Policy Forum: Should the Canada Revenue Agency Also Be a Social Benefits Agency?
The Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) plays an important role in the delivery of benefits to Canadians, but should that role be expanded? The speed and ease with which several new income benefits were launched by the CRA during the COVID-19 pandemic have prompted the question of whether the agency should...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Canadian tax journal 2021, Vol.69 (1), p.87-98 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 98 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 87 |
container_title | Canadian tax journal |
container_volume | 69 |
creator | Robson, Jennifer Schwartz, Saul |
description | The Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) plays an important role in the delivery of benefits to Canadians, but should that role be expanded? The speed and ease with which several new income benefits were launched by the CRA during the COVID-19 pandemic have prompted the question of whether the agency should take on a much larger role as a social benefits agency, in addition to tax collector. We review the arguments for and against, noting important weaknesses that already impair the CRA's current role in benefit delivery and that would be exacerbated in an expanded role. On balance, we conclude that an expanded role is not the better choice. We suggest that the CRA might instead enhance one of its strengths—collecting and sharing information—so that other agencies can more effectively administer benefits not directly tied to the tax system. |
doi_str_mv | 10.32721/ctj.2021.69.1.pf.robson |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2542464374</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2542464374</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c230n-a84d498ee67307858aec707fbe85c66ff3b11842b5d66d377abb06581a5296a03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkFtLwzAAhfOg4Jz-h4DPrbkn9UXm8AYDh9PnkKaJ6-iSmrTC_r3V7emch49z4AMAYlRSIgm-tcOuJIjgUlQlLntfpljnGM7ADCGkCo4xvgCXOe8QwlxWbAbW69i19gCfYhr3d3CzjWPXwGHr4NIE0xj47n5cGB1cfLkwcYsuR_jgoIGbaFvTTT043w75BNxfgXNvuuyuTzkHn0-PH8uXYvX2_LpcrApLKAqFUaxhlXJOSIqk4so4K5H0tVPcCuE9rTFWjNS8EaKhUpq6RoIrbDiphEF0Dm6Ou32K36PLg97FMYXpUhPOCBOMSjZR6kjZFHNOzus-tXuTDhoj_e9MT870nzMtKo117_XRGf0F_IdkDA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2542464374</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Policy Forum: Should the Canada Revenue Agency Also Be a Social Benefits Agency?</title><source>HeinOnline</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Robson, Jennifer ; Schwartz, Saul</creator><creatorcontrib>Robson, Jennifer ; Schwartz, Saul</creatorcontrib><description>The Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) plays an important role in the delivery of benefits to Canadians, but should that role be expanded? The speed and ease with which several new income benefits were launched by the CRA during the COVID-19 pandemic have prompted the question of whether the agency should take on a much larger role as a social benefits agency, in addition to tax collector. We review the arguments for and against, noting important weaknesses that already impair the CRA's current role in benefit delivery and that would be exacerbated in an expanded role. On balance, we conclude that an expanded role is not the better choice. We suggest that the CRA might instead enhance one of its strengths—collecting and sharing information—so that other agencies can more effectively administer benefits not directly tied to the tax system.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-5111</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.32721/ctj.2021.69.1.pf.robson</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Toronto: Canadian Tax Foundation</publisher><subject>Beneficiaries ; Canadians ; Compliance ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; Employees ; Employers ; Government agencies ; Pandemics ; Roles ; Self employment ; Subsidies ; Tax collections ; Tax refunds ; Tax returns</subject><ispartof>Canadian tax journal, 2021, Vol.69 (1), p.87-98</ispartof><rights>Copyright Canadian Tax Foundation 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Robson, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Saul</creatorcontrib><title>Policy Forum: Should the Canada Revenue Agency Also Be a Social Benefits Agency?</title><title>Canadian tax journal</title><description>The Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) plays an important role in the delivery of benefits to Canadians, but should that role be expanded? The speed and ease with which several new income benefits were launched by the CRA during the COVID-19 pandemic have prompted the question of whether the agency should take on a much larger role as a social benefits agency, in addition to tax collector. We review the arguments for and against, noting important weaknesses that already impair the CRA's current role in benefit delivery and that would be exacerbated in an expanded role. On balance, we conclude that an expanded role is not the better choice. We suggest that the CRA might instead enhance one of its strengths—collecting and sharing information—so that other agencies can more effectively administer benefits not directly tied to the tax system.</description><subject>Beneficiaries</subject><subject>Canadians</subject><subject>Compliance</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Employers</subject><subject>Government agencies</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Roles</subject><subject>Self employment</subject><subject>Subsidies</subject><subject>Tax collections</subject><subject>Tax refunds</subject><subject>Tax returns</subject><issn>0008-5111</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNotkFtLwzAAhfOg4Jz-h4DPrbkn9UXm8AYDh9PnkKaJ6-iSmrTC_r3V7emch49z4AMAYlRSIgm-tcOuJIjgUlQlLntfpljnGM7ADCGkCo4xvgCXOe8QwlxWbAbW69i19gCfYhr3d3CzjWPXwGHr4NIE0xj47n5cGB1cfLkwcYsuR_jgoIGbaFvTTT043w75BNxfgXNvuuyuTzkHn0-PH8uXYvX2_LpcrApLKAqFUaxhlXJOSIqk4so4K5H0tVPcCuE9rTFWjNS8EaKhUpq6RoIrbDiphEF0Dm6Ou32K36PLg97FMYXpUhPOCBOMSjZR6kjZFHNOzus-tXuTDhoj_e9MT870nzMtKo117_XRGf0F_IdkDA</recordid><startdate>2021</startdate><enddate>2021</enddate><creator>Robson, Jennifer</creator><creator>Schwartz, Saul</creator><general>Canadian Tax Foundation</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X1</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8A9</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRAZJ</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2021</creationdate><title>Policy Forum: Should the Canada Revenue Agency Also Be a Social Benefits Agency?</title><author>Robson, Jennifer ; Schwartz, Saul</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c230n-a84d498ee67307858aec707fbe85c66ff3b11842b5d66d377abb06581a5296a03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Beneficiaries</topic><topic>Canadians</topic><topic>Compliance</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Employers</topic><topic>Government agencies</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Roles</topic><topic>Self employment</topic><topic>Subsidies</topic><topic>Tax collections</topic><topic>Tax refunds</topic><topic>Tax returns</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Robson, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Saul</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Accounting & Tax Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Accounting & Tax Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Canadian tax journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Robson, Jennifer</au><au>Schwartz, Saul</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Policy Forum: Should the Canada Revenue Agency Also Be a Social Benefits Agency?</atitle><jtitle>Canadian tax journal</jtitle><date>2021</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>87</spage><epage>98</epage><pages>87-98</pages><issn>0008-5111</issn><abstract>The Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) plays an important role in the delivery of benefits to Canadians, but should that role be expanded? The speed and ease with which several new income benefits were launched by the CRA during the COVID-19 pandemic have prompted the question of whether the agency should take on a much larger role as a social benefits agency, in addition to tax collector. We review the arguments for and against, noting important weaknesses that already impair the CRA's current role in benefit delivery and that would be exacerbated in an expanded role. On balance, we conclude that an expanded role is not the better choice. We suggest that the CRA might instead enhance one of its strengths—collecting and sharing information—so that other agencies can more effectively administer benefits not directly tied to the tax system.</abstract><cop>Toronto</cop><pub>Canadian Tax Foundation</pub><doi>10.32721/ctj.2021.69.1.pf.robson</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0008-5111 |
ispartof | Canadian tax journal, 2021, Vol.69 (1), p.87-98 |
issn | 0008-5111 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2542464374 |
source | HeinOnline; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | Beneficiaries Canadians Compliance Coronaviruses COVID-19 Employees Employers Government agencies Pandemics Roles Self employment Subsidies Tax collections Tax refunds Tax returns |
title | Policy Forum: Should the Canada Revenue Agency Also Be a Social Benefits Agency? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T17%3A06%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Policy%20Forum:%20Should%20the%20Canada%20Revenue%20Agency%20Also%20Be%20a%20Social%20Benefits%20Agency?&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20tax%20journal&rft.au=Robson,%20Jennifer&rft.date=2021&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=87&rft.epage=98&rft.pages=87-98&rft.issn=0008-5111&rft_id=info:doi/10.32721/ctj.2021.69.1.pf.robson&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2542464374%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2542464374&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |