P) and calcium (Ca) budget for a 121,700 ha fenced game reserve located in the southern Kalahari. We then use faecal P concentrations from 11 mammal herbivores &gt;10 kg as an indicator of potential nutrient stress in this system to investigate whether the implications of nutrient loss via off‐site wildlife removal may be cause for concern. Finally, we assess the role of natural predation as a mechanism to minimise the need for wildlife removal and concomitant nutrient loss. During the period 2009–2018, mean loss of P and Ca via wildlife removal was 2.9 and 6.2 kg km−2 year−1, respectively. This compares to 1.0 and 2.1 kg km−2 year−1 of P and Ca added via the provision of mineral licks. If it is assumed that natural fluxes of these elements are in steady state, then anthropogenic activities have resulted in a net deficit of 18.5 kg/km2 of P and 40.6 kg/km2 of Ca over the decade. We found that dry season herbivore faecal P concentrations are close to or below a widely cited minimum threshold of 2,000 mg/kg, below which most vertebrates begin suffering growth and reproductive issues. Large animals were more likely to be under this threshold. Prolonged continuation of off‐site wildlife removal may result in nutrient losses that can lead to long‐term ecological degradation. Natural predation levels were, however, found sufficient to mitigate the need for wildlife removal and present a management strategy whereby herbivore populations can be regulated without a loss of nutrients. Synthesis and applications. We find that the capture and permanent removal of large‐bodied animals from wildlife reserves can be a significant cause of nutrient loss. Over time, in sites where nutrient input and/or retention is low, this may contribute to nutritional stress for remaining resident animals. Where possible, holistic management strategies that promote the retention of animals and carcasses within the reserve—such as the reintroduction of large carnivores—should be preferred. Isicatshulwa Izilwanyana ziqokelela ndawonye izondlo ezingundoqo emizimbeni yazo. Kwithanga elibiyelweyo lokugcina izilwanyana zasendle apho igalelo lezondlo okanye ukugcinwa kwezondlo kuphantsi, ukususwa ngaphandle kwethanga kwezilwanyana kusenokwenza ilahleko ebalulekileyo yezondlo kwindalo. Apha sidibanisa ukubanjwa nokususwa kwezilwanyana zasendle kumyinge we‐ phosphorus (P) kunye necalcium (Ca) kwithanga lwezilwanyana zasendle elinesiza esiyi 121,700 ha elifumaneka emazantsi eKalahari. Sisebenzise ke iphosphorus efumaneka ebulongweni bezilwanyana ezanyisayo ezilishumi elinanye, ezibunzima bungaphezulu kweshumi lwekilograms njengesalathisi soxinizelelo lwezondlo olunokubakho koluhlobo lwethanga xa besiphanda ukuba ukuchaphazeleka koxinizelelo lwezondlo ngenxa yokususwa ngaphandle kwethanga kwezilwanyana kunokuba ngunobangela wenkxalabo. Okokugqibela, sivavanya indima yokutyiwa kwezilwanyana zezinye njengesixhobo esingasetyenziswa ukunciphisa isidingo sokususwa kwezilwanyana zasendle kumathanga wazo ehambelana kunye nokulahleka kwezondlo. Ngexesha lika 2009 ukuya kunyaka ka 2018, ilahleko yephosphorus necalcium ngenxa yokususwa kwezilwanyana zasendle kumathanga wazo ibingumlinganiselo ongangesithathu (2.9 kg km−2 year−1) kwiphosphorus nesithandathu (6.2 kg km−2 year−1) kwicalcium. Oku kuthelekiswa kumlinganiselo omnye (1.0 kg km−2 year−1) wephosphorus kunye nemibini (2.1 kg km−2 year−1) yecalcium ezongezwe lubonelelo lweemitha zezimbiwa. Ukuba kucingelwa ngaba ukubhobhoza ngokwendalo kwezizinto kukwimeko ezinzileyo, ithetha ukuthi lonto imisebenzi eyenziwa ngabantu ephazamisa indalo ibangele intsilelo eninzi, engumlinganiselo weshumi elinethoba (18.5 kg/km2) lwephosphorus namashumi amane ananye ecalcium (40. 6 kg/km2) kwiminyaka elishumi. SIfumanise ukuba iphosphorus kubulongwe bezilwanyana ezanyisayo obuqokelelwe ngexesha lonyaka ekome ngalo isondele okanye ingezantsi kumyinge obekiweyo ngokubanzi wamawaka amabini (2,000 mg/kg), myinge lowo ongezantsi othi wenze uninzi lwezilwanyana ezinomqolo ziqale ukukhula ngokubandezeleka kuchaphazeleke nemicimbi yokuzala. Izilwanyana ezinkulu bekusenzeka ukuba zibengezantsi kwalomyinge. Ukuqhubeka ixesha elide kokususwa kwezilwanyana zasendle kumathanga wazo kunobangela ilahleko yezondlo engakhokelela ekonakaleni kwendalo ixesha elide. Nangona kunjalo amanqanaba okutyiwa kwezilwanyana zezinye afunyenwe onele ukunciphisa isidingo sokususwa kwezilwanyana zasendle kumathanga wazo kwaye ivelisa iqhinga lolawulo apho izilwanyana zinokulawulwa ngaphandle kokulahleka kwezondlo. Indibanisela noncedo: Sifumanisa ukuba ukubanjwa nokususwa ngokusisigxina kwezilwanyana zasendle kumathanga wazo kunokuba ngunobangela wokulahleka kwezondlo. Emva kwexesha elide, emathangeni apho igalelo okanye ukugcinwa kwezondlo kuphantsi kungenza uxinizelelo lwezondlo kwizilwanyana ezishiyekileyo. Apho kunokwenzeka, izicwangciso zolawulo olubanzi olukhuthaza ukugcinwa kwezilwanyana kunye nezidumbu ngaphakathi emathangeni ‐ njengokungeniswa kwakhona kwezilwanyana ezitya ezinye‐ kokona kufanele kukhethwe. We find that the capture and permanent removal of large‐bodied animals from wildlife reserves can be a significant cause of nutrient loss. Over time, in sites where nutrient input and/or retention is low, this may contribute to nutritional stress for remaining resident animals. Where possible, holistic management strategies that promote the retention of animals and carcasses within the reserve—such as the reintroduction of large carnivores—should be preferred.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>biogeochemistry</subject><subject>Calcium</subject><subject>carnivore</subject><subject>Carnivores</subject><subject>Dry season</subject><subject>Ecological effects</subject><subject>Environmental degradation</subject><subject>Fluxes</subject><subject>Game preserves</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Hydroxyapatite</subject><subject>Mineral licks</subject><subject>nutrient cycles</subject><subject>Nutrient deficiency</subject><subject>Nutrient loss</subject><subject>Nutrient removal</subject><subject>Nutrient reserves</subject><subject>Nutrient retention</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Phosphorus</subject><subject>Phosphorus removal</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Reintroduction</subject><subject>Retention</subject><subject>skeleton</subject><subject>Vertebrates</subject><subject>Wildlife</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><subject>Wildlife refuges</subject><issn>0021-8901</issn><issn>1365-2664</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkLlOAzEQhi0EEiFQ01qi3sTH-ipRFC5FggJqy2t7w0Z7BHsTlI5H4Bl5ErwsomWakWa-f44fgEuMZjjFHFPOMsJ5PsNUCnkEJn-VYzBBiOBMKoRPwVmMG4SQYpROQFiZsPZwG7wzfRcitKaFTdVXa9N72O76UPm2h3UXo4_QxNjZKnUcfK_6V9iV5dfHZ6wSGnzT7U2dStC0VWPqCMvQNdAksnZ1VQ5I9GHvz8FJmdr-4jdPwcvN8nlxl60eb-8X16vMUsZlxpgkQhHPGc1R4QplBTKFVMrltsQcC-EKyphFHkvEuFKEcCsK6wijgiNHp-BqnLsN3dvOx15vul1o00pNWC4kkTJHiZqPlA3px-BLvQ3p_HDQGOnBWD3YqAcb9Y-xScFGRXrMH_7D9cPTctR9A-ele-M</recordid><startdate>202107</startdate><enddate>202107</enddate><creator>Abraham, Andrew J.</creator><creator>Webster, Andrea B.</creator><creator>Prys‐Jones, Tomos O.</creator><creator>Roux, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Smith, Dylan</creator><creator>McFayden, Duncan</creator><creator>Jager, Pieter C.</creator><creator>Clauss, Marcus</creator><creator>Doughty, Christopher E.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7136-4421</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8468-8284</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7361-9002</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6472-302X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3985-7960</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8625-8851</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202107</creationdate><title>Large predators can mitigate nutrient losses associated with off‐site removal of animals from a wildlife reserve</title><author>Abraham, Andrew J. ; Webster, Andrea B. ; Prys‐Jones, Tomos O. ; Roux, Elizabeth ; Smith, Dylan ; McFayden, Duncan ; Jager, Pieter C. ; Clauss, Marcus ; Doughty, Christopher E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3568-5582792e65340bdb9c70ab899d4cf16177db355c0e1805699226c7bcd253760d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>biogeochemistry</topic><topic>Calcium</topic><topic>carnivore</topic><topic>Carnivores</topic><topic>Dry season</topic><topic>Ecological effects</topic><topic>Environmental degradation</topic><topic>Fluxes</topic><topic>Game preserves</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Hydroxyapatite</topic><topic>Mineral licks</topic><topic>nutrient cycles</topic><topic>Nutrient deficiency</topic><topic>Nutrient loss</topic><topic>Nutrient removal</topic><topic>Nutrient reserves</topic><topic>Nutrient retention</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Phosphorus</topic><topic>Phosphorus removal</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Reintroduction</topic><topic>Retention</topic><topic>skeleton</topic><topic>Vertebrates</topic><topic>Wildlife</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><topic>Wildlife refuges</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abraham, Andrew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Webster, Andrea B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prys‐Jones, Tomos O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roux, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Dylan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McFayden, Duncan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jager, Pieter C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clauss, Marcus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doughty, Christopher E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of applied ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abraham, Andrew J.</au><au>Webster, Andrea B.</au><au>Prys‐Jones, Tomos O.</au><au>Roux, Elizabeth</au><au>Smith, Dylan</au><au>McFayden, Duncan</au><au>Jager, Pieter C.</au><au>Clauss, Marcus</au><au>Doughty, Christopher E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Large predators can mitigate nutrient losses associated with off‐site removal of animals from a wildlife reserve</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of applied ecology</jtitle><date>2021-07</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1360</spage><epage>1369</epage><pages>1360-1369</pages><issn>0021-8901</issn><eissn>1365-2664</eissn><abstract>Animals concentrate key nutrients in their bodies. In fenced wildlife reserves where nutrient input and/or retention is low, the off‐site removal of animals may constitute a significant loss of nutrients for the ecosystem. Here we add wildlife capture and removal into the phosphorus (P) and calcium (Ca) budget for a 121,700 ha fenced game reserve located in the southern Kalahari. We then use faecal P concentrations from 11 mammal herbivores &gt;10 kg as an indicator of potential nutrient stress in this system to investigate whether the implications of nutrient loss via off‐site wildlife removal may be cause for concern. Finally, we assess the role of natural predation as a mechanism to minimise the need for wildlife removal and concomitant nutrient loss. During the period 2009–2018, mean loss of P and Ca via wildlife removal was 2.9 and 6.2 kg km−2 year−1, respectively. This compares to 1.0 and 2.1 kg km−2 year−1 of P and Ca added via the provision of mineral licks. If it is assumed that natural fluxes of these elements are in steady state, then anthropogenic activities have resulted in a net deficit of 18.5 kg/km2 of P and 40.6 kg/km2 of Ca over the decade. We found that dry season herbivore faecal P concentrations are close to or below a widely cited minimum threshold of 2,000 mg/kg, below which most vertebrates begin suffering growth and reproductive issues. Large animals were more likely to be under this threshold. Prolonged continuation of off‐site wildlife removal may result in nutrient losses that can lead to long‐term ecological degradation. Natural predation levels were, however, found sufficient to mitigate the need for wildlife removal and present a management strategy whereby herbivore populations can be regulated without a loss of nutrients. Synthesis and applications. We find that the capture and permanent removal of large‐bodied animals from wildlife reserves can be a significant cause of nutrient loss. Over time, in sites where nutrient input and/or retention is low, this may contribute to nutritional stress for remaining resident animals. Where possible, holistic management strategies that promote the retention of animals and carcasses within the reserve—such as the reintroduction of large carnivores—should be preferred. Isicatshulwa Izilwanyana ziqokelela ndawonye izondlo ezingundoqo emizimbeni yazo. Kwithanga elibiyelweyo lokugcina izilwanyana zasendle apho igalelo lezondlo okanye ukugcinwa kwezondlo kuphantsi, ukususwa ngaphandle kwethanga kwezilwanyana kusenokwenza ilahleko ebalulekileyo yezondlo kwindalo. Apha sidibanisa ukubanjwa nokususwa kwezilwanyana zasendle kumyinge we‐ phosphorus (P) kunye necalcium (Ca) kwithanga lwezilwanyana zasendle elinesiza esiyi 121,700 ha elifumaneka emazantsi eKalahari. Sisebenzise ke iphosphorus efumaneka ebulongweni bezilwanyana ezanyisayo ezilishumi elinanye, ezibunzima bungaphezulu kweshumi lwekilograms njengesalathisi soxinizelelo lwezondlo olunokubakho koluhlobo lwethanga xa besiphanda ukuba ukuchaphazeleka koxinizelelo lwezondlo ngenxa yokususwa ngaphandle kwethanga kwezilwanyana kunokuba ngunobangela wenkxalabo. Okokugqibela, sivavanya indima yokutyiwa kwezilwanyana zezinye njengesixhobo esingasetyenziswa ukunciphisa isidingo sokususwa kwezilwanyana zasendle kumathanga wazo ehambelana kunye nokulahleka kwezondlo. Ngexesha lika 2009 ukuya kunyaka ka 2018, ilahleko yephosphorus necalcium ngenxa yokususwa kwezilwanyana zasendle kumathanga wazo ibingumlinganiselo ongangesithathu (2.9 kg km−2 year−1) kwiphosphorus nesithandathu (6.2 kg km−2 year−1) kwicalcium. Oku kuthelekiswa kumlinganiselo omnye (1.0 kg km−2 year−1) wephosphorus kunye nemibini (2.1 kg km−2 year−1) yecalcium ezongezwe lubonelelo lweemitha zezimbiwa. Ukuba kucingelwa ngaba ukubhobhoza ngokwendalo kwezizinto kukwimeko ezinzileyo, ithetha ukuthi lonto imisebenzi eyenziwa ngabantu ephazamisa indalo ibangele intsilelo eninzi, engumlinganiselo weshumi elinethoba (18.5 kg/km2) lwephosphorus namashumi amane ananye ecalcium (40. 6 kg/km2) kwiminyaka elishumi. SIfumanise ukuba iphosphorus kubulongwe bezilwanyana ezanyisayo obuqokelelwe ngexesha lonyaka ekome ngalo isondele okanye ingezantsi kumyinge obekiweyo ngokubanzi wamawaka amabini (2,000 mg/kg), myinge lowo ongezantsi othi wenze uninzi lwezilwanyana ezinomqolo ziqale ukukhula ngokubandezeleka kuchaphazeleke nemicimbi yokuzala. Izilwanyana ezinkulu bekusenzeka ukuba zibengezantsi kwalomyinge. Ukuqhubeka ixesha elide kokususwa kwezilwanyana zasendle kumathanga wazo kunobangela ilahleko yezondlo engakhokelela ekonakaleni kwendalo ixesha elide. Nangona kunjalo amanqanaba okutyiwa kwezilwanyana zezinye afunyenwe onele ukunciphisa isidingo sokususwa kwezilwanyana zasendle kumathanga wazo kwaye ivelisa iqhinga lolawulo apho izilwanyana zinokulawulwa ngaphandle kokulahleka kwezondlo. Indibanisela noncedo: Sifumanisa ukuba ukubanjwa nokususwa ngokusisigxina kwezilwanyana zasendle kumathanga wazo kunokuba ngunobangela wokulahleka kwezondlo. Emva kwexesha elide, emathangeni apho igalelo okanye ukugcinwa kwezondlo kuphantsi kungenza uxinizelelo lwezondlo kwizilwanyana ezishiyekileyo. Apho kunokwenzeka, izicwangciso zolawulo olubanzi olukhuthaza ukugcinwa kwezilwanyana kunye nezidumbu ngaphakathi emathangeni ‐ njengokungeniswa kwakhona kwezilwanyana ezitya ezinye‐ kokona kufanele kukhethwe. We find that the capture and permanent removal of large‐bodied animals from wildlife reserves can be a significant cause of nutrient loss. Over time, in sites where nutrient input and/or retention is low, this may contribute to nutritional stress for remaining resident animals. Where possible, holistic management strategies that promote the retention of animals and carcasses within the reserve—such as the reintroduction of large carnivores—should be preferred.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/1365-2664.13878</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7136-4421</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8468-8284</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7361-9002</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6472-302X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3985-7960</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8625-8851</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8901
ispartof The Journal of applied ecology, 2021-07, Vol.58 (7), p.1360-1369
issn 0021-8901
1365-2664
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2547828840
source Wiley Free Content; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Animals
Anthropogenic factors
biogeochemistry
Calcium
carnivore
Carnivores
Dry season
Ecological effects
Environmental degradation
Fluxes
Game preserves
Herbivores
Hydroxyapatite
Mineral licks
nutrient cycles
Nutrient deficiency
Nutrient loss
Nutrient removal
Nutrient reserves
Nutrient retention
Nutrients
Phosphorus
Phosphorus removal
Predation
Predators
Reintroduction
Retention
skeleton
Vertebrates
Wildlife
Wildlife management
Wildlife refuges
title Large predators can mitigate nutrient losses associated with off‐site removal of animals from a wildlife reserve
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T18%3A36%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Large%20predators%20can%20mitigate%20nutrient%20losses%20associated%20with%20off%E2%80%90site%20removal%20of%20animals%20from%20a%20wildlife%20reserve&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20applied%20ecology&rft.au=Abraham,%20Andrew%20J.&rft.date=2021-07&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1360&rft.epage=1369&rft.pages=1360-1369&rft.issn=0021-8901&rft.eissn=1365-2664&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1365-2664.13878&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2547828840%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2547828840&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true