A Kinetic Approach for Assessing the Uptake of Ag from Pristine and Sulfidized Ag Nanomaterials to Plants

Nanomaterials (NMs) are thermodynamically unstable by nature, and exposure of soil organisms to NMs in the terrestrial environment cannot be assumed constant. Thus, steady‐state conditions may not apply to NMs, and bioaccumulation modeling for uptake should follow a dynamic approach. The one‐compart...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental toxicology and chemistry 2021-07, Vol.40 (7), p.1861-1872
Hauptverfasser: Lahive, E., Schultz, C.L., Van Gestel, C.A.M., Robinson, A., Horton, A.A., Spurgeon, D.J., Svendsen, C., Busquets‐Fité, M., Matzke, M., Green Etxabe, A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1872
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1861
container_title Environmental toxicology and chemistry
container_volume 40
creator Lahive, E.
Schultz, C.L.
Van Gestel, C.A.M.
Robinson, A.
Horton, A.A.
Spurgeon, D.J.
Svendsen, C.
Busquets‐Fité, M.
Matzke, M.
Green Etxabe, A.
description Nanomaterials (NMs) are thermodynamically unstable by nature, and exposure of soil organisms to NMs in the terrestrial environment cannot be assumed constant. Thus, steady‐state conditions may not apply to NMs, and bioaccumulation modeling for uptake should follow a dynamic approach. The one‐compartment model allows the uptake and elimination of a chemical to be determined, while also permitting changes in exposure and growth to be taken into account. The aim of the present study was to investigate the accumulation of Ag from different Ag NM types (20 nm Ag0 NMs, 50 nm Ag0 NMs, and 25 nm Ag2S NMs) in the crop plant wheat (Triticum aestivum). Seeds were emerged in contaminated soils (3 or 10 mg Ag/kg dry soil, nominal) and plants grown for up to 42 d postemergence. Plant roots and shoots were collected after 1, 7, 14, 21, and 42 d postemergence; and total Ag was measured. Soil porewater Ag concentrations were also measured at each sampling time. Using the plant growth rates in the different treatments and the changing porewater concentrations as parameters, the one‐compartment model was used to estimate the uptake and elimination of Ag from the plant tissues. The best fit of the model to the data included growth rate and porewater concentration decline, while showing elimination of Ag to be close to zero. Uptake was highest for Ag0 NMs, and size did not influence their uptake rates. Accumulation of Ag from Ag2S NMs was lower, as reflected by the lower porewater concentrations. Environ Toxicol Chem 2021;40:1861–1872. © 2021 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/etc.5031
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2544501319</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2544501319</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3831-e4c6cb106c0dbc772a8744e77a4c3b4df01ea234c2669cfc57ac1d9506fc54533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtOwzAQRS0EoqUg8QXIEhs2KXb8SpYR4iUqqARdR47jtC55YTtC5etxaWHHyiPPmTuaA8A5RlOMUHytvZoyRPABGGPG4ijhODkEYyQIikTMkxE4cW6NEOZpmh6DESGcY0boGJgMPplWe6Ng1ve2k2oFq87CzDntnGmX0K80XPRevmvYVTBbwsp2DZxb43wYhLIt4etQV6Y0X7rc9p9l2zXSa2tk7aDv4LyWrXen4KgKH_ps_07A4u727eYhmr3cP95ks0iRhOBIU8VVgRFXqCyUELFMBKVaCEkVKWhZIaxlTKiKOU9VpZiQCpcpQzzUlBEyAZe73HDNx6Cdz9fdYNuwMo8ZpQxhgtNAXe0oZTvnrK7y3ppG2k2OUb51mgen-dZpQC_2gUPR6PIP_JUYgGgHfJpab_4NygPzE_gN3ht_OQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2544501319</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Kinetic Approach for Assessing the Uptake of Ag from Pristine and Sulfidized Ag Nanomaterials to Plants</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Lahive, E. ; Schultz, C.L. ; Van Gestel, C.A.M. ; Robinson, A. ; Horton, A.A. ; Spurgeon, D.J. ; Svendsen, C. ; Busquets‐Fité, M. ; Matzke, M. ; Green Etxabe, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lahive, E. ; Schultz, C.L. ; Van Gestel, C.A.M. ; Robinson, A. ; Horton, A.A. ; Spurgeon, D.J. ; Svendsen, C. ; Busquets‐Fité, M. ; Matzke, M. ; Green Etxabe, A.</creatorcontrib><description>Nanomaterials (NMs) are thermodynamically unstable by nature, and exposure of soil organisms to NMs in the terrestrial environment cannot be assumed constant. Thus, steady‐state conditions may not apply to NMs, and bioaccumulation modeling for uptake should follow a dynamic approach. The one‐compartment model allows the uptake and elimination of a chemical to be determined, while also permitting changes in exposure and growth to be taken into account. The aim of the present study was to investigate the accumulation of Ag from different Ag NM types (20 nm Ag0 NMs, 50 nm Ag0 NMs, and 25 nm Ag2S NMs) in the crop plant wheat (Triticum aestivum). Seeds were emerged in contaminated soils (3 or 10 mg Ag/kg dry soil, nominal) and plants grown for up to 42 d postemergence. Plant roots and shoots were collected after 1, 7, 14, 21, and 42 d postemergence; and total Ag was measured. Soil porewater Ag concentrations were also measured at each sampling time. Using the plant growth rates in the different treatments and the changing porewater concentrations as parameters, the one‐compartment model was used to estimate the uptake and elimination of Ag from the plant tissues. The best fit of the model to the data included growth rate and porewater concentration decline, while showing elimination of Ag to be close to zero. Uptake was highest for Ag0 NMs, and size did not influence their uptake rates. Accumulation of Ag from Ag2S NMs was lower, as reflected by the lower porewater concentrations. Environ Toxicol Chem 2021;40:1861–1872. © 2021 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0730-7268</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-8618</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/etc.5031</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33661534</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Ag2S ; Bioaccumulation ; Bioavailability ; Cereal crops ; Growth rate ; Kinetics ; Nanomaterials ; Nanoparticles ; Nanostructures ; Nanotechnology ; Plant growth ; Plant roots ; Plant tissues ; Plants ; Pore water ; Seeds ; Shoots ; Soil - chemistry ; Soil contamination ; Soil Pollutants - analysis ; Soil pollution ; Soils ; Terrestrial environments ; Toxicology ; Wheat</subject><ispartof>Environmental toxicology and chemistry, 2021-07, Vol.40 (7), p.1861-1872</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC.</rights><rights>2021 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC.</rights><rights>2021. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3831-e4c6cb106c0dbc772a8744e77a4c3b4df01ea234c2669cfc57ac1d9506fc54533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3831-e4c6cb106c0dbc772a8744e77a4c3b4df01ea234c2669cfc57ac1d9506fc54533</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7939-5265 ; 0000-0002-5651-0208</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fetc.5031$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fetc.5031$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27926,27927,45576,45577</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33661534$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lahive, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schultz, C.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Gestel, C.A.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horton, A.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spurgeon, D.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Svendsen, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Busquets‐Fité, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matzke, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green Etxabe, A.</creatorcontrib><title>A Kinetic Approach for Assessing the Uptake of Ag from Pristine and Sulfidized Ag Nanomaterials to Plants</title><title>Environmental toxicology and chemistry</title><addtitle>Environ Toxicol Chem</addtitle><description>Nanomaterials (NMs) are thermodynamically unstable by nature, and exposure of soil organisms to NMs in the terrestrial environment cannot be assumed constant. Thus, steady‐state conditions may not apply to NMs, and bioaccumulation modeling for uptake should follow a dynamic approach. The one‐compartment model allows the uptake and elimination of a chemical to be determined, while also permitting changes in exposure and growth to be taken into account. The aim of the present study was to investigate the accumulation of Ag from different Ag NM types (20 nm Ag0 NMs, 50 nm Ag0 NMs, and 25 nm Ag2S NMs) in the crop plant wheat (Triticum aestivum). Seeds were emerged in contaminated soils (3 or 10 mg Ag/kg dry soil, nominal) and plants grown for up to 42 d postemergence. Plant roots and shoots were collected after 1, 7, 14, 21, and 42 d postemergence; and total Ag was measured. Soil porewater Ag concentrations were also measured at each sampling time. Using the plant growth rates in the different treatments and the changing porewater concentrations as parameters, the one‐compartment model was used to estimate the uptake and elimination of Ag from the plant tissues. The best fit of the model to the data included growth rate and porewater concentration decline, while showing elimination of Ag to be close to zero. Uptake was highest for Ag0 NMs, and size did not influence their uptake rates. Accumulation of Ag from Ag2S NMs was lower, as reflected by the lower porewater concentrations. Environ Toxicol Chem 2021;40:1861–1872. © 2021 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC.</description><subject>Ag2S</subject><subject>Bioaccumulation</subject><subject>Bioavailability</subject><subject>Cereal crops</subject><subject>Growth rate</subject><subject>Kinetics</subject><subject>Nanomaterials</subject><subject>Nanoparticles</subject><subject>Nanostructures</subject><subject>Nanotechnology</subject><subject>Plant growth</subject><subject>Plant roots</subject><subject>Plant tissues</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Pore water</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><subject>Shoots</subject><subject>Soil - chemistry</subject><subject>Soil contamination</subject><subject>Soil Pollutants - analysis</subject><subject>Soil pollution</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Terrestrial environments</subject><subject>Toxicology</subject><subject>Wheat</subject><issn>0730-7268</issn><issn>1552-8618</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtOwzAQRS0EoqUg8QXIEhs2KXb8SpYR4iUqqARdR47jtC55YTtC5etxaWHHyiPPmTuaA8A5RlOMUHytvZoyRPABGGPG4ijhODkEYyQIikTMkxE4cW6NEOZpmh6DESGcY0boGJgMPplWe6Ng1ve2k2oFq87CzDntnGmX0K80XPRevmvYVTBbwsp2DZxb43wYhLIt4etQV6Y0X7rc9p9l2zXSa2tk7aDv4LyWrXen4KgKH_ps_07A4u727eYhmr3cP95ks0iRhOBIU8VVgRFXqCyUELFMBKVaCEkVKWhZIaxlTKiKOU9VpZiQCpcpQzzUlBEyAZe73HDNx6Cdz9fdYNuwMo8ZpQxhgtNAXe0oZTvnrK7y3ppG2k2OUb51mgen-dZpQC_2gUPR6PIP_JUYgGgHfJpab_4NygPzE_gN3ht_OQ</recordid><startdate>202107</startdate><enddate>202107</enddate><creator>Lahive, E.</creator><creator>Schultz, C.L.</creator><creator>Van Gestel, C.A.M.</creator><creator>Robinson, A.</creator><creator>Horton, A.A.</creator><creator>Spurgeon, D.J.</creator><creator>Svendsen, C.</creator><creator>Busquets‐Fité, M.</creator><creator>Matzke, M.</creator><creator>Green Etxabe, A.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7939-5265</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5651-0208</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202107</creationdate><title>A Kinetic Approach for Assessing the Uptake of Ag from Pristine and Sulfidized Ag Nanomaterials to Plants</title><author>Lahive, E. ; Schultz, C.L. ; Van Gestel, C.A.M. ; Robinson, A. ; Horton, A.A. ; Spurgeon, D.J. ; Svendsen, C. ; Busquets‐Fité, M. ; Matzke, M. ; Green Etxabe, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3831-e4c6cb106c0dbc772a8744e77a4c3b4df01ea234c2669cfc57ac1d9506fc54533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Ag2S</topic><topic>Bioaccumulation</topic><topic>Bioavailability</topic><topic>Cereal crops</topic><topic>Growth rate</topic><topic>Kinetics</topic><topic>Nanomaterials</topic><topic>Nanoparticles</topic><topic>Nanostructures</topic><topic>Nanotechnology</topic><topic>Plant growth</topic><topic>Plant roots</topic><topic>Plant tissues</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Pore water</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><topic>Shoots</topic><topic>Soil - chemistry</topic><topic>Soil contamination</topic><topic>Soil Pollutants - analysis</topic><topic>Soil pollution</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Terrestrial environments</topic><topic>Toxicology</topic><topic>Wheat</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lahive, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schultz, C.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Gestel, C.A.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horton, A.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spurgeon, D.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Svendsen, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Busquets‐Fité, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matzke, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green Etxabe, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental toxicology and chemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lahive, E.</au><au>Schultz, C.L.</au><au>Van Gestel, C.A.M.</au><au>Robinson, A.</au><au>Horton, A.A.</au><au>Spurgeon, D.J.</au><au>Svendsen, C.</au><au>Busquets‐Fité, M.</au><au>Matzke, M.</au><au>Green Etxabe, A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Kinetic Approach for Assessing the Uptake of Ag from Pristine and Sulfidized Ag Nanomaterials to Plants</atitle><jtitle>Environmental toxicology and chemistry</jtitle><addtitle>Environ Toxicol Chem</addtitle><date>2021-07</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1861</spage><epage>1872</epage><pages>1861-1872</pages><issn>0730-7268</issn><eissn>1552-8618</eissn><abstract>Nanomaterials (NMs) are thermodynamically unstable by nature, and exposure of soil organisms to NMs in the terrestrial environment cannot be assumed constant. Thus, steady‐state conditions may not apply to NMs, and bioaccumulation modeling for uptake should follow a dynamic approach. The one‐compartment model allows the uptake and elimination of a chemical to be determined, while also permitting changes in exposure and growth to be taken into account. The aim of the present study was to investigate the accumulation of Ag from different Ag NM types (20 nm Ag0 NMs, 50 nm Ag0 NMs, and 25 nm Ag2S NMs) in the crop plant wheat (Triticum aestivum). Seeds were emerged in contaminated soils (3 or 10 mg Ag/kg dry soil, nominal) and plants grown for up to 42 d postemergence. Plant roots and shoots were collected after 1, 7, 14, 21, and 42 d postemergence; and total Ag was measured. Soil porewater Ag concentrations were also measured at each sampling time. Using the plant growth rates in the different treatments and the changing porewater concentrations as parameters, the one‐compartment model was used to estimate the uptake and elimination of Ag from the plant tissues. The best fit of the model to the data included growth rate and porewater concentration decline, while showing elimination of Ag to be close to zero. Uptake was highest for Ag0 NMs, and size did not influence their uptake rates. Accumulation of Ag from Ag2S NMs was lower, as reflected by the lower porewater concentrations. Environ Toxicol Chem 2021;40:1861–1872. © 2021 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>33661534</pmid><doi>10.1002/etc.5031</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7939-5265</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5651-0208</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0730-7268
ispartof Environmental toxicology and chemistry, 2021-07, Vol.40 (7), p.1861-1872
issn 0730-7268
1552-8618
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2544501319
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Ag2S
Bioaccumulation
Bioavailability
Cereal crops
Growth rate
Kinetics
Nanomaterials
Nanoparticles
Nanostructures
Nanotechnology
Plant growth
Plant roots
Plant tissues
Plants
Pore water
Seeds
Shoots
Soil - chemistry
Soil contamination
Soil Pollutants - analysis
Soil pollution
Soils
Terrestrial environments
Toxicology
Wheat
title A Kinetic Approach for Assessing the Uptake of Ag from Pristine and Sulfidized Ag Nanomaterials to Plants
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T13%3A21%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Kinetic%20Approach%20for%20Assessing%20the%20Uptake%20of%20Ag%20from%20Pristine%20and%20Sulfidized%20Ag%20Nanomaterials%20to%20Plants&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20toxicology%20and%20chemistry&rft.au=Lahive,%20E.&rft.date=2021-07&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1861&rft.epage=1872&rft.pages=1861-1872&rft.issn=0730-7268&rft.eissn=1552-8618&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/etc.5031&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2544501319%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2544501319&rft_id=info:pmid/33661534&rfr_iscdi=true