China's E-Justice Revolution
In recent years, the Supreme People's Court of China (SPC) under Chief Justice Zhou Qiang (Jf 3g) has actively embraced electronic technologies and made a bold move toward e-justice, leading to the technologiz-ing of civil judicial proceedings across China.1 Such an aggressive approach is unpre...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Judicature 2021-04, Vol.105 (1), p.36-47 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 47 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 36 |
container_title | Judicature |
container_volume | 105 |
creator | Wang, Zhuhao |
description | In recent years, the Supreme People's Court of China (SPC) under Chief Justice Zhou Qiang (Jf 3g) has actively embraced electronic technologies and made a bold move toward e-justice, leading to the technologiz-ing of civil judicial proceedings across China.1 Such an aggressive approach is unprecedented in China and rare in the world, and thus deserves a closer look. [...]it became the subject of heated debate: According to the 2015 Judicial Interpretation on PRC Civil Procedural Law, electronic data refers to "information formed or saved in certain electronic media through an email, electronic data exchange, online conversation record, blog, microblog, cell-phone text message, electronic signature or domain name, etc. An attacker would have to hack all the copies simultaneously to be successful. Besides possessing all the general features of DLT, blockchain utilizes an append-only structure that further strengthens its tamper-resistance. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2540566000</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2540566000</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_25405660003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0MDAy0jW1MDDgYOAqLs4yMDA0MrA042SQcc7IzEtUL1Zw1fUqLS7JTE5VCEoty88pLcnMz-NhYE1LzClO5YXS3AzKbq4hzh66BUX5haWpxSXxWfmlRXlAqXgjUxMDUzMzAwMDY-JUAQCVUSpx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2540566000</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>China's E-Justice Revolution</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Wang, Zhuhao</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zhuhao</creatorcontrib><description>In recent years, the Supreme People's Court of China (SPC) under Chief Justice Zhou Qiang (Jf 3g) has actively embraced electronic technologies and made a bold move toward e-justice, leading to the technologiz-ing of civil judicial proceedings across China.1 Such an aggressive approach is unprecedented in China and rare in the world, and thus deserves a closer look. [...]it became the subject of heated debate: According to the 2015 Judicial Interpretation on PRC Civil Procedural Law, electronic data refers to "information formed or saved in certain electronic media through an email, electronic data exchange, online conversation record, blog, microblog, cell-phone text message, electronic signature or domain name, etc. An attacker would have to hack all the copies simultaneously to be successful. Besides possessing all the general features of DLT, blockchain utilizes an append-only structure that further strengthens its tamper-resistance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-5800</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: Duke Law Center for Judicial Studies</publisher><subject>Audiovisual materials ; Authenticity ; Blockchain ; Court hearings & proceedings ; Digital currencies ; Evidence ; Judges & magistrates ; Judiciary ; Peer to peer computing ; Trials</subject><ispartof>Judicature, 2021-04, Vol.105 (1), p.36-47</ispartof><rights>Copyright Duke Law Center for Judicial Studies Spring 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zhuhao</creatorcontrib><title>China's E-Justice Revolution</title><title>Judicature</title><description>In recent years, the Supreme People's Court of China (SPC) under Chief Justice Zhou Qiang (Jf 3g) has actively embraced electronic technologies and made a bold move toward e-justice, leading to the technologiz-ing of civil judicial proceedings across China.1 Such an aggressive approach is unprecedented in China and rare in the world, and thus deserves a closer look. [...]it became the subject of heated debate: According to the 2015 Judicial Interpretation on PRC Civil Procedural Law, electronic data refers to "information formed or saved in certain electronic media through an email, electronic data exchange, online conversation record, blog, microblog, cell-phone text message, electronic signature or domain name, etc. An attacker would have to hack all the copies simultaneously to be successful. Besides possessing all the general features of DLT, blockchain utilizes an append-only structure that further strengthens its tamper-resistance.</description><subject>Audiovisual materials</subject><subject>Authenticity</subject><subject>Blockchain</subject><subject>Court hearings & proceedings</subject><subject>Digital currencies</subject><subject>Evidence</subject><subject>Judges & magistrates</subject><subject>Judiciary</subject><subject>Peer to peer computing</subject><subject>Trials</subject><issn>0022-5800</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYeA0MDAy0jW1MDDgYOAqLs4yMDA0MrA042SQcc7IzEtUL1Zw1fUqLS7JTE5VCEoty88pLcnMz-NhYE1LzClO5YXS3AzKbq4hzh66BUX5haWpxSXxWfmlRXlAqXgjUxMDUzMzAwMDY-JUAQCVUSpx</recordid><startdate>20210401</startdate><enddate>20210401</enddate><creator>Wang, Zhuhao</creator><general>Duke Law Center for Judicial Studies</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210401</creationdate><title>China's E-Justice Revolution</title><author>Wang, Zhuhao</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_25405660003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Audiovisual materials</topic><topic>Authenticity</topic><topic>Blockchain</topic><topic>Court hearings & proceedings</topic><topic>Digital currencies</topic><topic>Evidence</topic><topic>Judges & magistrates</topic><topic>Judiciary</topic><topic>Peer to peer computing</topic><topic>Trials</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zhuhao</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Judicature</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Zhuhao</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>China's E-Justice Revolution</atitle><jtitle>Judicature</jtitle><date>2021-04-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>105</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>36</spage><epage>47</epage><pages>36-47</pages><issn>0022-5800</issn><abstract>In recent years, the Supreme People's Court of China (SPC) under Chief Justice Zhou Qiang (Jf 3g) has actively embraced electronic technologies and made a bold move toward e-justice, leading to the technologiz-ing of civil judicial proceedings across China.1 Such an aggressive approach is unprecedented in China and rare in the world, and thus deserves a closer look. [...]it became the subject of heated debate: According to the 2015 Judicial Interpretation on PRC Civil Procedural Law, electronic data refers to "information formed or saved in certain electronic media through an email, electronic data exchange, online conversation record, blog, microblog, cell-phone text message, electronic signature or domain name, etc. An attacker would have to hack all the copies simultaneously to be successful. Besides possessing all the general features of DLT, blockchain utilizes an append-only structure that further strengthens its tamper-resistance.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>Duke Law Center for Judicial Studies</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-5800 |
ispartof | Judicature, 2021-04, Vol.105 (1), p.36-47 |
issn | 0022-5800 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2540566000 |
source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
subjects | Audiovisual materials Authenticity Blockchain Court hearings & proceedings Digital currencies Evidence Judges & magistrates Judiciary Peer to peer computing Trials |
title | China's E-Justice Revolution |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T03%3A31%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=China's%20E-Justice%20Revolution&rft.jtitle=Judicature&rft.au=Wang,%20Zhuhao&rft.date=2021-04-01&rft.volume=105&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=36&rft.epage=47&rft.pages=36-47&rft.issn=0022-5800&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2540566000%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2540566000&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |