When Stigma Doesn’t Transfer: Stigma Deflection and Occupational Stratification in the Sharing Economy

Research has suggested that when an occupation is stigmatized, new occupational members will assume the stigma of incumbents because stigma transfers. Yet, current research does not account for shifts in the modern workforce that are changing the nature of many stigmatized occupations. We argue that...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of management studies 2021-06, Vol.58 (4), p.1107-1139
Hauptverfasser: Phung, Kam, Buchanan, Sean, Toubiana, Madeline, Ruebottom, Trish, Turchick‐Hakak, Luciana
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1139
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1107
container_title Journal of management studies
container_volume 58
creator Phung, Kam
Buchanan, Sean
Toubiana, Madeline
Ruebottom, Trish
Turchick‐Hakak, Luciana
description Research has suggested that when an occupation is stigmatized, new occupational members will assume the stigma of incumbents because stigma transfers. Yet, current research does not account for shifts in the modern workforce that are changing the nature of many stigmatized occupations. We argue that these changes raise questions about whether stigma will transfer to new occupational members. Drawing from a study of Uber’s entry into Toronto, Canada, we reveal the process by which stigma transfer can be avoided by new occupational members. We show how categorical ambiguity during entry enabled two sets of activities: creating categorical distinctiveness and showcasing identity discrepancies. These activities acted as mechanisms of stigma deflection by distancing Uber drivers from the taint associated with taxi drivers. However, this further entrenched the taint facing incumbents and stratified the occupation along a stigma faultline. We offer implications for research on stigma, market entry, and the sharing economy.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/joms.12574
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2541123012</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A665559568</galeid><sourcerecordid>A665559568</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4064-fa504676bcb8b8439eac88d894db3a7616a7dbd40fbb9f1125faa9529293a8d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kN9KwzAUxoMoOKc3PkFA8ELoTNs0Tb0bc_5D2cUGXobTNOk6unQmLbo7X8PX80nMVvHSA-Gc5PzO4cuH0HlIRqGP61WzdqMwSlJ6gAYhZWnAKGeHaEBIFAVRzMkxOnFuRXzQlAzQ8nWpDJ63VbkGfNsoZ74_v1q8sGCcVvbmr6V0rWRbNQaDKfBMym4DuyvUHrG-1JXcP-DK4Hap8HwJtjIlnsrGNOvtKTrSUDt19puHaHE3XUwegufZ_eNk_BxIShgNNCTEy2a5zHnOaZwpkJwXPKNFHkPKQgZpkReU6DzPdOi_qgGyJMqiLAZexEN00a_d2OatU64Vq6azXqUTUUI9HxN_huiyp0qolaiMl9iqj7aEzjkhxowlSZIljHvwqgelbZyzSouNrdZgtyIkYue42Dku9o57OOzh96pW239I8TR7mfczP7bvhH4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2541123012</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>When Stigma Doesn’t Transfer: Stigma Deflection and Occupational Stratification in the Sharing Economy</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Phung, Kam ; Buchanan, Sean ; Toubiana, Madeline ; Ruebottom, Trish ; Turchick‐Hakak, Luciana</creator><creatorcontrib>Phung, Kam ; Buchanan, Sean ; Toubiana, Madeline ; Ruebottom, Trish ; Turchick‐Hakak, Luciana</creatorcontrib><description>Research has suggested that when an occupation is stigmatized, new occupational members will assume the stigma of incumbents because stigma transfers. Yet, current research does not account for shifts in the modern workforce that are changing the nature of many stigmatized occupations. We argue that these changes raise questions about whether stigma will transfer to new occupational members. Drawing from a study of Uber’s entry into Toronto, Canada, we reveal the process by which stigma transfer can be avoided by new occupational members. We show how categorical ambiguity during entry enabled two sets of activities: creating categorical distinctiveness and showcasing identity discrepancies. These activities acted as mechanisms of stigma deflection by distancing Uber drivers from the taint associated with taxi drivers. However, this further entrenched the taint facing incumbents and stratified the occupation along a stigma faultline. We offer implications for research on stigma, market entry, and the sharing economy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2380</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-6486</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/joms.12574</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Ambiguity ; dirty work ; Discrepancies ; Distinctiveness ; Market entry ; occupational stratification ; Occupations ; Sharing economy ; Stigma ; stigma transfer ; stigmatized occupation ; Stratification ; Uber ; Workforce</subject><ispartof>Journal of management studies, 2021-06, Vol.58 (4), p.1107-1139</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors. Journal of Management Studies published by Society for the Advancement of Management Studies and John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Wiley Subscription Services, Inc.</rights><rights>2020. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4064-fa504676bcb8b8439eac88d894db3a7616a7dbd40fbb9f1125faa9529293a8d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4064-fa504676bcb8b8439eac88d894db3a7616a7dbd40fbb9f1125faa9529293a8d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjoms.12574$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjoms.12574$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27915,27916,45565,45566</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Phung, Kam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buchanan, Sean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toubiana, Madeline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruebottom, Trish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turchick‐Hakak, Luciana</creatorcontrib><title>When Stigma Doesn’t Transfer: Stigma Deflection and Occupational Stratification in the Sharing Economy</title><title>Journal of management studies</title><description>Research has suggested that when an occupation is stigmatized, new occupational members will assume the stigma of incumbents because stigma transfers. Yet, current research does not account for shifts in the modern workforce that are changing the nature of many stigmatized occupations. We argue that these changes raise questions about whether stigma will transfer to new occupational members. Drawing from a study of Uber’s entry into Toronto, Canada, we reveal the process by which stigma transfer can be avoided by new occupational members. We show how categorical ambiguity during entry enabled two sets of activities: creating categorical distinctiveness and showcasing identity discrepancies. These activities acted as mechanisms of stigma deflection by distancing Uber drivers from the taint associated with taxi drivers. However, this further entrenched the taint facing incumbents and stratified the occupation along a stigma faultline. We offer implications for research on stigma, market entry, and the sharing economy.</description><subject>Ambiguity</subject><subject>dirty work</subject><subject>Discrepancies</subject><subject>Distinctiveness</subject><subject>Market entry</subject><subject>occupational stratification</subject><subject>Occupations</subject><subject>Sharing economy</subject><subject>Stigma</subject><subject>stigma transfer</subject><subject>stigmatized occupation</subject><subject>Stratification</subject><subject>Uber</subject><subject>Workforce</subject><issn>0022-2380</issn><issn>1467-6486</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kN9KwzAUxoMoOKc3PkFA8ELoTNs0Tb0bc_5D2cUGXobTNOk6unQmLbo7X8PX80nMVvHSA-Gc5PzO4cuH0HlIRqGP61WzdqMwSlJ6gAYhZWnAKGeHaEBIFAVRzMkxOnFuRXzQlAzQ8nWpDJ63VbkGfNsoZ74_v1q8sGCcVvbmr6V0rWRbNQaDKfBMym4DuyvUHrG-1JXcP-DK4Hap8HwJtjIlnsrGNOvtKTrSUDt19puHaHE3XUwegufZ_eNk_BxIShgNNCTEy2a5zHnOaZwpkJwXPKNFHkPKQgZpkReU6DzPdOi_qgGyJMqiLAZexEN00a_d2OatU64Vq6azXqUTUUI9HxN_huiyp0qolaiMl9iqj7aEzjkhxowlSZIljHvwqgelbZyzSouNrdZgtyIkYue42Dku9o57OOzh96pW239I8TR7mfczP7bvhH4</recordid><startdate>202106</startdate><enddate>202106</enddate><creator>Phung, Kam</creator><creator>Buchanan, Sean</creator><creator>Toubiana, Madeline</creator><creator>Ruebottom, Trish</creator><creator>Turchick‐Hakak, Luciana</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202106</creationdate><title>When Stigma Doesn’t Transfer: Stigma Deflection and Occupational Stratification in the Sharing Economy</title><author>Phung, Kam ; Buchanan, Sean ; Toubiana, Madeline ; Ruebottom, Trish ; Turchick‐Hakak, Luciana</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4064-fa504676bcb8b8439eac88d894db3a7616a7dbd40fbb9f1125faa9529293a8d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Ambiguity</topic><topic>dirty work</topic><topic>Discrepancies</topic><topic>Distinctiveness</topic><topic>Market entry</topic><topic>occupational stratification</topic><topic>Occupations</topic><topic>Sharing economy</topic><topic>Stigma</topic><topic>stigma transfer</topic><topic>stigmatized occupation</topic><topic>Stratification</topic><topic>Uber</topic><topic>Workforce</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Phung, Kam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buchanan, Sean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toubiana, Madeline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruebottom, Trish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turchick‐Hakak, Luciana</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of management studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Phung, Kam</au><au>Buchanan, Sean</au><au>Toubiana, Madeline</au><au>Ruebottom, Trish</au><au>Turchick‐Hakak, Luciana</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>When Stigma Doesn’t Transfer: Stigma Deflection and Occupational Stratification in the Sharing Economy</atitle><jtitle>Journal of management studies</jtitle><date>2021-06</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1107</spage><epage>1139</epage><pages>1107-1139</pages><issn>0022-2380</issn><eissn>1467-6486</eissn><abstract>Research has suggested that when an occupation is stigmatized, new occupational members will assume the stigma of incumbents because stigma transfers. Yet, current research does not account for shifts in the modern workforce that are changing the nature of many stigmatized occupations. We argue that these changes raise questions about whether stigma will transfer to new occupational members. Drawing from a study of Uber’s entry into Toronto, Canada, we reveal the process by which stigma transfer can be avoided by new occupational members. We show how categorical ambiguity during entry enabled two sets of activities: creating categorical distinctiveness and showcasing identity discrepancies. These activities acted as mechanisms of stigma deflection by distancing Uber drivers from the taint associated with taxi drivers. However, this further entrenched the taint facing incumbents and stratified the occupation along a stigma faultline. We offer implications for research on stigma, market entry, and the sharing economy.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/joms.12574</doi><tpages>33</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-2380
ispartof Journal of management studies, 2021-06, Vol.58 (4), p.1107-1139
issn 0022-2380
1467-6486
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2541123012
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Ambiguity
dirty work
Discrepancies
Distinctiveness
Market entry
occupational stratification
Occupations
Sharing economy
Stigma
stigma transfer
stigmatized occupation
Stratification
Uber
Workforce
title When Stigma Doesn’t Transfer: Stigma Deflection and Occupational Stratification in the Sharing Economy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T05%3A39%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=When%20Stigma%20Doesn%E2%80%99t%20Transfer:%20Stigma%20Deflection%20and%20Occupational%20Stratification%20in%20the%20Sharing%20Economy&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20management%20studies&rft.au=Phung,%20Kam&rft.date=2021-06&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1107&rft.epage=1139&rft.pages=1107-1139&rft.issn=0022-2380&rft.eissn=1467-6486&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/joms.12574&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA665559568%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2541123012&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A665559568&rfr_iscdi=true