Ruminal Protozoal Populations of Angus Steers Differing in Feed Efficiency
Feed accounts for as much as 70% of beef production costs, and improvement of the efficiency with which animals convert feed to product has the potential to have substantial financial impact on the beef industry. The rumen microbiome plays a key role in determining feed efficiency; however, previous...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Animals (Basel) 2021-05, Vol.11 (6), p.1561 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1561 |
container_title | Animals (Basel) |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Clemmons, Brooke A. Shin, Sung B. Smith, Timothy P. L. Embree, Mallory M. Voy, Brynn H. Schneider, Liesel G. Donohoe, Dallas R. McLean, Kyle J. Myer, Phillip R. |
description | Feed accounts for as much as 70% of beef production costs, and improvement of the efficiency with which animals convert feed to product has the potential to have substantial financial impact on the beef industry. The rumen microbiome plays a key role in determining feed efficiency; however, previous studies of rumen microbiota have not focused on protozoal communities despite the estimation that these organisms represent approximately 50% of rumen content biomass. Protozoal communities participate in the regulation of bacterial populations and nitrogen cycling—key aspects of microbiome dynamics. The present study focused on identifying potential associations of protozoal community profiles with feed efficiency. Weaned steers (n = 50) 7 months of age weighing approximately 260 kg were adapted to a growing ration and GrowSafe for 2 weeks prior to a 70-day feed efficiency trial. The GrowSafe system is a feeding system that monitors feed intake in real time. Body weights were collected on the first day and then every 7 days of the feed efficiency trial, and on the final day, approximately 50 mL of rumen content were collected via orogastric tubing and frozen at −80 °C. Body weight and feed intake were used to calculate residual feed intake (RFI) as a measure of feed efficiency, and steers were categorized as high (n = 14) or low (n = 10) RFI based on ±0.5 standard deviations about the mean RFI. Microbial DNA was extracted, and the eukaryotic component profiled by amplification and sequencing of 18S genes using degenerate primers that can amplify this locus across a range of protists. The taxonomy of protozoal sequences was assigned using QIIME 1.9 and analyzed using QIIME and SAS 9.4 with significance determined at α ≤ 0.05. Greater abundances of unassigned taxa were associated with high-RFI steers (p = 0.03), indicating a need for further study to identify component protozoal species. Differences were observed between low- and high-RFI steers in protozoal community phylogenetic diversity, including weighted beta-diversity (p = 0.04), Faith’s phylogenetic diversity (p = 0.03), and observed Operational taxonomic unit (OTU) (p = 0.03). The unassigned taxa and differences in phylogenetic diversity of protozoal communities may contribute to divergences observed in feed efficiency phenotypes in beef steers. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/ani11061561 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2544565094</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_418386d288aa4659a975dd1842de449c</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2536466806</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-5363de88bbc270f6dca07e19020d2cdf318ca3c5b79212489391258a8f84e38f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkd9LHDEQgEOpVFGf_AcW-lIoZ_N7k5fCcT2tRVBafQ65ZHLm2EuuyW7h_Ovd80S085JJ5uNjJoPQGcHnjGn8zaZICJZESPIBHVHcygkdbx_f5IfotNYVHqMVjAjyCR0yjluimDpCv34P65hs19yW3OfHvMvyZuhsH3OqTQ7NNC2H2vzpAUptfsQQoMS0bGJqLgB8Mw8hugjJbU_QQbBdhdOX8xjdX8zvZj8n1zeXV7Pp9cRxQfuJYJJ5UGqxcLTFQXpncQtEY4o9dT4wopxlTixaTQnlSjNNqFBWBcWBqcCO0dXe67NdmU2Ja1u2Jttonh9yWRpb-ug6MHw3pPRUKWu5FNrqVnhPFKceONdudH3fuzbDYg3eQeqL7d5J31dSfDDL_M8oSrWS7Sj48iIo-e8AtTfrWB10nU2Qh2roOC6XUmE5op__Q1d5KOPf7yjOhRRY85H6uqdcybUWCK_NEGx2KzdvVs6eAFoHmz4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2544565094</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ruminal Protozoal Populations of Angus Steers Differing in Feed Efficiency</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Clemmons, Brooke A. ; Shin, Sung B. ; Smith, Timothy P. L. ; Embree, Mallory M. ; Voy, Brynn H. ; Schneider, Liesel G. ; Donohoe, Dallas R. ; McLean, Kyle J. ; Myer, Phillip R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Clemmons, Brooke A. ; Shin, Sung B. ; Smith, Timothy P. L. ; Embree, Mallory M. ; Voy, Brynn H. ; Schneider, Liesel G. ; Donohoe, Dallas R. ; McLean, Kyle J. ; Myer, Phillip R.</creatorcontrib><description>Feed accounts for as much as 70% of beef production costs, and improvement of the efficiency with which animals convert feed to product has the potential to have substantial financial impact on the beef industry. The rumen microbiome plays a key role in determining feed efficiency; however, previous studies of rumen microbiota have not focused on protozoal communities despite the estimation that these organisms represent approximately 50% of rumen content biomass. Protozoal communities participate in the regulation of bacterial populations and nitrogen cycling—key aspects of microbiome dynamics. The present study focused on identifying potential associations of protozoal community profiles with feed efficiency. Weaned steers (n = 50) 7 months of age weighing approximately 260 kg were adapted to a growing ration and GrowSafe for 2 weeks prior to a 70-day feed efficiency trial. The GrowSafe system is a feeding system that monitors feed intake in real time. Body weights were collected on the first day and then every 7 days of the feed efficiency trial, and on the final day, approximately 50 mL of rumen content were collected via orogastric tubing and frozen at −80 °C. Body weight and feed intake were used to calculate residual feed intake (RFI) as a measure of feed efficiency, and steers were categorized as high (n = 14) or low (n = 10) RFI based on ±0.5 standard deviations about the mean RFI. Microbial DNA was extracted, and the eukaryotic component profiled by amplification and sequencing of 18S genes using degenerate primers that can amplify this locus across a range of protists. The taxonomy of protozoal sequences was assigned using QIIME 1.9 and analyzed using QIIME and SAS 9.4 with significance determined at α ≤ 0.05. Greater abundances of unassigned taxa were associated with high-RFI steers (p = 0.03), indicating a need for further study to identify component protozoal species. Differences were observed between low- and high-RFI steers in protozoal community phylogenetic diversity, including weighted beta-diversity (p = 0.04), Faith’s phylogenetic diversity (p = 0.03), and observed Operational taxonomic unit (OTU) (p = 0.03). The unassigned taxa and differences in phylogenetic diversity of protozoal communities may contribute to divergences observed in feed efficiency phenotypes in beef steers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2076-2615</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2076-2615</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/ani11061561</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34071838</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Animals ; Bacteria ; Beef ; Biodegradation ; Body weight ; Cattle ; Community involvement ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; Divergence ; DNA ; DNA sequencing ; Efficiency ; Fatty acids ; Feed efficiency ; Feeds ; Genera ; Genetic testing ; Meat production ; Metabolism ; Methanogenesis ; microbiome ; Microbiomes ; Microbiota ; Microorganisms ; Nitrogen ; Nitrogen cycle ; Normal distribution ; Nutrition ; Phenotypes ; Phylogeny ; Populations ; Production costs ; Proteins ; Protozoa ; Rumen ; Species diversity ; Taxa ; Taxonomy ; Variance analysis</subject><ispartof>Animals (Basel), 2021-05, Vol.11 (6), p.1561</ispartof><rights>2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 by the authors. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-5363de88bbc270f6dca07e19020d2cdf318ca3c5b79212489391258a8f84e38f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-5363de88bbc270f6dca07e19020d2cdf318ca3c5b79212489391258a8f84e38f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1923-9110 ; 0000-0003-1611-6828 ; 0000-0002-1980-2105</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8229867/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8229867/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Clemmons, Brooke A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, Sung B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Timothy P. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Embree, Mallory M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voy, Brynn H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Liesel G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donohoe, Dallas R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLean, Kyle J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Myer, Phillip R.</creatorcontrib><title>Ruminal Protozoal Populations of Angus Steers Differing in Feed Efficiency</title><title>Animals (Basel)</title><description>Feed accounts for as much as 70% of beef production costs, and improvement of the efficiency with which animals convert feed to product has the potential to have substantial financial impact on the beef industry. The rumen microbiome plays a key role in determining feed efficiency; however, previous studies of rumen microbiota have not focused on protozoal communities despite the estimation that these organisms represent approximately 50% of rumen content biomass. Protozoal communities participate in the regulation of bacterial populations and nitrogen cycling—key aspects of microbiome dynamics. The present study focused on identifying potential associations of protozoal community profiles with feed efficiency. Weaned steers (n = 50) 7 months of age weighing approximately 260 kg were adapted to a growing ration and GrowSafe for 2 weeks prior to a 70-day feed efficiency trial. The GrowSafe system is a feeding system that monitors feed intake in real time. Body weights were collected on the first day and then every 7 days of the feed efficiency trial, and on the final day, approximately 50 mL of rumen content were collected via orogastric tubing and frozen at −80 °C. Body weight and feed intake were used to calculate residual feed intake (RFI) as a measure of feed efficiency, and steers were categorized as high (n = 14) or low (n = 10) RFI based on ±0.5 standard deviations about the mean RFI. Microbial DNA was extracted, and the eukaryotic component profiled by amplification and sequencing of 18S genes using degenerate primers that can amplify this locus across a range of protists. The taxonomy of protozoal sequences was assigned using QIIME 1.9 and analyzed using QIIME and SAS 9.4 with significance determined at α ≤ 0.05. Greater abundances of unassigned taxa were associated with high-RFI steers (p = 0.03), indicating a need for further study to identify component protozoal species. Differences were observed between low- and high-RFI steers in protozoal community phylogenetic diversity, including weighted beta-diversity (p = 0.04), Faith’s phylogenetic diversity (p = 0.03), and observed Operational taxonomic unit (OTU) (p = 0.03). The unassigned taxa and differences in phylogenetic diversity of protozoal communities may contribute to divergences observed in feed efficiency phenotypes in beef steers.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Beef</subject><subject>Biodegradation</subject><subject>Body weight</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Community involvement</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>Divergence</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>DNA sequencing</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Fatty acids</subject><subject>Feed efficiency</subject><subject>Feeds</subject><subject>Genera</subject><subject>Genetic testing</subject><subject>Meat production</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>Methanogenesis</subject><subject>microbiome</subject><subject>Microbiomes</subject><subject>Microbiota</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Nitrogen cycle</subject><subject>Normal distribution</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Phenotypes</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>Production costs</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Protozoa</subject><subject>Rumen</subject><subject>Species diversity</subject><subject>Taxa</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><issn>2076-2615</issn><issn>2076-2615</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkd9LHDEQgEOpVFGf_AcW-lIoZ_N7k5fCcT2tRVBafQ65ZHLm2EuuyW7h_Ovd80S085JJ5uNjJoPQGcHnjGn8zaZICJZESPIBHVHcygkdbx_f5IfotNYVHqMVjAjyCR0yjluimDpCv34P65hs19yW3OfHvMvyZuhsH3OqTQ7NNC2H2vzpAUptfsQQoMS0bGJqLgB8Mw8hugjJbU_QQbBdhdOX8xjdX8zvZj8n1zeXV7Pp9cRxQfuJYJJ5UGqxcLTFQXpncQtEY4o9dT4wopxlTixaTQnlSjNNqFBWBcWBqcCO0dXe67NdmU2Ja1u2Jttonh9yWRpb-ug6MHw3pPRUKWu5FNrqVnhPFKceONdudH3fuzbDYg3eQeqL7d5J31dSfDDL_M8oSrWS7Sj48iIo-e8AtTfrWB10nU2Qh2roOC6XUmE5op__Q1d5KOPf7yjOhRRY85H6uqdcybUWCK_NEGx2KzdvVs6eAFoHmz4</recordid><startdate>20210527</startdate><enddate>20210527</enddate><creator>Clemmons, Brooke A.</creator><creator>Shin, Sung B.</creator><creator>Smith, Timothy P. L.</creator><creator>Embree, Mallory M.</creator><creator>Voy, Brynn H.</creator><creator>Schneider, Liesel G.</creator><creator>Donohoe, Dallas R.</creator><creator>McLean, Kyle J.</creator><creator>Myer, Phillip R.</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1923-9110</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1611-6828</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1980-2105</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210527</creationdate><title>Ruminal Protozoal Populations of Angus Steers Differing in Feed Efficiency</title><author>Clemmons, Brooke A. ; Shin, Sung B. ; Smith, Timothy P. L. ; Embree, Mallory M. ; Voy, Brynn H. ; Schneider, Liesel G. ; Donohoe, Dallas R. ; McLean, Kyle J. ; Myer, Phillip R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-5363de88bbc270f6dca07e19020d2cdf318ca3c5b79212489391258a8f84e38f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Beef</topic><topic>Biodegradation</topic><topic>Body weight</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Community involvement</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>Divergence</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>DNA sequencing</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Fatty acids</topic><topic>Feed efficiency</topic><topic>Feeds</topic><topic>Genera</topic><topic>Genetic testing</topic><topic>Meat production</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>Methanogenesis</topic><topic>microbiome</topic><topic>Microbiomes</topic><topic>Microbiota</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Nitrogen cycle</topic><topic>Normal distribution</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Phenotypes</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>Production costs</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Protozoa</topic><topic>Rumen</topic><topic>Species diversity</topic><topic>Taxa</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Clemmons, Brooke A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, Sung B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Timothy P. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Embree, Mallory M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voy, Brynn H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Liesel G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donohoe, Dallas R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLean, Kyle J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Myer, Phillip R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Animals (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Clemmons, Brooke A.</au><au>Shin, Sung B.</au><au>Smith, Timothy P. L.</au><au>Embree, Mallory M.</au><au>Voy, Brynn H.</au><au>Schneider, Liesel G.</au><au>Donohoe, Dallas R.</au><au>McLean, Kyle J.</au><au>Myer, Phillip R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ruminal Protozoal Populations of Angus Steers Differing in Feed Efficiency</atitle><jtitle>Animals (Basel)</jtitle><date>2021-05-27</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1561</spage><pages>1561-</pages><issn>2076-2615</issn><eissn>2076-2615</eissn><abstract>Feed accounts for as much as 70% of beef production costs, and improvement of the efficiency with which animals convert feed to product has the potential to have substantial financial impact on the beef industry. The rumen microbiome plays a key role in determining feed efficiency; however, previous studies of rumen microbiota have not focused on protozoal communities despite the estimation that these organisms represent approximately 50% of rumen content biomass. Protozoal communities participate in the regulation of bacterial populations and nitrogen cycling—key aspects of microbiome dynamics. The present study focused on identifying potential associations of protozoal community profiles with feed efficiency. Weaned steers (n = 50) 7 months of age weighing approximately 260 kg were adapted to a growing ration and GrowSafe for 2 weeks prior to a 70-day feed efficiency trial. The GrowSafe system is a feeding system that monitors feed intake in real time. Body weights were collected on the first day and then every 7 days of the feed efficiency trial, and on the final day, approximately 50 mL of rumen content were collected via orogastric tubing and frozen at −80 °C. Body weight and feed intake were used to calculate residual feed intake (RFI) as a measure of feed efficiency, and steers were categorized as high (n = 14) or low (n = 10) RFI based on ±0.5 standard deviations about the mean RFI. Microbial DNA was extracted, and the eukaryotic component profiled by amplification and sequencing of 18S genes using degenerate primers that can amplify this locus across a range of protists. The taxonomy of protozoal sequences was assigned using QIIME 1.9 and analyzed using QIIME and SAS 9.4 with significance determined at α ≤ 0.05. Greater abundances of unassigned taxa were associated with high-RFI steers (p = 0.03), indicating a need for further study to identify component protozoal species. Differences were observed between low- and high-RFI steers in protozoal community phylogenetic diversity, including weighted beta-diversity (p = 0.04), Faith’s phylogenetic diversity (p = 0.03), and observed Operational taxonomic unit (OTU) (p = 0.03). The unassigned taxa and differences in phylogenetic diversity of protozoal communities may contribute to divergences observed in feed efficiency phenotypes in beef steers.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>34071838</pmid><doi>10.3390/ani11061561</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1923-9110</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1611-6828</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1980-2105</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2076-2615 |
ispartof | Animals (Basel), 2021-05, Vol.11 (6), p.1561 |
issn | 2076-2615 2076-2615 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2544565094 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Animals Bacteria Beef Biodegradation Body weight Cattle Community involvement Deoxyribonucleic acid Divergence DNA DNA sequencing Efficiency Fatty acids Feed efficiency Feeds Genera Genetic testing Meat production Metabolism Methanogenesis microbiome Microbiomes Microbiota Microorganisms Nitrogen Nitrogen cycle Normal distribution Nutrition Phenotypes Phylogeny Populations Production costs Proteins Protozoa Rumen Species diversity Taxa Taxonomy Variance analysis |
title | Ruminal Protozoal Populations of Angus Steers Differing in Feed Efficiency |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T03%3A23%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ruminal%20Protozoal%20Populations%20of%20Angus%20Steers%20Differing%20in%20Feed%20Efficiency&rft.jtitle=Animals%20(Basel)&rft.au=Clemmons,%20Brooke%20A.&rft.date=2021-05-27&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1561&rft.pages=1561-&rft.issn=2076-2615&rft.eissn=2076-2615&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/ani11061561&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2536466806%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2544565094&rft_id=info:pmid/34071838&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_418386d288aa4659a975dd1842de449c&rfr_iscdi=true |