Agile Roadmapping: An Adaptive Approach to Technology Foresight

Technology roadmapping has become an important foresight tool for science, technology, and innovation (STI) policy and technology strategy development. There are, however, challenges in translating evidence from foresight into the strategies of STI agencies and the planning of research & technol...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Foresight and STI governance 2021-01, Vol.15 (2), p.65-81
Hauptverfasser: O’Sullivan, Eoin, Phaal, Rob, Featherston, Charles
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 81
container_issue 2
container_start_page 65
container_title Foresight and STI governance
container_volume 15
creator O’Sullivan, Eoin
Phaal, Rob
Featherston, Charles
description Technology roadmapping has become an important foresight tool for science, technology, and innovation (STI) policy and technology strategy development. There are, however, challenges in translating evidence from foresight into the strategies of STI agencies and the planning of research & technology development (RTD) organizations. While the foresight evaluation literature identifies methodological issues related to evidence granularity, scope, and stakeholder confidence, there is limited guidance on how to ensure roadmapping outputs are strategically relevant, appropriately detailed, and credible. This paper highlights the potential of using structured visual roadmapping frameworks to anticipate potential strategic foresight evidence failures and using the adaptive and iterative nature of roadmapping processes to address them. In this paper, we distinguish between: the roadmapping framework ‘canvas’; the foresight evidence captured on the canvas; the process of generating the evidence; and any final strategic plan developed using that evidence (with goals, milestones, actions, etc). We investigate efforts to use the roadmapping canvas as a research tool and diagnostic to explore emerging technology trajectories and innovation ‘pathways’. We demonstrate that key patterns of evidence distribution on the roadmapping canvas have the potential to reveal where further evidence may need to be gathered, or where further triangulation of stakeholder perspectives may be required. We argue that by adaptively addressing these patterns at key stages within the roadmapping process (and appropriately re-scoping, re-prioritizing, and re-focusing foresight effort and resources), the granularity, coverage, and consensus of the roadmapping evidence can be greatly enhanced. We conclude the paper by summarizing a set of novel principles for adaptive agile roadmapping, reflecting on the implications for foresight more generally, and outlining a future research agenda to test and refine this approach to agile foresight.
doi_str_mv 10.17323/2500-2597.2021.2.65.81
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2545945153</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2545945153</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-9437daf16140edf47e20963f864e43e893ae4a82e839bf9e6092bcaf22d71bc73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkF9LwzAUxYMoOOY-gwGfW5Obf40vUoZTYSDIfA5Zm3QdW1OTTti3t3MiPp0D53Du5YfQLSU5VQzYPQhCMhBa5UCA5pBLkRf0Ak3-gst__hrNUtoSQkBQYEpO0GPZtDuH34Ot97bv2655wGWHy9r2Q_vlcNn3Mdhqg4eAV67adGEXmiNehOhS22yGG3Tl7S652a9O0cfiaTV_yZZvz6_zcplVjPEh05yp2noqKSeu9lw5IFoyX0juOHOFZtZxW4ArmF577STRsK6sB6gVXVeKTdHdeXd85_Pg0mC24RC78aQBwYXmggo2ttS5VcWQUnTe9LHd23g0lJgfYObEwpxYmBMwA0YKU1D2DU6xXLI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2545945153</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Agile Roadmapping: An Adaptive Approach to Technology Foresight</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><creator>O’Sullivan, Eoin ; Phaal, Rob ; Featherston, Charles</creator><creatorcontrib>O’Sullivan, Eoin ; Phaal, Rob ; Featherston, Charles ; University of Cambridge ; UK Government Office of Science</creatorcontrib><description>Technology roadmapping has become an important foresight tool for science, technology, and innovation (STI) policy and technology strategy development. There are, however, challenges in translating evidence from foresight into the strategies of STI agencies and the planning of research &amp; technology development (RTD) organizations. While the foresight evaluation literature identifies methodological issues related to evidence granularity, scope, and stakeholder confidence, there is limited guidance on how to ensure roadmapping outputs are strategically relevant, appropriately detailed, and credible. This paper highlights the potential of using structured visual roadmapping frameworks to anticipate potential strategic foresight evidence failures and using the adaptive and iterative nature of roadmapping processes to address them. In this paper, we distinguish between: the roadmapping framework ‘canvas’; the foresight evidence captured on the canvas; the process of generating the evidence; and any final strategic plan developed using that evidence (with goals, milestones, actions, etc). We investigate efforts to use the roadmapping canvas as a research tool and diagnostic to explore emerging technology trajectories and innovation ‘pathways’. We demonstrate that key patterns of evidence distribution on the roadmapping canvas have the potential to reveal where further evidence may need to be gathered, or where further triangulation of stakeholder perspectives may be required. We argue that by adaptively addressing these patterns at key stages within the roadmapping process (and appropriately re-scoping, re-prioritizing, and re-focusing foresight effort and resources), the granularity, coverage, and consensus of the roadmapping evidence can be greatly enhanced. We conclude the paper by summarizing a set of novel principles for adaptive agile roadmapping, reflecting on the implications for foresight more generally, and outlining a future research agenda to test and refine this approach to agile foresight.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2500-2597</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2500-2597</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.17323/2500-2597.2021.2.65.81</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Moscow: National Research University Higher School of Economics</publisher><subject>Stakeholders ; Strategic planning ; Technological planning ; Trends</subject><ispartof>Foresight and STI governance, 2021-01, Vol.15 (2), p.65-81</ispartof><rights>Copyright National Research University Higher School of Economics 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-9437daf16140edf47e20963f864e43e893ae4a82e839bf9e6092bcaf22d71bc73</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>O’Sullivan, Eoin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phaal, Rob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Featherston, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>University of Cambridge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>UK Government Office of Science</creatorcontrib><title>Agile Roadmapping: An Adaptive Approach to Technology Foresight</title><title>Foresight and STI governance</title><description>Technology roadmapping has become an important foresight tool for science, technology, and innovation (STI) policy and technology strategy development. There are, however, challenges in translating evidence from foresight into the strategies of STI agencies and the planning of research &amp; technology development (RTD) organizations. While the foresight evaluation literature identifies methodological issues related to evidence granularity, scope, and stakeholder confidence, there is limited guidance on how to ensure roadmapping outputs are strategically relevant, appropriately detailed, and credible. This paper highlights the potential of using structured visual roadmapping frameworks to anticipate potential strategic foresight evidence failures and using the adaptive and iterative nature of roadmapping processes to address them. In this paper, we distinguish between: the roadmapping framework ‘canvas’; the foresight evidence captured on the canvas; the process of generating the evidence; and any final strategic plan developed using that evidence (with goals, milestones, actions, etc). We investigate efforts to use the roadmapping canvas as a research tool and diagnostic to explore emerging technology trajectories and innovation ‘pathways’. We demonstrate that key patterns of evidence distribution on the roadmapping canvas have the potential to reveal where further evidence may need to be gathered, or where further triangulation of stakeholder perspectives may be required. We argue that by adaptively addressing these patterns at key stages within the roadmapping process (and appropriately re-scoping, re-prioritizing, and re-focusing foresight effort and resources), the granularity, coverage, and consensus of the roadmapping evidence can be greatly enhanced. We conclude the paper by summarizing a set of novel principles for adaptive agile roadmapping, reflecting on the implications for foresight more generally, and outlining a future research agenda to test and refine this approach to agile foresight.</description><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Strategic planning</subject><subject>Technological planning</subject><subject>Trends</subject><issn>2500-2597</issn><issn>2500-2597</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkF9LwzAUxYMoOOY-gwGfW5Obf40vUoZTYSDIfA5Zm3QdW1OTTti3t3MiPp0D53Du5YfQLSU5VQzYPQhCMhBa5UCA5pBLkRf0Ak3-gst__hrNUtoSQkBQYEpO0GPZtDuH34Ot97bv2655wGWHy9r2Q_vlcNn3Mdhqg4eAV67adGEXmiNehOhS22yGG3Tl7S652a9O0cfiaTV_yZZvz6_zcplVjPEh05yp2noqKSeu9lw5IFoyX0juOHOFZtZxW4ArmF577STRsK6sB6gVXVeKTdHdeXd85_Pg0mC24RC78aQBwYXmggo2ttS5VcWQUnTe9LHd23g0lJgfYObEwpxYmBMwA0YKU1D2DU6xXLI</recordid><startdate>20210101</startdate><enddate>20210101</enddate><creator>O’Sullivan, Eoin</creator><creator>Phaal, Rob</creator><creator>Featherston, Charles</creator><general>National Research University Higher School of Economics</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210101</creationdate><title>Agile Roadmapping: An Adaptive Approach to Technology Foresight</title><author>O’Sullivan, Eoin ; Phaal, Rob ; Featherston, Charles</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-9437daf16140edf47e20963f864e43e893ae4a82e839bf9e6092bcaf22d71bc73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Strategic planning</topic><topic>Technological planning</topic><topic>Trends</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>O’Sullivan, Eoin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phaal, Rob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Featherston, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>University of Cambridge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>UK Government Office of Science</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Foresight and STI governance</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>O’Sullivan, Eoin</au><au>Phaal, Rob</au><au>Featherston, Charles</au><aucorp>University of Cambridge</aucorp><aucorp>UK Government Office of Science</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Agile Roadmapping: An Adaptive Approach to Technology Foresight</atitle><jtitle>Foresight and STI governance</jtitle><date>2021-01-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>65</spage><epage>81</epage><pages>65-81</pages><issn>2500-2597</issn><eissn>2500-2597</eissn><abstract>Technology roadmapping has become an important foresight tool for science, technology, and innovation (STI) policy and technology strategy development. There are, however, challenges in translating evidence from foresight into the strategies of STI agencies and the planning of research &amp; technology development (RTD) organizations. While the foresight evaluation literature identifies methodological issues related to evidence granularity, scope, and stakeholder confidence, there is limited guidance on how to ensure roadmapping outputs are strategically relevant, appropriately detailed, and credible. This paper highlights the potential of using structured visual roadmapping frameworks to anticipate potential strategic foresight evidence failures and using the adaptive and iterative nature of roadmapping processes to address them. In this paper, we distinguish between: the roadmapping framework ‘canvas’; the foresight evidence captured on the canvas; the process of generating the evidence; and any final strategic plan developed using that evidence (with goals, milestones, actions, etc). We investigate efforts to use the roadmapping canvas as a research tool and diagnostic to explore emerging technology trajectories and innovation ‘pathways’. We demonstrate that key patterns of evidence distribution on the roadmapping canvas have the potential to reveal where further evidence may need to be gathered, or where further triangulation of stakeholder perspectives may be required. We argue that by adaptively addressing these patterns at key stages within the roadmapping process (and appropriately re-scoping, re-prioritizing, and re-focusing foresight effort and resources), the granularity, coverage, and consensus of the roadmapping evidence can be greatly enhanced. We conclude the paper by summarizing a set of novel principles for adaptive agile roadmapping, reflecting on the implications for foresight more generally, and outlining a future research agenda to test and refine this approach to agile foresight.</abstract><cop>Moscow</cop><pub>National Research University Higher School of Economics</pub><doi>10.17323/2500-2597.2021.2.65.81</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2500-2597
ispartof Foresight and STI governance, 2021-01, Vol.15 (2), p.65-81
issn 2500-2597
2500-2597
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2545945153
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
subjects Stakeholders
Strategic planning
Technological planning
Trends
title Agile Roadmapping: An Adaptive Approach to Technology Foresight
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T01%3A01%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Agile%20Roadmapping:%20An%20Adaptive%20Approach%20to%20Technology%20Foresight&rft.jtitle=Foresight%20and%20STI%20governance&rft.au=O%E2%80%99Sullivan,%20Eoin&rft.aucorp=University%20of%20Cambridge&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=65&rft.epage=81&rft.pages=65-81&rft.issn=2500-2597&rft.eissn=2500-2597&rft_id=info:doi/10.17323/2500-2597.2021.2.65.81&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2545945153%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2545945153&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true