When Stigma Doesn’t Transfer: Stigma Deflection and Occupational Stratification in the Sharing Economy
Research has suggested that when an occupation is stigmatized, new occupational members will assume the stigma of incumbents because stigma transfers. Yet, current research does not account for shifts in the modern workforce that are changing the nature of many stigmatized occupations. We argue that...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of management studies 2021-06, Vol.58 (4), p.1107-1139 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1139 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1107 |
container_title | Journal of management studies |
container_volume | 58 |
creator | Phung, Kam Buchanan, Sean Toubiana, Madeline Ruebottom, Trish Turchick‐Hakak, Luciana |
description | Research has suggested that when an occupation is stigmatized, new occupational members will assume the stigma of incumbents because stigma transfers. Yet, current research does not account for shifts in the modern workforce that are changing the nature of many stigmatized occupations. We argue that these changes raise questions about whether stigma will transfer to new occupational members. Drawing from a study of Uber’s entry into Toronto, Canada, we reveal the process by which stigma transfer can be avoided by new occupational members. We show how categorical ambiguity during entry enabled two sets of activities: creating categorical distinctiveness and showcasing identity discrepancies. These activities acted as mechanisms of stigma deflection by distancing Uber drivers from the taint associated with taxi drivers. However, this further entrenched the taint facing incumbents and stratified the occupation along a stigma faultline. We offer implications for research on stigma, market entry, and the sharing economy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/joms.12574 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2541123012</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A665559568</galeid><sourcerecordid>A665559568</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4064-fa504676bcb8b8439eac88d894db3a7616a7dbd40fbb9f1125faa9529293a8d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kN9KwzAUxoMoOKc3PkFA8ELoTNs0Tb0bc_5D2cUGXobTNOk6unQmLbo7X8PX80nMVvHSA-Gc5PzO4cuH0HlIRqGP61WzdqMwSlJ6gAYhZWnAKGeHaEBIFAVRzMkxOnFuRXzQlAzQ8nWpDJ63VbkGfNsoZ74_v1q8sGCcVvbmr6V0rWRbNQaDKfBMym4DuyvUHrG-1JXcP-DK4Hap8HwJtjIlnsrGNOvtKTrSUDt19puHaHE3XUwegufZ_eNk_BxIShgNNCTEy2a5zHnOaZwpkJwXPKNFHkPKQgZpkReU6DzPdOi_qgGyJMqiLAZexEN00a_d2OatU64Vq6azXqUTUUI9HxN_huiyp0qolaiMl9iqj7aEzjkhxowlSZIljHvwqgelbZyzSouNrdZgtyIkYue42Dku9o57OOzh96pW239I8TR7mfczP7bvhH4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2541123012</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>When Stigma Doesn’t Transfer: Stigma Deflection and Occupational Stratification in the Sharing Economy</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Phung, Kam ; Buchanan, Sean ; Toubiana, Madeline ; Ruebottom, Trish ; Turchick‐Hakak, Luciana</creator><creatorcontrib>Phung, Kam ; Buchanan, Sean ; Toubiana, Madeline ; Ruebottom, Trish ; Turchick‐Hakak, Luciana</creatorcontrib><description>Research has suggested that when an occupation is stigmatized, new occupational members will assume the stigma of incumbents because stigma transfers. Yet, current research does not account for shifts in the modern workforce that are changing the nature of many stigmatized occupations. We argue that these changes raise questions about whether stigma will transfer to new occupational members. Drawing from a study of Uber’s entry into Toronto, Canada, we reveal the process by which stigma transfer can be avoided by new occupational members. We show how categorical ambiguity during entry enabled two sets of activities: creating categorical distinctiveness and showcasing identity discrepancies. These activities acted as mechanisms of stigma deflection by distancing Uber drivers from the taint associated with taxi drivers. However, this further entrenched the taint facing incumbents and stratified the occupation along a stigma faultline. We offer implications for research on stigma, market entry, and the sharing economy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2380</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-6486</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/joms.12574</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Ambiguity ; dirty work ; Discrepancies ; Distinctiveness ; Market entry ; occupational stratification ; Occupations ; Sharing economy ; Stigma ; stigma transfer ; stigmatized occupation ; Stratification ; Uber ; Workforce</subject><ispartof>Journal of management studies, 2021-06, Vol.58 (4), p.1107-1139</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors. Journal of Management Studies published by Society for the Advancement of Management Studies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Wiley Subscription Services, Inc.</rights><rights>2020. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4064-fa504676bcb8b8439eac88d894db3a7616a7dbd40fbb9f1125faa9529293a8d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4064-fa504676bcb8b8439eac88d894db3a7616a7dbd40fbb9f1125faa9529293a8d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjoms.12574$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjoms.12574$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27915,27916,45565,45566</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Phung, Kam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buchanan, Sean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toubiana, Madeline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruebottom, Trish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turchick‐Hakak, Luciana</creatorcontrib><title>When Stigma Doesn’t Transfer: Stigma Deflection and Occupational Stratification in the Sharing Economy</title><title>Journal of management studies</title><description>Research has suggested that when an occupation is stigmatized, new occupational members will assume the stigma of incumbents because stigma transfers. Yet, current research does not account for shifts in the modern workforce that are changing the nature of many stigmatized occupations. We argue that these changes raise questions about whether stigma will transfer to new occupational members. Drawing from a study of Uber’s entry into Toronto, Canada, we reveal the process by which stigma transfer can be avoided by new occupational members. We show how categorical ambiguity during entry enabled two sets of activities: creating categorical distinctiveness and showcasing identity discrepancies. These activities acted as mechanisms of stigma deflection by distancing Uber drivers from the taint associated with taxi drivers. However, this further entrenched the taint facing incumbents and stratified the occupation along a stigma faultline. We offer implications for research on stigma, market entry, and the sharing economy.</description><subject>Ambiguity</subject><subject>dirty work</subject><subject>Discrepancies</subject><subject>Distinctiveness</subject><subject>Market entry</subject><subject>occupational stratification</subject><subject>Occupations</subject><subject>Sharing economy</subject><subject>Stigma</subject><subject>stigma transfer</subject><subject>stigmatized occupation</subject><subject>Stratification</subject><subject>Uber</subject><subject>Workforce</subject><issn>0022-2380</issn><issn>1467-6486</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kN9KwzAUxoMoOKc3PkFA8ELoTNs0Tb0bc_5D2cUGXobTNOk6unQmLbo7X8PX80nMVvHSA-Gc5PzO4cuH0HlIRqGP61WzdqMwSlJ6gAYhZWnAKGeHaEBIFAVRzMkxOnFuRXzQlAzQ8nWpDJ63VbkGfNsoZ74_v1q8sGCcVvbmr6V0rWRbNQaDKfBMym4DuyvUHrG-1JXcP-DK4Hap8HwJtjIlnsrGNOvtKTrSUDt19puHaHE3XUwegufZ_eNk_BxIShgNNCTEy2a5zHnOaZwpkJwXPKNFHkPKQgZpkReU6DzPdOi_qgGyJMqiLAZexEN00a_d2OatU64Vq6azXqUTUUI9HxN_huiyp0qolaiMl9iqj7aEzjkhxowlSZIljHvwqgelbZyzSouNrdZgtyIkYue42Dku9o57OOzh96pW239I8TR7mfczP7bvhH4</recordid><startdate>202106</startdate><enddate>202106</enddate><creator>Phung, Kam</creator><creator>Buchanan, Sean</creator><creator>Toubiana, Madeline</creator><creator>Ruebottom, Trish</creator><creator>Turchick‐Hakak, Luciana</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202106</creationdate><title>When Stigma Doesn’t Transfer: Stigma Deflection and Occupational Stratification in the Sharing Economy</title><author>Phung, Kam ; Buchanan, Sean ; Toubiana, Madeline ; Ruebottom, Trish ; Turchick‐Hakak, Luciana</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4064-fa504676bcb8b8439eac88d894db3a7616a7dbd40fbb9f1125faa9529293a8d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Ambiguity</topic><topic>dirty work</topic><topic>Discrepancies</topic><topic>Distinctiveness</topic><topic>Market entry</topic><topic>occupational stratification</topic><topic>Occupations</topic><topic>Sharing economy</topic><topic>Stigma</topic><topic>stigma transfer</topic><topic>stigmatized occupation</topic><topic>Stratification</topic><topic>Uber</topic><topic>Workforce</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Phung, Kam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buchanan, Sean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toubiana, Madeline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruebottom, Trish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turchick‐Hakak, Luciana</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of management studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Phung, Kam</au><au>Buchanan, Sean</au><au>Toubiana, Madeline</au><au>Ruebottom, Trish</au><au>Turchick‐Hakak, Luciana</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>When Stigma Doesn’t Transfer: Stigma Deflection and Occupational Stratification in the Sharing Economy</atitle><jtitle>Journal of management studies</jtitle><date>2021-06</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1107</spage><epage>1139</epage><pages>1107-1139</pages><issn>0022-2380</issn><eissn>1467-6486</eissn><abstract>Research has suggested that when an occupation is stigmatized, new occupational members will assume the stigma of incumbents because stigma transfers. Yet, current research does not account for shifts in the modern workforce that are changing the nature of many stigmatized occupations. We argue that these changes raise questions about whether stigma will transfer to new occupational members. Drawing from a study of Uber’s entry into Toronto, Canada, we reveal the process by which stigma transfer can be avoided by new occupational members. We show how categorical ambiguity during entry enabled two sets of activities: creating categorical distinctiveness and showcasing identity discrepancies. These activities acted as mechanisms of stigma deflection by distancing Uber drivers from the taint associated with taxi drivers. However, this further entrenched the taint facing incumbents and stratified the occupation along a stigma faultline. We offer implications for research on stigma, market entry, and the sharing economy.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/joms.12574</doi><tpages>33</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-2380 |
ispartof | Journal of management studies, 2021-06, Vol.58 (4), p.1107-1139 |
issn | 0022-2380 1467-6486 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2541123012 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Ambiguity dirty work Discrepancies Distinctiveness Market entry occupational stratification Occupations Sharing economy Stigma stigma transfer stigmatized occupation Stratification Uber Workforce |
title | When Stigma Doesn’t Transfer: Stigma Deflection and Occupational Stratification in the Sharing Economy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T05%3A39%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=When%20Stigma%20Doesn%E2%80%99t%20Transfer:%20Stigma%20Deflection%20and%20Occupational%20Stratification%20in%20the%20Sharing%20Economy&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20management%20studies&rft.au=Phung,%20Kam&rft.date=2021-06&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1107&rft.epage=1139&rft.pages=1107-1139&rft.issn=0022-2380&rft.eissn=1467-6486&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/joms.12574&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA665559568%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2541123012&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A665559568&rfr_iscdi=true |