Team Boundary Spanning in a Large Engineering Project

This paper reports on a qualitative study of how 12 work teams and a project-management team spanned their boundaries in a large engineering project. The study identified two types of boundary-spanning activities. Project-level managers carried out receptive activities in which they spanned boundari...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Small group research 2021-08, Vol.52 (4), p.405-430
1. Verfasser: Kou, Chia-Yu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 430
container_issue 4
container_start_page 405
container_title Small group research
container_volume 52
creator Kou, Chia-Yu
description This paper reports on a qualitative study of how 12 work teams and a project-management team spanned their boundaries in a large engineering project. The study identified two types of boundary-spanning activities. Project-level managers carried out receptive activities in which they spanned boundaries vertically, adapted their management practices, and attuned themselves to the teams. Team-level managers’ activities, on the other hand, were reactive: they spanned boundaries vertically and horizontally when they needed to, and made informal connections to peer teams and project-level management. These findings underscore the important role of team boundary-spanning activities in the shape of subsequent inter-team interactions.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1046496420976836
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2543669851</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1046496420976836</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2543669851</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-d1d26710986ecb151bf4fadd8bea8ed917bb52ec4ab5bcdcd01ef3fe9ece3b5e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UEtLxDAQDqLgunr3WPBczTSPpkdd1lUoKLieSx7T0uKma9Ie_Pe2VBAETzPM92I-Qq6B3gLk-R1QLnkheUaLXComT8gKhMhSleXqdNonOJ3xc3IRY0cpFcDZiog96kPy0I_e6fCVvB21961vktYnOil1aDDZ-qb1iGE-v4a-QztckrNaf0S8-plr8v643W-e0vJl97y5L1PLBAypA5fJHGihJFoDAkzNa-2cMqgVugJyY0SGlmsjjHXWUcCa1VigRWYEsjW5WXyPof8cMQ5V14_BT5FVJjiTslACJhZdWDb0MQasq2NoD9M7FdBqLqf6W84kSRdJ1A3-mv7L_wbhnWQD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2543669851</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Team Boundary Spanning in a Large Engineering Project</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Kou, Chia-Yu</creator><creatorcontrib>Kou, Chia-Yu</creatorcontrib><description>This paper reports on a qualitative study of how 12 work teams and a project-management team spanned their boundaries in a large engineering project. The study identified two types of boundary-spanning activities. Project-level managers carried out receptive activities in which they spanned boundaries vertically, adapted their management practices, and attuned themselves to the teams. Team-level managers’ activities, on the other hand, were reactive: they spanned boundaries vertically and horizontally when they needed to, and made informal connections to peer teams and project-level management. These findings underscore the important role of team boundary-spanning activities in the shape of subsequent inter-team interactions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1046-4964</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-8278</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1046496420976836</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Engineering ; Management ; Qualitative research ; Teams ; Teamwork</subject><ispartof>Small group research, 2021-08, Vol.52 (4), p.405-430</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-d1d26710986ecb151bf4fadd8bea8ed917bb52ec4ab5bcdcd01ef3fe9ece3b5e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-d1d26710986ecb151bf4fadd8bea8ed917bb52ec4ab5bcdcd01ef3fe9ece3b5e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5351-0659</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1046496420976836$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1046496420976836$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21818,27923,27924,30998,33773,43620,43621</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kou, Chia-Yu</creatorcontrib><title>Team Boundary Spanning in a Large Engineering Project</title><title>Small group research</title><description>This paper reports on a qualitative study of how 12 work teams and a project-management team spanned their boundaries in a large engineering project. The study identified two types of boundary-spanning activities. Project-level managers carried out receptive activities in which they spanned boundaries vertically, adapted their management practices, and attuned themselves to the teams. Team-level managers’ activities, on the other hand, were reactive: they spanned boundaries vertically and horizontally when they needed to, and made informal connections to peer teams and project-level management. These findings underscore the important role of team boundary-spanning activities in the shape of subsequent inter-team interactions.</description><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Teams</subject><subject>Teamwork</subject><issn>1046-4964</issn><issn>1552-8278</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UEtLxDAQDqLgunr3WPBczTSPpkdd1lUoKLieSx7T0uKma9Ie_Pe2VBAETzPM92I-Qq6B3gLk-R1QLnkheUaLXComT8gKhMhSleXqdNonOJ3xc3IRY0cpFcDZiog96kPy0I_e6fCVvB21961vktYnOil1aDDZ-qb1iGE-v4a-QztckrNaf0S8-plr8v643W-e0vJl97y5L1PLBAypA5fJHGihJFoDAkzNa-2cMqgVugJyY0SGlmsjjHXWUcCa1VigRWYEsjW5WXyPof8cMQ5V14_BT5FVJjiTslACJhZdWDb0MQasq2NoD9M7FdBqLqf6W84kSRdJ1A3-mv7L_wbhnWQD</recordid><startdate>202108</startdate><enddate>202108</enddate><creator>Kou, Chia-Yu</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5351-0659</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202108</creationdate><title>Team Boundary Spanning in a Large Engineering Project</title><author>Kou, Chia-Yu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-d1d26710986ecb151bf4fadd8bea8ed917bb52ec4ab5bcdcd01ef3fe9ece3b5e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Teams</topic><topic>Teamwork</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kou, Chia-Yu</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Small group research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kou, Chia-Yu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Team Boundary Spanning in a Large Engineering Project</atitle><jtitle>Small group research</jtitle><date>2021-08</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>405</spage><epage>430</epage><pages>405-430</pages><issn>1046-4964</issn><eissn>1552-8278</eissn><abstract>This paper reports on a qualitative study of how 12 work teams and a project-management team spanned their boundaries in a large engineering project. The study identified two types of boundary-spanning activities. Project-level managers carried out receptive activities in which they spanned boundaries vertically, adapted their management practices, and attuned themselves to the teams. Team-level managers’ activities, on the other hand, were reactive: they spanned boundaries vertically and horizontally when they needed to, and made informal connections to peer teams and project-level management. These findings underscore the important role of team boundary-spanning activities in the shape of subsequent inter-team interactions.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1046496420976836</doi><tpages>26</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5351-0659</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1046-4964
ispartof Small group research, 2021-08, Vol.52 (4), p.405-430
issn 1046-4964
1552-8278
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2543669851
source Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE Complete A-Z List; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Engineering
Management
Qualitative research
Teams
Teamwork
title Team Boundary Spanning in a Large Engineering Project
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T03%3A15%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Team%20Boundary%20Spanning%20in%20a%20Large%20Engineering%20Project&rft.jtitle=Small%20group%20research&rft.au=Kou,%20Chia-Yu&rft.date=2021-08&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=405&rft.epage=430&rft.pages=405-430&rft.issn=1046-4964&rft.eissn=1552-8278&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1046496420976836&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2543669851%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2543669851&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1046496420976836&rfr_iscdi=true