Combination of Herbicide Band Application and Inter-Row Cultivation Provides Sustainable Weed Control in Maize
Herbicides have facilitated weed management but their incorrect use can lead to environmental contamination. Reducing herbicide use by limiting their application to a band along the crop row can decrease their environmental impact. Three field experiments were conducted in North-eastern Italy to eva...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Agronomy (Basel) 2020-01, Vol.10 (1), p.20 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 20 |
| container_title | Agronomy (Basel) |
| container_volume | 10 |
| creator | Loddo, Donato Scarabel, Laura Sattin, Maurizio Pederzoli, Antonio Morsiani, Chiara Canestrale, Renato Tommasini, Maria Grazia |
| description | Herbicides have facilitated weed management but their incorrect use can lead to environmental contamination. Reducing herbicide use by limiting their application to a band along the crop row can decrease their environmental impact. Three field experiments were conducted in North-eastern Italy to evaluate herbicide band application systems integrated with inter-row hoeing for silage maize. Post-emergence herbicide band application (sprayed area 50% of total field; herbicide dose 50% of that recommended, application with an inter-row cultivator prototype) was compared with pre-emergence band application (sprayed area 33% of total field; herbicide dose 33% of that recommended, application with a seeder) and pre-emergence broadcast application (sprayed area 100% of total field; full recommended herbicide dose, application with a boom sprayer) that is standard management for maize. Weed density and composition were evaluated before and after post-emergence herbicide application and at crop harvest. Crop yield was also recorded. Weed density in untreated areas ranged between 5 and 15 plants m−2 in the different experiments. Optimal weed control and good yields were achieved without significant differences between all treatments. Herbicide band application can provide optimal weed control in silage maize, at the same time allowing a relevant reduction of herbicide input. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3390/agronomy10010020 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2545589382</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2545589382</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c313t-5e55b05d22784e196f060365431b991b92e639bf2183ba06dfe6a331e92223813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUN9LwzAQDqLgmHv3MeBzNck1XfM4i7rBRPEHPpa0vUpGl9Sk3Zh_vR31QTzuuDu-776Dj5BLzq4BFLvRn95Ztz1wxoYU7IRMBJtDFIOSp3_mczILYcOGUBxSNp8Qm7ltYazujLPU1XSJvjClqZDealvRRds2phzR476yHfroxe1p1jed2Y3Is3e74STQ1z50elArGqQfiBXNnO28a6ix9FGbb7wgZ7VuAs5--5S839-9Zcto_fSwyhbrqAQOXSRRyoLJSoh5GiNXSc0SBomMgRdKDSUwAVXUgqdQaJZUNSYagKMSQkDKYUquRt3Wu68eQ5dvXO_t8DIXMpYyVZCKgcVGVuldCB7rvPVmq_0h5yw_Gpv_NxZ-AHZMbLY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2545589382</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Combination of Herbicide Band Application and Inter-Row Cultivation Provides Sustainable Weed Control in Maize</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><creator>Loddo, Donato ; Scarabel, Laura ; Sattin, Maurizio ; Pederzoli, Antonio ; Morsiani, Chiara ; Canestrale, Renato ; Tommasini, Maria Grazia</creator><creatorcontrib>Loddo, Donato ; Scarabel, Laura ; Sattin, Maurizio ; Pederzoli, Antonio ; Morsiani, Chiara ; Canestrale, Renato ; Tommasini, Maria Grazia</creatorcontrib><description>Herbicides have facilitated weed management but their incorrect use can lead to environmental contamination. Reducing herbicide use by limiting their application to a band along the crop row can decrease their environmental impact. Three field experiments were conducted in North-eastern Italy to evaluate herbicide band application systems integrated with inter-row hoeing for silage maize. Post-emergence herbicide band application (sprayed area 50% of total field; herbicide dose 50% of that recommended, application with an inter-row cultivator prototype) was compared with pre-emergence band application (sprayed area 33% of total field; herbicide dose 33% of that recommended, application with a seeder) and pre-emergence broadcast application (sprayed area 100% of total field; full recommended herbicide dose, application with a boom sprayer) that is standard management for maize. Weed density and composition were evaluated before and after post-emergence herbicide application and at crop harvest. Crop yield was also recorded. Weed density in untreated areas ranged between 5 and 15 plants m−2 in the different experiments. Optimal weed control and good yields were achieved without significant differences between all treatments. Herbicide band application can provide optimal weed control in silage maize, at the same time allowing a relevant reduction of herbicide input.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2073-4395</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2073-4395</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/agronomy10010020</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Contamination ; Corn ; Crop rotation ; Crop yield ; Crops ; Density ; Environmental impact ; Experiments ; Field tests ; Herbicides ; Nozzles ; Pesticides ; Silage ; Sprays ; Weed control ; Weeds</subject><ispartof>Agronomy (Basel), 2020-01, Vol.10 (1), p.20</ispartof><rights>2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c313t-5e55b05d22784e196f060365431b991b92e639bf2183ba06dfe6a331e92223813</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c313t-5e55b05d22784e196f060365431b991b92e639bf2183ba06dfe6a331e92223813</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9144-3816 ; 0000-0001-8118-9973</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Loddo, Donato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scarabel, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sattin, Maurizio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pederzoli, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morsiani, Chiara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Canestrale, Renato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tommasini, Maria Grazia</creatorcontrib><title>Combination of Herbicide Band Application and Inter-Row Cultivation Provides Sustainable Weed Control in Maize</title><title>Agronomy (Basel)</title><description>Herbicides have facilitated weed management but their incorrect use can lead to environmental contamination. Reducing herbicide use by limiting their application to a band along the crop row can decrease their environmental impact. Three field experiments were conducted in North-eastern Italy to evaluate herbicide band application systems integrated with inter-row hoeing for silage maize. Post-emergence herbicide band application (sprayed area 50% of total field; herbicide dose 50% of that recommended, application with an inter-row cultivator prototype) was compared with pre-emergence band application (sprayed area 33% of total field; herbicide dose 33% of that recommended, application with a seeder) and pre-emergence broadcast application (sprayed area 100% of total field; full recommended herbicide dose, application with a boom sprayer) that is standard management for maize. Weed density and composition were evaluated before and after post-emergence herbicide application and at crop harvest. Crop yield was also recorded. Weed density in untreated areas ranged between 5 and 15 plants m−2 in the different experiments. Optimal weed control and good yields were achieved without significant differences between all treatments. Herbicide band application can provide optimal weed control in silage maize, at the same time allowing a relevant reduction of herbicide input.</description><subject>Contamination</subject><subject>Corn</subject><subject>Crop rotation</subject><subject>Crop yield</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Field tests</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Nozzles</subject><subject>Pesticides</subject><subject>Silage</subject><subject>Sprays</subject><subject>Weed control</subject><subject>Weeds</subject><issn>2073-4395</issn><issn>2073-4395</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUN9LwzAQDqLgmHv3MeBzNck1XfM4i7rBRPEHPpa0vUpGl9Sk3Zh_vR31QTzuuDu-776Dj5BLzq4BFLvRn95Ztz1wxoYU7IRMBJtDFIOSp3_mczILYcOGUBxSNp8Qm7ltYazujLPU1XSJvjClqZDealvRRds2phzR476yHfroxe1p1jed2Y3Is3e74STQ1z50elArGqQfiBXNnO28a6ix9FGbb7wgZ7VuAs5--5S839-9Zcto_fSwyhbrqAQOXSRRyoLJSoh5GiNXSc0SBomMgRdKDSUwAVXUgqdQaJZUNSYagKMSQkDKYUquRt3Wu68eQ5dvXO_t8DIXMpYyVZCKgcVGVuldCB7rvPVmq_0h5yw_Gpv_NxZ-AHZMbLY</recordid><startdate>20200101</startdate><enddate>20200101</enddate><creator>Loddo, Donato</creator><creator>Scarabel, Laura</creator><creator>Sattin, Maurizio</creator><creator>Pederzoli, Antonio</creator><creator>Morsiani, Chiara</creator><creator>Canestrale, Renato</creator><creator>Tommasini, Maria Grazia</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9144-3816</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8118-9973</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200101</creationdate><title>Combination of Herbicide Band Application and Inter-Row Cultivation Provides Sustainable Weed Control in Maize</title><author>Loddo, Donato ; Scarabel, Laura ; Sattin, Maurizio ; Pederzoli, Antonio ; Morsiani, Chiara ; Canestrale, Renato ; Tommasini, Maria Grazia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c313t-5e55b05d22784e196f060365431b991b92e639bf2183ba06dfe6a331e92223813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Contamination</topic><topic>Corn</topic><topic>Crop rotation</topic><topic>Crop yield</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Field tests</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Nozzles</topic><topic>Pesticides</topic><topic>Silage</topic><topic>Sprays</topic><topic>Weed control</topic><topic>Weeds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Loddo, Donato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scarabel, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sattin, Maurizio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pederzoli, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morsiani, Chiara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Canestrale, Renato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tommasini, Maria Grazia</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Agronomy (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Loddo, Donato</au><au>Scarabel, Laura</au><au>Sattin, Maurizio</au><au>Pederzoli, Antonio</au><au>Morsiani, Chiara</au><au>Canestrale, Renato</au><au>Tommasini, Maria Grazia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Combination of Herbicide Band Application and Inter-Row Cultivation Provides Sustainable Weed Control in Maize</atitle><jtitle>Agronomy (Basel)</jtitle><date>2020-01-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>20</spage><pages>20-</pages><issn>2073-4395</issn><eissn>2073-4395</eissn><abstract>Herbicides have facilitated weed management but their incorrect use can lead to environmental contamination. Reducing herbicide use by limiting their application to a band along the crop row can decrease their environmental impact. Three field experiments were conducted in North-eastern Italy to evaluate herbicide band application systems integrated with inter-row hoeing for silage maize. Post-emergence herbicide band application (sprayed area 50% of total field; herbicide dose 50% of that recommended, application with an inter-row cultivator prototype) was compared with pre-emergence band application (sprayed area 33% of total field; herbicide dose 33% of that recommended, application with a seeder) and pre-emergence broadcast application (sprayed area 100% of total field; full recommended herbicide dose, application with a boom sprayer) that is standard management for maize. Weed density and composition were evaluated before and after post-emergence herbicide application and at crop harvest. Crop yield was also recorded. Weed density in untreated areas ranged between 5 and 15 plants m−2 in the different experiments. Optimal weed control and good yields were achieved without significant differences between all treatments. Herbicide band application can provide optimal weed control in silage maize, at the same time allowing a relevant reduction of herbicide input.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/agronomy10010020</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9144-3816</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8118-9973</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2073-4395 |
| ispartof | Agronomy (Basel), 2020-01, Vol.10 (1), p.20 |
| issn | 2073-4395 2073-4395 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2545589382 |
| source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute |
| subjects | Contamination Corn Crop rotation Crop yield Crops Density Environmental impact Experiments Field tests Herbicides Nozzles Pesticides Silage Sprays Weed control Weeds |
| title | Combination of Herbicide Band Application and Inter-Row Cultivation Provides Sustainable Weed Control in Maize |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T01%3A00%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Combination%20of%20Herbicide%20Band%20Application%20and%20Inter-Row%20Cultivation%20Provides%20Sustainable%20Weed%20Control%20in%20Maize&rft.jtitle=Agronomy%20(Basel)&rft.au=Loddo,%20Donato&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=20&rft.pages=20-&rft.issn=2073-4395&rft.eissn=2073-4395&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/agronomy10010020&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2545589382%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2545589382&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |