Does adoption of climate-smart agriculture (CSA) practices improve farmers’ crop income? Assessing the determinants and its impacts in Punjab province, Pakistan
The agriculture sector, particularly in developing countries, is the more victim of the impacts of climate change due to less adaptation. The low response to the adoption of climate-smart agriculture (CSA) practices raises questions about the factors influencing adaptation determinants. Therefore, t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environment, development and sustainability development and sustainability, 2021-07, Vol.23 (7), p.10119-10140 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 10140 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 10119 |
container_title | Environment, development and sustainability |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Sardar, Asif Kiani, Adiqa K. Kuslu, Yasemin |
description | The agriculture sector, particularly in developing countries, is the more victim of the impacts of climate change due to less adaptation. The low response to the adoption of climate-smart agriculture (CSA) practices raises questions about the factors influencing adaptation determinants. Therefore, the present study is designed to explore the adoption of CSA practices and the intensity, assessing through its determinants, and estimating its benefits in terms of its impacts on crop yield and farm income. For this purpose, 420 farmers were interviewed across three agro-ecological zones of Punjab, Pakistan. The study employs multinomial logistic regression to examine the factors that determine the adoption of single to a full package of CSA practices. Further, it uses a two-stage least square estimation technique to control the endogeneity problem and to estimate its conditional impact on crop yield and farm income. The study reveals interesting findings and demonstrates that the adoption of single to a full package of CSA practices is mostly explained by the institutional factors, financial resources, size of land holding, and level of education attained by the farmers. Similarly, more affected farmers due to climatic shocks were more intended to adopt CSA practices. Findings confirm that farmers who adopted a full set of CSA practices gain higher yield 32% and 44% kg/ha, and higher farm income 45% and 48% US$ per ha than non-adopted farmers for cotton–wheat and rice–wheat crops, respectively. Further, the impact of adaptation also varies to the intensity of CSA practices adopted by the farmers. This study suggests effective institutional and policy implications for creating awareness and financial support to the farmers to accelerate the adoption of CSA practices. These measures can enhance the farmers’ adaptive capacity that is needed for the sustainable livelihood of rural masses and food production. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10668-020-01049-6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2541568092</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2541568092</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-60eb8f42ec38a9bd4956f6d7faad590bea770c58fd8188180faf647eb3c3413a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc2KFDEUhQtxwHHGF3AVcKNgNKmqpFIraXr8gwEHVHAXbqVu2rRdqTJJCbPzNdz6aD6Jd6YFdwOBm8U5303OqarHUryQQnQvsxRaGy5qwYUUbc_1vepUqq7hdd-p-3RvTMeVUV8eVA9z3gtS9rU-rX5fzJgZjPNSwhzZ7Jk7hAkK8jxBKgx2Kbj1UNaE7On24-YZWxK4Ehy5wrSk-QcyD2nClP_8_MVcmhcWopsnfMU2OWPOIe5Y-YpsxIJpChFioYVxZKHcIohGM7KrNe5hYDdIAuBzdgXfQi4Qz6sTD4eMj_7Ns-rzm9eftu_45Ye377ebS-7aWheuBQ7GtzW6xkA_jG2vtNdj5wFG1YsBoeuEU8aPRho6woPXbYdD45pWNtCcVU-OXHrC9xVzsft5TZFW2lq1UmlDkZGqPqroqzkn9HZJFFi6tlLYmy7ssQtLCdvbLqwmU3M0ZRLHHab_6DtcfwHjipDg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2541568092</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does adoption of climate-smart agriculture (CSA) practices improve farmers’ crop income? Assessing the determinants and its impacts in Punjab province, Pakistan</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Sardar, Asif ; Kiani, Adiqa K. ; Kuslu, Yasemin</creator><creatorcontrib>Sardar, Asif ; Kiani, Adiqa K. ; Kuslu, Yasemin</creatorcontrib><description>The agriculture sector, particularly in developing countries, is the more victim of the impacts of climate change due to less adaptation. The low response to the adoption of climate-smart agriculture (CSA) practices raises questions about the factors influencing adaptation determinants. Therefore, the present study is designed to explore the adoption of CSA practices and the intensity, assessing through its determinants, and estimating its benefits in terms of its impacts on crop yield and farm income. For this purpose, 420 farmers were interviewed across three agro-ecological zones of Punjab, Pakistan. The study employs multinomial logistic regression to examine the factors that determine the adoption of single to a full package of CSA practices. Further, it uses a two-stage least square estimation technique to control the endogeneity problem and to estimate its conditional impact on crop yield and farm income. The study reveals interesting findings and demonstrates that the adoption of single to a full package of CSA practices is mostly explained by the institutional factors, financial resources, size of land holding, and level of education attained by the farmers. Similarly, more affected farmers due to climatic shocks were more intended to adopt CSA practices. Findings confirm that farmers who adopted a full set of CSA practices gain higher yield 32% and 44% kg/ha, and higher farm income 45% and 48% US$ per ha than non-adopted farmers for cotton–wheat and rice–wheat crops, respectively. Further, the impact of adaptation also varies to the intensity of CSA practices adopted by the farmers. This study suggests effective institutional and policy implications for creating awareness and financial support to the farmers to accelerate the adoption of CSA practices. These measures can enhance the farmers’ adaptive capacity that is needed for the sustainable livelihood of rural masses and food production.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1387-585X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2975</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10668-020-01049-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Adaptation ; Agricultural economics ; Agricultural practices ; Agricultural production ; Agriculture ; Cereal crops ; Climate change ; Climate-smart agriculture ; Community supported agriculture ; Cotton ; Crop yield ; Crops ; Developing countries ; Digital agriculture ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecology ; Economic Geology ; Economic Growth ; Environment ; Environmental Economics ; Environmental impact ; Environmental Management ; Farm income ; Farmers ; Farms ; Financial support ; Food production ; Income ; LDCs ; Livelihood ; Organizational aspects ; Rice ; Sustainable Development ; Sustainable livelihood ; Wheat</subject><ispartof>Environment, development and sustainability, 2021-07, Vol.23 (7), p.10119-10140</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2020</rights><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-60eb8f42ec38a9bd4956f6d7faad590bea770c58fd8188180faf647eb3c3413a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-60eb8f42ec38a9bd4956f6d7faad590bea770c58fd8188180faf647eb3c3413a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0970-5993</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10668-020-01049-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-020-01049-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,41486,42555,51317</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sardar, Asif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiani, Adiqa K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuslu, Yasemin</creatorcontrib><title>Does adoption of climate-smart agriculture (CSA) practices improve farmers’ crop income? Assessing the determinants and its impacts in Punjab province, Pakistan</title><title>Environment, development and sustainability</title><addtitle>Environ Dev Sustain</addtitle><description>The agriculture sector, particularly in developing countries, is the more victim of the impacts of climate change due to less adaptation. The low response to the adoption of climate-smart agriculture (CSA) practices raises questions about the factors influencing adaptation determinants. Therefore, the present study is designed to explore the adoption of CSA practices and the intensity, assessing through its determinants, and estimating its benefits in terms of its impacts on crop yield and farm income. For this purpose, 420 farmers were interviewed across three agro-ecological zones of Punjab, Pakistan. The study employs multinomial logistic regression to examine the factors that determine the adoption of single to a full package of CSA practices. Further, it uses a two-stage least square estimation technique to control the endogeneity problem and to estimate its conditional impact on crop yield and farm income. The study reveals interesting findings and demonstrates that the adoption of single to a full package of CSA practices is mostly explained by the institutional factors, financial resources, size of land holding, and level of education attained by the farmers. Similarly, more affected farmers due to climatic shocks were more intended to adopt CSA practices. Findings confirm that farmers who adopted a full set of CSA practices gain higher yield 32% and 44% kg/ha, and higher farm income 45% and 48% US$ per ha than non-adopted farmers for cotton–wheat and rice–wheat crops, respectively. Further, the impact of adaptation also varies to the intensity of CSA practices adopted by the farmers. This study suggests effective institutional and policy implications for creating awareness and financial support to the farmers to accelerate the adoption of CSA practices. These measures can enhance the farmers’ adaptive capacity that is needed for the sustainable livelihood of rural masses and food production.</description><subject>Adaptation</subject><subject>Agricultural economics</subject><subject>Agricultural practices</subject><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Cereal crops</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate-smart agriculture</subject><subject>Community supported agriculture</subject><subject>Cotton</subject><subject>Crop yield</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Digital agriculture</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Economic Geology</subject><subject>Economic Growth</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Economics</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Farm income</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Financial support</subject><subject>Food production</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Livelihood</subject><subject>Organizational aspects</subject><subject>Rice</subject><subject>Sustainable Development</subject><subject>Sustainable livelihood</subject><subject>Wheat</subject><issn>1387-585X</issn><issn>1573-2975</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc2KFDEUhQtxwHHGF3AVcKNgNKmqpFIraXr8gwEHVHAXbqVu2rRdqTJJCbPzNdz6aD6Jd6YFdwOBm8U5303OqarHUryQQnQvsxRaGy5qwYUUbc_1vepUqq7hdd-p-3RvTMeVUV8eVA9z3gtS9rU-rX5fzJgZjPNSwhzZ7Jk7hAkK8jxBKgx2Kbj1UNaE7On24-YZWxK4Ehy5wrSk-QcyD2nClP_8_MVcmhcWopsnfMU2OWPOIe5Y-YpsxIJpChFioYVxZKHcIohGM7KrNe5hYDdIAuBzdgXfQi4Qz6sTD4eMj_7Ns-rzm9eftu_45Ye377ebS-7aWheuBQ7GtzW6xkA_jG2vtNdj5wFG1YsBoeuEU8aPRho6woPXbYdD45pWNtCcVU-OXHrC9xVzsft5TZFW2lq1UmlDkZGqPqroqzkn9HZJFFi6tlLYmy7ssQtLCdvbLqwmU3M0ZRLHHab_6DtcfwHjipDg</recordid><startdate>20210701</startdate><enddate>20210701</enddate><creator>Sardar, Asif</creator><creator>Kiani, Adiqa K.</creator><creator>Kuslu, Yasemin</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0970-5993</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210701</creationdate><title>Does adoption of climate-smart agriculture (CSA) practices improve farmers’ crop income? Assessing the determinants and its impacts in Punjab province, Pakistan</title><author>Sardar, Asif ; Kiani, Adiqa K. ; Kuslu, Yasemin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-60eb8f42ec38a9bd4956f6d7faad590bea770c58fd8188180faf647eb3c3413a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adaptation</topic><topic>Agricultural economics</topic><topic>Agricultural practices</topic><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Cereal crops</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate-smart agriculture</topic><topic>Community supported agriculture</topic><topic>Cotton</topic><topic>Crop yield</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Digital agriculture</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Economic Geology</topic><topic>Economic Growth</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Economics</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Farm income</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Financial support</topic><topic>Food production</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Livelihood</topic><topic>Organizational aspects</topic><topic>Rice</topic><topic>Sustainable Development</topic><topic>Sustainable livelihood</topic><topic>Wheat</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sardar, Asif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiani, Adiqa K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuslu, Yasemin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environment, development and sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sardar, Asif</au><au>Kiani, Adiqa K.</au><au>Kuslu, Yasemin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does adoption of climate-smart agriculture (CSA) practices improve farmers’ crop income? Assessing the determinants and its impacts in Punjab province, Pakistan</atitle><jtitle>Environment, development and sustainability</jtitle><stitle>Environ Dev Sustain</stitle><date>2021-07-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>10119</spage><epage>10140</epage><pages>10119-10140</pages><issn>1387-585X</issn><eissn>1573-2975</eissn><abstract>The agriculture sector, particularly in developing countries, is the more victim of the impacts of climate change due to less adaptation. The low response to the adoption of climate-smart agriculture (CSA) practices raises questions about the factors influencing adaptation determinants. Therefore, the present study is designed to explore the adoption of CSA practices and the intensity, assessing through its determinants, and estimating its benefits in terms of its impacts on crop yield and farm income. For this purpose, 420 farmers were interviewed across three agro-ecological zones of Punjab, Pakistan. The study employs multinomial logistic regression to examine the factors that determine the adoption of single to a full package of CSA practices. Further, it uses a two-stage least square estimation technique to control the endogeneity problem and to estimate its conditional impact on crop yield and farm income. The study reveals interesting findings and demonstrates that the adoption of single to a full package of CSA practices is mostly explained by the institutional factors, financial resources, size of land holding, and level of education attained by the farmers. Similarly, more affected farmers due to climatic shocks were more intended to adopt CSA practices. Findings confirm that farmers who adopted a full set of CSA practices gain higher yield 32% and 44% kg/ha, and higher farm income 45% and 48% US$ per ha than non-adopted farmers for cotton–wheat and rice–wheat crops, respectively. Further, the impact of adaptation also varies to the intensity of CSA practices adopted by the farmers. This study suggests effective institutional and policy implications for creating awareness and financial support to the farmers to accelerate the adoption of CSA practices. These measures can enhance the farmers’ adaptive capacity that is needed for the sustainable livelihood of rural masses and food production.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10668-020-01049-6</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0970-5993</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1387-585X |
ispartof | Environment, development and sustainability, 2021-07, Vol.23 (7), p.10119-10140 |
issn | 1387-585X 1573-2975 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2541568092 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Adaptation Agricultural economics Agricultural practices Agricultural production Agriculture Cereal crops Climate change Climate-smart agriculture Community supported agriculture Cotton Crop yield Crops Developing countries Digital agriculture Earth and Environmental Science Ecology Economic Geology Economic Growth Environment Environmental Economics Environmental impact Environmental Management Farm income Farmers Farms Financial support Food production Income LDCs Livelihood Organizational aspects Rice Sustainable Development Sustainable livelihood Wheat |
title | Does adoption of climate-smart agriculture (CSA) practices improve farmers’ crop income? Assessing the determinants and its impacts in Punjab province, Pakistan |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T21%3A16%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20adoption%20of%20climate-smart%20agriculture%20(CSA)%20practices%20improve%20farmers%E2%80%99%20crop%20income?%20Assessing%20the%20determinants%20and%20its%20impacts%20in%20Punjab%20province,%20Pakistan&rft.jtitle=Environment,%20development%20and%20sustainability&rft.au=Sardar,%20Asif&rft.date=2021-07-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=10119&rft.epage=10140&rft.pages=10119-10140&rft.issn=1387-585X&rft.eissn=1573-2975&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10668-020-01049-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2541568092%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2541568092&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |