Assessing the Effectiveness of Cancer Screening Interventions Targeting Appalachian Populations: A Systematic Review

Purpose Appalachian residents have higher cancer prevalence and invasive cancer incidence in almost all cancer types relative to non‐Appalachian residents. Public health interventions have been carried out to increase preventive cancer screening participation. However, no studies have evaluated the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of rural health 2021-06, Vol.37 (3), p.602-623
Hauptverfasser: Robertson, Nicole M., Hudson, Lauren, Attia, Suzanna Labib, Porterfield, J. Zachary, Vanderford, Nathan L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 623
container_issue 3
container_start_page 602
container_title The Journal of rural health
container_volume 37
creator Robertson, Nicole M.
Hudson, Lauren
Attia, Suzanna Labib
Porterfield, J. Zachary
Vanderford, Nathan L.
description Purpose Appalachian residents have higher cancer prevalence and invasive cancer incidence in almost all cancer types relative to non‐Appalachian residents. Public health interventions have been carried out to increase preventive cancer screening participation. However, no studies have evaluated the effectiveness of existing interventions targeting cancer screening uptake in this high‐risk population. The main objective of this study is to assess the effectiveness of interventions aimed at increasing uptake and/or continuing participation in screened cancers (breast, cervical, colorectal, lung, and prostate) in Appalachia. Methods We conducted a systematic review of electronic databases and gray literature using a combination of MeSH and free‐text search terms related to breast, cervical, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancer; mass screening; health promotion; and Appalachia. We identified 3,014 articles of which 15 articles were included. We assessed methodological quality using validated tools and analyzed findings using narrative synthesis. Findings Fifteen studies reported uptake and/or continued participation in screening interventions; these focused on cervical (n = 7), colorectal (n = 5), breast (n = 2), and lung (n = 1) cancers in Appalachia. Interventions included diverse components: mass media campaigns, community outreach events, community health workers, interpersonal counseling, and educational materials. We found that multi‐strategy interventions had higher screening uptake relative to interventions employing 1 intervention strategy. Studies that targeted noncompliant populations and leveraged existing community‐based organization partnerships had a substantial increase in screening participation versus others. Conclusions There is an urgent need for further research and implementation of effective cancer prevention and screening interventions to reduce disparities in cancer morbidity and mortality in Appalachian populations.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jrh.12550
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2544229791</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2544229791</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-2d2cbe2eedadd676b5c542dbbf1bcc5299836ba00aa6b873d16ece5aef8c98853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFPwkAQhTdGI4ge_ANmE08eCrvbbrv1RggKhkQDmHhrttsplJS27rYQ_r0LRW_OZTJvvrzJPITuKelTW4ONXvcp45xcoC4NPOEQ16eXqEtESJzA518ddGPMhhAWCte7Rh3XdQkXwu-iemgMGJMVK1yvAY_TFFSd7aCwIi5TPJKFAo0XSgMUR2pa1KDtvs7KwuCl1Cuoj_qwqmQu1TqTBf4oqyaXJ-IZD_HiYGrY2lnhOewy2N-iq1TmBu7OvYc-X8bL0cSZvb9OR8OZo1whiMMSpmJgAIlMEj_wY664x5I4TmmsFGeh_caPJSFS-rEI3IT6oIBLSIUKheBuDz22vpUuvxswdbQpG13YkxHjnsdYGITUUk8tpXRpjIY0qnS2lfoQURId841svtEpX8s-nB2beAvJH_kbqAUGLbDPcjj87xS9zSet5Q_B_YdO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2544229791</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing the Effectiveness of Cancer Screening Interventions Targeting Appalachian Populations: A Systematic Review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Robertson, Nicole M. ; Hudson, Lauren ; Attia, Suzanna Labib ; Porterfield, J. Zachary ; Vanderford, Nathan L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Robertson, Nicole M. ; Hudson, Lauren ; Attia, Suzanna Labib ; Porterfield, J. Zachary ; Vanderford, Nathan L.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose Appalachian residents have higher cancer prevalence and invasive cancer incidence in almost all cancer types relative to non‐Appalachian residents. Public health interventions have been carried out to increase preventive cancer screening participation. However, no studies have evaluated the effectiveness of existing interventions targeting cancer screening uptake in this high‐risk population. The main objective of this study is to assess the effectiveness of interventions aimed at increasing uptake and/or continuing participation in screened cancers (breast, cervical, colorectal, lung, and prostate) in Appalachia. Methods We conducted a systematic review of electronic databases and gray literature using a combination of MeSH and free‐text search terms related to breast, cervical, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancer; mass screening; health promotion; and Appalachia. We identified 3,014 articles of which 15 articles were included. We assessed methodological quality using validated tools and analyzed findings using narrative synthesis. Findings Fifteen studies reported uptake and/or continued participation in screening interventions; these focused on cervical (n = 7), colorectal (n = 5), breast (n = 2), and lung (n = 1) cancers in Appalachia. Interventions included diverse components: mass media campaigns, community outreach events, community health workers, interpersonal counseling, and educational materials. We found that multi‐strategy interventions had higher screening uptake relative to interventions employing 1 intervention strategy. Studies that targeted noncompliant populations and leveraged existing community‐based organization partnerships had a substantial increase in screening participation versus others. Conclusions There is an urgent need for further research and implementation of effective cancer prevention and screening interventions to reduce disparities in cancer morbidity and mortality in Appalachian populations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-765X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-0361</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12550</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33305886</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Academic guidance counseling ; Appalachia ; Appalachian Region - epidemiology ; Breast ; Breast cancer ; Campaigns ; Cancer ; Cancer screening ; Cervical cancer ; Cervix ; Community health workers ; Counseling ; Early Detection of Cancer ; Educational materials ; Effectiveness ; Health education ; Health Promotion ; Humans ; Intervention ; Invasiveness ; Lung cancer ; Lungs ; Male ; Mass media ; Mass Screening ; Medical personnel ; Medical screening ; Morbidity ; Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Neoplasms - prevention &amp; control ; Participation ; Partnerships ; Population studies ; Populations ; Prevention ; Prevention programs ; Prostate ; Prostate cancer ; Public health ; Quality assessment ; Residents ; Rural health care ; secondary prevention ; Strategy ; Systematic review ; Uptake</subject><ispartof>The Journal of rural health, 2021-06, Vol.37 (3), p.602-623</ispartof><rights>2020 National Rural Health Association</rights><rights>2020 National Rural Health Association.</rights><rights>2021 National Rural Health Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-2d2cbe2eedadd676b5c542dbbf1bcc5299836ba00aa6b873d16ece5aef8c98853</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-2d2cbe2eedadd676b5c542dbbf1bcc5299836ba00aa6b873d16ece5aef8c98853</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5977-6661 ; 0000-0003-2139-8321</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjrh.12550$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjrh.12550$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27866,27924,27925,30999,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33305886$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Robertson, Nicole M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hudson, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Attia, Suzanna Labib</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porterfield, J. Zachary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanderford, Nathan L.</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing the Effectiveness of Cancer Screening Interventions Targeting Appalachian Populations: A Systematic Review</title><title>The Journal of rural health</title><addtitle>J Rural Health</addtitle><description>Purpose Appalachian residents have higher cancer prevalence and invasive cancer incidence in almost all cancer types relative to non‐Appalachian residents. Public health interventions have been carried out to increase preventive cancer screening participation. However, no studies have evaluated the effectiveness of existing interventions targeting cancer screening uptake in this high‐risk population. The main objective of this study is to assess the effectiveness of interventions aimed at increasing uptake and/or continuing participation in screened cancers (breast, cervical, colorectal, lung, and prostate) in Appalachia. Methods We conducted a systematic review of electronic databases and gray literature using a combination of MeSH and free‐text search terms related to breast, cervical, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancer; mass screening; health promotion; and Appalachia. We identified 3,014 articles of which 15 articles were included. We assessed methodological quality using validated tools and analyzed findings using narrative synthesis. Findings Fifteen studies reported uptake and/or continued participation in screening interventions; these focused on cervical (n = 7), colorectal (n = 5), breast (n = 2), and lung (n = 1) cancers in Appalachia. Interventions included diverse components: mass media campaigns, community outreach events, community health workers, interpersonal counseling, and educational materials. We found that multi‐strategy interventions had higher screening uptake relative to interventions employing 1 intervention strategy. Studies that targeted noncompliant populations and leveraged existing community‐based organization partnerships had a substantial increase in screening participation versus others. Conclusions There is an urgent need for further research and implementation of effective cancer prevention and screening interventions to reduce disparities in cancer morbidity and mortality in Appalachian populations.</description><subject>Academic guidance counseling</subject><subject>Appalachia</subject><subject>Appalachian Region - epidemiology</subject><subject>Breast</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Campaigns</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer screening</subject><subject>Cervical cancer</subject><subject>Cervix</subject><subject>Community health workers</subject><subject>Counseling</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer</subject><subject>Educational materials</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Health education</subject><subject>Health Promotion</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Invasiveness</subject><subject>Lung cancer</subject><subject>Lungs</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mass media</subject><subject>Mass Screening</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Neoplasms - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Partnerships</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Prevention programs</subject><subject>Prostate</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Quality assessment</subject><subject>Residents</subject><subject>Rural health care</subject><subject>secondary prevention</subject><subject>Strategy</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Uptake</subject><issn>0890-765X</issn><issn>1748-0361</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEFPwkAQhTdGI4ge_ANmE08eCrvbbrv1RggKhkQDmHhrttsplJS27rYQ_r0LRW_OZTJvvrzJPITuKelTW4ONXvcp45xcoC4NPOEQ16eXqEtESJzA518ddGPMhhAWCte7Rh3XdQkXwu-iemgMGJMVK1yvAY_TFFSd7aCwIi5TPJKFAo0XSgMUR2pa1KDtvs7KwuCl1Cuoj_qwqmQu1TqTBf4oqyaXJ-IZD_HiYGrY2lnhOewy2N-iq1TmBu7OvYc-X8bL0cSZvb9OR8OZo1whiMMSpmJgAIlMEj_wY664x5I4TmmsFGeh_caPJSFS-rEI3IT6oIBLSIUKheBuDz22vpUuvxswdbQpG13YkxHjnsdYGITUUk8tpXRpjIY0qnS2lfoQURId841svtEpX8s-nB2beAvJH_kbqAUGLbDPcjj87xS9zSet5Q_B_YdO</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>Robertson, Nicole M.</creator><creator>Hudson, Lauren</creator><creator>Attia, Suzanna Labib</creator><creator>Porterfield, J. Zachary</creator><creator>Vanderford, Nathan L.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5977-6661</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2139-8321</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>Assessing the Effectiveness of Cancer Screening Interventions Targeting Appalachian Populations: A Systematic Review</title><author>Robertson, Nicole M. ; Hudson, Lauren ; Attia, Suzanna Labib ; Porterfield, J. Zachary ; Vanderford, Nathan L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-2d2cbe2eedadd676b5c542dbbf1bcc5299836ba00aa6b873d16ece5aef8c98853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Academic guidance counseling</topic><topic>Appalachia</topic><topic>Appalachian Region - epidemiology</topic><topic>Breast</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Campaigns</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer screening</topic><topic>Cervical cancer</topic><topic>Cervix</topic><topic>Community health workers</topic><topic>Counseling</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer</topic><topic>Educational materials</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Health education</topic><topic>Health Promotion</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Invasiveness</topic><topic>Lung cancer</topic><topic>Lungs</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mass media</topic><topic>Mass Screening</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Neoplasms - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Partnerships</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Prevention programs</topic><topic>Prostate</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Quality assessment</topic><topic>Residents</topic><topic>Rural health care</topic><topic>secondary prevention</topic><topic>Strategy</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Uptake</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Robertson, Nicole M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hudson, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Attia, Suzanna Labib</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porterfield, J. Zachary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanderford, Nathan L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>The Journal of rural health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Robertson, Nicole M.</au><au>Hudson, Lauren</au><au>Attia, Suzanna Labib</au><au>Porterfield, J. Zachary</au><au>Vanderford, Nathan L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing the Effectiveness of Cancer Screening Interventions Targeting Appalachian Populations: A Systematic Review</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of rural health</jtitle><addtitle>J Rural Health</addtitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>602</spage><epage>623</epage><pages>602-623</pages><issn>0890-765X</issn><eissn>1748-0361</eissn><abstract>Purpose Appalachian residents have higher cancer prevalence and invasive cancer incidence in almost all cancer types relative to non‐Appalachian residents. Public health interventions have been carried out to increase preventive cancer screening participation. However, no studies have evaluated the effectiveness of existing interventions targeting cancer screening uptake in this high‐risk population. The main objective of this study is to assess the effectiveness of interventions aimed at increasing uptake and/or continuing participation in screened cancers (breast, cervical, colorectal, lung, and prostate) in Appalachia. Methods We conducted a systematic review of electronic databases and gray literature using a combination of MeSH and free‐text search terms related to breast, cervical, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancer; mass screening; health promotion; and Appalachia. We identified 3,014 articles of which 15 articles were included. We assessed methodological quality using validated tools and analyzed findings using narrative synthesis. Findings Fifteen studies reported uptake and/or continued participation in screening interventions; these focused on cervical (n = 7), colorectal (n = 5), breast (n = 2), and lung (n = 1) cancers in Appalachia. Interventions included diverse components: mass media campaigns, community outreach events, community health workers, interpersonal counseling, and educational materials. We found that multi‐strategy interventions had higher screening uptake relative to interventions employing 1 intervention strategy. Studies that targeted noncompliant populations and leveraged existing community‐based organization partnerships had a substantial increase in screening participation versus others. Conclusions There is an urgent need for further research and implementation of effective cancer prevention and screening interventions to reduce disparities in cancer morbidity and mortality in Appalachian populations.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>33305886</pmid><doi>10.1111/jrh.12550</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5977-6661</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2139-8321</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0890-765X
ispartof The Journal of rural health, 2021-06, Vol.37 (3), p.602-623
issn 0890-765X
1748-0361
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2544229791
source MEDLINE; PAIS Index; Access via Wiley Online Library; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects Academic guidance counseling
Appalachia
Appalachian Region - epidemiology
Breast
Breast cancer
Campaigns
Cancer
Cancer screening
Cervical cancer
Cervix
Community health workers
Counseling
Early Detection of Cancer
Educational materials
Effectiveness
Health education
Health Promotion
Humans
Intervention
Invasiveness
Lung cancer
Lungs
Male
Mass media
Mass Screening
Medical personnel
Medical screening
Morbidity
Neoplasms - diagnosis
Neoplasms - epidemiology
Neoplasms - prevention & control
Participation
Partnerships
Population studies
Populations
Prevention
Prevention programs
Prostate
Prostate cancer
Public health
Quality assessment
Residents
Rural health care
secondary prevention
Strategy
Systematic review
Uptake
title Assessing the Effectiveness of Cancer Screening Interventions Targeting Appalachian Populations: A Systematic Review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T23%3A50%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20the%20Effectiveness%20of%20Cancer%20Screening%20Interventions%20Targeting%20Appalachian%20Populations:%20A%20Systematic%20Review&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20rural%20health&rft.au=Robertson,%20Nicole%20M.&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=602&rft.epage=623&rft.pages=602-623&rft.issn=0890-765X&rft.eissn=1748-0361&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jrh.12550&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2544229791%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2544229791&rft_id=info:pmid/33305886&rfr_iscdi=true