Channel Selection and Pricing Decisions Considering Three Charging Modes of Production Capacity Sharing Platform: A Sustainable Operations Perspective
In the context of sharing economy, a manufacturer can source from two alternative channels: sharing and traditional, when facing production capacity constraints and sustainably conscious consumers. The aim of the paper is to analyze channel selection and pricing strategies of the manufacturer for ac...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sustainability 2019-11, Vol.11 (21), p.5913 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 21 |
container_start_page | 5913 |
container_title | Sustainability |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Zhao, Daozhi Xue, Yang Cao, Cejun Han, Hongshuai |
description | In the context of sharing economy, a manufacturer can source from two alternative channels: sharing and traditional, when facing production capacity constraints and sustainably conscious consumers. The aim of the paper is to analyze channel selection and pricing strategies of the manufacturer for achieving sustainable operations, to investigate the operations of the platform regarding charging modes, access requirements, and commission rates in different stages of development, and to discuss the interaction among all stakeholders for sustainability in the whole system. The game-theoretic approach is adopted. The results provide references for decisions of the manufacturer and surplus production capacity supplier to join in the sharing, as well as corresponding optimal pricing strategies, which guides platforms to keep a balance between profitability and attracting participants by relatively low access requirements and commission rates. Moreover, developing platforms prefer to charge suppliers and set low access requirements while relatively developed platforms tend to charge bilateral sides or manufacturers and set high access requirements. Charging the manufacturer encourages the bilateral participation of the platform most. In addition, as charging mode changes, the trend of changes in consumer surplus and social welfare is the same as that in the market share of products from the sharing channel. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/su11215913 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2541327975</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2541327975</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-d054ef162a64238858634464294fca02bfa0df6212780bec74a7868e8fe961673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUF1LwzAUDaLgmHvxFwR8E6r5aNPWt1GdCpMNNp9Llt5sGV1Tk1bYH_H3mjpB78P9OJxz7uUidE3JHec5ufc9pYwmOeVnaMRISiNKEnL-r79EE-_3JATnNKdihL6KnWwaqPEKalCdsQ2WTYWXzijTbPEjKOMD6HERkqnADeh65wBwULrtML7ZCjy2Oqhs1Z9MCtlKZbojXgXWQFrWstPWHR7wFK9630nTyE0NeNGCk93PiiU43w5HfMIVutCy9jD5rWP0PntaFy_RfPH8WkznkWJ50kUVSWLQVDApYsazLMkEj-PQ57FWkrCNlqTSglGWZmQDKo1lmokMMg25oCLlY3Rz8m2d_ejBd-Xe9q4JK0uWxJSzNE-TwLo9sZSz3jvQZevMQbpjSUk5vL78ez3_BvEDd1M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2541327975</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Channel Selection and Pricing Decisions Considering Three Charging Modes of Production Capacity Sharing Platform: A Sustainable Operations Perspective</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Zhao, Daozhi ; Xue, Yang ; Cao, Cejun ; Han, Hongshuai</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Daozhi ; Xue, Yang ; Cao, Cejun ; Han, Hongshuai</creatorcontrib><description>In the context of sharing economy, a manufacturer can source from two alternative channels: sharing and traditional, when facing production capacity constraints and sustainably conscious consumers. The aim of the paper is to analyze channel selection and pricing strategies of the manufacturer for achieving sustainable operations, to investigate the operations of the platform regarding charging modes, access requirements, and commission rates in different stages of development, and to discuss the interaction among all stakeholders for sustainability in the whole system. The game-theoretic approach is adopted. The results provide references for decisions of the manufacturer and surplus production capacity supplier to join in the sharing, as well as corresponding optimal pricing strategies, which guides platforms to keep a balance between profitability and attracting participants by relatively low access requirements and commission rates. Moreover, developing platforms prefer to charge suppliers and set low access requirements while relatively developed platforms tend to charge bilateral sides or manufacturers and set high access requirements. Charging the manufacturer encourages the bilateral participation of the platform most. In addition, as charging mode changes, the trend of changes in consumer surplus and social welfare is the same as that in the market share of products from the sharing channel.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su11215913</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Charging ; Decision making ; Decision theory ; Economics ; Game theory ; Manufacturing ; Suppliers ; Sustainability</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2019-11, Vol.11 (21), p.5913</ispartof><rights>2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-d054ef162a64238858634464294fca02bfa0df6212780bec74a7868e8fe961673</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-d054ef162a64238858634464294fca02bfa0df6212780bec74a7868e8fe961673</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8888-0035 ; 0000-0002-0767-6404</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Daozhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xue, Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Cejun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Hongshuai</creatorcontrib><title>Channel Selection and Pricing Decisions Considering Three Charging Modes of Production Capacity Sharing Platform: A Sustainable Operations Perspective</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>In the context of sharing economy, a manufacturer can source from two alternative channels: sharing and traditional, when facing production capacity constraints and sustainably conscious consumers. The aim of the paper is to analyze channel selection and pricing strategies of the manufacturer for achieving sustainable operations, to investigate the operations of the platform regarding charging modes, access requirements, and commission rates in different stages of development, and to discuss the interaction among all stakeholders for sustainability in the whole system. The game-theoretic approach is adopted. The results provide references for decisions of the manufacturer and surplus production capacity supplier to join in the sharing, as well as corresponding optimal pricing strategies, which guides platforms to keep a balance between profitability and attracting participants by relatively low access requirements and commission rates. Moreover, developing platforms prefer to charge suppliers and set low access requirements while relatively developed platforms tend to charge bilateral sides or manufacturers and set high access requirements. Charging the manufacturer encourages the bilateral participation of the platform most. In addition, as charging mode changes, the trend of changes in consumer surplus and social welfare is the same as that in the market share of products from the sharing channel.</description><subject>Charging</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Decision theory</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Game theory</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Suppliers</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUF1LwzAUDaLgmHvxFwR8E6r5aNPWt1GdCpMNNp9Llt5sGV1Tk1bYH_H3mjpB78P9OJxz7uUidE3JHec5ufc9pYwmOeVnaMRISiNKEnL-r79EE-_3JATnNKdihL6KnWwaqPEKalCdsQ2WTYWXzijTbPEjKOMD6HERkqnADeh65wBwULrtML7ZCjy2Oqhs1Z9MCtlKZbojXgXWQFrWstPWHR7wFK9630nTyE0NeNGCk93PiiU43w5HfMIVutCy9jD5rWP0PntaFy_RfPH8WkznkWJ50kUVSWLQVDApYsazLMkEj-PQ57FWkrCNlqTSglGWZmQDKo1lmokMMg25oCLlY3Rz8m2d_ejBd-Xe9q4JK0uWxJSzNE-TwLo9sZSz3jvQZevMQbpjSUk5vL78ez3_BvEDd1M</recordid><startdate>20191101</startdate><enddate>20191101</enddate><creator>Zhao, Daozhi</creator><creator>Xue, Yang</creator><creator>Cao, Cejun</creator><creator>Han, Hongshuai</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8888-0035</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0767-6404</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191101</creationdate><title>Channel Selection and Pricing Decisions Considering Three Charging Modes of Production Capacity Sharing Platform: A Sustainable Operations Perspective</title><author>Zhao, Daozhi ; Xue, Yang ; Cao, Cejun ; Han, Hongshuai</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-d054ef162a64238858634464294fca02bfa0df6212780bec74a7868e8fe961673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Charging</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Decision theory</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Game theory</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Suppliers</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Daozhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xue, Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Cejun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Hongshuai</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhao, Daozhi</au><au>Xue, Yang</au><au>Cao, Cejun</au><au>Han, Hongshuai</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Channel Selection and Pricing Decisions Considering Three Charging Modes of Production Capacity Sharing Platform: A Sustainable Operations Perspective</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2019-11-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>21</issue><spage>5913</spage><pages>5913-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>In the context of sharing economy, a manufacturer can source from two alternative channels: sharing and traditional, when facing production capacity constraints and sustainably conscious consumers. The aim of the paper is to analyze channel selection and pricing strategies of the manufacturer for achieving sustainable operations, to investigate the operations of the platform regarding charging modes, access requirements, and commission rates in different stages of development, and to discuss the interaction among all stakeholders for sustainability in the whole system. The game-theoretic approach is adopted. The results provide references for decisions of the manufacturer and surplus production capacity supplier to join in the sharing, as well as corresponding optimal pricing strategies, which guides platforms to keep a balance between profitability and attracting participants by relatively low access requirements and commission rates. Moreover, developing platforms prefer to charge suppliers and set low access requirements while relatively developed platforms tend to charge bilateral sides or manufacturers and set high access requirements. Charging the manufacturer encourages the bilateral participation of the platform most. In addition, as charging mode changes, the trend of changes in consumer surplus and social welfare is the same as that in the market share of products from the sharing channel.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su11215913</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8888-0035</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0767-6404</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2071-1050 |
ispartof | Sustainability, 2019-11, Vol.11 (21), p.5913 |
issn | 2071-1050 2071-1050 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2541327975 |
source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Charging Decision making Decision theory Economics Game theory Manufacturing Suppliers Sustainability |
title | Channel Selection and Pricing Decisions Considering Three Charging Modes of Production Capacity Sharing Platform: A Sustainable Operations Perspective |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T06%3A31%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Channel%20Selection%20and%20Pricing%20Decisions%20Considering%20Three%20Charging%20Modes%20of%20Production%20Capacity%20Sharing%20Platform:%20A%20Sustainable%20Operations%20Perspective&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Zhao,%20Daozhi&rft.date=2019-11-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=21&rft.spage=5913&rft.pages=5913-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su11215913&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2541327975%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2541327975&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |