Party Institutionalization and Welfare State Development
This article argues that the extent to which political parties are institutionalized shapes welfare state development. Institutionalized parties allow politicians to overcome co-ordination problems, avoid capture by special interests and form stable linkages with broad social groups. These features...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of political science 2021-07, Vol.51 (3), p.1203-1229 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1229 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 1203 |
container_title | British journal of political science |
container_volume | 51 |
creator | Rasmussen, Magnus B. Knutsen, Carl Henrik |
description | This article argues that the extent to which political parties are institutionalized shapes welfare state development. Institutionalized parties allow politicians to overcome co-ordination problems, avoid capture by special interests and form stable linkages with broad social groups. These features both enable and incentivize politicians to pursue extensive welfare policies. The study employs measures of party institutionalization and welfare state features to study these proposed relationships. Even when accounting for country- and year-fixed effects and plausible confounders such as electoral system, unionization, regime type and state capacity, the authors find clear relationships between party institutionalization and more extensive and universal welfare states. Focusing on universalism, they find that the relationship is more pronounced when constraints on executives are strong and in democracies, but that it also exists in autocracies. Further, when disaggregating party institutionalization and evaluating mechanisms, the linkages that institutionalized parties form with social groups constitute one important, but not the only relevant, factor. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0007123419000498 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2543259257</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0007123419000498</cupid><sourcerecordid>2543259257</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-494792269a54307b53808ba7d74f376cf4c675e257020fda3f8636f85463ca1e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kElLxEAQhRtRMI7-AG8Bz9He0stRxm1gQGEUj6GSdEuGbHZ3hPHX22EGPIinekW971E8hC4JviaYyJsNxlgSyjjRUXGtjlBCuNAZJYQeo2Q-Z_P9FJ15v42rYookSL2AC7t01fvQhCk0Qw9t8w2zSKGv03fTWnAm3QQIJr0zX6Ydxs704RydWGi9uTjMBXp7uH9dPmXr58fV8nadVRyrkHHNpaZUaMg5w7LMmcKqBFlLbpkUleWVkLmhucQU2xqYVYIJq3IuWAXEsAW62ueObvicjA_Fdphc_NIXNEbSXEc2usjeVbnBe2dsMbqmA7crCC7mgoo_BUWGHRjoStfUH-Y3-n_qB37bZZw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2543259257</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Party Institutionalization and Welfare State Development</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Cambridge Journals</source><creator>Rasmussen, Magnus B. ; Knutsen, Carl Henrik</creator><creatorcontrib>Rasmussen, Magnus B. ; Knutsen, Carl Henrik</creatorcontrib><description>This article argues that the extent to which political parties are institutionalized shapes welfare state development. Institutionalized parties allow politicians to overcome co-ordination problems, avoid capture by special interests and form stable linkages with broad social groups. These features both enable and incentivize politicians to pursue extensive welfare policies. The study employs measures of party institutionalization and welfare state features to study these proposed relationships. Even when accounting for country- and year-fixed effects and plausible confounders such as electoral system, unionization, regime type and state capacity, the authors find clear relationships between party institutionalization and more extensive and universal welfare states. Focusing on universalism, they find that the relationship is more pronounced when constraints on executives are strong and in democracies, but that it also exists in autocracies. Further, when disaggregating party institutionalization and evaluating mechanisms, the linkages that institutionalized parties form with social groups constitute one important, but not the only relevant, factor.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1234</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-2112</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0007123419000498</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Autocracy ; Civil society ; Decision making ; Democracy ; Elections ; Electoral systems ; Hypotheses ; Ideology ; Institutionalization ; Ordination ; Political activism ; Political parties ; Political science ; Politicians ; Social groups ; Social policy ; Time series ; Unionization ; Universalism ; Voters ; Welfare policy ; Welfare state</subject><ispartof>British journal of political science, 2021-07, Vol.51 (3), p.1203-1229</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-494792269a54307b53808ba7d74f376cf4c675e257020fda3f8636f85463ca1e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-494792269a54307b53808ba7d74f376cf4c675e257020fda3f8636f85463ca1e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5470-9045 ; 0000-0003-3664-0555</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0007123419000498/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,12824,27843,27901,27902,55603</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rasmussen, Magnus B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knutsen, Carl Henrik</creatorcontrib><title>Party Institutionalization and Welfare State Development</title><title>British journal of political science</title><addtitle>Brit. J. Polit. Sci</addtitle><description>This article argues that the extent to which political parties are institutionalized shapes welfare state development. Institutionalized parties allow politicians to overcome co-ordination problems, avoid capture by special interests and form stable linkages with broad social groups. These features both enable and incentivize politicians to pursue extensive welfare policies. The study employs measures of party institutionalization and welfare state features to study these proposed relationships. Even when accounting for country- and year-fixed effects and plausible confounders such as electoral system, unionization, regime type and state capacity, the authors find clear relationships between party institutionalization and more extensive and universal welfare states. Focusing on universalism, they find that the relationship is more pronounced when constraints on executives are strong and in democracies, but that it also exists in autocracies. Further, when disaggregating party institutionalization and evaluating mechanisms, the linkages that institutionalized parties form with social groups constitute one important, but not the only relevant, factor.</description><subject>Autocracy</subject><subject>Civil society</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Elections</subject><subject>Electoral systems</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Ideology</subject><subject>Institutionalization</subject><subject>Ordination</subject><subject>Political activism</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>Political science</subject><subject>Politicians</subject><subject>Social groups</subject><subject>Social policy</subject><subject>Time series</subject><subject>Unionization</subject><subject>Universalism</subject><subject>Voters</subject><subject>Welfare policy</subject><subject>Welfare state</subject><issn>0007-1234</issn><issn>1469-2112</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>PQHSC</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kElLxEAQhRtRMI7-AG8Bz9He0stRxm1gQGEUj6GSdEuGbHZ3hPHX22EGPIinekW971E8hC4JviaYyJsNxlgSyjjRUXGtjlBCuNAZJYQeo2Q-Z_P9FJ15v42rYookSL2AC7t01fvQhCk0Qw9t8w2zSKGv03fTWnAm3QQIJr0zX6Ydxs704RydWGi9uTjMBXp7uH9dPmXr58fV8nadVRyrkHHNpaZUaMg5w7LMmcKqBFlLbpkUleWVkLmhucQU2xqYVYIJq3IuWAXEsAW62ueObvicjA_Fdphc_NIXNEbSXEc2usjeVbnBe2dsMbqmA7crCC7mgoo_BUWGHRjoStfUH-Y3-n_qB37bZZw</recordid><startdate>202107</startdate><enddate>202107</enddate><creator>Rasmussen, Magnus B.</creator><creator>Knutsen, Carl Henrik</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQHSC</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5470-9045</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3664-0555</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202107</creationdate><title>Party Institutionalization and Welfare State Development</title><author>Rasmussen, Magnus B. ; Knutsen, Carl Henrik</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-494792269a54307b53808ba7d74f376cf4c675e257020fda3f8636f85463ca1e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Autocracy</topic><topic>Civil society</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Elections</topic><topic>Electoral systems</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Ideology</topic><topic>Institutionalization</topic><topic>Ordination</topic><topic>Political activism</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>Political science</topic><topic>Politicians</topic><topic>Social groups</topic><topic>Social policy</topic><topic>Time series</topic><topic>Unionization</topic><topic>Universalism</topic><topic>Voters</topic><topic>Welfare policy</topic><topic>Welfare state</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rasmussen, Magnus B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knutsen, Carl Henrik</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>History Study Center</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>British journal of political science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rasmussen, Magnus B.</au><au>Knutsen, Carl Henrik</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Party Institutionalization and Welfare State Development</atitle><jtitle>British journal of political science</jtitle><addtitle>Brit. J. Polit. Sci</addtitle><date>2021-07</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1203</spage><epage>1229</epage><pages>1203-1229</pages><issn>0007-1234</issn><eissn>1469-2112</eissn><abstract>This article argues that the extent to which political parties are institutionalized shapes welfare state development. Institutionalized parties allow politicians to overcome co-ordination problems, avoid capture by special interests and form stable linkages with broad social groups. These features both enable and incentivize politicians to pursue extensive welfare policies. The study employs measures of party institutionalization and welfare state features to study these proposed relationships. Even when accounting for country- and year-fixed effects and plausible confounders such as electoral system, unionization, regime type and state capacity, the authors find clear relationships between party institutionalization and more extensive and universal welfare states. Focusing on universalism, they find that the relationship is more pronounced when constraints on executives are strong and in democracies, but that it also exists in autocracies. Further, when disaggregating party institutionalization and evaluating mechanisms, the linkages that institutionalized parties form with social groups constitute one important, but not the only relevant, factor.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0007123419000498</doi><tpages>27</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5470-9045</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3664-0555</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-1234 |
ispartof | British journal of political science, 2021-07, Vol.51 (3), p.1203-1229 |
issn | 0007-1234 1469-2112 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2543259257 |
source | PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Cambridge Journals |
subjects | Autocracy Civil society Decision making Democracy Elections Electoral systems Hypotheses Ideology Institutionalization Ordination Political activism Political parties Political science Politicians Social groups Social policy Time series Unionization Universalism Voters Welfare policy Welfare state |
title | Party Institutionalization and Welfare State Development |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T18%3A02%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Party%20Institutionalization%20and%20Welfare%20State%20Development&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20political%20science&rft.au=Rasmussen,%20Magnus%20B.&rft.date=2021-07&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1203&rft.epage=1229&rft.pages=1203-1229&rft.issn=0007-1234&rft.eissn=1469-2112&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0007123419000498&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2543259257%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2543259257&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0007123419000498&rfr_iscdi=true |