An Ethical Assessment on Patients Involuntarily Admitted to the Psychiatric Ward of a University Hospital

Objective: Involuntary hospitalizations are commonly applied in the treatment of psychiatric disorders. These practices have been controversial since they may pose morally questionable situations. This study aimed to reveal the clinical characteristics of patients who were involuntarily admitted to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Erciyes Medical Journal 2021-09, Vol.43 (3), p.261
1. Verfasser: Çolak, Burçin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page 261
container_title Erciyes Medical Journal
container_volume 43
creator Çolak, Burçin
description Objective: Involuntary hospitalizations are commonly applied in the treatment of psychiatric disorders. These practices have been controversial since they may pose morally questionable situations. This study aimed to reveal the clinical characteristics of patients who were involuntarily admitted to the psychiatry clinic as well as the reasons behind the involuntary admission decision and to examine the findings from an ethical point of view. Materials and Methods: Socio-demographic and clinical records of patients who had been involuntarily admitted to a university hospital between January-2013 and January-2019 were collected retrospectively. These data were compared with the variables of the voluntarily admitted patients who were matched with the involuntarily admitted study group in terms of admission year, sex, and age. Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of socio-demographic characteristics. The frequency of involuntary hospitalization was found to be higher in patients with psychotic disorders. These patients had a longer duration of hospitalization and were given long-acting antipsychotics more frequently. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of risk of doing harm to oneself/others and treatment needs. Conclusion: Involuntary hospitalizations would contradict further with the principle of respect for patient’s autonomy in comparison with those done due to the risk of doing harm to oneself/others. Prolonged hospitalization and long-acting drug choices in the absence of the risk of giving harm to oneself/others may contradict basic ethical principles, such as the right to choose one’s treatment. Caution should be taken against potential ethical issues while considering involuntary hospitalization.
doi_str_mv 10.14744/etd.2020.00820
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2546648436</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2546648436</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c261t-483ba66c79a873a03eabcdaee04c974c99247ab766ed2fb2aef6ecef181543753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkL1rwzAUxEVpoSHN3FXQ2Ym-LNtjCGkTCDRDQ0fxLD8TFcdKJSXg_75u2uFxNxx3vB8hz5zNuSqUWmBq5oIJNmesFOyOTERVskzwXN-PnqsqE0IVj2QWo6tZzgrJhZYT4pY9Xaejs9DRZYwY4wn7RH1P95DcaCPd9lffXfoEwXUDXTYnlxI2NHmajkj3cbBHByk4Sz8hNNS3FOihd1cM0aWBbnw8uwTdE3looYs4-9cpObyuP1abbPf-tl0td5kVmqdMlbIGrW1RQVlIYBKhtg0gMmWrYrxq_APqQmtsRFsLwFajxZaXPFeyyOWUvPz1noP_vmBM5stfQj9OGpErrVWppB5Ti7-UDT7GgK05B3eCMBjOzA2pGZGaX6TmhlT-ADx8azA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2546648436</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An Ethical Assessment on Patients Involuntarily Admitted to the Psychiatric Ward of a University Hospital</title><source>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Çolak, Burçin</creator><creatorcontrib>Çolak, Burçin</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: Involuntary hospitalizations are commonly applied in the treatment of psychiatric disorders. These practices have been controversial since they may pose morally questionable situations. This study aimed to reveal the clinical characteristics of patients who were involuntarily admitted to the psychiatry clinic as well as the reasons behind the involuntary admission decision and to examine the findings from an ethical point of view. Materials and Methods: Socio-demographic and clinical records of patients who had been involuntarily admitted to a university hospital between January-2013 and January-2019 were collected retrospectively. These data were compared with the variables of the voluntarily admitted patients who were matched with the involuntarily admitted study group in terms of admission year, sex, and age. Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of socio-demographic characteristics. The frequency of involuntary hospitalization was found to be higher in patients with psychotic disorders. These patients had a longer duration of hospitalization and were given long-acting antipsychotics more frequently. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of risk of doing harm to oneself/others and treatment needs. Conclusion: Involuntary hospitalizations would contradict further with the principle of respect for patient’s autonomy in comparison with those done due to the risk of doing harm to oneself/others. Prolonged hospitalization and long-acting drug choices in the absence of the risk of giving harm to oneself/others may contradict basic ethical principles, such as the right to choose one’s treatment. Caution should be taken against potential ethical issues while considering involuntary hospitalization.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2149-2247</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2980-2156</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.14744/etd.2020.00820</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Istanbul: Kare Publishing</publisher><subject>Ethics ; Hospitalization ; Sociodemographics</subject><ispartof>Erciyes Medical Journal, 2021-09, Vol.43 (3), p.261</ispartof><rights>2021. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2546648436?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,21388,21389,27924,27925,33530,33744,43659,43805,64385,64389,72469</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Çolak, Burçin</creatorcontrib><title>An Ethical Assessment on Patients Involuntarily Admitted to the Psychiatric Ward of a University Hospital</title><title>Erciyes Medical Journal</title><description>Objective: Involuntary hospitalizations are commonly applied in the treatment of psychiatric disorders. These practices have been controversial since they may pose morally questionable situations. This study aimed to reveal the clinical characteristics of patients who were involuntarily admitted to the psychiatry clinic as well as the reasons behind the involuntary admission decision and to examine the findings from an ethical point of view. Materials and Methods: Socio-demographic and clinical records of patients who had been involuntarily admitted to a university hospital between January-2013 and January-2019 were collected retrospectively. These data were compared with the variables of the voluntarily admitted patients who were matched with the involuntarily admitted study group in terms of admission year, sex, and age. Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of socio-demographic characteristics. The frequency of involuntary hospitalization was found to be higher in patients with psychotic disorders. These patients had a longer duration of hospitalization and were given long-acting antipsychotics more frequently. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of risk of doing harm to oneself/others and treatment needs. Conclusion: Involuntary hospitalizations would contradict further with the principle of respect for patient’s autonomy in comparison with those done due to the risk of doing harm to oneself/others. Prolonged hospitalization and long-acting drug choices in the absence of the risk of giving harm to oneself/others may contradict basic ethical principles, such as the right to choose one’s treatment. Caution should be taken against potential ethical issues while considering involuntary hospitalization.</description><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Sociodemographics</subject><issn>2149-2247</issn><issn>2980-2156</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNotkL1rwzAUxEVpoSHN3FXQ2Ym-LNtjCGkTCDRDQ0fxLD8TFcdKJSXg_75u2uFxNxx3vB8hz5zNuSqUWmBq5oIJNmesFOyOTERVskzwXN-PnqsqE0IVj2QWo6tZzgrJhZYT4pY9Xaejs9DRZYwY4wn7RH1P95DcaCPd9lffXfoEwXUDXTYnlxI2NHmajkj3cbBHByk4Sz8hNNS3FOihd1cM0aWBbnw8uwTdE3looYs4-9cpObyuP1abbPf-tl0td5kVmqdMlbIGrW1RQVlIYBKhtg0gMmWrYrxq_APqQmtsRFsLwFajxZaXPFeyyOWUvPz1noP_vmBM5stfQj9OGpErrVWppB5Ti7-UDT7GgK05B3eCMBjOzA2pGZGaX6TmhlT-ADx8azA</recordid><startdate>20210901</startdate><enddate>20210901</enddate><creator>Çolak, Burçin</creator><general>Kare Publishing</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210901</creationdate><title>An Ethical Assessment on Patients Involuntarily Admitted to the Psychiatric Ward of a University Hospital</title><author>Çolak, Burçin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c261t-483ba66c79a873a03eabcdaee04c974c99247ab766ed2fb2aef6ecef181543753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Sociodemographics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Çolak, Burçin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Erciyes Medical Journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Çolak, Burçin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An Ethical Assessment on Patients Involuntarily Admitted to the Psychiatric Ward of a University Hospital</atitle><jtitle>Erciyes Medical Journal</jtitle><date>2021-09-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>261</spage><pages>261-</pages><issn>2149-2247</issn><eissn>2980-2156</eissn><abstract>Objective: Involuntary hospitalizations are commonly applied in the treatment of psychiatric disorders. These practices have been controversial since they may pose morally questionable situations. This study aimed to reveal the clinical characteristics of patients who were involuntarily admitted to the psychiatry clinic as well as the reasons behind the involuntary admission decision and to examine the findings from an ethical point of view. Materials and Methods: Socio-demographic and clinical records of patients who had been involuntarily admitted to a university hospital between January-2013 and January-2019 were collected retrospectively. These data were compared with the variables of the voluntarily admitted patients who were matched with the involuntarily admitted study group in terms of admission year, sex, and age. Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of socio-demographic characteristics. The frequency of involuntary hospitalization was found to be higher in patients with psychotic disorders. These patients had a longer duration of hospitalization and were given long-acting antipsychotics more frequently. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of risk of doing harm to oneself/others and treatment needs. Conclusion: Involuntary hospitalizations would contradict further with the principle of respect for patient’s autonomy in comparison with those done due to the risk of doing harm to oneself/others. Prolonged hospitalization and long-acting drug choices in the absence of the risk of giving harm to oneself/others may contradict basic ethical principles, such as the right to choose one’s treatment. Caution should be taken against potential ethical issues while considering involuntary hospitalization.</abstract><cop>Istanbul</cop><pub>Kare Publishing</pub><doi>10.14744/etd.2020.00820</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2149-2247
ispartof Erciyes Medical Journal, 2021-09, Vol.43 (3), p.261
issn 2149-2247
2980-2156
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2546648436
source ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition); DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; ProQuest Central
subjects Ethics
Hospitalization
Sociodemographics
title An Ethical Assessment on Patients Involuntarily Admitted to the Psychiatric Ward of a University Hospital
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T05%3A37%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20Ethical%20Assessment%20on%20Patients%20Involuntarily%20Admitted%20to%20the%20Psychiatric%20Ward%20of%20a%20University%20Hospital&rft.jtitle=Erciyes%20Medical%20Journal&rft.au=%C3%87olak,%20Bur%C3%A7in&rft.date=2021-09-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=261&rft.pages=261-&rft.issn=2149-2247&rft.eissn=2980-2156&rft_id=info:doi/10.14744/etd.2020.00820&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2546648436%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2546648436&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true