Strategies for Meeting Phase 2 GHG and Ultra-Low NOx Emission Standards for Heavy-Duty Diesel Engines

When considered along with Phase 2 Greenhouse Gas (GHG) requirements, the proposed Air Resource Board (ARB) nitrogen oxide (NOₓ) emission limit of 0.02 g/bhp-hr will be very challenging to achieve as the trade-off between fuel consumption and NOₓ emissions is not favorable. To meet any future ultra-...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:SAE International journal of engines 2018-01, Vol.11 (6), p.1109-1122, Article 2018-01-1429
Hauptverfasser: Dahodwala, Mufaddel, Satyum, Joshi, Koehler, Erik, Michael, Franke, Tomazic, Dean
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1122
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1109
container_title SAE International journal of engines
container_volume 11
creator Dahodwala, Mufaddel
Satyum, Joshi
Koehler, Erik
Michael, Franke
Tomazic, Dean
description When considered along with Phase 2 Greenhouse Gas (GHG) requirements, the proposed Air Resource Board (ARB) nitrogen oxide (NOₓ) emission limit of 0.02 g/bhp-hr will be very challenging to achieve as the trade-off between fuel consumption and NOₓ emissions is not favorable. To meet any future ultra-low NOₓ emission regulation, the NOₓ conversion efficiency during the cold start of the emission test cycles needs to be improved. In such a scenario, apart from changes in aftertreatment layout and formulation, additional heating measures will be required. In this article, a physics-based model for an advanced aftertreatment system comprising of a diesel oxidation catalyst (DOC), an SCR-catalyzed diesel particulate filter (SDPF), a stand-alone selective catalytic reduction (SCR), and an ammonia slip catalyst (ASC) was calibrated against experimental data. The calibrated model was then used to evaluate various advanced aftertreatment system configurations that included the application of an electrically heated catalyst, mini-burner, fuel dosing, passive NOₓ adsorber (PNA), and ammonia injection. The advanced aftertreatment system capable of meeting the 0.02 g/bhp-hr NOₓ emission limit with minimum fuel consumption penalty was then coupled to two different advanced engine models. Each of these engine models met the 2027 Phase 2 GHG emission standards but used a different combination of technologies, including downsizing, downspeeding, variable compression ratio (VCR), cylinder deactivation, and turbocompounding. The combined engine and aftertreatment system models were then evaluated on both cold and hot start Heavy-Duty Federal Test Procedure (HD-FTP) test cycles. The results show that with appropriate selection of engine and aftertreatment technology packages, the 2027 Phase 2 GHG emission standards and the proposed 2024 ultra-low NOₓ emission standards can be achieved simultaneously.
doi_str_mv 10.4271/2018-01-1429
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2540543651</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26649151</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26649151</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-a071ed884b8ebb652cdf92c408848650864ebc1b27f0866d9a469e0a873e13013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkNFLwzAQh4MoOKdvvgoBX40maZo2jzLnJkwnzD2HtL3Ojq6dSabuvzelMvEpR-6777gfQpeM3gqesDtOWUooI0xwdYQGTAlJIiXE8aGO5Ck6c25NqUxoRAcIFt4aD6sKHC5bi58BfNWs8Ou7cYA5nkwn2DQFXtaBI7P2C7_Mv_F4UzlXtQ1e-NA0tuiHp2A-9-Rh5_f4IQihxuNmVTXgztFJaWoHF7_vEC0fx2-jKZnNJ0-j-xnJhRSeGJowKNJUZClkmYx5XpSK54KGr1TGNJUCspxlPClDLQtlhFRATZpEwCLKoiG67r1b237swHm9bne2CSs1jwWNRSTjjrrpqdy2zlko9dZWG2P3mlHdBam7IDVlugsy4KTHnQFdNR6C0IfjTf0n_89f9fza-dYe3FxKoVhY_wModnxo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2540543651</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Strategies for Meeting Phase 2 GHG and Ultra-Low NOx Emission Standards for Heavy-Duty Diesel Engines</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Dahodwala, Mufaddel ; Satyum, Joshi ; Koehler, Erik ; Michael, Franke ; Tomazic, Dean</creator><creatorcontrib>Dahodwala, Mufaddel ; Satyum, Joshi ; Koehler, Erik ; Michael, Franke ; Tomazic, Dean</creatorcontrib><description>When considered along with Phase 2 Greenhouse Gas (GHG) requirements, the proposed Air Resource Board (ARB) nitrogen oxide (NOₓ) emission limit of 0.02 g/bhp-hr will be very challenging to achieve as the trade-off between fuel consumption and NOₓ emissions is not favorable. To meet any future ultra-low NOₓ emission regulation, the NOₓ conversion efficiency during the cold start of the emission test cycles needs to be improved. In such a scenario, apart from changes in aftertreatment layout and formulation, additional heating measures will be required. In this article, a physics-based model for an advanced aftertreatment system comprising of a diesel oxidation catalyst (DOC), an SCR-catalyzed diesel particulate filter (SDPF), a stand-alone selective catalytic reduction (SCR), and an ammonia slip catalyst (ASC) was calibrated against experimental data. The calibrated model was then used to evaluate various advanced aftertreatment system configurations that included the application of an electrically heated catalyst, mini-burner, fuel dosing, passive NOₓ adsorber (PNA), and ammonia injection. The advanced aftertreatment system capable of meeting the 0.02 g/bhp-hr NOₓ emission limit with minimum fuel consumption penalty was then coupled to two different advanced engine models. Each of these engine models met the 2027 Phase 2 GHG emission standards but used a different combination of technologies, including downsizing, downspeeding, variable compression ratio (VCR), cylinder deactivation, and turbocompounding. The combined engine and aftertreatment system models were then evaluated on both cold and hot start Heavy-Duty Federal Test Procedure (HD-FTP) test cycles. The results show that with appropriate selection of engine and aftertreatment technology packages, the 2027 Phase 2 GHG emission standards and the proposed 2024 ultra-low NOₓ emission standards can be achieved simultaneously.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1946-3936</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1946-3944</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1946-3944</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4271/2018-01-1429</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Warrendale: SAE International</publisher><subject>Advanced aftertreatment system ; Advanced engine tehcnologies ; ARB ultra-low NOx emission standard ; Cold starts ; Cylinder deactivation ; Diesel engines ; Downsizing ; Downspeeding ; Electrically heated catalyst ; Emission analysis ; Emission standards ; Emissions control ; EPA/NHTSA Phase 2 GHG standards ; Greenhouse gases ; Mini-burner ; Nitrogen oxides ; Variable Compression Ratio</subject><ispartof>SAE International journal of engines, 2018-01, Vol.11 (6), p.1109-1122, Article 2018-01-1429</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2018 SAE International</rights><rights>2018 SAE International. All Rights Reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright SAE International, a Pennsylvania Not-for Profit 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-a071ed884b8ebb652cdf92c408848650864ebc1b27f0866d9a469e0a873e13013</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-a071ed884b8ebb652cdf92c408848650864ebc1b27f0866d9a469e0a873e13013</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26649151$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26649151$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dahodwala, Mufaddel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Satyum, Joshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koehler, Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michael, Franke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomazic, Dean</creatorcontrib><title>Strategies for Meeting Phase 2 GHG and Ultra-Low NOx Emission Standards for Heavy-Duty Diesel Engines</title><title>SAE International journal of engines</title><description>When considered along with Phase 2 Greenhouse Gas (GHG) requirements, the proposed Air Resource Board (ARB) nitrogen oxide (NOₓ) emission limit of 0.02 g/bhp-hr will be very challenging to achieve as the trade-off between fuel consumption and NOₓ emissions is not favorable. To meet any future ultra-low NOₓ emission regulation, the NOₓ conversion efficiency during the cold start of the emission test cycles needs to be improved. In such a scenario, apart from changes in aftertreatment layout and formulation, additional heating measures will be required. In this article, a physics-based model for an advanced aftertreatment system comprising of a diesel oxidation catalyst (DOC), an SCR-catalyzed diesel particulate filter (SDPF), a stand-alone selective catalytic reduction (SCR), and an ammonia slip catalyst (ASC) was calibrated against experimental data. The calibrated model was then used to evaluate various advanced aftertreatment system configurations that included the application of an electrically heated catalyst, mini-burner, fuel dosing, passive NOₓ adsorber (PNA), and ammonia injection. The advanced aftertreatment system capable of meeting the 0.02 g/bhp-hr NOₓ emission limit with minimum fuel consumption penalty was then coupled to two different advanced engine models. Each of these engine models met the 2027 Phase 2 GHG emission standards but used a different combination of technologies, including downsizing, downspeeding, variable compression ratio (VCR), cylinder deactivation, and turbocompounding. The combined engine and aftertreatment system models were then evaluated on both cold and hot start Heavy-Duty Federal Test Procedure (HD-FTP) test cycles. The results show that with appropriate selection of engine and aftertreatment technology packages, the 2027 Phase 2 GHG emission standards and the proposed 2024 ultra-low NOₓ emission standards can be achieved simultaneously.</description><subject>Advanced aftertreatment system</subject><subject>Advanced engine tehcnologies</subject><subject>ARB ultra-low NOx emission standard</subject><subject>Cold starts</subject><subject>Cylinder deactivation</subject><subject>Diesel engines</subject><subject>Downsizing</subject><subject>Downspeeding</subject><subject>Electrically heated catalyst</subject><subject>Emission analysis</subject><subject>Emission standards</subject><subject>Emissions control</subject><subject>EPA/NHTSA Phase 2 GHG standards</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Mini-burner</subject><subject>Nitrogen oxides</subject><subject>Variable Compression Ratio</subject><issn>1946-3936</issn><issn>1946-3944</issn><issn>1946-3944</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkNFLwzAQh4MoOKdvvgoBX40maZo2jzLnJkwnzD2HtL3Ojq6dSabuvzelMvEpR-6777gfQpeM3gqesDtOWUooI0xwdYQGTAlJIiXE8aGO5Ck6c25NqUxoRAcIFt4aD6sKHC5bi58BfNWs8Ou7cYA5nkwn2DQFXtaBI7P2C7_Mv_F4UzlXtQ1e-NA0tuiHp2A-9-Rh5_f4IQihxuNmVTXgztFJaWoHF7_vEC0fx2-jKZnNJ0-j-xnJhRSeGJowKNJUZClkmYx5XpSK54KGr1TGNJUCspxlPClDLQtlhFRATZpEwCLKoiG67r1b237swHm9bne2CSs1jwWNRSTjjrrpqdy2zlko9dZWG2P3mlHdBam7IDVlugsy4KTHnQFdNR6C0IfjTf0n_89f9fza-dYe3FxKoVhY_wModnxo</recordid><startdate>20180101</startdate><enddate>20180101</enddate><creator>Dahodwala, Mufaddel</creator><creator>Satyum, Joshi</creator><creator>Koehler, Erik</creator><creator>Michael, Franke</creator><creator>Tomazic, Dean</creator><general>SAE International</general><general>SAE International, a Pennsylvania Not-for Profit</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180101</creationdate><title>Strategies for Meeting Phase 2 GHG and Ultra-Low NOx Emission Standards for Heavy-Duty Diesel Engines</title><author>Dahodwala, Mufaddel ; Satyum, Joshi ; Koehler, Erik ; Michael, Franke ; Tomazic, Dean</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-a071ed884b8ebb652cdf92c408848650864ebc1b27f0866d9a469e0a873e13013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Advanced aftertreatment system</topic><topic>Advanced engine tehcnologies</topic><topic>ARB ultra-low NOx emission standard</topic><topic>Cold starts</topic><topic>Cylinder deactivation</topic><topic>Diesel engines</topic><topic>Downsizing</topic><topic>Downspeeding</topic><topic>Electrically heated catalyst</topic><topic>Emission analysis</topic><topic>Emission standards</topic><topic>Emissions control</topic><topic>EPA/NHTSA Phase 2 GHG standards</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Mini-burner</topic><topic>Nitrogen oxides</topic><topic>Variable Compression Ratio</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dahodwala, Mufaddel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Satyum, Joshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koehler, Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michael, Franke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomazic, Dean</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><jtitle>SAE International journal of engines</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dahodwala, Mufaddel</au><au>Satyum, Joshi</au><au>Koehler, Erik</au><au>Michael, Franke</au><au>Tomazic, Dean</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Strategies for Meeting Phase 2 GHG and Ultra-Low NOx Emission Standards for Heavy-Duty Diesel Engines</atitle><jtitle>SAE International journal of engines</jtitle><date>2018-01-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1109</spage><epage>1122</epage><pages>1109-1122</pages><artnum>2018-01-1429</artnum><issn>1946-3936</issn><issn>1946-3944</issn><eissn>1946-3944</eissn><abstract>When considered along with Phase 2 Greenhouse Gas (GHG) requirements, the proposed Air Resource Board (ARB) nitrogen oxide (NOₓ) emission limit of 0.02 g/bhp-hr will be very challenging to achieve as the trade-off between fuel consumption and NOₓ emissions is not favorable. To meet any future ultra-low NOₓ emission regulation, the NOₓ conversion efficiency during the cold start of the emission test cycles needs to be improved. In such a scenario, apart from changes in aftertreatment layout and formulation, additional heating measures will be required. In this article, a physics-based model for an advanced aftertreatment system comprising of a diesel oxidation catalyst (DOC), an SCR-catalyzed diesel particulate filter (SDPF), a stand-alone selective catalytic reduction (SCR), and an ammonia slip catalyst (ASC) was calibrated against experimental data. The calibrated model was then used to evaluate various advanced aftertreatment system configurations that included the application of an electrically heated catalyst, mini-burner, fuel dosing, passive NOₓ adsorber (PNA), and ammonia injection. The advanced aftertreatment system capable of meeting the 0.02 g/bhp-hr NOₓ emission limit with minimum fuel consumption penalty was then coupled to two different advanced engine models. Each of these engine models met the 2027 Phase 2 GHG emission standards but used a different combination of technologies, including downsizing, downspeeding, variable compression ratio (VCR), cylinder deactivation, and turbocompounding. The combined engine and aftertreatment system models were then evaluated on both cold and hot start Heavy-Duty Federal Test Procedure (HD-FTP) test cycles. The results show that with appropriate selection of engine and aftertreatment technology packages, the 2027 Phase 2 GHG emission standards and the proposed 2024 ultra-low NOₓ emission standards can be achieved simultaneously.</abstract><cop>Warrendale</cop><pub>SAE International</pub><doi>10.4271/2018-01-1429</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1946-3936
ispartof SAE International journal of engines, 2018-01, Vol.11 (6), p.1109-1122, Article 2018-01-1429
issn 1946-3936
1946-3944
1946-3944
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2540543651
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Advanced aftertreatment system
Advanced engine tehcnologies
ARB ultra-low NOx emission standard
Cold starts
Cylinder deactivation
Diesel engines
Downsizing
Downspeeding
Electrically heated catalyst
Emission analysis
Emission standards
Emissions control
EPA/NHTSA Phase 2 GHG standards
Greenhouse gases
Mini-burner
Nitrogen oxides
Variable Compression Ratio
title Strategies for Meeting Phase 2 GHG and Ultra-Low NOx Emission Standards for Heavy-Duty Diesel Engines
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T20%3A19%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Strategies%20for%20Meeting%20Phase%202%20GHG%20and%20Ultra-Low%20NOx%20Emission%20Standards%20for%20Heavy-Duty%20Diesel%20Engines&rft.jtitle=SAE%20International%20journal%20of%20engines&rft.au=Dahodwala,%20Mufaddel&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1109&rft.epage=1122&rft.pages=1109-1122&rft.artnum=2018-01-1429&rft.issn=1946-3936&rft.eissn=1946-3944&rft_id=info:doi/10.4271/2018-01-1429&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26649151%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2540543651&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26649151&rfr_iscdi=true