Using Demography to Evaluate Reintroductions for Conservation of the Endangered Frog, Rana sierrae, in Streams

Reintroductions are an important recovery tool for endangered species but have had varying success. We used demographic data to evaluate the use of reintroductions for the recovery of the federally endangered Sierra Nevada Yellow-legged Frog (Rana sierrae) in stream populations in its northern range...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Herpetologica 2020-12, Vol.76 (4), p.383-395
Hauptverfasser: Brown, Cathy, Keung, Neil C., Dillingham, Colin P., Mussulman, Sarah, Bushell, Jessie, Sollmann, Rahel, Todd, Brian D., Lawler, Sharon P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 395
container_issue 4
container_start_page 383
container_title Herpetologica
container_volume 76
creator Brown, Cathy
Keung, Neil C.
Dillingham, Colin P.
Mussulman, Sarah
Bushell, Jessie
Sollmann, Rahel
Todd, Brian D.
Lawler, Sharon P.
description Reintroductions are an important recovery tool for endangered species but have had varying success. We used demographic data to evaluate the use of reintroductions for the recovery of the federally endangered Sierra Nevada Yellow-legged Frog (Rana sierrae) in stream populations in its northern range where the species is particularly at risk. We conducted a capture–mark–recapture study from 2016–2018 in four diverse streams. One of the streams contained a high abundance of frogs that allowed us to investigate demography in a relatively healthy population. In another of the streams, we tested a reintroduction using captive-reared frogs. We used robust design Huggins and Pradel models to estimate abundance, apparent overwinter survival, recruitment, longevity, and sex ratios. Annual abundance estimates were small, with ≤52 wild adult frogs at three streams and few tadpoles or subadults seen in any of the streams. The oldest frog in our streams was at least 13 yr. Estimates of apparent survival rates of wild adults ranged from 0.55 ± 0.05 standard error (SE) to 0.90 ± 0.05 SE, and estimates of annual recruitment ranged from 0.02 ± 0.11 SE to 0.26 ± 0.03 SE per site. High survival rates leading to long-lived adults may facilitate persistence of these stream populations, whereas low recruitment may limit population growth and recovery. The two largest populations were in intermittent streams, which may reflect their roles as a refuge from fishes. At least 52% of captive-reared frogs survived their first summer after release and at least 36% survived their first winter. Apparent overwinter survival of captive-reared frogs was lower than for wild frogs, ranging from 0.29 ± 0.13 SE to 0.56 ± 0.14 SE. Because of the apparent low survival of wild eggs, tadpoles, and subadults, releasing adults as was done in this study, rather than younger life stages, may be more successful. Our results offer promise for the use of reintroductions to augment depleted populations and suggest that further research on factors affecting recruitment and survival of younger life stages is needed.
doi_str_mv 10.1655/0018-0831-76.4.383
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2543427756</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>27099245</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27099245</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b366t-bd4994ef31834e1055e525d44de78444ea1d918513f95745bc9f6166cbf8d4e93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkFtLKzEQx4MoWC9fQBAC59WtyWZyezz01AsIgpfnkO3O1i026UlSod_eXSo-ik8zzP8y8CPkgrMpV1JeM8ZNxYzglVZTmAojDsiEW2Eqyaw9JJNvwzE5yXnFGBO65hMSXnMflvQfruMy-c3bjpZI5x_-fesL0ifsQ0mx3S5KH0OmXUx0NiyYPvx4obGj5Q3pPLQ-LDFhS29SXF7RJx88zT2m5PGK9oE-l4R-nc_IUeffM55_zVPyejN_md1VD4-397O_D1UjlCpV04K1gJ3gRgByJiXKWrYALWoDAOh5a7mRXHRWapDNwnaKK7VoOtMCWnFK_ux7Nyn-32IubhW3KQwvXS1BQK21VD-6QDMY0Jmxq967FinmnLBzm9Svfdo5ztxI341w3QjXaeXADfSH0OU-tMolpu9ErYfOGuSgs73e9DEG_E3lJ4n5jts</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2470409989</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using Demography to Evaluate Reintroductions for Conservation of the Endangered Frog, Rana sierrae, in Streams</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Brown, Cathy ; Keung, Neil C. ; Dillingham, Colin P. ; Mussulman, Sarah ; Bushell, Jessie ; Sollmann, Rahel ; Todd, Brian D. ; Lawler, Sharon P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Brown, Cathy ; Keung, Neil C. ; Dillingham, Colin P. ; Mussulman, Sarah ; Bushell, Jessie ; Sollmann, Rahel ; Todd, Brian D. ; Lawler, Sharon P.</creatorcontrib><description>Reintroductions are an important recovery tool for endangered species but have had varying success. We used demographic data to evaluate the use of reintroductions for the recovery of the federally endangered Sierra Nevada Yellow-legged Frog (Rana sierrae) in stream populations in its northern range where the species is particularly at risk. We conducted a capture–mark–recapture study from 2016–2018 in four diverse streams. One of the streams contained a high abundance of frogs that allowed us to investigate demography in a relatively healthy population. In another of the streams, we tested a reintroduction using captive-reared frogs. We used robust design Huggins and Pradel models to estimate abundance, apparent overwinter survival, recruitment, longevity, and sex ratios. Annual abundance estimates were small, with ≤52 wild adult frogs at three streams and few tadpoles or subadults seen in any of the streams. The oldest frog in our streams was at least 13 yr. Estimates of apparent survival rates of wild adults ranged from 0.55 ± 0.05 standard error (SE) to 0.90 ± 0.05 SE, and estimates of annual recruitment ranged from 0.02 ± 0.11 SE to 0.26 ± 0.03 SE per site. High survival rates leading to long-lived adults may facilitate persistence of these stream populations, whereas low recruitment may limit population growth and recovery. The two largest populations were in intermittent streams, which may reflect their roles as a refuge from fishes. At least 52% of captive-reared frogs survived their first summer after release and at least 36% survived their first winter. Apparent overwinter survival of captive-reared frogs was lower than for wild frogs, ranging from 0.29 ± 0.13 SE to 0.56 ± 0.14 SE. Because of the apparent low survival of wild eggs, tadpoles, and subadults, releasing adults as was done in this study, rather than younger life stages, may be more successful. Our results offer promise for the use of reintroductions to augment depleted populations and suggest that further research on factors affecting recruitment and survival of younger life stages is needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-0831</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-5099</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1655/0018-0831-76.4.383</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lawrence: Herpetologists' League</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Adults ; Amphibian ; Amphibians ; Annual ; Captive-rearing ; Capture-recapture studies ; Creeks &amp; streams ; Demography ; Design ; Ecology ; Eggs ; Endangered &amp; extinct species ; Endangered species ; Estimates ; Frogs ; Intermittent streams ; Juveniles ; Lakes ; Mark–recapture ; Ova ; Population ; Population augmentation ; Population dynamics ; Population growth ; Rare species ; Recovery ; Recruitment ; Recruitment (fisheries) ; Reintroduction ; Rivers ; Robust design ; Sierra Nevada Yellow-legged Frogs ; Standard error ; Streams ; Success ; Survival ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>Herpetologica, 2020-12, Vol.76 (4), p.383-395</ispartof><rights>2020 by The Herpetologists' League, Inc.</rights><rights>2020 by The Herpetologists’ League, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Allen Press Publishing Services Dec 2020</rights><rights>Copyright Allen Press Inc. Dec 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b366t-bd4994ef31834e1055e525d44de78444ea1d918513f95745bc9f6166cbf8d4e93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b366t-bd4994ef31834e1055e525d44de78444ea1d918513f95745bc9f6166cbf8d4e93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27099245$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27099245$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27923,27924,58016,58249</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brown, Cathy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keung, Neil C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dillingham, Colin P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mussulman, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bushell, Jessie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sollmann, Rahel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Todd, Brian D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawler, Sharon P.</creatorcontrib><title>Using Demography to Evaluate Reintroductions for Conservation of the Endangered Frog, Rana sierrae, in Streams</title><title>Herpetologica</title><description>Reintroductions are an important recovery tool for endangered species but have had varying success. We used demographic data to evaluate the use of reintroductions for the recovery of the federally endangered Sierra Nevada Yellow-legged Frog (Rana sierrae) in stream populations in its northern range where the species is particularly at risk. We conducted a capture–mark–recapture study from 2016–2018 in four diverse streams. One of the streams contained a high abundance of frogs that allowed us to investigate demography in a relatively healthy population. In another of the streams, we tested a reintroduction using captive-reared frogs. We used robust design Huggins and Pradel models to estimate abundance, apparent overwinter survival, recruitment, longevity, and sex ratios. Annual abundance estimates were small, with ≤52 wild adult frogs at three streams and few tadpoles or subadults seen in any of the streams. The oldest frog in our streams was at least 13 yr. Estimates of apparent survival rates of wild adults ranged from 0.55 ± 0.05 standard error (SE) to 0.90 ± 0.05 SE, and estimates of annual recruitment ranged from 0.02 ± 0.11 SE to 0.26 ± 0.03 SE per site. High survival rates leading to long-lived adults may facilitate persistence of these stream populations, whereas low recruitment may limit population growth and recovery. The two largest populations were in intermittent streams, which may reflect their roles as a refuge from fishes. At least 52% of captive-reared frogs survived their first summer after release and at least 36% survived their first winter. Apparent overwinter survival of captive-reared frogs was lower than for wild frogs, ranging from 0.29 ± 0.13 SE to 0.56 ± 0.14 SE. Because of the apparent low survival of wild eggs, tadpoles, and subadults, releasing adults as was done in this study, rather than younger life stages, may be more successful. Our results offer promise for the use of reintroductions to augment depleted populations and suggest that further research on factors affecting recruitment and survival of younger life stages is needed.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Amphibian</subject><subject>Amphibians</subject><subject>Annual</subject><subject>Captive-rearing</subject><subject>Capture-recapture studies</subject><subject>Creeks &amp; streams</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Eggs</subject><subject>Endangered &amp; extinct species</subject><subject>Endangered species</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Frogs</subject><subject>Intermittent streams</subject><subject>Juveniles</subject><subject>Lakes</subject><subject>Mark–recapture</subject><subject>Ova</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Population augmentation</subject><subject>Population dynamics</subject><subject>Population growth</subject><subject>Rare species</subject><subject>Recovery</subject><subject>Recruitment</subject><subject>Recruitment (fisheries)</subject><subject>Reintroduction</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Robust design</subject><subject>Sierra Nevada Yellow-legged Frogs</subject><subject>Standard error</subject><subject>Streams</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>0018-0831</issn><issn>1938-5099</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkFtLKzEQx4MoWC9fQBAC59WtyWZyezz01AsIgpfnkO3O1i026UlSod_eXSo-ik8zzP8y8CPkgrMpV1JeM8ZNxYzglVZTmAojDsiEW2Eqyaw9JJNvwzE5yXnFGBO65hMSXnMflvQfruMy-c3bjpZI5x_-fesL0ifsQ0mx3S5KH0OmXUx0NiyYPvx4obGj5Q3pPLQ-LDFhS29SXF7RJx88zT2m5PGK9oE-l4R-nc_IUeffM55_zVPyejN_md1VD4-397O_D1UjlCpV04K1gJ3gRgByJiXKWrYALWoDAOh5a7mRXHRWapDNwnaKK7VoOtMCWnFK_ux7Nyn-32IubhW3KQwvXS1BQK21VD-6QDMY0Jmxq967FinmnLBzm9Svfdo5ztxI341w3QjXaeXADfSH0OU-tMolpu9ErYfOGuSgs73e9DEG_E3lJ4n5jts</recordid><startdate>20201201</startdate><enddate>20201201</enddate><creator>Brown, Cathy</creator><creator>Keung, Neil C.</creator><creator>Dillingham, Colin P.</creator><creator>Mussulman, Sarah</creator><creator>Bushell, Jessie</creator><creator>Sollmann, Rahel</creator><creator>Todd, Brian D.</creator><creator>Lawler, Sharon P.</creator><general>Herpetologists' League</general><general>Allen Press Publishing</general><general>Allen Press Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201201</creationdate><title>Using Demography to Evaluate Reintroductions for Conservation of the Endangered Frog, Rana sierrae, in Streams</title><author>Brown, Cathy ; Keung, Neil C. ; Dillingham, Colin P. ; Mussulman, Sarah ; Bushell, Jessie ; Sollmann, Rahel ; Todd, Brian D. ; Lawler, Sharon P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b366t-bd4994ef31834e1055e525d44de78444ea1d918513f95745bc9f6166cbf8d4e93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Amphibian</topic><topic>Amphibians</topic><topic>Annual</topic><topic>Captive-rearing</topic><topic>Capture-recapture studies</topic><topic>Creeks &amp; streams</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Eggs</topic><topic>Endangered &amp; extinct species</topic><topic>Endangered species</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Frogs</topic><topic>Intermittent streams</topic><topic>Juveniles</topic><topic>Lakes</topic><topic>Mark–recapture</topic><topic>Ova</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Population augmentation</topic><topic>Population dynamics</topic><topic>Population growth</topic><topic>Rare species</topic><topic>Recovery</topic><topic>Recruitment</topic><topic>Recruitment (fisheries)</topic><topic>Reintroduction</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Robust design</topic><topic>Sierra Nevada Yellow-legged Frogs</topic><topic>Standard error</topic><topic>Streams</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brown, Cathy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keung, Neil C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dillingham, Colin P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mussulman, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bushell, Jessie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sollmann, Rahel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Todd, Brian D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawler, Sharon P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Herpetologica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brown, Cathy</au><au>Keung, Neil C.</au><au>Dillingham, Colin P.</au><au>Mussulman, Sarah</au><au>Bushell, Jessie</au><au>Sollmann, Rahel</au><au>Todd, Brian D.</au><au>Lawler, Sharon P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Using Demography to Evaluate Reintroductions for Conservation of the Endangered Frog, Rana sierrae, in Streams</atitle><jtitle>Herpetologica</jtitle><date>2020-12-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>76</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>383</spage><epage>395</epage><pages>383-395</pages><issn>0018-0831</issn><eissn>1938-5099</eissn><abstract>Reintroductions are an important recovery tool for endangered species but have had varying success. We used demographic data to evaluate the use of reintroductions for the recovery of the federally endangered Sierra Nevada Yellow-legged Frog (Rana sierrae) in stream populations in its northern range where the species is particularly at risk. We conducted a capture–mark–recapture study from 2016–2018 in four diverse streams. One of the streams contained a high abundance of frogs that allowed us to investigate demography in a relatively healthy population. In another of the streams, we tested a reintroduction using captive-reared frogs. We used robust design Huggins and Pradel models to estimate abundance, apparent overwinter survival, recruitment, longevity, and sex ratios. Annual abundance estimates were small, with ≤52 wild adult frogs at three streams and few tadpoles or subadults seen in any of the streams. The oldest frog in our streams was at least 13 yr. Estimates of apparent survival rates of wild adults ranged from 0.55 ± 0.05 standard error (SE) to 0.90 ± 0.05 SE, and estimates of annual recruitment ranged from 0.02 ± 0.11 SE to 0.26 ± 0.03 SE per site. High survival rates leading to long-lived adults may facilitate persistence of these stream populations, whereas low recruitment may limit population growth and recovery. The two largest populations were in intermittent streams, which may reflect their roles as a refuge from fishes. At least 52% of captive-reared frogs survived their first summer after release and at least 36% survived their first winter. Apparent overwinter survival of captive-reared frogs was lower than for wild frogs, ranging from 0.29 ± 0.13 SE to 0.56 ± 0.14 SE. Because of the apparent low survival of wild eggs, tadpoles, and subadults, releasing adults as was done in this study, rather than younger life stages, may be more successful. Our results offer promise for the use of reintroductions to augment depleted populations and suggest that further research on factors affecting recruitment and survival of younger life stages is needed.</abstract><cop>Lawrence</cop><pub>Herpetologists' League</pub><doi>10.1655/0018-0831-76.4.383</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0018-0831
ispartof Herpetologica, 2020-12, Vol.76 (4), p.383-395
issn 0018-0831
1938-5099
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2543427756
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Abundance
Adults
Amphibian
Amphibians
Annual
Captive-rearing
Capture-recapture studies
Creeks & streams
Demography
Design
Ecology
Eggs
Endangered & extinct species
Endangered species
Estimates
Frogs
Intermittent streams
Juveniles
Lakes
Mark–recapture
Ova
Population
Population augmentation
Population dynamics
Population growth
Rare species
Recovery
Recruitment
Recruitment (fisheries)
Reintroduction
Rivers
Robust design
Sierra Nevada Yellow-legged Frogs
Standard error
Streams
Success
Survival
Wildlife conservation
title Using Demography to Evaluate Reintroductions for Conservation of the Endangered Frog, Rana sierrae, in Streams
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T21%3A52%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%20Demography%20to%20Evaluate%20Reintroductions%20for%20Conservation%20of%20the%20Endangered%20Frog,%20Rana%20sierrae,%20in%20Streams&rft.jtitle=Herpetologica&rft.au=Brown,%20Cathy&rft.date=2020-12-01&rft.volume=76&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=383&rft.epage=395&rft.pages=383-395&rft.issn=0018-0831&rft.eissn=1938-5099&rft_id=info:doi/10.1655/0018-0831-76.4.383&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E27099245%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2470409989&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=27099245&rfr_iscdi=true