Soot Observations and Exhaust Soot Comparisons from Ethanol-Blended and Methanol-Blended Gasoline Combustion in a Direct-Injected Engine

Particulate formation was studied under homogeneous-intent stoichiometric operating conditions when ethanol-blended (E10) or methanol-blended (M20) gasoline fuel was injected during intake stroke of a 4-stroke direct-injected engine. The engine was tested at wide open throttle under naturally aspira...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:SAE International journal of fuels and lubricants 2018-05, Vol.11 (2), p.163-180, Article 04-11-02-0008
Hauptverfasser: Vedula, Ravi Teja, Men, Yifan, Atis, Cyrus, Stuecken, Tom, Zhu, Guoming, Schock, Harold, Wooldridge, Steven
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 180
container_issue 2
container_start_page 163
container_title SAE International journal of fuels and lubricants
container_volume 11
creator Vedula, Ravi Teja
Men, Yifan
Atis, Cyrus
Stuecken, Tom
Zhu, Guoming
Schock, Harold
Wooldridge, Steven
description Particulate formation was studied under homogeneous-intent stoichiometric operating conditions when ethanol-blended (E10) or methanol-blended (M20) gasoline fuel was injected during intake stroke of a 4-stroke direct-injected engine. The engine was tested at wide open throttle under naturally aspirated conditions for a speed-load of 1500 rev/min and 9.8 bar indicated mean effective pressure. In-cylinder soot observations and exhaust soot measurements were completed for different fuel rail pressures, injection timings, coolant and piston temperatures of the optical engine. Fuel delivery settings were tested with both single and split injections during intake stroke. The target piston temperature of the optical engine was attained using pre-determined number of methane port fuel injection firing cycles. Overall, the in-cylinder soot observations correlated well with the engine-out soot measurements. A warmer cylinder head favored soot reduction for both fuels. A hot piston resulted in more soot than a warm piston, with a high fuel rail pressure. The two alcohol blends showed contrasting differences in their inclination for particulate formation. At the tested injection timing, a smaller and larger first split percent of fuel injection favored soot reduction for E10 and M20 respectively, compared to single injection operation.
doi_str_mv 10.4271/04-11-02-0008
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2540571595</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A564608469</galeid><jstor_id>26554704</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A564608469</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-85d940cb4e8150adae26c0bfed5a7ef17457ee027b3422cedab0caf82bd20d863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkcFu1DAQhqMKpJaWI0ekSJxdxo7tJMeyLKVSUQ_A2XLsSetVYi-2F9E36GPjdNFWVJUljzXzf_-MPFX1jsI5Zy39CJxQSoARAOiOqhPac0maXsKrw1uw4-pNShsA2UJDT6qH7yHk-mZIGH_r7IJPtfa2Xv-507uU68fqKsxbHV1aimMMc73Od9qHiXya0Fu0j8Q3fJa81ClMzuOCD8WreNfO17r-7CKaTK78poQiXPvbIjurXo96Svj2Xzytfn5Z_1h9Jdc3l1eri2timr7JpBO252AGjh0VoK1GJg0MI1qhWxxpy0WLCKwdGs6YQasHMHrs2GAZ2E42p9WHve82hl87TFltwi760lIxwUG0VPTiSXWrJ1TOjyFHbWaXjLoQkkvouOyL6vwFVTkWZ2eCx9GV_H8A2QMmhpQijmob3azjvaKglh0q4IqWm6llh08Nkl78M5ZBl4_U02Ho58D7PbBJOcSDO5NC8BZ48xe4Lah8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2540571595</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Soot Observations and Exhaust Soot Comparisons from Ethanol-Blended and Methanol-Blended Gasoline Combustion in a Direct-Injected Engine</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Vedula, Ravi Teja ; Men, Yifan ; Atis, Cyrus ; Stuecken, Tom ; Zhu, Guoming ; Schock, Harold ; Wooldridge, Steven</creator><creatorcontrib>Vedula, Ravi Teja ; Men, Yifan ; Atis, Cyrus ; Stuecken, Tom ; Zhu, Guoming ; Schock, Harold ; Wooldridge, Steven</creatorcontrib><description>Particulate formation was studied under homogeneous-intent stoichiometric operating conditions when ethanol-blended (E10) or methanol-blended (M20) gasoline fuel was injected during intake stroke of a 4-stroke direct-injected engine. The engine was tested at wide open throttle under naturally aspirated conditions for a speed-load of 1500 rev/min and 9.8 bar indicated mean effective pressure. In-cylinder soot observations and exhaust soot measurements were completed for different fuel rail pressures, injection timings, coolant and piston temperatures of the optical engine. Fuel delivery settings were tested with both single and split injections during intake stroke. The target piston temperature of the optical engine was attained using pre-determined number of methane port fuel injection firing cycles. Overall, the in-cylinder soot observations correlated well with the engine-out soot measurements. A warmer cylinder head favored soot reduction for both fuels. A hot piston resulted in more soot than a warm piston, with a high fuel rail pressure. The two alcohol blends showed contrasting differences in their inclination for particulate formation. At the tested injection timing, a smaller and larger first split percent of fuel injection favored soot reduction for E10 and M20 respectively, compared to single injection operation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1946-3952</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1946-3960</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1946-3960</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4271/04-11-02-0008</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Warrendale: SAE International</publisher><subject>Air pollution ; Alcohol fuels ; Automotive gasoline engines ; Combustion ; Comparative analysis ; Cylinder heads ; Direct injection ; Energy use ; Ethanol ; Ethanol fuels ; Ethanol-blended gasoline ; Exhaust gases ; Exhaust soot concentration ; Fuel injection ; Gasoline ; In-cylinder soot imaging ; Injection ; Methane ; Methanol ; Methanol-blended gasoline ; Reduction ; Soot ; Spark ignition engine</subject><ispartof>SAE International journal of fuels and lubricants, 2018-05, Vol.11 (2), p.163-180, Article 04-11-02-0008</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2018 SAE International</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 SAE International</rights><rights>Copyright SAE International, a Pennsylvania Not-for Profit 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-85d940cb4e8150adae26c0bfed5a7ef17457ee027b3422cedab0caf82bd20d863</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26554704$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26554704$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vedula, Ravi Teja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Men, Yifan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atis, Cyrus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stuecken, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Guoming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schock, Harold</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wooldridge, Steven</creatorcontrib><title>Soot Observations and Exhaust Soot Comparisons from Ethanol-Blended and Methanol-Blended Gasoline Combustion in a Direct-Injected Engine</title><title>SAE International journal of fuels and lubricants</title><description>Particulate formation was studied under homogeneous-intent stoichiometric operating conditions when ethanol-blended (E10) or methanol-blended (M20) gasoline fuel was injected during intake stroke of a 4-stroke direct-injected engine. The engine was tested at wide open throttle under naturally aspirated conditions for a speed-load of 1500 rev/min and 9.8 bar indicated mean effective pressure. In-cylinder soot observations and exhaust soot measurements were completed for different fuel rail pressures, injection timings, coolant and piston temperatures of the optical engine. Fuel delivery settings were tested with both single and split injections during intake stroke. The target piston temperature of the optical engine was attained using pre-determined number of methane port fuel injection firing cycles. Overall, the in-cylinder soot observations correlated well with the engine-out soot measurements. A warmer cylinder head favored soot reduction for both fuels. A hot piston resulted in more soot than a warm piston, with a high fuel rail pressure. The two alcohol blends showed contrasting differences in their inclination for particulate formation. At the tested injection timing, a smaller and larger first split percent of fuel injection favored soot reduction for E10 and M20 respectively, compared to single injection operation.</description><subject>Air pollution</subject><subject>Alcohol fuels</subject><subject>Automotive gasoline engines</subject><subject>Combustion</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Cylinder heads</subject><subject>Direct injection</subject><subject>Energy use</subject><subject>Ethanol</subject><subject>Ethanol fuels</subject><subject>Ethanol-blended gasoline</subject><subject>Exhaust gases</subject><subject>Exhaust soot concentration</subject><subject>Fuel injection</subject><subject>Gasoline</subject><subject>In-cylinder soot imaging</subject><subject>Injection</subject><subject>Methane</subject><subject>Methanol</subject><subject>Methanol-blended gasoline</subject><subject>Reduction</subject><subject>Soot</subject><subject>Spark ignition engine</subject><issn>1946-3952</issn><issn>1946-3960</issn><issn>1946-3960</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNptkcFu1DAQhqMKpJaWI0ekSJxdxo7tJMeyLKVSUQ_A2XLsSetVYi-2F9E36GPjdNFWVJUljzXzf_-MPFX1jsI5Zy39CJxQSoARAOiOqhPac0maXsKrw1uw4-pNShsA2UJDT6qH7yHk-mZIGH_r7IJPtfa2Xv-507uU68fqKsxbHV1aimMMc73Od9qHiXya0Fu0j8Q3fJa81ClMzuOCD8WreNfO17r-7CKaTK78poQiXPvbIjurXo96Svj2Xzytfn5Z_1h9Jdc3l1eri2timr7JpBO252AGjh0VoK1GJg0MI1qhWxxpy0WLCKwdGs6YQasHMHrs2GAZ2E42p9WHve82hl87TFltwi760lIxwUG0VPTiSXWrJ1TOjyFHbWaXjLoQkkvouOyL6vwFVTkWZ2eCx9GV_H8A2QMmhpQijmob3azjvaKglh0q4IqWm6llh08Nkl78M5ZBl4_U02Ho58D7PbBJOcSDO5NC8BZ48xe4Lah8</recordid><startdate>20180501</startdate><enddate>20180501</enddate><creator>Vedula, Ravi Teja</creator><creator>Men, Yifan</creator><creator>Atis, Cyrus</creator><creator>Stuecken, Tom</creator><creator>Zhu, Guoming</creator><creator>Schock, Harold</creator><creator>Wooldridge, Steven</creator><general>SAE International</general><general>SAE International, a Pennsylvania Not-for Profit</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180501</creationdate><title>Soot Observations and Exhaust Soot Comparisons from Ethanol-Blended and Methanol-Blended Gasoline Combustion in a Direct-Injected Engine</title><author>Vedula, Ravi Teja ; Men, Yifan ; Atis, Cyrus ; Stuecken, Tom ; Zhu, Guoming ; Schock, Harold ; Wooldridge, Steven</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-85d940cb4e8150adae26c0bfed5a7ef17457ee027b3422cedab0caf82bd20d863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Air pollution</topic><topic>Alcohol fuels</topic><topic>Automotive gasoline engines</topic><topic>Combustion</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Cylinder heads</topic><topic>Direct injection</topic><topic>Energy use</topic><topic>Ethanol</topic><topic>Ethanol fuels</topic><topic>Ethanol-blended gasoline</topic><topic>Exhaust gases</topic><topic>Exhaust soot concentration</topic><topic>Fuel injection</topic><topic>Gasoline</topic><topic>In-cylinder soot imaging</topic><topic>Injection</topic><topic>Methane</topic><topic>Methanol</topic><topic>Methanol-blended gasoline</topic><topic>Reduction</topic><topic>Soot</topic><topic>Spark ignition engine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vedula, Ravi Teja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Men, Yifan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atis, Cyrus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stuecken, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Guoming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schock, Harold</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wooldridge, Steven</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>SAE International journal of fuels and lubricants</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vedula, Ravi Teja</au><au>Men, Yifan</au><au>Atis, Cyrus</au><au>Stuecken, Tom</au><au>Zhu, Guoming</au><au>Schock, Harold</au><au>Wooldridge, Steven</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Soot Observations and Exhaust Soot Comparisons from Ethanol-Blended and Methanol-Blended Gasoline Combustion in a Direct-Injected Engine</atitle><jtitle>SAE International journal of fuels and lubricants</jtitle><date>2018-05-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>163</spage><epage>180</epage><pages>163-180</pages><artnum>04-11-02-0008</artnum><issn>1946-3952</issn><issn>1946-3960</issn><eissn>1946-3960</eissn><abstract>Particulate formation was studied under homogeneous-intent stoichiometric operating conditions when ethanol-blended (E10) or methanol-blended (M20) gasoline fuel was injected during intake stroke of a 4-stroke direct-injected engine. The engine was tested at wide open throttle under naturally aspirated conditions for a speed-load of 1500 rev/min and 9.8 bar indicated mean effective pressure. In-cylinder soot observations and exhaust soot measurements were completed for different fuel rail pressures, injection timings, coolant and piston temperatures of the optical engine. Fuel delivery settings were tested with both single and split injections during intake stroke. The target piston temperature of the optical engine was attained using pre-determined number of methane port fuel injection firing cycles. Overall, the in-cylinder soot observations correlated well with the engine-out soot measurements. A warmer cylinder head favored soot reduction for both fuels. A hot piston resulted in more soot than a warm piston, with a high fuel rail pressure. The two alcohol blends showed contrasting differences in their inclination for particulate formation. At the tested injection timing, a smaller and larger first split percent of fuel injection favored soot reduction for E10 and M20 respectively, compared to single injection operation.</abstract><cop>Warrendale</cop><pub>SAE International</pub><doi>10.4271/04-11-02-0008</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1946-3952
ispartof SAE International journal of fuels and lubricants, 2018-05, Vol.11 (2), p.163-180, Article 04-11-02-0008
issn 1946-3952
1946-3960
1946-3960
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2540571595
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Air pollution
Alcohol fuels
Automotive gasoline engines
Combustion
Comparative analysis
Cylinder heads
Direct injection
Energy use
Ethanol
Ethanol fuels
Ethanol-blended gasoline
Exhaust gases
Exhaust soot concentration
Fuel injection
Gasoline
In-cylinder soot imaging
Injection
Methane
Methanol
Methanol-blended gasoline
Reduction
Soot
Spark ignition engine
title Soot Observations and Exhaust Soot Comparisons from Ethanol-Blended and Methanol-Blended Gasoline Combustion in a Direct-Injected Engine
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T02%3A37%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Soot%20Observations%20and%20Exhaust%20Soot%20Comparisons%20from%20Ethanol-Blended%20and%20Methanol-Blended%20Gasoline%20Combustion%20in%20a%20Direct-Injected%20Engine&rft.jtitle=SAE%20International%20journal%20of%20fuels%20and%20lubricants&rft.au=Vedula,%20Ravi%20Teja&rft.date=2018-05-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=163&rft.epage=180&rft.pages=163-180&rft.artnum=04-11-02-0008&rft.issn=1946-3952&rft.eissn=1946-3960&rft_id=info:doi/10.4271/04-11-02-0008&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA564608469%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2540571595&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A564608469&rft_jstor_id=26554704&rfr_iscdi=true