Reproduction is affected by individual breeding experience but not pair longevity in a socially monogamous bird

In socially monogamous animals, maintaining stable mating pairs across years has been hypothesized to result in increased reproductive success. However, previous individual breeding experience may independently affect reproductive success, regardless of pair stability. We examined associations betwe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Behavioral ecology and sociobiology 2021-07, Vol.75 (7), p.1-11, Article 101
Hauptverfasser: Pitera, Angela M., Branch, Carrie L., Sonnenberg, Benjamin R., Benedict, Lauren M., Kozlovsky, Dovid Y., Pravosudov, Vladimir V.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 11
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1
container_title Behavioral ecology and sociobiology
container_volume 75
creator Pitera, Angela M.
Branch, Carrie L.
Sonnenberg, Benjamin R.
Benedict, Lauren M.
Kozlovsky, Dovid Y.
Pravosudov, Vladimir V.
description In socially monogamous animals, maintaining stable mating pairs across years has been hypothesized to result in increased reproductive success. However, previous individual breeding experience may independently affect reproductive success, regardless of pair stability. We examined associations between pair composition based on previous breeding experience, pair longevity, and reproduction in socially monogamous mountain chickadees, Poecile gambeli, in the Sierra Nevada. There were no significant differences in any reproductive parameters between pairs of experienced breeders that had bred together in previous years and those that were newly formed. Pairs in which both partners were experienced had heavier nestlings than both first-year breeders and mixed experienced–inexperienced pairs. Experienced females started laying eggs earlier and laid larger clutches regardless of their social mate’s previous breeding experience. As all experienced birds were older than inexperienced breeders, it remains possible that observed differences between these groups were due to age rather than breeding experience. Overall, our data did not support the hypothesis that pair longevity drives reproductive investment.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00265-021-03042-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2544321221</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>48773013</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>48773013</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c271t-faf77119f9d003026ca4f175ce552cf18abee47c70473b230b6274765312df4d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWKt_QBACrqM3j5lMl1J8QUEQXYdMHiVlOqnJTLH99U4d0Z2ruznfuZwPoUsKNxRA3mYAVhYEGCXAQTCyP0ITKjgjIEt2jCbABZBCCH6KznJeAUBJq2qC4qvbpGh704XY4pCx9t6Zzllc73BobdgG2-sG18k5G9oldp8bl4JrjcN13-E2dnijQ8JNbJduG7oDhTXO0QTdNDu8jm1c6nXsM65DsufoxOsmu4ufO0XvD_dv8yeyeHl8nt8tiGGSdsRrLyWlMz-zMAxipdHCU1kYVxTMeFrp2jkhjQQhec041CWTQpYFp8x6YfkUXY-9w7qP3uVOrWKf2uGlYgcNjDJGhxQbUybFnJPzapPCWqedoqAOYtUoVg1i1bdYtR8gPkJ5CA-j01_1v9TVSK1yF9PvH1FJyYFy_gUf8Iau</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2544321221</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reproduction is affected by individual breeding experience but not pair longevity in a socially monogamous bird</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Pitera, Angela M. ; Branch, Carrie L. ; Sonnenberg, Benjamin R. ; Benedict, Lauren M. ; Kozlovsky, Dovid Y. ; Pravosudov, Vladimir V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pitera, Angela M. ; Branch, Carrie L. ; Sonnenberg, Benjamin R. ; Benedict, Lauren M. ; Kozlovsky, Dovid Y. ; Pravosudov, Vladimir V.</creatorcontrib><description>In socially monogamous animals, maintaining stable mating pairs across years has been hypothesized to result in increased reproductive success. However, previous individual breeding experience may independently affect reproductive success, regardless of pair stability. We examined associations between pair composition based on previous breeding experience, pair longevity, and reproduction in socially monogamous mountain chickadees, Poecile gambeli, in the Sierra Nevada. There were no significant differences in any reproductive parameters between pairs of experienced breeders that had bred together in previous years and those that were newly formed. Pairs in which both partners were experienced had heavier nestlings than both first-year breeders and mixed experienced–inexperienced pairs. Experienced females started laying eggs earlier and laid larger clutches regardless of their social mate’s previous breeding experience. As all experienced birds were older than inexperienced breeders, it remains possible that observed differences between these groups were due to age rather than breeding experience. Overall, our data did not support the hypothesis that pair longevity drives reproductive investment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0340-5443</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0762</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00265-021-03042-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Science + Business Media</publisher><subject>Age ; Animal breeding ; Animal Ecology ; Animal reproduction ; Behavioral Sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Birds ; Breeding ; Breeding success ; Clutch size ; Life Sciences ; Longevity ; Monogamy ; Mountains ; ORIGINAL ARTICLE ; Parameters ; Reproduction ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology, 2021-07, Vol.75 (7), p.1-11, Article 101</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c271t-faf77119f9d003026ca4f175ce552cf18abee47c70473b230b6274765312df4d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c271t-faf77119f9d003026ca4f175ce552cf18abee47c70473b230b6274765312df4d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6166-3639</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00265-021-03042-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00265-021-03042-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pitera, Angela M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Branch, Carrie L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sonnenberg, Benjamin R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benedict, Lauren M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kozlovsky, Dovid Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pravosudov, Vladimir V.</creatorcontrib><title>Reproduction is affected by individual breeding experience but not pair longevity in a socially monogamous bird</title><title>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology</title><addtitle>Behav Ecol Sociobiol</addtitle><description>In socially monogamous animals, maintaining stable mating pairs across years has been hypothesized to result in increased reproductive success. However, previous individual breeding experience may independently affect reproductive success, regardless of pair stability. We examined associations between pair composition based on previous breeding experience, pair longevity, and reproduction in socially monogamous mountain chickadees, Poecile gambeli, in the Sierra Nevada. There were no significant differences in any reproductive parameters between pairs of experienced breeders that had bred together in previous years and those that were newly formed. Pairs in which both partners were experienced had heavier nestlings than both first-year breeders and mixed experienced–inexperienced pairs. Experienced females started laying eggs earlier and laid larger clutches regardless of their social mate’s previous breeding experience. As all experienced birds were older than inexperienced breeders, it remains possible that observed differences between these groups were due to age rather than breeding experience. Overall, our data did not support the hypothesis that pair longevity drives reproductive investment.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Animal breeding</subject><subject>Animal Ecology</subject><subject>Animal reproduction</subject><subject>Behavioral Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>Breeding success</subject><subject>Clutch size</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Longevity</subject><subject>Monogamy</subject><subject>Mountains</subject><subject>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0340-5443</issn><issn>1432-0762</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWKt_QBACrqM3j5lMl1J8QUEQXYdMHiVlOqnJTLH99U4d0Z2ruznfuZwPoUsKNxRA3mYAVhYEGCXAQTCyP0ITKjgjIEt2jCbABZBCCH6KznJeAUBJq2qC4qvbpGh704XY4pCx9t6Zzllc73BobdgG2-sG18k5G9oldp8bl4JrjcN13-E2dnijQ8JNbJduG7oDhTXO0QTdNDu8jm1c6nXsM65DsufoxOsmu4ufO0XvD_dv8yeyeHl8nt8tiGGSdsRrLyWlMz-zMAxipdHCU1kYVxTMeFrp2jkhjQQhec041CWTQpYFp8x6YfkUXY-9w7qP3uVOrWKf2uGlYgcNjDJGhxQbUybFnJPzapPCWqedoqAOYtUoVg1i1bdYtR8gPkJ5CA-j01_1v9TVSK1yF9PvH1FJyYFy_gUf8Iau</recordid><startdate>20210701</startdate><enddate>20210701</enddate><creator>Pitera, Angela M.</creator><creator>Branch, Carrie L.</creator><creator>Sonnenberg, Benjamin R.</creator><creator>Benedict, Lauren M.</creator><creator>Kozlovsky, Dovid Y.</creator><creator>Pravosudov, Vladimir V.</creator><general>Springer Science + Business Media</general><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>POGQB</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRQQA</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6166-3639</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210701</creationdate><title>Reproduction is affected by individual breeding experience but not pair longevity in a socially monogamous bird</title><author>Pitera, Angela M. ; Branch, Carrie L. ; Sonnenberg, Benjamin R. ; Benedict, Lauren M. ; Kozlovsky, Dovid Y. ; Pravosudov, Vladimir V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c271t-faf77119f9d003026ca4f175ce552cf18abee47c70473b230b6274765312df4d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Animal breeding</topic><topic>Animal Ecology</topic><topic>Animal reproduction</topic><topic>Behavioral Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>Breeding success</topic><topic>Clutch size</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Longevity</topic><topic>Monogamy</topic><topic>Mountains</topic><topic>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pitera, Angela M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Branch, Carrie L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sonnenberg, Benjamin R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benedict, Lauren M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kozlovsky, Dovid Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pravosudov, Vladimir V.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Sociology &amp; Social Sciences Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied &amp; Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pitera, Angela M.</au><au>Branch, Carrie L.</au><au>Sonnenberg, Benjamin R.</au><au>Benedict, Lauren M.</au><au>Kozlovsky, Dovid Y.</au><au>Pravosudov, Vladimir V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reproduction is affected by individual breeding experience but not pair longevity in a socially monogamous bird</atitle><jtitle>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology</jtitle><stitle>Behav Ecol Sociobiol</stitle><date>2021-07-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>11</epage><pages>1-11</pages><artnum>101</artnum><issn>0340-5443</issn><eissn>1432-0762</eissn><abstract>In socially monogamous animals, maintaining stable mating pairs across years has been hypothesized to result in increased reproductive success. However, previous individual breeding experience may independently affect reproductive success, regardless of pair stability. We examined associations between pair composition based on previous breeding experience, pair longevity, and reproduction in socially monogamous mountain chickadees, Poecile gambeli, in the Sierra Nevada. There were no significant differences in any reproductive parameters between pairs of experienced breeders that had bred together in previous years and those that were newly formed. Pairs in which both partners were experienced had heavier nestlings than both first-year breeders and mixed experienced–inexperienced pairs. Experienced females started laying eggs earlier and laid larger clutches regardless of their social mate’s previous breeding experience. As all experienced birds were older than inexperienced breeders, it remains possible that observed differences between these groups were due to age rather than breeding experience. Overall, our data did not support the hypothesis that pair longevity drives reproductive investment.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Science + Business Media</pub><doi>10.1007/s00265-021-03042-z</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6166-3639</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0340-5443
ispartof Behavioral ecology and sociobiology, 2021-07, Vol.75 (7), p.1-11, Article 101
issn 0340-5443
1432-0762
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2544321221
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Age
Animal breeding
Animal Ecology
Animal reproduction
Behavioral Sciences
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Birds
Breeding
Breeding success
Clutch size
Life Sciences
Longevity
Monogamy
Mountains
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Parameters
Reproduction
Zoology
title Reproduction is affected by individual breeding experience but not pair longevity in a socially monogamous bird
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T21%3A06%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reproduction%20is%20affected%20by%20individual%20breeding%20experience%20but%20not%20pair%20longevity%20in%20a%20socially%20monogamous%20bird&rft.jtitle=Behavioral%20ecology%20and%20sociobiology&rft.au=Pitera,%20Angela%20M.&rft.date=2021-07-01&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=11&rft.pages=1-11&rft.artnum=101&rft.issn=0340-5443&rft.eissn=1432-0762&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00265-021-03042-z&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E48773013%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2544321221&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=48773013&rfr_iscdi=true