Investigating Gaps in Perception of Wildlife between Urban and Rural Inhabitants: Empirical Evidence from Japan

A decline in natural resource management by rural communities has significantly contributed to human–wildlife conflicts, especially crop-raiding, in Japan. Collaborative wildlife management between existing rural stakeholders and new urban stakeholders is essential to address this problem. However,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sustainability 2019-09, Vol.11 (17), p.4516
Hauptverfasser: Kato, Eri, Yano, Yuki, Ohe, Yasuo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 17
container_start_page 4516
container_title Sustainability
container_volume 11
creator Kato, Eri
Yano, Yuki
Ohe, Yasuo
description A decline in natural resource management by rural communities has significantly contributed to human–wildlife conflicts, especially crop-raiding, in Japan. Collaborative wildlife management between existing rural stakeholders and new urban stakeholders is essential to address this problem. However, differences in the perception regarding wildlife exist between rural populations, which have ample direct experience with wildlife, and urban populations, which lack direct experience with wildlife. Consequently, this gap in perception can potentially lead to conflicts between stakeholders during collaborative wildlife management. In this study, content analysis, which has been extensively employed to analyze qualitative data, was performed to elucidate the differences in perception of wildlife between urban and rural stakeholders. An online survey was conducted in December 2016 to understand the perception of wildlife by stakeholders, in which 1401 responses were received. The results indicate that the urban individuals did not have a comprehensive understanding of wildlife and any positive views were primarily abstract. Conversely, rural individuals had diverse perceptions, both positive and negative. Therefore, a novel perceptual gap-narrowing approach based on staged interactions with the rural environment, is suggested. Introduction to rural issues through field-based experiences to urban stakeholders is likely to the narrow gaps in perception between urban and rural stakeholders, in order to allow for efficient and collaborative wildlife management.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/su11174516
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2541325396</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2541325396</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-9ee5a80ccf52cdd305b30145dd5724d58ee56be26b3d282f3b50ca7610cd300e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkE9LAzEQxYMoWGovfoKAN2E1fza7XW9Saq0UFLF4XLLJpKZss2uSbfHbG6mgc3nDzI95zEPokpIbzityGwZKaZkLWpygESMlzSgR5PRff44mIWxJKs5pRYsR6pZuDyHajYzWbfBC9gFbh1_AK-ij7RzuDH63rW6tAdxAPAA4vPaNdFg6jV8HL1u8dB-ysVG6GO7wfNdbb1Uaz_dWg1OAje92-En20l2gMyPbAJNfHaP1w_xt9pitnhfL2f0qU7ygMasAhJwSpYxgSmtORMMJzYXWomS5FtO0LxpgRcM1mzLDG0GULAtKVIIJ8DG6Ot7tffc5pA_rbTd4lyxrJnLKmeBVkajrI6V8F4IHU_fe7qT_qimpfzKt_zLl34F3aYA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2541325396</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Investigating Gaps in Perception of Wildlife between Urban and Rural Inhabitants: Empirical Evidence from Japan</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Kato, Eri ; Yano, Yuki ; Ohe, Yasuo</creator><creatorcontrib>Kato, Eri ; Yano, Yuki ; Ohe, Yasuo</creatorcontrib><description>A decline in natural resource management by rural communities has significantly contributed to human–wildlife conflicts, especially crop-raiding, in Japan. Collaborative wildlife management between existing rural stakeholders and new urban stakeholders is essential to address this problem. However, differences in the perception regarding wildlife exist between rural populations, which have ample direct experience with wildlife, and urban populations, which lack direct experience with wildlife. Consequently, this gap in perception can potentially lead to conflicts between stakeholders during collaborative wildlife management. In this study, content analysis, which has been extensively employed to analyze qualitative data, was performed to elucidate the differences in perception of wildlife between urban and rural stakeholders. An online survey was conducted in December 2016 to understand the perception of wildlife by stakeholders, in which 1401 responses were received. The results indicate that the urban individuals did not have a comprehensive understanding of wildlife and any positive views were primarily abstract. Conversely, rural individuals had diverse perceptions, both positive and negative. Therefore, a novel perceptual gap-narrowing approach based on staged interactions with the rural environment, is suggested. Introduction to rural issues through field-based experiences to urban stakeholders is likely to the narrow gaps in perception between urban and rural stakeholders, in order to allow for efficient and collaborative wildlife management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su11174516</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Bears ; Collaboration ; Content analysis ; Natural resource management ; Natural resources ; Perception ; Perceptions ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Population ; Populations ; Qualitative analysis ; Resource management ; Rural areas ; Rural communities ; Rural environments ; Rural populations ; Stakeholders ; Sustainability ; Urban areas ; Urban populations ; Wildlife management</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2019-09, Vol.11 (17), p.4516</ispartof><rights>2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-9ee5a80ccf52cdd305b30145dd5724d58ee56be26b3d282f3b50ca7610cd300e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-9ee5a80ccf52cdd305b30145dd5724d58ee56be26b3d282f3b50ca7610cd300e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7361-8600</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kato, Eri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yano, Yuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohe, Yasuo</creatorcontrib><title>Investigating Gaps in Perception of Wildlife between Urban and Rural Inhabitants: Empirical Evidence from Japan</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>A decline in natural resource management by rural communities has significantly contributed to human–wildlife conflicts, especially crop-raiding, in Japan. Collaborative wildlife management between existing rural stakeholders and new urban stakeholders is essential to address this problem. However, differences in the perception regarding wildlife exist between rural populations, which have ample direct experience with wildlife, and urban populations, which lack direct experience with wildlife. Consequently, this gap in perception can potentially lead to conflicts between stakeholders during collaborative wildlife management. In this study, content analysis, which has been extensively employed to analyze qualitative data, was performed to elucidate the differences in perception of wildlife between urban and rural stakeholders. An online survey was conducted in December 2016 to understand the perception of wildlife by stakeholders, in which 1401 responses were received. The results indicate that the urban individuals did not have a comprehensive understanding of wildlife and any positive views were primarily abstract. Conversely, rural individuals had diverse perceptions, both positive and negative. Therefore, a novel perceptual gap-narrowing approach based on staged interactions with the rural environment, is suggested. Introduction to rural issues through field-based experiences to urban stakeholders is likely to the narrow gaps in perception between urban and rural stakeholders, in order to allow for efficient and collaborative wildlife management.</description><subject>Bears</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Content analysis</subject><subject>Natural resource management</subject><subject>Natural resources</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>Qualitative analysis</subject><subject>Resource management</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Rural communities</subject><subject>Rural environments</subject><subject>Rural populations</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Urban populations</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkE9LAzEQxYMoWGovfoKAN2E1fza7XW9Saq0UFLF4XLLJpKZss2uSbfHbG6mgc3nDzI95zEPokpIbzityGwZKaZkLWpygESMlzSgR5PRff44mIWxJKs5pRYsR6pZuDyHajYzWbfBC9gFbh1_AK-ij7RzuDH63rW6tAdxAPAA4vPaNdFg6jV8HL1u8dB-ysVG6GO7wfNdbb1Uaz_dWg1OAje92-En20l2gMyPbAJNfHaP1w_xt9pitnhfL2f0qU7ygMasAhJwSpYxgSmtORMMJzYXWomS5FtO0LxpgRcM1mzLDG0GULAtKVIIJ8DG6Ot7tffc5pA_rbTd4lyxrJnLKmeBVkajrI6V8F4IHU_fe7qT_qimpfzKt_zLl34F3aYA</recordid><startdate>20190901</startdate><enddate>20190901</enddate><creator>Kato, Eri</creator><creator>Yano, Yuki</creator><creator>Ohe, Yasuo</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7361-8600</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190901</creationdate><title>Investigating Gaps in Perception of Wildlife between Urban and Rural Inhabitants: Empirical Evidence from Japan</title><author>Kato, Eri ; Yano, Yuki ; Ohe, Yasuo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-9ee5a80ccf52cdd305b30145dd5724d58ee56be26b3d282f3b50ca7610cd300e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Bears</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Content analysis</topic><topic>Natural resource management</topic><topic>Natural resources</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>Qualitative analysis</topic><topic>Resource management</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Rural communities</topic><topic>Rural environments</topic><topic>Rural populations</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Urban populations</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kato, Eri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yano, Yuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohe, Yasuo</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kato, Eri</au><au>Yano, Yuki</au><au>Ohe, Yasuo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Investigating Gaps in Perception of Wildlife between Urban and Rural Inhabitants: Empirical Evidence from Japan</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2019-09-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>17</issue><spage>4516</spage><pages>4516-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>A decline in natural resource management by rural communities has significantly contributed to human–wildlife conflicts, especially crop-raiding, in Japan. Collaborative wildlife management between existing rural stakeholders and new urban stakeholders is essential to address this problem. However, differences in the perception regarding wildlife exist between rural populations, which have ample direct experience with wildlife, and urban populations, which lack direct experience with wildlife. Consequently, this gap in perception can potentially lead to conflicts between stakeholders during collaborative wildlife management. In this study, content analysis, which has been extensively employed to analyze qualitative data, was performed to elucidate the differences in perception of wildlife between urban and rural stakeholders. An online survey was conducted in December 2016 to understand the perception of wildlife by stakeholders, in which 1401 responses were received. The results indicate that the urban individuals did not have a comprehensive understanding of wildlife and any positive views were primarily abstract. Conversely, rural individuals had diverse perceptions, both positive and negative. Therefore, a novel perceptual gap-narrowing approach based on staged interactions with the rural environment, is suggested. Introduction to rural issues through field-based experiences to urban stakeholders is likely to the narrow gaps in perception between urban and rural stakeholders, in order to allow for efficient and collaborative wildlife management.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su11174516</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7361-8600</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2071-1050
ispartof Sustainability, 2019-09, Vol.11 (17), p.4516
issn 2071-1050
2071-1050
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2541325396
source MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Bears
Collaboration
Content analysis
Natural resource management
Natural resources
Perception
Perceptions
Polls & surveys
Population
Populations
Qualitative analysis
Resource management
Rural areas
Rural communities
Rural environments
Rural populations
Stakeholders
Sustainability
Urban areas
Urban populations
Wildlife management
title Investigating Gaps in Perception of Wildlife between Urban and Rural Inhabitants: Empirical Evidence from Japan
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T14%3A11%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Investigating%20Gaps%20in%20Perception%20of%20Wildlife%20between%20Urban%20and%20Rural%20Inhabitants:%20Empirical%20Evidence%20from%20Japan&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Kato,%20Eri&rft.date=2019-09-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=17&rft.spage=4516&rft.pages=4516-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su11174516&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2541325396%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2541325396&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true