Intensified constructed wetlands for the treatment of municipal wastewater: experimental investigation and kinetic modelling
This study reports organics and nutrient removal performances of the intensified constructed wetlands, i.e., tidal flow-based microbial fuel cell (MFC) and tidal flow wetlands that received municipal wastewater. The wetland systems were filled with organic (coco peat, biochar) or waste (Jhama brick,...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental science and pollution research international 2021-06, Vol.28 (24), p.30908-30928 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 30928 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 24 |
| container_start_page | 30908 |
| container_title | Environmental science and pollution research international |
| container_volume | 28 |
| creator | Saeed, Tanveer Miah, Md Jihad Khan, Tanbir |
| description | This study reports organics and nutrient removal performances of the intensified constructed wetlands, i.e., tidal flow-based microbial fuel cell (MFC) and tidal flow wetlands that received municipal wastewater. The wetland systems were filled with organic (coco peat, biochar) or waste (Jhama brick, steel slag) materials, planted with
Phragmites australis
or
Chrysopogon zizanioides
(Vetiver) species, and operated under three flood periods: 8, 16, 24 h. Input ammonia nitrogen (NH
3
–N), total nitrogen (TN), phosphorus (P), chemical oxygen demand (COD), and biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) load across the wetland systems ranged between 3–27, 12–78, 0.1–23, 36–1130, and 11–281 g/m
2
day, respectively; mean removal percentages were 60–83, 74–84, 95–100, 94–98, and 93–97%, respectively, throughout the experimental run. The wetland systems achieved similar organics and P removals; operational and media variation did not influence removal kinetics. All wetland systems achieved the highest TN removal (76–87%) when subjected to 24-h flood period. TN removal performances of waste material–based wetlands were comparable to organic media-based systems. Tidal flow-based MFC wetlands achieved better TN removal than tidal flow wetlands because of supplementary electron production through fuel cell–based organics degradation kinetics. Maximum power production rates across the tidal flow-based MFC wetlands ranged between 53 and 57 mW/m
2
. Monod kinetics–based continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) models predicted NH
3
–N, TN, and COD removals (in wetland systems) more accurately. Kinetic models confirmed the influence of substrate (i.e., pollutant) and environmental parameters on pollutant removal routes. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11356-021-12700-8 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2545810130</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2661004574</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-564b5873158f504c23808259c67010f2895b74590a7f517821ecea94264a09b83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9vFCEYh4mxsdvqF_BgSLx4GfvybwBvptHapIkXPROWfWelzjArMK4m_fCybtXEQ0-QvA8_fvAQ8pzBawagLwpjQvUdcNYxrgE684isWM9kp6W1j8kKrJQdE1KekrNSbgE4WK6fkFMhlJWqZytyd50qphKHiBsa5lRqXkJt-z3W0adNocOcaf2CtGb0dcJU6TzQaUkxxJ0f6d6XintfMb-h-GOHOR6YNojpO5Yat77GOdEWRb_GhDUGOs0bHMeYtk_JyeDHgs_u13Py-f27T5cfupuPV9eXb2-6IMHUTvVyrYwWTJlBgQxcGDBc2dBrYDBwY9VaS2XB60ExbTjDgN5K3ksPdm3EOXl1zN3l-dvSWrkpltA6-ITzUhzv-_ahUmnZ0Jf_obfzklNr57iSyjBgAhrFj1TIcykZB7dr7_b5p2PgDm7c0Y1rbtxvN-7Q4sV99LKecPP3yB8ZDRBHoLRR2mL-d_cDsb8ApPWaaw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2545810130</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intensified constructed wetlands for the treatment of municipal wastewater: experimental investigation and kinetic modelling</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Saeed, Tanveer ; Miah, Md Jihad ; Khan, Tanbir</creator><creatorcontrib>Saeed, Tanveer ; Miah, Md Jihad ; Khan, Tanbir</creatorcontrib><description>This study reports organics and nutrient removal performances of the intensified constructed wetlands, i.e., tidal flow-based microbial fuel cell (MFC) and tidal flow wetlands that received municipal wastewater. The wetland systems were filled with organic (coco peat, biochar) or waste (Jhama brick, steel slag) materials, planted with
Phragmites australis
or
Chrysopogon zizanioides
(Vetiver) species, and operated under three flood periods: 8, 16, 24 h. Input ammonia nitrogen (NH
3
–N), total nitrogen (TN), phosphorus (P), chemical oxygen demand (COD), and biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) load across the wetland systems ranged between 3–27, 12–78, 0.1–23, 36–1130, and 11–281 g/m
2
day, respectively; mean removal percentages were 60–83, 74–84, 95–100, 94–98, and 93–97%, respectively, throughout the experimental run. The wetland systems achieved similar organics and P removals; operational and media variation did not influence removal kinetics. All wetland systems achieved the highest TN removal (76–87%) when subjected to 24-h flood period. TN removal performances of waste material–based wetlands were comparable to organic media-based systems. Tidal flow-based MFC wetlands achieved better TN removal than tidal flow wetlands because of supplementary electron production through fuel cell–based organics degradation kinetics. Maximum power production rates across the tidal flow-based MFC wetlands ranged between 53 and 57 mW/m
2
. Monod kinetics–based continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) models predicted NH
3
–N, TN, and COD removals (in wetland systems) more accurately. Kinetic models confirmed the influence of substrate (i.e., pollutant) and environmental parameters on pollutant removal routes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0944-1344</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1614-7499</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-12700-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33594561</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Ammonia ; ammonium nitrogen ; Aquatic plants ; Aquatic Pollution ; Artificial wetlands ; Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution ; biochar ; Biochemical fuel cells ; Biochemical oxygen demand ; Biodegradation ; Biological Oxygen Demand Analysis ; bricks ; Charcoal ; Chemical oxygen demand ; Chrysopogon zizanioides ; Continuously stirred tank reactors ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecotoxicology ; Environment ; Environmental Chemistry ; Environmental Health ; Environmental science ; Fuel cells ; Fuel technology ; fuels ; Kinetics ; Maximum power ; microbial fuel cells ; Microorganisms ; Monod kinetics ; Municipal wastewater ; Nitrogen ; Nitrogen - analysis ; Nuclear fuels ; Nutrient removal ; Peat ; Phosphorus ; Phragmites australis ; Pollutant removal ; Pollutants ; pollution control ; power generation ; Research Article ; Slag ; slags ; species ; steel ; Substrates ; Tidal flow ; Tidal power ; total nitrogen ; Waste Disposal, Fluid ; Waste materials ; Waste Water Technology ; Wastewater ; Wastewater treatment ; Water Management ; Water Pollution Control ; Wetlands</subject><ispartof>Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021-06, Vol.28 (24), p.30908-30928</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-564b5873158f504c23808259c67010f2895b74590a7f517821ecea94264a09b83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-564b5873158f504c23808259c67010f2895b74590a7f517821ecea94264a09b83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11356-021-12700-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11356-021-12700-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33594561$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Saeed, Tanveer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miah, Md Jihad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Tanbir</creatorcontrib><title>Intensified constructed wetlands for the treatment of municipal wastewater: experimental investigation and kinetic modelling</title><title>Environmental science and pollution research international</title><addtitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res</addtitle><addtitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res Int</addtitle><description>This study reports organics and nutrient removal performances of the intensified constructed wetlands, i.e., tidal flow-based microbial fuel cell (MFC) and tidal flow wetlands that received municipal wastewater. The wetland systems were filled with organic (coco peat, biochar) or waste (Jhama brick, steel slag) materials, planted with
Phragmites australis
or
Chrysopogon zizanioides
(Vetiver) species, and operated under three flood periods: 8, 16, 24 h. Input ammonia nitrogen (NH
3
–N), total nitrogen (TN), phosphorus (P), chemical oxygen demand (COD), and biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) load across the wetland systems ranged between 3–27, 12–78, 0.1–23, 36–1130, and 11–281 g/m
2
day, respectively; mean removal percentages were 60–83, 74–84, 95–100, 94–98, and 93–97%, respectively, throughout the experimental run. The wetland systems achieved similar organics and P removals; operational and media variation did not influence removal kinetics. All wetland systems achieved the highest TN removal (76–87%) when subjected to 24-h flood period. TN removal performances of waste material–based wetlands were comparable to organic media-based systems. Tidal flow-based MFC wetlands achieved better TN removal than tidal flow wetlands because of supplementary electron production through fuel cell–based organics degradation kinetics. Maximum power production rates across the tidal flow-based MFC wetlands ranged between 53 and 57 mW/m
2
. Monod kinetics–based continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) models predicted NH
3
–N, TN, and COD removals (in wetland systems) more accurately. Kinetic models confirmed the influence of substrate (i.e., pollutant) and environmental parameters on pollutant removal routes.</description><subject>Ammonia</subject><subject>ammonium nitrogen</subject><subject>Aquatic plants</subject><subject>Aquatic Pollution</subject><subject>Artificial wetlands</subject><subject>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</subject><subject>biochar</subject><subject>Biochemical fuel cells</subject><subject>Biochemical oxygen demand</subject><subject>Biodegradation</subject><subject>Biological Oxygen Demand Analysis</subject><subject>bricks</subject><subject>Charcoal</subject><subject>Chemical oxygen demand</subject><subject>Chrysopogon zizanioides</subject><subject>Continuously stirred tank reactors</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Chemistry</subject><subject>Environmental Health</subject><subject>Environmental science</subject><subject>Fuel cells</subject><subject>Fuel technology</subject><subject>fuels</subject><subject>Kinetics</subject><subject>Maximum power</subject><subject>microbial fuel cells</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Monod kinetics</subject><subject>Municipal wastewater</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Nitrogen - analysis</subject><subject>Nuclear fuels</subject><subject>Nutrient removal</subject><subject>Peat</subject><subject>Phosphorus</subject><subject>Phragmites australis</subject><subject>Pollutant removal</subject><subject>Pollutants</subject><subject>pollution control</subject><subject>power generation</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Slag</subject><subject>slags</subject><subject>species</subject><subject>steel</subject><subject>Substrates</subject><subject>Tidal flow</subject><subject>Tidal power</subject><subject>total nitrogen</subject><subject>Waste Disposal, Fluid</subject><subject>Waste materials</subject><subject>Waste Water Technology</subject><subject>Wastewater</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment</subject><subject>Water Management</subject><subject>Water Pollution Control</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><issn>0944-1344</issn><issn>1614-7499</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9vFCEYh4mxsdvqF_BgSLx4GfvybwBvptHapIkXPROWfWelzjArMK4m_fCybtXEQ0-QvA8_fvAQ8pzBawagLwpjQvUdcNYxrgE684isWM9kp6W1j8kKrJQdE1KekrNSbgE4WK6fkFMhlJWqZytyd50qphKHiBsa5lRqXkJt-z3W0adNocOcaf2CtGb0dcJU6TzQaUkxxJ0f6d6XintfMb-h-GOHOR6YNojpO5Yat77GOdEWRb_GhDUGOs0bHMeYtk_JyeDHgs_u13Py-f27T5cfupuPV9eXb2-6IMHUTvVyrYwWTJlBgQxcGDBc2dBrYDBwY9VaS2XB60ExbTjDgN5K3ksPdm3EOXl1zN3l-dvSWrkpltA6-ITzUhzv-_ahUmnZ0Jf_obfzklNr57iSyjBgAhrFj1TIcykZB7dr7_b5p2PgDm7c0Y1rbtxvN-7Q4sV99LKecPP3yB8ZDRBHoLRR2mL-d_cDsb8ApPWaaw</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>Saeed, Tanveer</creator><creator>Miah, Md Jihad</creator><creator>Khan, Tanbir</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>Intensified constructed wetlands for the treatment of municipal wastewater: experimental investigation and kinetic modelling</title><author>Saeed, Tanveer ; Miah, Md Jihad ; Khan, Tanbir</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-564b5873158f504c23808259c67010f2895b74590a7f517821ecea94264a09b83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Ammonia</topic><topic>ammonium nitrogen</topic><topic>Aquatic plants</topic><topic>Aquatic Pollution</topic><topic>Artificial wetlands</topic><topic>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</topic><topic>biochar</topic><topic>Biochemical fuel cells</topic><topic>Biochemical oxygen demand</topic><topic>Biodegradation</topic><topic>Biological Oxygen Demand Analysis</topic><topic>bricks</topic><topic>Charcoal</topic><topic>Chemical oxygen demand</topic><topic>Chrysopogon zizanioides</topic><topic>Continuously stirred tank reactors</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Chemistry</topic><topic>Environmental Health</topic><topic>Environmental science</topic><topic>Fuel cells</topic><topic>Fuel technology</topic><topic>fuels</topic><topic>Kinetics</topic><topic>Maximum power</topic><topic>microbial fuel cells</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Monod kinetics</topic><topic>Municipal wastewater</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Nitrogen - analysis</topic><topic>Nuclear fuels</topic><topic>Nutrient removal</topic><topic>Peat</topic><topic>Phosphorus</topic><topic>Phragmites australis</topic><topic>Pollutant removal</topic><topic>Pollutants</topic><topic>pollution control</topic><topic>power generation</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Slag</topic><topic>slags</topic><topic>species</topic><topic>steel</topic><topic>Substrates</topic><topic>Tidal flow</topic><topic>Tidal power</topic><topic>total nitrogen</topic><topic>Waste Disposal, Fluid</topic><topic>Waste materials</topic><topic>Waste Water Technology</topic><topic>Wastewater</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment</topic><topic>Water Management</topic><topic>Water Pollution Control</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Saeed, Tanveer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miah, Md Jihad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Tanbir</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Environmental science and pollution research international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Saeed, Tanveer</au><au>Miah, Md Jihad</au><au>Khan, Tanbir</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intensified constructed wetlands for the treatment of municipal wastewater: experimental investigation and kinetic modelling</atitle><jtitle>Environmental science and pollution research international</jtitle><stitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res</stitle><addtitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res Int</addtitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>24</issue><spage>30908</spage><epage>30928</epage><pages>30908-30928</pages><issn>0944-1344</issn><eissn>1614-7499</eissn><abstract>This study reports organics and nutrient removal performances of the intensified constructed wetlands, i.e., tidal flow-based microbial fuel cell (MFC) and tidal flow wetlands that received municipal wastewater. The wetland systems were filled with organic (coco peat, biochar) or waste (Jhama brick, steel slag) materials, planted with
Phragmites australis
or
Chrysopogon zizanioides
(Vetiver) species, and operated under three flood periods: 8, 16, 24 h. Input ammonia nitrogen (NH
3
–N), total nitrogen (TN), phosphorus (P), chemical oxygen demand (COD), and biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) load across the wetland systems ranged between 3–27, 12–78, 0.1–23, 36–1130, and 11–281 g/m
2
day, respectively; mean removal percentages were 60–83, 74–84, 95–100, 94–98, and 93–97%, respectively, throughout the experimental run. The wetland systems achieved similar organics and P removals; operational and media variation did not influence removal kinetics. All wetland systems achieved the highest TN removal (76–87%) when subjected to 24-h flood period. TN removal performances of waste material–based wetlands were comparable to organic media-based systems. Tidal flow-based MFC wetlands achieved better TN removal than tidal flow wetlands because of supplementary electron production through fuel cell–based organics degradation kinetics. Maximum power production rates across the tidal flow-based MFC wetlands ranged between 53 and 57 mW/m
2
. Monod kinetics–based continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) models predicted NH
3
–N, TN, and COD removals (in wetland systems) more accurately. Kinetic models confirmed the influence of substrate (i.e., pollutant) and environmental parameters on pollutant removal routes.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>33594561</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11356-021-12700-8</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0944-1344 |
| ispartof | Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021-06, Vol.28 (24), p.30908-30928 |
| issn | 0944-1344 1614-7499 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2545810130 |
| source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
| subjects | Ammonia ammonium nitrogen Aquatic plants Aquatic Pollution Artificial wetlands Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution biochar Biochemical fuel cells Biochemical oxygen demand Biodegradation Biological Oxygen Demand Analysis bricks Charcoal Chemical oxygen demand Chrysopogon zizanioides Continuously stirred tank reactors Earth and Environmental Science Ecotoxicology Environment Environmental Chemistry Environmental Health Environmental science Fuel cells Fuel technology fuels Kinetics Maximum power microbial fuel cells Microorganisms Monod kinetics Municipal wastewater Nitrogen Nitrogen - analysis Nuclear fuels Nutrient removal Peat Phosphorus Phragmites australis Pollutant removal Pollutants pollution control power generation Research Article Slag slags species steel Substrates Tidal flow Tidal power total nitrogen Waste Disposal, Fluid Waste materials Waste Water Technology Wastewater Wastewater treatment Water Management Water Pollution Control Wetlands |
| title | Intensified constructed wetlands for the treatment of municipal wastewater: experimental investigation and kinetic modelling |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T17%3A27%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intensified%20constructed%20wetlands%20for%20the%20treatment%20of%20municipal%20wastewater:%20experimental%20investigation%20and%20kinetic%20modelling&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20science%20and%20pollution%20research%20international&rft.au=Saeed,%20Tanveer&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=24&rft.spage=30908&rft.epage=30928&rft.pages=30908-30928&rft.issn=0944-1344&rft.eissn=1614-7499&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11356-021-12700-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2661004574%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2545810130&rft_id=info:pmid/33594561&rfr_iscdi=true |