Efficacy and patterns of use of antimicrobial prophylaxis for gunshot wounds in a South African hospital setting : an observational study using propensity score-based analyses
Background: Limited evidence supports the efficacy of antimicrobial prophylaxis (AP) in prevention of gunshot woundrelated (GSW-related) infection in resource restricted areas. At Tygerberg Hospital, South Africa, it is standard care for GSW patients to receive one dose of broad-spectrum AP. For var...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | South African journal of surgery 2020-03, Vol.58 (1), p.27-32 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 32 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 27 |
container_title | South African journal of surgery |
container_volume | 58 |
creator | De Boer, M.G.J. Visbeek, M.C. Cronje, U.J. Taljaard, J.J. Steyn, E. |
description | Background: Limited evidence supports the efficacy of antimicrobial prophylaxis (AP) in prevention of gunshot woundrelated (GSW-related) infection in resource restricted areas. At Tygerberg Hospital, South Africa, it is standard care for GSW patients to receive one dose of broad-spectrum AP. For various reasons, this protocol is not consistently followed. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of AP in the reduction of in-hospital GSW-related infection and to identify opportunities for practice improvement.Methods: All patients admitted with GSW over a three-month period were eligible for inclusion. Patients who did and did not receive AP were identified retrospectively the morning of admission; thereafter, data was collected prospectively. Data regarding circumstances of the incident, injury characteristics, type of AP and surgery was obtained. The occurrence of in-hospital GSW-related infection was recorded over 30 days or until discharge. Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability weighting (IPW) methods were utilised to assess the effect of AP on the prevention of GSW-related infection.Results: 165 consecutive patients were assessed, of which 103 received AP according to protocol within 12 hours of admission. PSM showed a reduced in-hospital GSW infection risk of 12% (95% CI, 0.2–24%, p = 0.046) with AP. IPW showed that AP reduced the risk for infection by 14% (95% CI, 3–27%, p = 0.015).Conclusions: Providing AP to GSW patients in a civilian setting appeared to result in a modest but clinically relevant lower risk of in-hospital GSW-related infection. In this study setting, optimisation of AP for all patients with GSWs should significantly lower the burden of wound infection. |
doi_str_mv | 10.17159/2078-5151/2020/v58n1a3102 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2544453525</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A639078780</galeid><sabinet_id>https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC-1e2a899780</sabinet_id><sourcerecordid>A639078780</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-833a41d2ecdbd77d7d77551a399254ab5084f391cd3db88fe2b1c1ff233c77593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkt1u1DAQhSMEoqvSV0AWSNyl9U_cJL1Bq9Xyp0pcANeWE9sbo6y9eJxCnopXZMKWhUrIF4483xlPjk9RvGD0ktVMtlec1k0pmWT4xenVnWwC04JR_qhYnWqPixWloim5uGZnxQWA7yiXgjdSiKfFmeC8EozxVfFz65zvdT8THQw56JxtCkCiIxPYZdMh-73vU-y8HskhxcMwj_qHB-JiIrspwBAz-R6nYID4QDT5FKc8kLVL2DeQIcLBZ5SCzdmHHbnBliR2YNOdzj6GpZQnM-OFS3m5wQbweSbQx2TLToM1qNHjDBaeFU-cHsFe3O_nxZc328-bd-Xtx7fvN-vbspec5rIRQlfMcNubztS1wVVLiT61LZeV7iRtKida1hthuqZxlnesZ85xIXokW3FevDz2xXm-TRay-hqnhEOAwgZVJYVEP0_UTo9W-eBiTrrfe-jV-lq0-Bp1Q5G6_A-Fy1h0NgbrPJ4_ELz6RzBYPeYB4jgtdsFD8OYI4vsAJOvUIfm9TrNiVP2Oi1oioZZIqCUu6m9cUPz8_henbm_NSfonHAi8PgKgOx9sVqAtsmrI-QBqMKMaMDQ44VJjFI1X2w8bxSzXTdsu8_0CDPfTvA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2544453525</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy and patterns of use of antimicrobial prophylaxis for gunshot wounds in a South African hospital setting : an observational study using propensity score-based analyses</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>African Journals Online (Open Access)</source><creator>De Boer, M.G.J. ; Visbeek, M.C. ; Cronje, U.J. ; Taljaard, J.J. ; Steyn, E.</creator><creatorcontrib>De Boer, M.G.J. ; Visbeek, M.C. ; Cronje, U.J. ; Taljaard, J.J. ; Steyn, E.</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Limited evidence supports the efficacy of antimicrobial prophylaxis (AP) in prevention of gunshot woundrelated (GSW-related) infection in resource restricted areas. At Tygerberg Hospital, South Africa, it is standard care for GSW patients to receive one dose of broad-spectrum AP. For various reasons, this protocol is not consistently followed. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of AP in the reduction of in-hospital GSW-related infection and to identify opportunities for practice improvement.Methods: All patients admitted with GSW over a three-month period were eligible for inclusion. Patients who did and did not receive AP were identified retrospectively the morning of admission; thereafter, data was collected prospectively. Data regarding circumstances of the incident, injury characteristics, type of AP and surgery was obtained. The occurrence of in-hospital GSW-related infection was recorded over 30 days or until discharge. Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability weighting (IPW) methods were utilised to assess the effect of AP on the prevention of GSW-related infection.Results: 165 consecutive patients were assessed, of which 103 received AP according to protocol within 12 hours of admission. PSM showed a reduced in-hospital GSW infection risk of 12% (95% CI, 0.2–24%, p = 0.046) with AP. IPW showed that AP reduced the risk for infection by 14% (95% CI, 3–27%, p = 0.015).Conclusions: Providing AP to GSW patients in a civilian setting appeared to result in a modest but clinically relevant lower risk of in-hospital GSW-related infection. In this study setting, optimisation of AP for all patients with GSWs should significantly lower the burden of wound infection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0038-2361</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2078-5151</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.17159/2078-5151/2020/v58n1a3102</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32243112</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>South Africa: Medpharm Publications</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Analysis ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use ; Antibiotic Prophylaxis - statistics & numerical data ; Antimicrobial agents ; Bacterial Infections - etiology ; Bacterial Infections - prevention & control ; Cross Infection - prevention & control ; Disease prevention ; Female ; Gangs ; Gunshot wounds ; Health aspects ; Hospitalization ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Infection ; Infections ; Infectious diseases ; Injuries ; Male ; Medical care quality ; Medical research ; Middle Aged ; Observational studies ; Propensity Score ; Prophylaxis ; Retrospective Studies ; South Africa ; Surgery ; Trauma ; Violent crime ; Wounds, Gunshot - complications ; Wounds, Gunshot - therapy ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>South African journal of surgery, 2020-03, Vol.58 (1), p.27-32</ispartof><rights>Copyright© Authors.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 South African Sports Medicine Association</rights><rights>2020. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-833a41d2ecdbd77d7d77551a399254ab5084f391cd3db88fe2b1c1ff233c77593</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-6025-2053 ; 0000-0002-5009-6499 ; 0000-0002-5210-9054 ; 0000-0002-9587-4127 ; 0000-0002-8090-1559</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32243112$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>De Boer, M.G.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Visbeek, M.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cronje, U.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taljaard, J.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steyn, E.</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy and patterns of use of antimicrobial prophylaxis for gunshot wounds in a South African hospital setting : an observational study using propensity score-based analyses</title><title>South African journal of surgery</title><addtitle>S Afr J Surg</addtitle><description>Background: Limited evidence supports the efficacy of antimicrobial prophylaxis (AP) in prevention of gunshot woundrelated (GSW-related) infection in resource restricted areas. At Tygerberg Hospital, South Africa, it is standard care for GSW patients to receive one dose of broad-spectrum AP. For various reasons, this protocol is not consistently followed. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of AP in the reduction of in-hospital GSW-related infection and to identify opportunities for practice improvement.Methods: All patients admitted with GSW over a three-month period were eligible for inclusion. Patients who did and did not receive AP were identified retrospectively the morning of admission; thereafter, data was collected prospectively. Data regarding circumstances of the incident, injury characteristics, type of AP and surgery was obtained. The occurrence of in-hospital GSW-related infection was recorded over 30 days or until discharge. Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability weighting (IPW) methods were utilised to assess the effect of AP on the prevention of GSW-related infection.Results: 165 consecutive patients were assessed, of which 103 received AP according to protocol within 12 hours of admission. PSM showed a reduced in-hospital GSW infection risk of 12% (95% CI, 0.2–24%, p = 0.046) with AP. IPW showed that AP reduced the risk for infection by 14% (95% CI, 3–27%, p = 0.015).Conclusions: Providing AP to GSW patients in a civilian setting appeared to result in a modest but clinically relevant lower risk of in-hospital GSW-related infection. In this study setting, optimisation of AP for all patients with GSWs should significantly lower the burden of wound infection.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Antibiotic Prophylaxis - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Antimicrobial agents</subject><subject>Bacterial Infections - etiology</subject><subject>Bacterial Infections - prevention & control</subject><subject>Cross Infection - prevention & control</subject><subject>Disease prevention</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gangs</subject><subject>Gunshot wounds</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infection</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Injuries</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical care quality</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Observational studies</subject><subject>Propensity Score</subject><subject>Prophylaxis</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>South Africa</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Trauma</subject><subject>Violent crime</subject><subject>Wounds, Gunshot - complications</subject><subject>Wounds, Gunshot - therapy</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0038-2361</issn><issn>2078-5151</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNptkt1u1DAQhSMEoqvSV0AWSNyl9U_cJL1Bq9Xyp0pcANeWE9sbo6y9eJxCnopXZMKWhUrIF4483xlPjk9RvGD0ktVMtlec1k0pmWT4xenVnWwC04JR_qhYnWqPixWloim5uGZnxQWA7yiXgjdSiKfFmeC8EozxVfFz65zvdT8THQw56JxtCkCiIxPYZdMh-73vU-y8HskhxcMwj_qHB-JiIrspwBAz-R6nYID4QDT5FKc8kLVL2DeQIcLBZ5SCzdmHHbnBliR2YNOdzj6GpZQnM-OFS3m5wQbweSbQx2TLToM1qNHjDBaeFU-cHsFe3O_nxZc328-bd-Xtx7fvN-vbspec5rIRQlfMcNubztS1wVVLiT61LZeV7iRtKida1hthuqZxlnesZ85xIXokW3FevDz2xXm-TRay-hqnhEOAwgZVJYVEP0_UTo9W-eBiTrrfe-jV-lq0-Bp1Q5G6_A-Fy1h0NgbrPJ4_ELz6RzBYPeYB4jgtdsFD8OYI4vsAJOvUIfm9TrNiVP2Oi1oioZZIqCUu6m9cUPz8_henbm_NSfonHAi8PgKgOx9sVqAtsmrI-QBqMKMaMDQ44VJjFI1X2w8bxSzXTdsu8_0CDPfTvA</recordid><startdate>20200301</startdate><enddate>20200301</enddate><creator>De Boer, M.G.J.</creator><creator>Visbeek, M.C.</creator><creator>Cronje, U.J.</creator><creator>Taljaard, J.J.</creator><creator>Steyn, E.</creator><general>Medpharm Publications</general><general>South African Sports Medicine Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6025-2053</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5009-6499</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5210-9054</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9587-4127</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8090-1559</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200301</creationdate><title>Efficacy and patterns of use of antimicrobial prophylaxis for gunshot wounds in a South African hospital setting : an observational study using propensity score-based analyses</title><author>De Boer, M.G.J. ; Visbeek, M.C. ; Cronje, U.J. ; Taljaard, J.J. ; Steyn, E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-833a41d2ecdbd77d7d77551a399254ab5084f391cd3db88fe2b1c1ff233c77593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Antibiotic Prophylaxis - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Antimicrobial agents</topic><topic>Bacterial Infections - etiology</topic><topic>Bacterial Infections - prevention & control</topic><topic>Cross Infection - prevention & control</topic><topic>Disease prevention</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gangs</topic><topic>Gunshot wounds</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infection</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Injuries</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical care quality</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Observational studies</topic><topic>Propensity Score</topic><topic>Prophylaxis</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>South Africa</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Trauma</topic><topic>Violent crime</topic><topic>Wounds, Gunshot - complications</topic><topic>Wounds, Gunshot - therapy</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>De Boer, M.G.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Visbeek, M.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cronje, U.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taljaard, J.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steyn, E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>South African journal of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>De Boer, M.G.J.</au><au>Visbeek, M.C.</au><au>Cronje, U.J.</au><au>Taljaard, J.J.</au><au>Steyn, E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy and patterns of use of antimicrobial prophylaxis for gunshot wounds in a South African hospital setting : an observational study using propensity score-based analyses</atitle><jtitle>South African journal of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>S Afr J Surg</addtitle><date>2020-03-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>27</spage><epage>32</epage><pages>27-32</pages><issn>0038-2361</issn><eissn>2078-5151</eissn><abstract>Background: Limited evidence supports the efficacy of antimicrobial prophylaxis (AP) in prevention of gunshot woundrelated (GSW-related) infection in resource restricted areas. At Tygerberg Hospital, South Africa, it is standard care for GSW patients to receive one dose of broad-spectrum AP. For various reasons, this protocol is not consistently followed. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of AP in the reduction of in-hospital GSW-related infection and to identify opportunities for practice improvement.Methods: All patients admitted with GSW over a three-month period were eligible for inclusion. Patients who did and did not receive AP were identified retrospectively the morning of admission; thereafter, data was collected prospectively. Data regarding circumstances of the incident, injury characteristics, type of AP and surgery was obtained. The occurrence of in-hospital GSW-related infection was recorded over 30 days or until discharge. Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability weighting (IPW) methods were utilised to assess the effect of AP on the prevention of GSW-related infection.Results: 165 consecutive patients were assessed, of which 103 received AP according to protocol within 12 hours of admission. PSM showed a reduced in-hospital GSW infection risk of 12% (95% CI, 0.2–24%, p = 0.046) with AP. IPW showed that AP reduced the risk for infection by 14% (95% CI, 3–27%, p = 0.015).Conclusions: Providing AP to GSW patients in a civilian setting appeared to result in a modest but clinically relevant lower risk of in-hospital GSW-related infection. In this study setting, optimisation of AP for all patients with GSWs should significantly lower the burden of wound infection.</abstract><cop>South Africa</cop><pub>Medpharm Publications</pub><pmid>32243112</pmid><doi>10.17159/2078-5151/2020/v58n1a3102</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6025-2053</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5009-6499</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5210-9054</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9587-4127</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8090-1559</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0038-2361 |
ispartof | South African journal of surgery, 2020-03, Vol.58 (1), p.27-32 |
issn | 0038-2361 2078-5151 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2544453525 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; African Journals Online (Open Access) |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Analysis Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use Antibiotic Prophylaxis - statistics & numerical data Antimicrobial agents Bacterial Infections - etiology Bacterial Infections - prevention & control Cross Infection - prevention & control Disease prevention Female Gangs Gunshot wounds Health aspects Hospitalization Hospitals Humans Infection Infections Infectious diseases Injuries Male Medical care quality Medical research Middle Aged Observational studies Propensity Score Prophylaxis Retrospective Studies South Africa Surgery Trauma Violent crime Wounds, Gunshot - complications Wounds, Gunshot - therapy Young Adult |
title | Efficacy and patterns of use of antimicrobial prophylaxis for gunshot wounds in a South African hospital setting : an observational study using propensity score-based analyses |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T17%3A16%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20and%20patterns%20of%20use%20of%20antimicrobial%20prophylaxis%20for%20gunshot%20wounds%20in%20a%20South%20African%20hospital%20setting%20:%20an%20observational%20study%20using%20propensity%20score-based%20analyses&rft.jtitle=South%20African%20journal%20of%20surgery&rft.au=De%20Boer,%20M.G.J.&rft.date=2020-03-01&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=27&rft.epage=32&rft.pages=27-32&rft.issn=0038-2361&rft.eissn=2078-5151&rft_id=info:doi/10.17159/2078-5151/2020/v58n1a3102&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA639078780%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2544453525&rft_id=info:pmid/32243112&rft_galeid=A639078780&rft_sabinet_id=https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC-1e2a899780&rfr_iscdi=true |