Evaluation of treatment effects in patients with endometrial cancer and POLE mutations: An individual patient data meta‐analysis
BACKGROUND Endometrial cancers (ECs) with somatic mutations in DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE) are characterized by unfavorable pathological features, which prompt adjuvant treatment. Paradoxically, women with POLE‐mutated EC have outstanding clinical outcomes, and this raises concerns of overtreatmen...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cancer 2021-07, Vol.127 (14), p.2409-2422 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2422 |
---|---|
container_issue | 14 |
container_start_page | 2409 |
container_title | Cancer |
container_volume | 127 |
creator | McAlpine, Jessica N. Chiu, Derek S. Nout, Remi A. Church, David N. Schmidt, Pascal Lam, Stephanie Leung, Samuel Bellone, Stefania Wong, Adele Brucker, Sara Y. Lee, Cheng Han Clarke, Blaise A. Huntsman, David G. Bernardini, Marcus Q. Ngeow, Joanne Santin, Alessandro D. Goodfellow, Paul Levine, Douglas A. Köbel, Martin Kommoss, Stefan Bosse, Tjalling Gilks, C. Blake Talhouk, Aline |
description | BACKGROUND
Endometrial cancers (ECs) with somatic mutations in DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE) are characterized by unfavorable pathological features, which prompt adjuvant treatment. Paradoxically, women with POLE‐mutated EC have outstanding clinical outcomes, and this raises concerns of overtreatment. The authors investigated whether favorable outcomes were independent of treatment.
METHODS
A PubMed search for POLE and endometrial was restricted to articles published between March 1, 2012, and March 1, 2018, that provided individual patient data (IPD), adjuvant treatment, and survival. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis (PRISMA) reporting guidelines for IPD, the authors used univariate and multivariate one‐stage meta‐analyses with mixed effects Cox models (random effects for study cohorts) to infer the associations of treatment, traditional prognostic factors, and outcome, which was defined as the time from first diagnosis to any adverse event (progression/recurrence or death from EC).
RESULTS
Three hundred fifty‐nine women with POLE‐mutated EC were identified; 294 (82%) had pathogenic mutations. Worse outcomes were demonstrated in patients with nonpathogenic POLE mutations (hazard ratio, 3.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.47‐7.58; log‐rank P < .01). Except for stage (P < .01), traditional prognosticators were not associated with progression/recurrence or death from disease. Adverse events were rare (11 progressions/recurrences and 3 disease‐specific deaths). Salvage rates in patients who experienced recurrence were high and sustained, with 8 of 11 alive without evidence of disease (range, 5.5‐14.2 years). Adjuvant treatment was not associated with outcome.
CONCLUSIONS
Clinical outcomes for ECs with pathogenic POLE mutations are not associated with most traditional risk parameters, and patients do not appear to benefit from adjuvant therapy. The observed low rates of recurrence/progression and the high and sustained salvage rates raise the possibility of safely de‐escalating treatment for these patients.
LAY SUMMARY
Ten percent of all endometrial cancers have mutations in the DNA repair gene DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE).
Women who have endometrial cancers with true POLE mutations experience almost no recurrences or deaths from their cancer even when their tumors appear to have very unfavorable characteristics.
Additional therapy (radiation and chemotherapy) does not appear to improve outcomes for women with POLE‐ |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/cncr.33516 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2546615848</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2546615848</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3936-4a560a10e8184d433f32db2b5224d91df29be94e58e1728ec6b4c9342125659a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9KHEEQh5ugxNXkkgcIDd6E0f47M52bLBsVFpWQQG5DT3cNaZnp2XT3rOxNfII8o09i6645eiqq6quP4ofQF0pOKSHszHgTTjmXtPyAZpSoqiBUsD00I4TUhRT89wE6jPEutxWT_CM64LxSXFV0hh4Xa91POrnR47HDKYBOA_iEoevApIidx6u8zqOI7136g8HbcYAUnO6x0d5AwNpbfHuzXOBhSq-q-A2f-3xq3drZKYM7BbY6aZyv9dPDP-11v4kufkL7ne4jfN7VI_Tr--Ln_LJY3lxczc-XheGKl4XQsiSaEqhpLazgvOPMtqyVjAmrqO2YakEJkDXQitVgylYYxQWjTJZSaX6EjrfeVRj_ThBTczdOIT8RGyZFWVJZizpTJ1vKhDHGAF2zCm7QYdNQ0rzE3bzE3bzGneGvO-XUDmD_o2_5ZoBugXvXw-YdVTO_nv_YSp8BwE2McQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2546615848</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of treatment effects in patients with endometrial cancer and POLE mutations: An individual patient data meta‐analysis</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>McAlpine, Jessica N. ; Chiu, Derek S. ; Nout, Remi A. ; Church, David N. ; Schmidt, Pascal ; Lam, Stephanie ; Leung, Samuel ; Bellone, Stefania ; Wong, Adele ; Brucker, Sara Y. ; Lee, Cheng Han ; Clarke, Blaise A. ; Huntsman, David G. ; Bernardini, Marcus Q. ; Ngeow, Joanne ; Santin, Alessandro D. ; Goodfellow, Paul ; Levine, Douglas A. ; Köbel, Martin ; Kommoss, Stefan ; Bosse, Tjalling ; Gilks, C. Blake ; Talhouk, Aline</creator><creatorcontrib>McAlpine, Jessica N. ; Chiu, Derek S. ; Nout, Remi A. ; Church, David N. ; Schmidt, Pascal ; Lam, Stephanie ; Leung, Samuel ; Bellone, Stefania ; Wong, Adele ; Brucker, Sara Y. ; Lee, Cheng Han ; Clarke, Blaise A. ; Huntsman, David G. ; Bernardini, Marcus Q. ; Ngeow, Joanne ; Santin, Alessandro D. ; Goodfellow, Paul ; Levine, Douglas A. ; Köbel, Martin ; Kommoss, Stefan ; Bosse, Tjalling ; Gilks, C. Blake ; Talhouk, Aline</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND
Endometrial cancers (ECs) with somatic mutations in DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE) are characterized by unfavorable pathological features, which prompt adjuvant treatment. Paradoxically, women with POLE‐mutated EC have outstanding clinical outcomes, and this raises concerns of overtreatment. The authors investigated whether favorable outcomes were independent of treatment.
METHODS
A PubMed search for POLE and endometrial was restricted to articles published between March 1, 2012, and March 1, 2018, that provided individual patient data (IPD), adjuvant treatment, and survival. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis (PRISMA) reporting guidelines for IPD, the authors used univariate and multivariate one‐stage meta‐analyses with mixed effects Cox models (random effects for study cohorts) to infer the associations of treatment, traditional prognostic factors, and outcome, which was defined as the time from first diagnosis to any adverse event (progression/recurrence or death from EC).
RESULTS
Three hundred fifty‐nine women with POLE‐mutated EC were identified; 294 (82%) had pathogenic mutations. Worse outcomes were demonstrated in patients with nonpathogenic POLE mutations (hazard ratio, 3.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.47‐7.58; log‐rank P < .01). Except for stage (P < .01), traditional prognosticators were not associated with progression/recurrence or death from disease. Adverse events were rare (11 progressions/recurrences and 3 disease‐specific deaths). Salvage rates in patients who experienced recurrence were high and sustained, with 8 of 11 alive without evidence of disease (range, 5.5‐14.2 years). Adjuvant treatment was not associated with outcome.
CONCLUSIONS
Clinical outcomes for ECs with pathogenic POLE mutations are not associated with most traditional risk parameters, and patients do not appear to benefit from adjuvant therapy. The observed low rates of recurrence/progression and the high and sustained salvage rates raise the possibility of safely de‐escalating treatment for these patients.
LAY SUMMARY
Ten percent of all endometrial cancers have mutations in the DNA repair gene DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE).
Women who have endometrial cancers with true POLE mutations experience almost no recurrences or deaths from their cancer even when their tumors appear to have very unfavorable characteristics.
Additional therapy (radiation and chemotherapy) does not appear to improve outcomes for women with POLE‐mutated endometrial cancer, and this supports the move to less therapy and less associated toxicity.
Diligent classification of endometrial cancers by molecular features provides valuable information to inform prognosis and to direct treatment/no treatment.
Despite often having unfavorable pathological features, women with pathogenic DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE)–mutated endometrial cancers have excellent cancer‐specific clinical outcomes, and this highlights the importance of molecular subtyping for endometrial cancer classification. Adjuvant therapy is not associated with improved outcomes for women with pathogenic POLE‐mutated endometrial cancers, and this supports de‐escalation of therapy for these patients in clinical trials.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-543X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0142</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33516</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33793971</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>adjuvant therapy ; Adverse events ; Cancer ; Cancer therapies ; Chemotherapy ; Clinical outcomes ; Confidence intervals ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; de‐escalation ; DNA ; DNA polymerase ; DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE) ; DNA Polymerase II - genetics ; DNA repair ; DNA-directed DNA polymerase ; Endometrial cancer ; Endometrial Neoplasms - genetics ; Endometrial Neoplasms - therapy ; Endometrium ; Fatalities ; Female ; Health services ; Humans ; individual patient data (IPD) meta‐analysis ; Medical prognosis ; Meta-analysis ; molecular classification ; Mutation ; Oncology ; overtreatment ; Patients ; Poly-ADP-Ribose Binding Proteins - genetics ; Prognosis ; Progressions ; Radiation ; Toxicity ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Cancer, 2021-07, Vol.127 (14), p.2409-2422</ispartof><rights>2021 American Cancer Society</rights><rights>2021 American Cancer Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3936-4a560a10e8184d433f32db2b5224d91df29be94e58e1728ec6b4c9342125659a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3936-4a560a10e8184d433f32db2b5224d91df29be94e58e1728ec6b4c9342125659a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7760-410X ; 0000-0002-0260-4583 ; 0000-0003-4724-9738</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fcncr.33516$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fcncr.33516$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33793971$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McAlpine, Jessica N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiu, Derek S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nout, Remi A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Church, David N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, Pascal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lam, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leung, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bellone, Stefania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Adele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brucker, Sara Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Cheng Han</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clarke, Blaise A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huntsman, David G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernardini, Marcus Q.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ngeow, Joanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santin, Alessandro D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodfellow, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levine, Douglas A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Köbel, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kommoss, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosse, Tjalling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilks, C. Blake</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talhouk, Aline</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of treatment effects in patients with endometrial cancer and POLE mutations: An individual patient data meta‐analysis</title><title>Cancer</title><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND
Endometrial cancers (ECs) with somatic mutations in DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE) are characterized by unfavorable pathological features, which prompt adjuvant treatment. Paradoxically, women with POLE‐mutated EC have outstanding clinical outcomes, and this raises concerns of overtreatment. The authors investigated whether favorable outcomes were independent of treatment.
METHODS
A PubMed search for POLE and endometrial was restricted to articles published between March 1, 2012, and March 1, 2018, that provided individual patient data (IPD), adjuvant treatment, and survival. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis (PRISMA) reporting guidelines for IPD, the authors used univariate and multivariate one‐stage meta‐analyses with mixed effects Cox models (random effects for study cohorts) to infer the associations of treatment, traditional prognostic factors, and outcome, which was defined as the time from first diagnosis to any adverse event (progression/recurrence or death from EC).
RESULTS
Three hundred fifty‐nine women with POLE‐mutated EC were identified; 294 (82%) had pathogenic mutations. Worse outcomes were demonstrated in patients with nonpathogenic POLE mutations (hazard ratio, 3.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.47‐7.58; log‐rank P < .01). Except for stage (P < .01), traditional prognosticators were not associated with progression/recurrence or death from disease. Adverse events were rare (11 progressions/recurrences and 3 disease‐specific deaths). Salvage rates in patients who experienced recurrence were high and sustained, with 8 of 11 alive without evidence of disease (range, 5.5‐14.2 years). Adjuvant treatment was not associated with outcome.
CONCLUSIONS
Clinical outcomes for ECs with pathogenic POLE mutations are not associated with most traditional risk parameters, and patients do not appear to benefit from adjuvant therapy. The observed low rates of recurrence/progression and the high and sustained salvage rates raise the possibility of safely de‐escalating treatment for these patients.
LAY SUMMARY
Ten percent of all endometrial cancers have mutations in the DNA repair gene DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE).
Women who have endometrial cancers with true POLE mutations experience almost no recurrences or deaths from their cancer even when their tumors appear to have very unfavorable characteristics.
Additional therapy (radiation and chemotherapy) does not appear to improve outcomes for women with POLE‐mutated endometrial cancer, and this supports the move to less therapy and less associated toxicity.
Diligent classification of endometrial cancers by molecular features provides valuable information to inform prognosis and to direct treatment/no treatment.
Despite often having unfavorable pathological features, women with pathogenic DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE)–mutated endometrial cancers have excellent cancer‐specific clinical outcomes, and this highlights the importance of molecular subtyping for endometrial cancer classification. Adjuvant therapy is not associated with improved outcomes for women with pathogenic POLE‐mutated endometrial cancers, and this supports de‐escalation of therapy for these patients in clinical trials.</description><subject>adjuvant therapy</subject><subject>Adverse events</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>de‐escalation</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>DNA polymerase</subject><subject>DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE)</subject><subject>DNA Polymerase II - genetics</subject><subject>DNA repair</subject><subject>DNA-directed DNA polymerase</subject><subject>Endometrial cancer</subject><subject>Endometrial Neoplasms - genetics</subject><subject>Endometrial Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Endometrium</subject><subject>Fatalities</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>individual patient data (IPD) meta‐analysis</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>molecular classification</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>overtreatment</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Poly-ADP-Ribose Binding Proteins - genetics</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Progressions</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0008-543X</issn><issn>1097-0142</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM9KHEEQh5ugxNXkkgcIDd6E0f47M52bLBsVFpWQQG5DT3cNaZnp2XT3rOxNfII8o09i6645eiqq6quP4ofQF0pOKSHszHgTTjmXtPyAZpSoqiBUsD00I4TUhRT89wE6jPEutxWT_CM64LxSXFV0hh4Xa91POrnR47HDKYBOA_iEoevApIidx6u8zqOI7136g8HbcYAUnO6x0d5AwNpbfHuzXOBhSq-q-A2f-3xq3drZKYM7BbY6aZyv9dPDP-11v4kufkL7ne4jfN7VI_Tr--Ln_LJY3lxczc-XheGKl4XQsiSaEqhpLazgvOPMtqyVjAmrqO2YakEJkDXQitVgylYYxQWjTJZSaX6EjrfeVRj_ThBTczdOIT8RGyZFWVJZizpTJ1vKhDHGAF2zCm7QYdNQ0rzE3bzE3bzGneGvO-XUDmD_o2_5ZoBugXvXw-YdVTO_nv_YSp8BwE2McQ</recordid><startdate>20210715</startdate><enddate>20210715</enddate><creator>McAlpine, Jessica N.</creator><creator>Chiu, Derek S.</creator><creator>Nout, Remi A.</creator><creator>Church, David N.</creator><creator>Schmidt, Pascal</creator><creator>Lam, Stephanie</creator><creator>Leung, Samuel</creator><creator>Bellone, Stefania</creator><creator>Wong, Adele</creator><creator>Brucker, Sara Y.</creator><creator>Lee, Cheng Han</creator><creator>Clarke, Blaise A.</creator><creator>Huntsman, David G.</creator><creator>Bernardini, Marcus Q.</creator><creator>Ngeow, Joanne</creator><creator>Santin, Alessandro D.</creator><creator>Goodfellow, Paul</creator><creator>Levine, Douglas A.</creator><creator>Köbel, Martin</creator><creator>Kommoss, Stefan</creator><creator>Bosse, Tjalling</creator><creator>Gilks, C. Blake</creator><creator>Talhouk, Aline</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7760-410X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0260-4583</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4724-9738</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210715</creationdate><title>Evaluation of treatment effects in patients with endometrial cancer and POLE mutations: An individual patient data meta‐analysis</title><author>McAlpine, Jessica N. ; Chiu, Derek S. ; Nout, Remi A. ; Church, David N. ; Schmidt, Pascal ; Lam, Stephanie ; Leung, Samuel ; Bellone, Stefania ; Wong, Adele ; Brucker, Sara Y. ; Lee, Cheng Han ; Clarke, Blaise A. ; Huntsman, David G. ; Bernardini, Marcus Q. ; Ngeow, Joanne ; Santin, Alessandro D. ; Goodfellow, Paul ; Levine, Douglas A. ; Köbel, Martin ; Kommoss, Stefan ; Bosse, Tjalling ; Gilks, C. Blake ; Talhouk, Aline</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3936-4a560a10e8184d433f32db2b5224d91df29be94e58e1728ec6b4c9342125659a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>adjuvant therapy</topic><topic>Adverse events</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>de‐escalation</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>DNA polymerase</topic><topic>DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE)</topic><topic>DNA Polymerase II - genetics</topic><topic>DNA repair</topic><topic>DNA-directed DNA polymerase</topic><topic>Endometrial cancer</topic><topic>Endometrial Neoplasms - genetics</topic><topic>Endometrial Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Endometrium</topic><topic>Fatalities</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>individual patient data (IPD) meta‐analysis</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>molecular classification</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>overtreatment</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Poly-ADP-Ribose Binding Proteins - genetics</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Progressions</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McAlpine, Jessica N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiu, Derek S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nout, Remi A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Church, David N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, Pascal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lam, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leung, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bellone, Stefania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Adele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brucker, Sara Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Cheng Han</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clarke, Blaise A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huntsman, David G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernardini, Marcus Q.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ngeow, Joanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santin, Alessandro D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodfellow, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levine, Douglas A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Köbel, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kommoss, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosse, Tjalling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilks, C. Blake</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talhouk, Aline</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McAlpine, Jessica N.</au><au>Chiu, Derek S.</au><au>Nout, Remi A.</au><au>Church, David N.</au><au>Schmidt, Pascal</au><au>Lam, Stephanie</au><au>Leung, Samuel</au><au>Bellone, Stefania</au><au>Wong, Adele</au><au>Brucker, Sara Y.</au><au>Lee, Cheng Han</au><au>Clarke, Blaise A.</au><au>Huntsman, David G.</au><au>Bernardini, Marcus Q.</au><au>Ngeow, Joanne</au><au>Santin, Alessandro D.</au><au>Goodfellow, Paul</au><au>Levine, Douglas A.</au><au>Köbel, Martin</au><au>Kommoss, Stefan</au><au>Bosse, Tjalling</au><au>Gilks, C. Blake</au><au>Talhouk, Aline</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of treatment effects in patients with endometrial cancer and POLE mutations: An individual patient data meta‐analysis</atitle><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><date>2021-07-15</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>127</volume><issue>14</issue><spage>2409</spage><epage>2422</epage><pages>2409-2422</pages><issn>0008-543X</issn><eissn>1097-0142</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND
Endometrial cancers (ECs) with somatic mutations in DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE) are characterized by unfavorable pathological features, which prompt adjuvant treatment. Paradoxically, women with POLE‐mutated EC have outstanding clinical outcomes, and this raises concerns of overtreatment. The authors investigated whether favorable outcomes were independent of treatment.
METHODS
A PubMed search for POLE and endometrial was restricted to articles published between March 1, 2012, and March 1, 2018, that provided individual patient data (IPD), adjuvant treatment, and survival. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis (PRISMA) reporting guidelines for IPD, the authors used univariate and multivariate one‐stage meta‐analyses with mixed effects Cox models (random effects for study cohorts) to infer the associations of treatment, traditional prognostic factors, and outcome, which was defined as the time from first diagnosis to any adverse event (progression/recurrence or death from EC).
RESULTS
Three hundred fifty‐nine women with POLE‐mutated EC were identified; 294 (82%) had pathogenic mutations. Worse outcomes were demonstrated in patients with nonpathogenic POLE mutations (hazard ratio, 3.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.47‐7.58; log‐rank P < .01). Except for stage (P < .01), traditional prognosticators were not associated with progression/recurrence or death from disease. Adverse events were rare (11 progressions/recurrences and 3 disease‐specific deaths). Salvage rates in patients who experienced recurrence were high and sustained, with 8 of 11 alive without evidence of disease (range, 5.5‐14.2 years). Adjuvant treatment was not associated with outcome.
CONCLUSIONS
Clinical outcomes for ECs with pathogenic POLE mutations are not associated with most traditional risk parameters, and patients do not appear to benefit from adjuvant therapy. The observed low rates of recurrence/progression and the high and sustained salvage rates raise the possibility of safely de‐escalating treatment for these patients.
LAY SUMMARY
Ten percent of all endometrial cancers have mutations in the DNA repair gene DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE).
Women who have endometrial cancers with true POLE mutations experience almost no recurrences or deaths from their cancer even when their tumors appear to have very unfavorable characteristics.
Additional therapy (radiation and chemotherapy) does not appear to improve outcomes for women with POLE‐mutated endometrial cancer, and this supports the move to less therapy and less associated toxicity.
Diligent classification of endometrial cancers by molecular features provides valuable information to inform prognosis and to direct treatment/no treatment.
Despite often having unfavorable pathological features, women with pathogenic DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE)–mutated endometrial cancers have excellent cancer‐specific clinical outcomes, and this highlights the importance of molecular subtyping for endometrial cancer classification. Adjuvant therapy is not associated with improved outcomes for women with pathogenic POLE‐mutated endometrial cancers, and this supports de‐escalation of therapy for these patients in clinical trials.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>33793971</pmid><doi>10.1002/cncr.33516</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7760-410X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0260-4583</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4724-9738</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0008-543X |
ispartof | Cancer, 2021-07, Vol.127 (14), p.2409-2422 |
issn | 0008-543X 1097-0142 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2546615848 |
source | Wiley Free Content; MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | adjuvant therapy Adverse events Cancer Cancer therapies Chemotherapy Clinical outcomes Confidence intervals Deoxyribonucleic acid de‐escalation DNA DNA polymerase DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE) DNA Polymerase II - genetics DNA repair DNA-directed DNA polymerase Endometrial cancer Endometrial Neoplasms - genetics Endometrial Neoplasms - therapy Endometrium Fatalities Female Health services Humans individual patient data (IPD) meta‐analysis Medical prognosis Meta-analysis molecular classification Mutation Oncology overtreatment Patients Poly-ADP-Ribose Binding Proteins - genetics Prognosis Progressions Radiation Toxicity Tumors |
title | Evaluation of treatment effects in patients with endometrial cancer and POLE mutations: An individual patient data meta‐analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T21%3A53%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20treatment%20effects%20in%20patients%20with%20endometrial%20cancer%20and%20POLE%20mutations:%20An%20individual%20patient%20data%20meta%E2%80%90analysis&rft.jtitle=Cancer&rft.au=McAlpine,%20Jessica%20N.&rft.date=2021-07-15&rft.volume=127&rft.issue=14&rft.spage=2409&rft.epage=2422&rft.pages=2409-2422&rft.issn=0008-543X&rft.eissn=1097-0142&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cncr.33516&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2546615848%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2546615848&rft_id=info:pmid/33793971&rfr_iscdi=true |