Assessing the Effectiveness of Cancer Screening Interventions Targeting Appalachian Populations: A Systematic Review
Purpose Appalachian residents have higher cancer prevalence and invasive cancer incidence in almost all cancer types relative to non‐Appalachian residents. Public health interventions have been carried out to increase preventive cancer screening participation. However, no studies have evaluated the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of rural health 2021-06, Vol.37 (3), p.602-623 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 623 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 602 |
container_title | The Journal of rural health |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Robertson, Nicole M. Hudson, Lauren Attia, Suzanna Labib Porterfield, J. Zachary Vanderford, Nathan L. |
description | Purpose
Appalachian residents have higher cancer prevalence and invasive cancer incidence in almost all cancer types relative to non‐Appalachian residents. Public health interventions have been carried out to increase preventive cancer screening participation. However, no studies have evaluated the effectiveness of existing interventions targeting cancer screening uptake in this high‐risk population. The main objective of this study is to assess the effectiveness of interventions aimed at increasing uptake and/or continuing participation in screened cancers (breast, cervical, colorectal, lung, and prostate) in Appalachia.
Methods
We conducted a systematic review of electronic databases and gray literature using a combination of MeSH and free‐text search terms related to breast, cervical, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancer; mass screening; health promotion; and Appalachia. We identified 3,014 articles of which 15 articles were included. We assessed methodological quality using validated tools and analyzed findings using narrative synthesis.
Findings
Fifteen studies reported uptake and/or continued participation in screening interventions; these focused on cervical (n = 7), colorectal (n = 5), breast (n = 2), and lung (n = 1) cancers in Appalachia. Interventions included diverse components: mass media campaigns, community outreach events, community health workers, interpersonal counseling, and educational materials. We found that multi‐strategy interventions had higher screening uptake relative to interventions employing 1 intervention strategy. Studies that targeted noncompliant populations and leveraged existing community‐based organization partnerships had a substantial increase in screening participation versus others.
Conclusions
There is an urgent need for further research and implementation of effective cancer prevention and screening interventions to reduce disparities in cancer morbidity and mortality in Appalachian populations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jrh.12550 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2544229791</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2544229791</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-2d2cbe2eedadd676b5c542dbbf1bcc5299836ba00aa6b873d16ece5aef8c98853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFPwkAQhTdGI4ge_ANmE08eCrvbbrv1RggKhkQDmHhrttsplJS27rYQ_r0LRW_OZTJvvrzJPITuKelTW4ONXvcp45xcoC4NPOEQ16eXqEtESJzA518ddGPMhhAWCte7Rh3XdQkXwu-iemgMGJMVK1yvAY_TFFSd7aCwIi5TPJKFAo0XSgMUR2pa1KDtvs7KwuCl1Cuoj_qwqmQu1TqTBf4oqyaXJ-IZD_HiYGrY2lnhOewy2N-iq1TmBu7OvYc-X8bL0cSZvb9OR8OZo1whiMMSpmJgAIlMEj_wY664x5I4TmmsFGeh_caPJSFS-rEI3IT6oIBLSIUKheBuDz22vpUuvxswdbQpG13YkxHjnsdYGITUUk8tpXRpjIY0qnS2lfoQURId841svtEpX8s-nB2beAvJH_kbqAUGLbDPcjj87xS9zSet5Q_B_YdO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2544229791</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing the Effectiveness of Cancer Screening Interventions Targeting Appalachian Populations: A Systematic Review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Robertson, Nicole M. ; Hudson, Lauren ; Attia, Suzanna Labib ; Porterfield, J. Zachary ; Vanderford, Nathan L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Robertson, Nicole M. ; Hudson, Lauren ; Attia, Suzanna Labib ; Porterfield, J. Zachary ; Vanderford, Nathan L.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
Appalachian residents have higher cancer prevalence and invasive cancer incidence in almost all cancer types relative to non‐Appalachian residents. Public health interventions have been carried out to increase preventive cancer screening participation. However, no studies have evaluated the effectiveness of existing interventions targeting cancer screening uptake in this high‐risk population. The main objective of this study is to assess the effectiveness of interventions aimed at increasing uptake and/or continuing participation in screened cancers (breast, cervical, colorectal, lung, and prostate) in Appalachia.
Methods
We conducted a systematic review of electronic databases and gray literature using a combination of MeSH and free‐text search terms related to breast, cervical, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancer; mass screening; health promotion; and Appalachia. We identified 3,014 articles of which 15 articles were included. We assessed methodological quality using validated tools and analyzed findings using narrative synthesis.
Findings
Fifteen studies reported uptake and/or continued participation in screening interventions; these focused on cervical (n = 7), colorectal (n = 5), breast (n = 2), and lung (n = 1) cancers in Appalachia. Interventions included diverse components: mass media campaigns, community outreach events, community health workers, interpersonal counseling, and educational materials. We found that multi‐strategy interventions had higher screening uptake relative to interventions employing 1 intervention strategy. Studies that targeted noncompliant populations and leveraged existing community‐based organization partnerships had a substantial increase in screening participation versus others.
Conclusions
There is an urgent need for further research and implementation of effective cancer prevention and screening interventions to reduce disparities in cancer morbidity and mortality in Appalachian populations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-765X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-0361</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12550</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33305886</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Academic guidance counseling ; Appalachia ; Appalachian Region - epidemiology ; Breast ; Breast cancer ; Campaigns ; Cancer ; Cancer screening ; Cervical cancer ; Cervix ; Community health workers ; Counseling ; Early Detection of Cancer ; Educational materials ; Effectiveness ; Health education ; Health Promotion ; Humans ; Intervention ; Invasiveness ; Lung cancer ; Lungs ; Male ; Mass media ; Mass Screening ; Medical personnel ; Medical screening ; Morbidity ; Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Neoplasms - prevention & control ; Participation ; Partnerships ; Population studies ; Populations ; Prevention ; Prevention programs ; Prostate ; Prostate cancer ; Public health ; Quality assessment ; Residents ; Rural health care ; secondary prevention ; Strategy ; Systematic review ; Uptake</subject><ispartof>The Journal of rural health, 2021-06, Vol.37 (3), p.602-623</ispartof><rights>2020 National Rural Health Association</rights><rights>2020 National Rural Health Association.</rights><rights>2021 National Rural Health Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-2d2cbe2eedadd676b5c542dbbf1bcc5299836ba00aa6b873d16ece5aef8c98853</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-2d2cbe2eedadd676b5c542dbbf1bcc5299836ba00aa6b873d16ece5aef8c98853</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5977-6661 ; 0000-0003-2139-8321</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjrh.12550$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjrh.12550$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27866,27924,27925,30999,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33305886$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Robertson, Nicole M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hudson, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Attia, Suzanna Labib</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porterfield, J. Zachary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanderford, Nathan L.</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing the Effectiveness of Cancer Screening Interventions Targeting Appalachian Populations: A Systematic Review</title><title>The Journal of rural health</title><addtitle>J Rural Health</addtitle><description>Purpose
Appalachian residents have higher cancer prevalence and invasive cancer incidence in almost all cancer types relative to non‐Appalachian residents. Public health interventions have been carried out to increase preventive cancer screening participation. However, no studies have evaluated the effectiveness of existing interventions targeting cancer screening uptake in this high‐risk population. The main objective of this study is to assess the effectiveness of interventions aimed at increasing uptake and/or continuing participation in screened cancers (breast, cervical, colorectal, lung, and prostate) in Appalachia.
Methods
We conducted a systematic review of electronic databases and gray literature using a combination of MeSH and free‐text search terms related to breast, cervical, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancer; mass screening; health promotion; and Appalachia. We identified 3,014 articles of which 15 articles were included. We assessed methodological quality using validated tools and analyzed findings using narrative synthesis.
Findings
Fifteen studies reported uptake and/or continued participation in screening interventions; these focused on cervical (n = 7), colorectal (n = 5), breast (n = 2), and lung (n = 1) cancers in Appalachia. Interventions included diverse components: mass media campaigns, community outreach events, community health workers, interpersonal counseling, and educational materials. We found that multi‐strategy interventions had higher screening uptake relative to interventions employing 1 intervention strategy. Studies that targeted noncompliant populations and leveraged existing community‐based organization partnerships had a substantial increase in screening participation versus others.
Conclusions
There is an urgent need for further research and implementation of effective cancer prevention and screening interventions to reduce disparities in cancer morbidity and mortality in Appalachian populations.</description><subject>Academic guidance counseling</subject><subject>Appalachia</subject><subject>Appalachian Region - epidemiology</subject><subject>Breast</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Campaigns</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer screening</subject><subject>Cervical cancer</subject><subject>Cervix</subject><subject>Community health workers</subject><subject>Counseling</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer</subject><subject>Educational materials</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Health education</subject><subject>Health Promotion</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Invasiveness</subject><subject>Lung cancer</subject><subject>Lungs</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mass media</subject><subject>Mass Screening</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Neoplasms - prevention & control</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Partnerships</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Prevention programs</subject><subject>Prostate</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Quality assessment</subject><subject>Residents</subject><subject>Rural health care</subject><subject>secondary prevention</subject><subject>Strategy</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Uptake</subject><issn>0890-765X</issn><issn>1748-0361</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEFPwkAQhTdGI4ge_ANmE08eCrvbbrv1RggKhkQDmHhrttsplJS27rYQ_r0LRW_OZTJvvrzJPITuKelTW4ONXvcp45xcoC4NPOEQ16eXqEtESJzA518ddGPMhhAWCte7Rh3XdQkXwu-iemgMGJMVK1yvAY_TFFSd7aCwIi5TPJKFAo0XSgMUR2pa1KDtvs7KwuCl1Cuoj_qwqmQu1TqTBf4oqyaXJ-IZD_HiYGrY2lnhOewy2N-iq1TmBu7OvYc-X8bL0cSZvb9OR8OZo1whiMMSpmJgAIlMEj_wY664x5I4TmmsFGeh_caPJSFS-rEI3IT6oIBLSIUKheBuDz22vpUuvxswdbQpG13YkxHjnsdYGITUUk8tpXRpjIY0qnS2lfoQURId841svtEpX8s-nB2beAvJH_kbqAUGLbDPcjj87xS9zSet5Q_B_YdO</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>Robertson, Nicole M.</creator><creator>Hudson, Lauren</creator><creator>Attia, Suzanna Labib</creator><creator>Porterfield, J. Zachary</creator><creator>Vanderford, Nathan L.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5977-6661</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2139-8321</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>Assessing the Effectiveness of Cancer Screening Interventions Targeting Appalachian Populations: A Systematic Review</title><author>Robertson, Nicole M. ; Hudson, Lauren ; Attia, Suzanna Labib ; Porterfield, J. Zachary ; Vanderford, Nathan L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-2d2cbe2eedadd676b5c542dbbf1bcc5299836ba00aa6b873d16ece5aef8c98853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Academic guidance counseling</topic><topic>Appalachia</topic><topic>Appalachian Region - epidemiology</topic><topic>Breast</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Campaigns</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer screening</topic><topic>Cervical cancer</topic><topic>Cervix</topic><topic>Community health workers</topic><topic>Counseling</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer</topic><topic>Educational materials</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Health education</topic><topic>Health Promotion</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Invasiveness</topic><topic>Lung cancer</topic><topic>Lungs</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mass media</topic><topic>Mass Screening</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Neoplasms - prevention & control</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Partnerships</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Prevention programs</topic><topic>Prostate</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Quality assessment</topic><topic>Residents</topic><topic>Rural health care</topic><topic>secondary prevention</topic><topic>Strategy</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Uptake</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Robertson, Nicole M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hudson, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Attia, Suzanna Labib</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porterfield, J. Zachary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanderford, Nathan L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>The Journal of rural health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Robertson, Nicole M.</au><au>Hudson, Lauren</au><au>Attia, Suzanna Labib</au><au>Porterfield, J. Zachary</au><au>Vanderford, Nathan L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing the Effectiveness of Cancer Screening Interventions Targeting Appalachian Populations: A Systematic Review</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of rural health</jtitle><addtitle>J Rural Health</addtitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>602</spage><epage>623</epage><pages>602-623</pages><issn>0890-765X</issn><eissn>1748-0361</eissn><abstract>Purpose
Appalachian residents have higher cancer prevalence and invasive cancer incidence in almost all cancer types relative to non‐Appalachian residents. Public health interventions have been carried out to increase preventive cancer screening participation. However, no studies have evaluated the effectiveness of existing interventions targeting cancer screening uptake in this high‐risk population. The main objective of this study is to assess the effectiveness of interventions aimed at increasing uptake and/or continuing participation in screened cancers (breast, cervical, colorectal, lung, and prostate) in Appalachia.
Methods
We conducted a systematic review of electronic databases and gray literature using a combination of MeSH and free‐text search terms related to breast, cervical, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancer; mass screening; health promotion; and Appalachia. We identified 3,014 articles of which 15 articles were included. We assessed methodological quality using validated tools and analyzed findings using narrative synthesis.
Findings
Fifteen studies reported uptake and/or continued participation in screening interventions; these focused on cervical (n = 7), colorectal (n = 5), breast (n = 2), and lung (n = 1) cancers in Appalachia. Interventions included diverse components: mass media campaigns, community outreach events, community health workers, interpersonal counseling, and educational materials. We found that multi‐strategy interventions had higher screening uptake relative to interventions employing 1 intervention strategy. Studies that targeted noncompliant populations and leveraged existing community‐based organization partnerships had a substantial increase in screening participation versus others.
Conclusions
There is an urgent need for further research and implementation of effective cancer prevention and screening interventions to reduce disparities in cancer morbidity and mortality in Appalachian populations.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>33305886</pmid><doi>10.1111/jrh.12550</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5977-6661</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2139-8321</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0890-765X |
ispartof | The Journal of rural health, 2021-06, Vol.37 (3), p.602-623 |
issn | 0890-765X 1748-0361 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2544229791 |
source | MEDLINE; PAIS Index; Access via Wiley Online Library; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
subjects | Academic guidance counseling Appalachia Appalachian Region - epidemiology Breast Breast cancer Campaigns Cancer Cancer screening Cervical cancer Cervix Community health workers Counseling Early Detection of Cancer Educational materials Effectiveness Health education Health Promotion Humans Intervention Invasiveness Lung cancer Lungs Male Mass media Mass Screening Medical personnel Medical screening Morbidity Neoplasms - diagnosis Neoplasms - epidemiology Neoplasms - prevention & control Participation Partnerships Population studies Populations Prevention Prevention programs Prostate Prostate cancer Public health Quality assessment Residents Rural health care secondary prevention Strategy Systematic review Uptake |
title | Assessing the Effectiveness of Cancer Screening Interventions Targeting Appalachian Populations: A Systematic Review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T23%3A50%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20the%20Effectiveness%20of%20Cancer%20Screening%20Interventions%20Targeting%20Appalachian%20Populations:%20A%20Systematic%20Review&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20rural%20health&rft.au=Robertson,%20Nicole%20M.&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=602&rft.epage=623&rft.pages=602-623&rft.issn=0890-765X&rft.eissn=1748-0361&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jrh.12550&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2544229791%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2544229791&rft_id=info:pmid/33305886&rfr_iscdi=true |