Seasonal Forecasting Skill of Sea‐Level Anomalies in a Multi‐Model Prediction Framework
Coastal high water level events are increasing in frequency and severity as global sea‐levels rise, and are exposing coastlines to risks of flooding. Yet, operational seasonal forecasts of sea‐level anomalies are not made for most coastal regions. Advancements in forecasting climate variability usin...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of geophysical research. Oceans 2021-06, Vol.126 (6), p.n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Journal of geophysical research. Oceans |
container_volume | 126 |
creator | Long, Xiaoyu Widlansky, Matthew J. Spillman, Claire M. Kumar, Arun Balmaseda, Magdalena Thompson, Philip R. Chikamoto, Yoshimitsu Smith, Grant A. Huang, Bohua Shin, Chul‐Su Merrifield, Mark A. Sweet, William V. Leuliette, Eric Annamalai, H. S. Marra, John J. Mitchum, Gary |
description | Coastal high water level events are increasing in frequency and severity as global sea‐levels rise, and are exposing coastlines to risks of flooding. Yet, operational seasonal forecasts of sea‐level anomalies are not made for most coastal regions. Advancements in forecasting climate variability using coupled ocean‐atmosphere global models provide the opportunity to predict the likelihood of future high water events several months in advance. However, the skill of these models to forecast seasonal sea‐level anomalies has not been fully assessed, especially in a multi‐model framework. Here, we construct a 10‐model ensemble of retrospective forecasts with future lead times of up to 11 months. We compare predicted sea levels from bias‐corrected forecasts with 20 years of observations from satellite‐based altimetry and shore‐based tide gauges. Forecast skill, as measured by anomaly correlation, tends to be highest in the tropical and subtropical open oceans, whereas the skill is lower in the higher latitudes and along some continental coasts. For most locations, multi‐model averaging produces forecast skill that is comparable to or better than the best performing individual model. We find that the most skillful predictions typically come from forecast systems with more accurate initializations of sea level, which is generally achieved by assimilating altimetry data. Having relatively higher horizontal resolution in the ocean is also beneficial, as such models seem to better capture dynamical processes necessary for successful forecasts. The multi‐model assessment suggests that skillful seasonal sea‐level forecasts are possible in many, though not all, parts of the global ocean.
Plain Language Summary
We assess 10 global climate forecasting systems to predict monthly and seasonal anomalies of local sea levels up to a year into the future. We find that skillful seasonal sea‐level forecasts are possible in many parts of the global ocean. Forecast skill is generally highest in the tropical and subtropical open oceans, whereas the skill is lower in the higher latitudes and along continental coasts. For most locations, multi‐model averaging improves the forecast skill, compared to considering the models individually. Overall, the most skillful predictions are from forecasting systems with more accurate initializations of sea level and higher horizontal resolutions of the ocean.
Key Points
Prediction skill of seasonal sea‐level anomalies up to a year in the future is |
doi_str_mv | 10.1029/2020JC017060 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2544472245</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2544472245</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4349-6b5b5bbd8d850fc9f02da90e967ffe9fb200901d50b062a119bdae023ad5e4b73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFKAzEQhoMoWGpvPkDAq6uTbLK7OZbFqqVFsXrysGQ3iaTdbmrSWnrzEXxGn8RIRTw5c5iB_2N-5kfolMAFASouKVAYl0ByyOAA9SjJRCKoIIe_e86P0SCEOcQqSMGY6KHnmZbBdbLFI-d1I8Padi94trBti53BUf18_5joN93iYeeWsrU6YNthiaebdm2jOHUqivdeK9usrevwyMul3jq_OEFHRrZBD35mHz2Nrh7Lm2Ryd31bDieJZCkTSVbz2LUqVMHBNMIAVVKAFllujBampgACiOJQQ0YlIaJWUgNNpeKa1XnaR2f7uyvvXjc6rKu52_j4U6goZ4zllDIeqfM91XgXgtemWnm7lH5XEai-E6z-JhjxdI9vbat3_7LV-PqhjBZcpF-6QXM4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2544472245</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Seasonal Forecasting Skill of Sea‐Level Anomalies in a Multi‐Model Prediction Framework</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Long, Xiaoyu ; Widlansky, Matthew J. ; Spillman, Claire M. ; Kumar, Arun ; Balmaseda, Magdalena ; Thompson, Philip R. ; Chikamoto, Yoshimitsu ; Smith, Grant A. ; Huang, Bohua ; Shin, Chul‐Su ; Merrifield, Mark A. ; Sweet, William V. ; Leuliette, Eric ; Annamalai, H. S. ; Marra, John J. ; Mitchum, Gary</creator><creatorcontrib>Long, Xiaoyu ; Widlansky, Matthew J. ; Spillman, Claire M. ; Kumar, Arun ; Balmaseda, Magdalena ; Thompson, Philip R. ; Chikamoto, Yoshimitsu ; Smith, Grant A. ; Huang, Bohua ; Shin, Chul‐Su ; Merrifield, Mark A. ; Sweet, William V. ; Leuliette, Eric ; Annamalai, H. S. ; Marra, John J. ; Mitchum, Gary</creatorcontrib><description>Coastal high water level events are increasing in frequency and severity as global sea‐levels rise, and are exposing coastlines to risks of flooding. Yet, operational seasonal forecasts of sea‐level anomalies are not made for most coastal regions. Advancements in forecasting climate variability using coupled ocean‐atmosphere global models provide the opportunity to predict the likelihood of future high water events several months in advance. However, the skill of these models to forecast seasonal sea‐level anomalies has not been fully assessed, especially in a multi‐model framework. Here, we construct a 10‐model ensemble of retrospective forecasts with future lead times of up to 11 months. We compare predicted sea levels from bias‐corrected forecasts with 20 years of observations from satellite‐based altimetry and shore‐based tide gauges. Forecast skill, as measured by anomaly correlation, tends to be highest in the tropical and subtropical open oceans, whereas the skill is lower in the higher latitudes and along some continental coasts. For most locations, multi‐model averaging produces forecast skill that is comparable to or better than the best performing individual model. We find that the most skillful predictions typically come from forecast systems with more accurate initializations of sea level, which is generally achieved by assimilating altimetry data. Having relatively higher horizontal resolution in the ocean is also beneficial, as such models seem to better capture dynamical processes necessary for successful forecasts. The multi‐model assessment suggests that skillful seasonal sea‐level forecasts are possible in many, though not all, parts of the global ocean.
Plain Language Summary
We assess 10 global climate forecasting systems to predict monthly and seasonal anomalies of local sea levels up to a year into the future. We find that skillful seasonal sea‐level forecasts are possible in many parts of the global ocean. Forecast skill is generally highest in the tropical and subtropical open oceans, whereas the skill is lower in the higher latitudes and along continental coasts. For most locations, multi‐model averaging improves the forecast skill, compared to considering the models individually. Overall, the most skillful predictions are from forecasting systems with more accurate initializations of sea level and higher horizontal resolutions of the ocean.
Key Points
Prediction skill of seasonal sea‐level anomalies up to a year in the future is assessed in 10 global climate forecasting systems
Skillful seasonal sea‐level forecasts are found in the tropics, whereas the skill is lower in higher latitudes and along continental coasts
The most skillful predictions are from models with more accurate initializations of sea level and higher resolutions of the ocean</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-9275</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-9291</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2020JC017060</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Altimetry ; Anomalies ; Atmospheric models ; Climate ; Climate models ; Climate prediction ; Climate system ; Climate variability ; Coastal flooding ; Coastal waters ; Coastal zone ; Coasts ; ensemble forecast ; Ensemble forecasting ; Environmental risk ; Flooding ; forecast skill ; Forecasting ; Forecasting skill ; Gauges ; Geophysics ; Global climate ; Latitude ; Ocean models ; Oceans ; Satellite observation ; Sea level ; Sea level anomalies ; Sea level forecasting ; seasonal forecast ; Seasonal forecasting ; Seasonal variations ; Tide gauges ; Tropical climate ; Water levels</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Oceans, 2021-06, Vol.126 (6), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2021. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4349-6b5b5bbd8d850fc9f02da90e967ffe9fb200901d50b062a119bdae023ad5e4b73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4349-6b5b5bbd8d850fc9f02da90e967ffe9fb200901d50b062a119bdae023ad5e4b73</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0853-8190 ; 0000-0003-4869-3849 ; 0000-0002-3425-4039 ; 0000-0002-0875-4208 ; 0000-0003-4692-6565 ; 0000-0003-2657-2755 ; 0000-0002-5026-8393 ; 0000-0003-1001-5188 ; 0000-0002-0478-9016 ; 0000-0001-8646-4997</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2020JC017060$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2020JC017060$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,1428,27905,27906,45555,45556,46390,46814</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Long, Xiaoyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Widlansky, Matthew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spillman, Claire M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Arun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balmaseda, Magdalena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Philip R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chikamoto, Yoshimitsu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Grant A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Bohua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, Chul‐Su</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merrifield, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sweet, William V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leuliette, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Annamalai, H. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marra, John J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitchum, Gary</creatorcontrib><title>Seasonal Forecasting Skill of Sea‐Level Anomalies in a Multi‐Model Prediction Framework</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Oceans</title><description>Coastal high water level events are increasing in frequency and severity as global sea‐levels rise, and are exposing coastlines to risks of flooding. Yet, operational seasonal forecasts of sea‐level anomalies are not made for most coastal regions. Advancements in forecasting climate variability using coupled ocean‐atmosphere global models provide the opportunity to predict the likelihood of future high water events several months in advance. However, the skill of these models to forecast seasonal sea‐level anomalies has not been fully assessed, especially in a multi‐model framework. Here, we construct a 10‐model ensemble of retrospective forecasts with future lead times of up to 11 months. We compare predicted sea levels from bias‐corrected forecasts with 20 years of observations from satellite‐based altimetry and shore‐based tide gauges. Forecast skill, as measured by anomaly correlation, tends to be highest in the tropical and subtropical open oceans, whereas the skill is lower in the higher latitudes and along some continental coasts. For most locations, multi‐model averaging produces forecast skill that is comparable to or better than the best performing individual model. We find that the most skillful predictions typically come from forecast systems with more accurate initializations of sea level, which is generally achieved by assimilating altimetry data. Having relatively higher horizontal resolution in the ocean is also beneficial, as such models seem to better capture dynamical processes necessary for successful forecasts. The multi‐model assessment suggests that skillful seasonal sea‐level forecasts are possible in many, though not all, parts of the global ocean.
Plain Language Summary
We assess 10 global climate forecasting systems to predict monthly and seasonal anomalies of local sea levels up to a year into the future. We find that skillful seasonal sea‐level forecasts are possible in many parts of the global ocean. Forecast skill is generally highest in the tropical and subtropical open oceans, whereas the skill is lower in the higher latitudes and along continental coasts. For most locations, multi‐model averaging improves the forecast skill, compared to considering the models individually. Overall, the most skillful predictions are from forecasting systems with more accurate initializations of sea level and higher horizontal resolutions of the ocean.
Key Points
Prediction skill of seasonal sea‐level anomalies up to a year in the future is assessed in 10 global climate forecasting systems
Skillful seasonal sea‐level forecasts are found in the tropics, whereas the skill is lower in higher latitudes and along continental coasts
The most skillful predictions are from models with more accurate initializations of sea level and higher resolutions of the ocean</description><subject>Altimetry</subject><subject>Anomalies</subject><subject>Atmospheric models</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Climate models</subject><subject>Climate prediction</subject><subject>Climate system</subject><subject>Climate variability</subject><subject>Coastal flooding</subject><subject>Coastal waters</subject><subject>Coastal zone</subject><subject>Coasts</subject><subject>ensemble forecast</subject><subject>Ensemble forecasting</subject><subject>Environmental risk</subject><subject>Flooding</subject><subject>forecast skill</subject><subject>Forecasting</subject><subject>Forecasting skill</subject><subject>Gauges</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>Global climate</subject><subject>Latitude</subject><subject>Ocean models</subject><subject>Oceans</subject><subject>Satellite observation</subject><subject>Sea level</subject><subject>Sea level anomalies</subject><subject>Sea level forecasting</subject><subject>seasonal forecast</subject><subject>Seasonal forecasting</subject><subject>Seasonal variations</subject><subject>Tide gauges</subject><subject>Tropical climate</subject><subject>Water levels</subject><issn>2169-9275</issn><issn>2169-9291</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFKAzEQhoMoWGpvPkDAq6uTbLK7OZbFqqVFsXrysGQ3iaTdbmrSWnrzEXxGn8RIRTw5c5iB_2N-5kfolMAFASouKVAYl0ByyOAA9SjJRCKoIIe_e86P0SCEOcQqSMGY6KHnmZbBdbLFI-d1I8Padi94trBti53BUf18_5joN93iYeeWsrU6YNthiaebdm2jOHUqivdeK9usrevwyMul3jq_OEFHRrZBD35mHz2Nrh7Lm2Ryd31bDieJZCkTSVbz2LUqVMHBNMIAVVKAFllujBampgACiOJQQ0YlIaJWUgNNpeKa1XnaR2f7uyvvXjc6rKu52_j4U6goZ4zllDIeqfM91XgXgtemWnm7lH5XEai-E6z-JhjxdI9vbat3_7LV-PqhjBZcpF-6QXM4</recordid><startdate>202106</startdate><enddate>202106</enddate><creator>Long, Xiaoyu</creator><creator>Widlansky, Matthew J.</creator><creator>Spillman, Claire M.</creator><creator>Kumar, Arun</creator><creator>Balmaseda, Magdalena</creator><creator>Thompson, Philip R.</creator><creator>Chikamoto, Yoshimitsu</creator><creator>Smith, Grant A.</creator><creator>Huang, Bohua</creator><creator>Shin, Chul‐Su</creator><creator>Merrifield, Mark A.</creator><creator>Sweet, William V.</creator><creator>Leuliette, Eric</creator><creator>Annamalai, H. S.</creator><creator>Marra, John J.</creator><creator>Mitchum, Gary</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0853-8190</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4869-3849</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3425-4039</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0875-4208</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4692-6565</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2657-2755</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5026-8393</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1001-5188</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0478-9016</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8646-4997</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202106</creationdate><title>Seasonal Forecasting Skill of Sea‐Level Anomalies in a Multi‐Model Prediction Framework</title><author>Long, Xiaoyu ; Widlansky, Matthew J. ; Spillman, Claire M. ; Kumar, Arun ; Balmaseda, Magdalena ; Thompson, Philip R. ; Chikamoto, Yoshimitsu ; Smith, Grant A. ; Huang, Bohua ; Shin, Chul‐Su ; Merrifield, Mark A. ; Sweet, William V. ; Leuliette, Eric ; Annamalai, H. S. ; Marra, John J. ; Mitchum, Gary</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4349-6b5b5bbd8d850fc9f02da90e967ffe9fb200901d50b062a119bdae023ad5e4b73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Altimetry</topic><topic>Anomalies</topic><topic>Atmospheric models</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Climate models</topic><topic>Climate prediction</topic><topic>Climate system</topic><topic>Climate variability</topic><topic>Coastal flooding</topic><topic>Coastal waters</topic><topic>Coastal zone</topic><topic>Coasts</topic><topic>ensemble forecast</topic><topic>Ensemble forecasting</topic><topic>Environmental risk</topic><topic>Flooding</topic><topic>forecast skill</topic><topic>Forecasting</topic><topic>Forecasting skill</topic><topic>Gauges</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>Global climate</topic><topic>Latitude</topic><topic>Ocean models</topic><topic>Oceans</topic><topic>Satellite observation</topic><topic>Sea level</topic><topic>Sea level anomalies</topic><topic>Sea level forecasting</topic><topic>seasonal forecast</topic><topic>Seasonal forecasting</topic><topic>Seasonal variations</topic><topic>Tide gauges</topic><topic>Tropical climate</topic><topic>Water levels</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Long, Xiaoyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Widlansky, Matthew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spillman, Claire M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Arun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balmaseda, Magdalena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Philip R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chikamoto, Yoshimitsu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Grant A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Bohua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, Chul‐Su</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merrifield, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sweet, William V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leuliette, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Annamalai, H. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marra, John J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitchum, Gary</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Oceans</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Long, Xiaoyu</au><au>Widlansky, Matthew J.</au><au>Spillman, Claire M.</au><au>Kumar, Arun</au><au>Balmaseda, Magdalena</au><au>Thompson, Philip R.</au><au>Chikamoto, Yoshimitsu</au><au>Smith, Grant A.</au><au>Huang, Bohua</au><au>Shin, Chul‐Su</au><au>Merrifield, Mark A.</au><au>Sweet, William V.</au><au>Leuliette, Eric</au><au>Annamalai, H. S.</au><au>Marra, John J.</au><au>Mitchum, Gary</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Seasonal Forecasting Skill of Sea‐Level Anomalies in a Multi‐Model Prediction Framework</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Oceans</jtitle><date>2021-06</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>126</volume><issue>6</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>2169-9275</issn><eissn>2169-9291</eissn><abstract>Coastal high water level events are increasing in frequency and severity as global sea‐levels rise, and are exposing coastlines to risks of flooding. Yet, operational seasonal forecasts of sea‐level anomalies are not made for most coastal regions. Advancements in forecasting climate variability using coupled ocean‐atmosphere global models provide the opportunity to predict the likelihood of future high water events several months in advance. However, the skill of these models to forecast seasonal sea‐level anomalies has not been fully assessed, especially in a multi‐model framework. Here, we construct a 10‐model ensemble of retrospective forecasts with future lead times of up to 11 months. We compare predicted sea levels from bias‐corrected forecasts with 20 years of observations from satellite‐based altimetry and shore‐based tide gauges. Forecast skill, as measured by anomaly correlation, tends to be highest in the tropical and subtropical open oceans, whereas the skill is lower in the higher latitudes and along some continental coasts. For most locations, multi‐model averaging produces forecast skill that is comparable to or better than the best performing individual model. We find that the most skillful predictions typically come from forecast systems with more accurate initializations of sea level, which is generally achieved by assimilating altimetry data. Having relatively higher horizontal resolution in the ocean is also beneficial, as such models seem to better capture dynamical processes necessary for successful forecasts. The multi‐model assessment suggests that skillful seasonal sea‐level forecasts are possible in many, though not all, parts of the global ocean.
Plain Language Summary
We assess 10 global climate forecasting systems to predict monthly and seasonal anomalies of local sea levels up to a year into the future. We find that skillful seasonal sea‐level forecasts are possible in many parts of the global ocean. Forecast skill is generally highest in the tropical and subtropical open oceans, whereas the skill is lower in the higher latitudes and along continental coasts. For most locations, multi‐model averaging improves the forecast skill, compared to considering the models individually. Overall, the most skillful predictions are from forecasting systems with more accurate initializations of sea level and higher horizontal resolutions of the ocean.
Key Points
Prediction skill of seasonal sea‐level anomalies up to a year in the future is assessed in 10 global climate forecasting systems
Skillful seasonal sea‐level forecasts are found in the tropics, whereas the skill is lower in higher latitudes and along continental coasts
The most skillful predictions are from models with more accurate initializations of sea level and higher resolutions of the ocean</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2020JC017060</doi><tpages>27</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0853-8190</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4869-3849</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3425-4039</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0875-4208</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4692-6565</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2657-2755</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5026-8393</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1001-5188</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0478-9016</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8646-4997</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2169-9275 |
ispartof | Journal of geophysical research. Oceans, 2021-06, Vol.126 (6), p.n/a |
issn | 2169-9275 2169-9291 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2544472245 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Free Content; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Altimetry Anomalies Atmospheric models Climate Climate models Climate prediction Climate system Climate variability Coastal flooding Coastal waters Coastal zone Coasts ensemble forecast Ensemble forecasting Environmental risk Flooding forecast skill Forecasting Forecasting skill Gauges Geophysics Global climate Latitude Ocean models Oceans Satellite observation Sea level Sea level anomalies Sea level forecasting seasonal forecast Seasonal forecasting Seasonal variations Tide gauges Tropical climate Water levels |
title | Seasonal Forecasting Skill of Sea‐Level Anomalies in a Multi‐Model Prediction Framework |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T22%3A04%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Seasonal%20Forecasting%20Skill%20of%20Sea%E2%80%90Level%20Anomalies%20in%20a%20Multi%E2%80%90Model%20Prediction%20Framework&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Oceans&rft.au=Long,%20Xiaoyu&rft.date=2021-06&rft.volume=126&rft.issue=6&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=2169-9275&rft.eissn=2169-9291&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2020JC017060&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2544472245%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2544472245&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |