Evaluation of treatment effects in patients with endometrial cancer and POLE mutations: An individual patient data meta‐analysis

BACKGROUND Endometrial cancers (ECs) with somatic mutations in DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE) are characterized by unfavorable pathological features, which prompt adjuvant treatment. Paradoxically, women with POLE‐mutated EC have outstanding clinical outcomes, and this raises concerns of overtreatmen...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer 2021-07, Vol.127 (14), p.2409-2422
Hauptverfasser: McAlpine, Jessica N., Chiu, Derek S., Nout, Remi A., Church, David N., Schmidt, Pascal, Lam, Stephanie, Leung, Samuel, Bellone, Stefania, Wong, Adele, Brucker, Sara Y., Lee, Cheng Han, Clarke, Blaise A., Huntsman, David G., Bernardini, Marcus Q., Ngeow, Joanne, Santin, Alessandro D., Goodfellow, Paul, Levine, Douglas A., Köbel, Martin, Kommoss, Stefan, Bosse, Tjalling, Gilks, C. Blake, Talhouk, Aline
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2422
container_issue 14
container_start_page 2409
container_title Cancer
container_volume 127
creator McAlpine, Jessica N.
Chiu, Derek S.
Nout, Remi A.
Church, David N.
Schmidt, Pascal
Lam, Stephanie
Leung, Samuel
Bellone, Stefania
Wong, Adele
Brucker, Sara Y.
Lee, Cheng Han
Clarke, Blaise A.
Huntsman, David G.
Bernardini, Marcus Q.
Ngeow, Joanne
Santin, Alessandro D.
Goodfellow, Paul
Levine, Douglas A.
Köbel, Martin
Kommoss, Stefan
Bosse, Tjalling
Gilks, C. Blake
Talhouk, Aline
description BACKGROUND Endometrial cancers (ECs) with somatic mutations in DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE) are characterized by unfavorable pathological features, which prompt adjuvant treatment. Paradoxically, women with POLE‐mutated EC have outstanding clinical outcomes, and this raises concerns of overtreatment. The authors investigated whether favorable outcomes were independent of treatment. METHODS A PubMed search for POLE and endometrial was restricted to articles published between March 1, 2012, and March 1, 2018, that provided individual patient data (IPD), adjuvant treatment, and survival. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis (PRISMA) reporting guidelines for IPD, the authors used univariate and multivariate one‐stage meta‐analyses with mixed effects Cox models (random effects for study cohorts) to infer the associations of treatment, traditional prognostic factors, and outcome, which was defined as the time from first diagnosis to any adverse event (progression/recurrence or death from EC). RESULTS Three hundred fifty‐nine women with POLE‐mutated EC were identified; 294 (82%) had pathogenic mutations. Worse outcomes were demonstrated in patients with nonpathogenic POLE mutations (hazard ratio, 3.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.47‐7.58; log‐rank P < .01). Except for stage (P < .01), traditional prognosticators were not associated with progression/recurrence or death from disease. Adverse events were rare (11 progressions/recurrences and 3 disease‐specific deaths). Salvage rates in patients who experienced recurrence were high and sustained, with 8 of 11 alive without evidence of disease (range, 5.5‐14.2 years). Adjuvant treatment was not associated with outcome. CONCLUSIONS Clinical outcomes for ECs with pathogenic POLE mutations are not associated with most traditional risk parameters, and patients do not appear to benefit from adjuvant therapy. The observed low rates of recurrence/progression and the high and sustained salvage rates raise the possibility of safely de‐escalating treatment for these patients. LAY SUMMARY Ten percent of all endometrial cancers have mutations in the DNA repair gene DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE). Women who have endometrial cancers with true POLE mutations experience almost no recurrences or deaths from their cancer even when their tumors appear to have very unfavorable characteristics. Additional therapy (radiation and chemotherapy) does not appear to improve outcomes for women with POLE‐
doi_str_mv 10.1002/cncr.33516
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2546615848</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2546615848</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3936-4a560a10e8184d433f32db2b5224d91df29be94e58e1728ec6b4c9342125659a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9KHEEQh5ugxNXkkgcIDd6E0f47M52bLBsVFpWQQG5DT3cNaZnp2XT3rOxNfII8o09i6645eiqq6quP4ofQF0pOKSHszHgTTjmXtPyAZpSoqiBUsD00I4TUhRT89wE6jPEutxWT_CM64LxSXFV0hh4Xa91POrnR47HDKYBOA_iEoevApIidx6u8zqOI7136g8HbcYAUnO6x0d5AwNpbfHuzXOBhSq-q-A2f-3xq3drZKYM7BbY6aZyv9dPDP-11v4kufkL7ne4jfN7VI_Tr--Ln_LJY3lxczc-XheGKl4XQsiSaEqhpLazgvOPMtqyVjAmrqO2YakEJkDXQitVgylYYxQWjTJZSaX6EjrfeVRj_ThBTczdOIT8RGyZFWVJZizpTJ1vKhDHGAF2zCm7QYdNQ0rzE3bzE3bzGneGvO-XUDmD_o2_5ZoBugXvXw-YdVTO_nv_YSp8BwE2McQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2546615848</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of treatment effects in patients with endometrial cancer and POLE mutations: An individual patient data meta‐analysis</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>McAlpine, Jessica N. ; Chiu, Derek S. ; Nout, Remi A. ; Church, David N. ; Schmidt, Pascal ; Lam, Stephanie ; Leung, Samuel ; Bellone, Stefania ; Wong, Adele ; Brucker, Sara Y. ; Lee, Cheng Han ; Clarke, Blaise A. ; Huntsman, David G. ; Bernardini, Marcus Q. ; Ngeow, Joanne ; Santin, Alessandro D. ; Goodfellow, Paul ; Levine, Douglas A. ; Köbel, Martin ; Kommoss, Stefan ; Bosse, Tjalling ; Gilks, C. Blake ; Talhouk, Aline</creator><creatorcontrib>McAlpine, Jessica N. ; Chiu, Derek S. ; Nout, Remi A. ; Church, David N. ; Schmidt, Pascal ; Lam, Stephanie ; Leung, Samuel ; Bellone, Stefania ; Wong, Adele ; Brucker, Sara Y. ; Lee, Cheng Han ; Clarke, Blaise A. ; Huntsman, David G. ; Bernardini, Marcus Q. ; Ngeow, Joanne ; Santin, Alessandro D. ; Goodfellow, Paul ; Levine, Douglas A. ; Köbel, Martin ; Kommoss, Stefan ; Bosse, Tjalling ; Gilks, C. Blake ; Talhouk, Aline</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND Endometrial cancers (ECs) with somatic mutations in DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE) are characterized by unfavorable pathological features, which prompt adjuvant treatment. Paradoxically, women with POLE‐mutated EC have outstanding clinical outcomes, and this raises concerns of overtreatment. The authors investigated whether favorable outcomes were independent of treatment. METHODS A PubMed search for POLE and endometrial was restricted to articles published between March 1, 2012, and March 1, 2018, that provided individual patient data (IPD), adjuvant treatment, and survival. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis (PRISMA) reporting guidelines for IPD, the authors used univariate and multivariate one‐stage meta‐analyses with mixed effects Cox models (random effects for study cohorts) to infer the associations of treatment, traditional prognostic factors, and outcome, which was defined as the time from first diagnosis to any adverse event (progression/recurrence or death from EC). RESULTS Three hundred fifty‐nine women with POLE‐mutated EC were identified; 294 (82%) had pathogenic mutations. Worse outcomes were demonstrated in patients with nonpathogenic POLE mutations (hazard ratio, 3.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.47‐7.58; log‐rank P &lt; .01). Except for stage (P &lt; .01), traditional prognosticators were not associated with progression/recurrence or death from disease. Adverse events were rare (11 progressions/recurrences and 3 disease‐specific deaths). Salvage rates in patients who experienced recurrence were high and sustained, with 8 of 11 alive without evidence of disease (range, 5.5‐14.2 years). Adjuvant treatment was not associated with outcome. CONCLUSIONS Clinical outcomes for ECs with pathogenic POLE mutations are not associated with most traditional risk parameters, and patients do not appear to benefit from adjuvant therapy. The observed low rates of recurrence/progression and the high and sustained salvage rates raise the possibility of safely de‐escalating treatment for these patients. LAY SUMMARY Ten percent of all endometrial cancers have mutations in the DNA repair gene DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE). Women who have endometrial cancers with true POLE mutations experience almost no recurrences or deaths from their cancer even when their tumors appear to have very unfavorable characteristics. Additional therapy (radiation and chemotherapy) does not appear to improve outcomes for women with POLE‐mutated endometrial cancer, and this supports the move to less therapy and less associated toxicity. Diligent classification of endometrial cancers by molecular features provides valuable information to inform prognosis and to direct treatment/no treatment. Despite often having unfavorable pathological features, women with pathogenic DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE)–mutated endometrial cancers have excellent cancer‐specific clinical outcomes, and this highlights the importance of molecular subtyping for endometrial cancer classification. Adjuvant therapy is not associated with improved outcomes for women with pathogenic POLE‐mutated endometrial cancers, and this supports de‐escalation of therapy for these patients in clinical trials.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-543X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0142</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33516</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33793971</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>adjuvant therapy ; Adverse events ; Cancer ; Cancer therapies ; Chemotherapy ; Clinical outcomes ; Confidence intervals ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; de‐escalation ; DNA ; DNA polymerase ; DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE) ; DNA Polymerase II - genetics ; DNA repair ; DNA-directed DNA polymerase ; Endometrial cancer ; Endometrial Neoplasms - genetics ; Endometrial Neoplasms - therapy ; Endometrium ; Fatalities ; Female ; Health services ; Humans ; individual patient data (IPD) meta‐analysis ; Medical prognosis ; Meta-analysis ; molecular classification ; Mutation ; Oncology ; overtreatment ; Patients ; Poly-ADP-Ribose Binding Proteins - genetics ; Prognosis ; Progressions ; Radiation ; Toxicity ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Cancer, 2021-07, Vol.127 (14), p.2409-2422</ispartof><rights>2021 American Cancer Society</rights><rights>2021 American Cancer Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3936-4a560a10e8184d433f32db2b5224d91df29be94e58e1728ec6b4c9342125659a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3936-4a560a10e8184d433f32db2b5224d91df29be94e58e1728ec6b4c9342125659a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7760-410X ; 0000-0002-0260-4583 ; 0000-0003-4724-9738</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fcncr.33516$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fcncr.33516$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33793971$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McAlpine, Jessica N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiu, Derek S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nout, Remi A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Church, David N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, Pascal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lam, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leung, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bellone, Stefania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Adele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brucker, Sara Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Cheng Han</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clarke, Blaise A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huntsman, David G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernardini, Marcus Q.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ngeow, Joanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santin, Alessandro D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodfellow, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levine, Douglas A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Köbel, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kommoss, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosse, Tjalling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilks, C. Blake</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talhouk, Aline</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of treatment effects in patients with endometrial cancer and POLE mutations: An individual patient data meta‐analysis</title><title>Cancer</title><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND Endometrial cancers (ECs) with somatic mutations in DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE) are characterized by unfavorable pathological features, which prompt adjuvant treatment. Paradoxically, women with POLE‐mutated EC have outstanding clinical outcomes, and this raises concerns of overtreatment. The authors investigated whether favorable outcomes were independent of treatment. METHODS A PubMed search for POLE and endometrial was restricted to articles published between March 1, 2012, and March 1, 2018, that provided individual patient data (IPD), adjuvant treatment, and survival. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis (PRISMA) reporting guidelines for IPD, the authors used univariate and multivariate one‐stage meta‐analyses with mixed effects Cox models (random effects for study cohorts) to infer the associations of treatment, traditional prognostic factors, and outcome, which was defined as the time from first diagnosis to any adverse event (progression/recurrence or death from EC). RESULTS Three hundred fifty‐nine women with POLE‐mutated EC were identified; 294 (82%) had pathogenic mutations. Worse outcomes were demonstrated in patients with nonpathogenic POLE mutations (hazard ratio, 3.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.47‐7.58; log‐rank P &lt; .01). Except for stage (P &lt; .01), traditional prognosticators were not associated with progression/recurrence or death from disease. Adverse events were rare (11 progressions/recurrences and 3 disease‐specific deaths). Salvage rates in patients who experienced recurrence were high and sustained, with 8 of 11 alive without evidence of disease (range, 5.5‐14.2 years). Adjuvant treatment was not associated with outcome. CONCLUSIONS Clinical outcomes for ECs with pathogenic POLE mutations are not associated with most traditional risk parameters, and patients do not appear to benefit from adjuvant therapy. The observed low rates of recurrence/progression and the high and sustained salvage rates raise the possibility of safely de‐escalating treatment for these patients. LAY SUMMARY Ten percent of all endometrial cancers have mutations in the DNA repair gene DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE). Women who have endometrial cancers with true POLE mutations experience almost no recurrences or deaths from their cancer even when their tumors appear to have very unfavorable characteristics. Additional therapy (radiation and chemotherapy) does not appear to improve outcomes for women with POLE‐mutated endometrial cancer, and this supports the move to less therapy and less associated toxicity. Diligent classification of endometrial cancers by molecular features provides valuable information to inform prognosis and to direct treatment/no treatment. Despite often having unfavorable pathological features, women with pathogenic DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE)–mutated endometrial cancers have excellent cancer‐specific clinical outcomes, and this highlights the importance of molecular subtyping for endometrial cancer classification. Adjuvant therapy is not associated with improved outcomes for women with pathogenic POLE‐mutated endometrial cancers, and this supports de‐escalation of therapy for these patients in clinical trials.</description><subject>adjuvant therapy</subject><subject>Adverse events</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>de‐escalation</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>DNA polymerase</subject><subject>DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE)</subject><subject>DNA Polymerase II - genetics</subject><subject>DNA repair</subject><subject>DNA-directed DNA polymerase</subject><subject>Endometrial cancer</subject><subject>Endometrial Neoplasms - genetics</subject><subject>Endometrial Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Endometrium</subject><subject>Fatalities</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>individual patient data (IPD) meta‐analysis</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>molecular classification</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>overtreatment</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Poly-ADP-Ribose Binding Proteins - genetics</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Progressions</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0008-543X</issn><issn>1097-0142</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM9KHEEQh5ugxNXkkgcIDd6E0f47M52bLBsVFpWQQG5DT3cNaZnp2XT3rOxNfII8o09i6645eiqq6quP4ofQF0pOKSHszHgTTjmXtPyAZpSoqiBUsD00I4TUhRT89wE6jPEutxWT_CM64LxSXFV0hh4Xa91POrnR47HDKYBOA_iEoevApIidx6u8zqOI7136g8HbcYAUnO6x0d5AwNpbfHuzXOBhSq-q-A2f-3xq3drZKYM7BbY6aZyv9dPDP-11v4kufkL7ne4jfN7VI_Tr--Ln_LJY3lxczc-XheGKl4XQsiSaEqhpLazgvOPMtqyVjAmrqO2YakEJkDXQitVgylYYxQWjTJZSaX6EjrfeVRj_ThBTczdOIT8RGyZFWVJZizpTJ1vKhDHGAF2zCm7QYdNQ0rzE3bzE3bzGneGvO-XUDmD_o2_5ZoBugXvXw-YdVTO_nv_YSp8BwE2McQ</recordid><startdate>20210715</startdate><enddate>20210715</enddate><creator>McAlpine, Jessica N.</creator><creator>Chiu, Derek S.</creator><creator>Nout, Remi A.</creator><creator>Church, David N.</creator><creator>Schmidt, Pascal</creator><creator>Lam, Stephanie</creator><creator>Leung, Samuel</creator><creator>Bellone, Stefania</creator><creator>Wong, Adele</creator><creator>Brucker, Sara Y.</creator><creator>Lee, Cheng Han</creator><creator>Clarke, Blaise A.</creator><creator>Huntsman, David G.</creator><creator>Bernardini, Marcus Q.</creator><creator>Ngeow, Joanne</creator><creator>Santin, Alessandro D.</creator><creator>Goodfellow, Paul</creator><creator>Levine, Douglas A.</creator><creator>Köbel, Martin</creator><creator>Kommoss, Stefan</creator><creator>Bosse, Tjalling</creator><creator>Gilks, C. Blake</creator><creator>Talhouk, Aline</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7760-410X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0260-4583</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4724-9738</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210715</creationdate><title>Evaluation of treatment effects in patients with endometrial cancer and POLE mutations: An individual patient data meta‐analysis</title><author>McAlpine, Jessica N. ; Chiu, Derek S. ; Nout, Remi A. ; Church, David N. ; Schmidt, Pascal ; Lam, Stephanie ; Leung, Samuel ; Bellone, Stefania ; Wong, Adele ; Brucker, Sara Y. ; Lee, Cheng Han ; Clarke, Blaise A. ; Huntsman, David G. ; Bernardini, Marcus Q. ; Ngeow, Joanne ; Santin, Alessandro D. ; Goodfellow, Paul ; Levine, Douglas A. ; Köbel, Martin ; Kommoss, Stefan ; Bosse, Tjalling ; Gilks, C. Blake ; Talhouk, Aline</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3936-4a560a10e8184d433f32db2b5224d91df29be94e58e1728ec6b4c9342125659a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>adjuvant therapy</topic><topic>Adverse events</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>de‐escalation</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>DNA polymerase</topic><topic>DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE)</topic><topic>DNA Polymerase II - genetics</topic><topic>DNA repair</topic><topic>DNA-directed DNA polymerase</topic><topic>Endometrial cancer</topic><topic>Endometrial Neoplasms - genetics</topic><topic>Endometrial Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Endometrium</topic><topic>Fatalities</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>individual patient data (IPD) meta‐analysis</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>molecular classification</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>overtreatment</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Poly-ADP-Ribose Binding Proteins - genetics</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Progressions</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McAlpine, Jessica N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiu, Derek S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nout, Remi A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Church, David N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, Pascal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lam, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leung, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bellone, Stefania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Adele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brucker, Sara Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Cheng Han</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clarke, Blaise A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huntsman, David G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernardini, Marcus Q.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ngeow, Joanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santin, Alessandro D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodfellow, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levine, Douglas A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Köbel, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kommoss, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosse, Tjalling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilks, C. Blake</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talhouk, Aline</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McAlpine, Jessica N.</au><au>Chiu, Derek S.</au><au>Nout, Remi A.</au><au>Church, David N.</au><au>Schmidt, Pascal</au><au>Lam, Stephanie</au><au>Leung, Samuel</au><au>Bellone, Stefania</au><au>Wong, Adele</au><au>Brucker, Sara Y.</au><au>Lee, Cheng Han</au><au>Clarke, Blaise A.</au><au>Huntsman, David G.</au><au>Bernardini, Marcus Q.</au><au>Ngeow, Joanne</au><au>Santin, Alessandro D.</au><au>Goodfellow, Paul</au><au>Levine, Douglas A.</au><au>Köbel, Martin</au><au>Kommoss, Stefan</au><au>Bosse, Tjalling</au><au>Gilks, C. Blake</au><au>Talhouk, Aline</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of treatment effects in patients with endometrial cancer and POLE mutations: An individual patient data meta‐analysis</atitle><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><date>2021-07-15</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>127</volume><issue>14</issue><spage>2409</spage><epage>2422</epage><pages>2409-2422</pages><issn>0008-543X</issn><eissn>1097-0142</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND Endometrial cancers (ECs) with somatic mutations in DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE) are characterized by unfavorable pathological features, which prompt adjuvant treatment. Paradoxically, women with POLE‐mutated EC have outstanding clinical outcomes, and this raises concerns of overtreatment. The authors investigated whether favorable outcomes were independent of treatment. METHODS A PubMed search for POLE and endometrial was restricted to articles published between March 1, 2012, and March 1, 2018, that provided individual patient data (IPD), adjuvant treatment, and survival. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis (PRISMA) reporting guidelines for IPD, the authors used univariate and multivariate one‐stage meta‐analyses with mixed effects Cox models (random effects for study cohorts) to infer the associations of treatment, traditional prognostic factors, and outcome, which was defined as the time from first diagnosis to any adverse event (progression/recurrence or death from EC). RESULTS Three hundred fifty‐nine women with POLE‐mutated EC were identified; 294 (82%) had pathogenic mutations. Worse outcomes were demonstrated in patients with nonpathogenic POLE mutations (hazard ratio, 3.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.47‐7.58; log‐rank P &lt; .01). Except for stage (P &lt; .01), traditional prognosticators were not associated with progression/recurrence or death from disease. Adverse events were rare (11 progressions/recurrences and 3 disease‐specific deaths). Salvage rates in patients who experienced recurrence were high and sustained, with 8 of 11 alive without evidence of disease (range, 5.5‐14.2 years). Adjuvant treatment was not associated with outcome. CONCLUSIONS Clinical outcomes for ECs with pathogenic POLE mutations are not associated with most traditional risk parameters, and patients do not appear to benefit from adjuvant therapy. The observed low rates of recurrence/progression and the high and sustained salvage rates raise the possibility of safely de‐escalating treatment for these patients. LAY SUMMARY Ten percent of all endometrial cancers have mutations in the DNA repair gene DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE). Women who have endometrial cancers with true POLE mutations experience almost no recurrences or deaths from their cancer even when their tumors appear to have very unfavorable characteristics. Additional therapy (radiation and chemotherapy) does not appear to improve outcomes for women with POLE‐mutated endometrial cancer, and this supports the move to less therapy and less associated toxicity. Diligent classification of endometrial cancers by molecular features provides valuable information to inform prognosis and to direct treatment/no treatment. Despite often having unfavorable pathological features, women with pathogenic DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE)–mutated endometrial cancers have excellent cancer‐specific clinical outcomes, and this highlights the importance of molecular subtyping for endometrial cancer classification. Adjuvant therapy is not associated with improved outcomes for women with pathogenic POLE‐mutated endometrial cancers, and this supports de‐escalation of therapy for these patients in clinical trials.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>33793971</pmid><doi>10.1002/cncr.33516</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7760-410X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0260-4583</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4724-9738</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0008-543X
ispartof Cancer, 2021-07, Vol.127 (14), p.2409-2422
issn 0008-543X
1097-0142
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2546615848
source Wiley Free Content; MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects adjuvant therapy
Adverse events
Cancer
Cancer therapies
Chemotherapy
Clinical outcomes
Confidence intervals
Deoxyribonucleic acid
de‐escalation
DNA
DNA polymerase
DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE)
DNA Polymerase II - genetics
DNA repair
DNA-directed DNA polymerase
Endometrial cancer
Endometrial Neoplasms - genetics
Endometrial Neoplasms - therapy
Endometrium
Fatalities
Female
Health services
Humans
individual patient data (IPD) meta‐analysis
Medical prognosis
Meta-analysis
molecular classification
Mutation
Oncology
overtreatment
Patients
Poly-ADP-Ribose Binding Proteins - genetics
Prognosis
Progressions
Radiation
Toxicity
Tumors
title Evaluation of treatment effects in patients with endometrial cancer and POLE mutations: An individual patient data meta‐analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T21%3A53%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20treatment%20effects%20in%20patients%20with%20endometrial%20cancer%20and%20POLE%20mutations:%20An%20individual%20patient%20data%20meta%E2%80%90analysis&rft.jtitle=Cancer&rft.au=McAlpine,%20Jessica%20N.&rft.date=2021-07-15&rft.volume=127&rft.issue=14&rft.spage=2409&rft.epage=2422&rft.pages=2409-2422&rft.issn=0008-543X&rft.eissn=1097-0142&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cncr.33516&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2546615848%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2546615848&rft_id=info:pmid/33793971&rfr_iscdi=true