Investigating Gaps in Perception of Wildlife between Urban and Rural Inhabitants: Empirical Evidence from Japan
A decline in natural resource management by rural communities has significantly contributed to human–wildlife conflicts, especially crop-raiding, in Japan. Collaborative wildlife management between existing rural stakeholders and new urban stakeholders is essential to address this problem. However,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sustainability 2019-09, Vol.11 (17), p.4516 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 17 |
container_start_page | 4516 |
container_title | Sustainability |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Kato, Eri Yano, Yuki Ohe, Yasuo |
description | A decline in natural resource management by rural communities has significantly contributed to human–wildlife conflicts, especially crop-raiding, in Japan. Collaborative wildlife management between existing rural stakeholders and new urban stakeholders is essential to address this problem. However, differences in the perception regarding wildlife exist between rural populations, which have ample direct experience with wildlife, and urban populations, which lack direct experience with wildlife. Consequently, this gap in perception can potentially lead to conflicts between stakeholders during collaborative wildlife management. In this study, content analysis, which has been extensively employed to analyze qualitative data, was performed to elucidate the differences in perception of wildlife between urban and rural stakeholders. An online survey was conducted in December 2016 to understand the perception of wildlife by stakeholders, in which 1401 responses were received. The results indicate that the urban individuals did not have a comprehensive understanding of wildlife and any positive views were primarily abstract. Conversely, rural individuals had diverse perceptions, both positive and negative. Therefore, a novel perceptual gap-narrowing approach based on staged interactions with the rural environment, is suggested. Introduction to rural issues through field-based experiences to urban stakeholders is likely to the narrow gaps in perception between urban and rural stakeholders, in order to allow for efficient and collaborative wildlife management. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/su11174516 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2541325396</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2541325396</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-9ee5a80ccf52cdd305b30145dd5724d58ee56be26b3d282f3b50ca7610cd300e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkE9LAzEQxYMoWGovfoKAN2E1fza7XW9Saq0UFLF4XLLJpKZss2uSbfHbG6mgc3nDzI95zEPokpIbzityGwZKaZkLWpygESMlzSgR5PRff44mIWxJKs5pRYsR6pZuDyHajYzWbfBC9gFbh1_AK-ij7RzuDH63rW6tAdxAPAA4vPaNdFg6jV8HL1u8dB-ysVG6GO7wfNdbb1Uaz_dWg1OAje92-En20l2gMyPbAJNfHaP1w_xt9pitnhfL2f0qU7ygMasAhJwSpYxgSmtORMMJzYXWomS5FtO0LxpgRcM1mzLDG0GULAtKVIIJ8DG6Ot7tffc5pA_rbTd4lyxrJnLKmeBVkajrI6V8F4IHU_fe7qT_qimpfzKt_zLl34F3aYA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2541325396</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Investigating Gaps in Perception of Wildlife between Urban and Rural Inhabitants: Empirical Evidence from Japan</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Kato, Eri ; Yano, Yuki ; Ohe, Yasuo</creator><creatorcontrib>Kato, Eri ; Yano, Yuki ; Ohe, Yasuo</creatorcontrib><description>A decline in natural resource management by rural communities has significantly contributed to human–wildlife conflicts, especially crop-raiding, in Japan. Collaborative wildlife management between existing rural stakeholders and new urban stakeholders is essential to address this problem. However, differences in the perception regarding wildlife exist between rural populations, which have ample direct experience with wildlife, and urban populations, which lack direct experience with wildlife. Consequently, this gap in perception can potentially lead to conflicts between stakeholders during collaborative wildlife management. In this study, content analysis, which has been extensively employed to analyze qualitative data, was performed to elucidate the differences in perception of wildlife between urban and rural stakeholders. An online survey was conducted in December 2016 to understand the perception of wildlife by stakeholders, in which 1401 responses were received. The results indicate that the urban individuals did not have a comprehensive understanding of wildlife and any positive views were primarily abstract. Conversely, rural individuals had diverse perceptions, both positive and negative. Therefore, a novel perceptual gap-narrowing approach based on staged interactions with the rural environment, is suggested. Introduction to rural issues through field-based experiences to urban stakeholders is likely to the narrow gaps in perception between urban and rural stakeholders, in order to allow for efficient and collaborative wildlife management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su11174516</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Bears ; Collaboration ; Content analysis ; Natural resource management ; Natural resources ; Perception ; Perceptions ; Polls & surveys ; Population ; Populations ; Qualitative analysis ; Resource management ; Rural areas ; Rural communities ; Rural environments ; Rural populations ; Stakeholders ; Sustainability ; Urban areas ; Urban populations ; Wildlife management</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2019-09, Vol.11 (17), p.4516</ispartof><rights>2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-9ee5a80ccf52cdd305b30145dd5724d58ee56be26b3d282f3b50ca7610cd300e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-9ee5a80ccf52cdd305b30145dd5724d58ee56be26b3d282f3b50ca7610cd300e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7361-8600</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kato, Eri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yano, Yuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohe, Yasuo</creatorcontrib><title>Investigating Gaps in Perception of Wildlife between Urban and Rural Inhabitants: Empirical Evidence from Japan</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>A decline in natural resource management by rural communities has significantly contributed to human–wildlife conflicts, especially crop-raiding, in Japan. Collaborative wildlife management between existing rural stakeholders and new urban stakeholders is essential to address this problem. However, differences in the perception regarding wildlife exist between rural populations, which have ample direct experience with wildlife, and urban populations, which lack direct experience with wildlife. Consequently, this gap in perception can potentially lead to conflicts between stakeholders during collaborative wildlife management. In this study, content analysis, which has been extensively employed to analyze qualitative data, was performed to elucidate the differences in perception of wildlife between urban and rural stakeholders. An online survey was conducted in December 2016 to understand the perception of wildlife by stakeholders, in which 1401 responses were received. The results indicate that the urban individuals did not have a comprehensive understanding of wildlife and any positive views were primarily abstract. Conversely, rural individuals had diverse perceptions, both positive and negative. Therefore, a novel perceptual gap-narrowing approach based on staged interactions with the rural environment, is suggested. Introduction to rural issues through field-based experiences to urban stakeholders is likely to the narrow gaps in perception between urban and rural stakeholders, in order to allow for efficient and collaborative wildlife management.</description><subject>Bears</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Content analysis</subject><subject>Natural resource management</subject><subject>Natural resources</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>Qualitative analysis</subject><subject>Resource management</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Rural communities</subject><subject>Rural environments</subject><subject>Rural populations</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Urban populations</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkE9LAzEQxYMoWGovfoKAN2E1fza7XW9Saq0UFLF4XLLJpKZss2uSbfHbG6mgc3nDzI95zEPokpIbzityGwZKaZkLWpygESMlzSgR5PRff44mIWxJKs5pRYsR6pZuDyHajYzWbfBC9gFbh1_AK-ij7RzuDH63rW6tAdxAPAA4vPaNdFg6jV8HL1u8dB-ysVG6GO7wfNdbb1Uaz_dWg1OAje92-En20l2gMyPbAJNfHaP1w_xt9pitnhfL2f0qU7ygMasAhJwSpYxgSmtORMMJzYXWomS5FtO0LxpgRcM1mzLDG0GULAtKVIIJ8DG6Ot7tffc5pA_rbTd4lyxrJnLKmeBVkajrI6V8F4IHU_fe7qT_qimpfzKt_zLl34F3aYA</recordid><startdate>20190901</startdate><enddate>20190901</enddate><creator>Kato, Eri</creator><creator>Yano, Yuki</creator><creator>Ohe, Yasuo</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7361-8600</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190901</creationdate><title>Investigating Gaps in Perception of Wildlife between Urban and Rural Inhabitants: Empirical Evidence from Japan</title><author>Kato, Eri ; Yano, Yuki ; Ohe, Yasuo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-9ee5a80ccf52cdd305b30145dd5724d58ee56be26b3d282f3b50ca7610cd300e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Bears</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Content analysis</topic><topic>Natural resource management</topic><topic>Natural resources</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>Qualitative analysis</topic><topic>Resource management</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Rural communities</topic><topic>Rural environments</topic><topic>Rural populations</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Urban populations</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kato, Eri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yano, Yuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohe, Yasuo</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kato, Eri</au><au>Yano, Yuki</au><au>Ohe, Yasuo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Investigating Gaps in Perception of Wildlife between Urban and Rural Inhabitants: Empirical Evidence from Japan</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2019-09-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>17</issue><spage>4516</spage><pages>4516-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>A decline in natural resource management by rural communities has significantly contributed to human–wildlife conflicts, especially crop-raiding, in Japan. Collaborative wildlife management between existing rural stakeholders and new urban stakeholders is essential to address this problem. However, differences in the perception regarding wildlife exist between rural populations, which have ample direct experience with wildlife, and urban populations, which lack direct experience with wildlife. Consequently, this gap in perception can potentially lead to conflicts between stakeholders during collaborative wildlife management. In this study, content analysis, which has been extensively employed to analyze qualitative data, was performed to elucidate the differences in perception of wildlife between urban and rural stakeholders. An online survey was conducted in December 2016 to understand the perception of wildlife by stakeholders, in which 1401 responses were received. The results indicate that the urban individuals did not have a comprehensive understanding of wildlife and any positive views were primarily abstract. Conversely, rural individuals had diverse perceptions, both positive and negative. Therefore, a novel perceptual gap-narrowing approach based on staged interactions with the rural environment, is suggested. Introduction to rural issues through field-based experiences to urban stakeholders is likely to the narrow gaps in perception between urban and rural stakeholders, in order to allow for efficient and collaborative wildlife management.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su11174516</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7361-8600</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2071-1050 |
ispartof | Sustainability, 2019-09, Vol.11 (17), p.4516 |
issn | 2071-1050 2071-1050 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2541325396 |
source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Bears Collaboration Content analysis Natural resource management Natural resources Perception Perceptions Polls & surveys Population Populations Qualitative analysis Resource management Rural areas Rural communities Rural environments Rural populations Stakeholders Sustainability Urban areas Urban populations Wildlife management |
title | Investigating Gaps in Perception of Wildlife between Urban and Rural Inhabitants: Empirical Evidence from Japan |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T14%3A11%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Investigating%20Gaps%20in%20Perception%20of%20Wildlife%20between%20Urban%20and%20Rural%20Inhabitants:%20Empirical%20Evidence%20from%20Japan&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Kato,%20Eri&rft.date=2019-09-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=17&rft.spage=4516&rft.pages=4516-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su11174516&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2541325396%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2541325396&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |