A Review of How Uncertainties in Management Decisions Are Addressed in Coastal Louisiana Restoration

Louisiana has lost over 4800 km2 of coastal land since 1932, and a large-scale effort to restore coastal Louisiana is underway, guided by Louisiana’s Comprehensive Master Plan for a Sustainable Coast. This paper reviews science-based planning processes to address uncertainties in management decision...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water (Basel) 2021-06, Vol.13 (11), p.1528
Hauptverfasser: Freeman, Angelina M., Pahl, James W., White, Eric D., Langlois, Summer, Lindquist, David C., Raynie, Richard C., Sharp, Leigh Anne
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1528
container_title Water (Basel)
container_volume 13
creator Freeman, Angelina M.
Pahl, James W.
White, Eric D.
Langlois, Summer
Lindquist, David C.
Raynie, Richard C.
Sharp, Leigh Anne
description Louisiana has lost over 4800 km2 of coastal land since 1932, and a large-scale effort to restore coastal Louisiana is underway, guided by Louisiana’s Comprehensive Master Plan for a Sustainable Coast. This paper reviews science-based planning processes to address uncertainties in management decisions, and determine the most effective combination of restoration and flood risk reduction projects to reduce land loss, maintain and restore coastal environments, and sustain communities. The large-scale effort to restore coastal Louisiana is made more challenging by uncertainties in sediment in the Mississippi River, rising sea levels, subsidence, storms, oil and gas activities, flood-control levees, and navigation infrastructure. To inform decision making, CPRA uses structured approaches to incorporate science at all stages of restoration project planning and implementation to: (1) identify alternative management actions, (2) select the management action based on the best available science, and (3) assess performance of the implemented management decisions. Applied science and synthesis initiatives are critical for solving scientific and technical uncertainties in the successive stages of program and project management, from planning, implementation, operations, to monitoring and assessment. The processes developed and lessons learned from planning and implementing restoration in coastal Louisiana are relevant to other vulnerable coastal regions around the globe.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/w13111528
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2539999935</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A793263421</galeid><sourcerecordid>A793263421</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-3a69522153f7722398aa70f3f994afb6f1b3208a7843221d3eca4cc6e157894d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkE1LAzEQhoMoWLQH_0HAk4etSSb7keNSPypUBLHnJc1OSkqb1GRr8d-bUhHfOcwwPO87MITccDYBUOz-wIFzXormjIwEq6GQUvLzf_MlGae0ZllSNU3JRqRv6Tt-OTzQYOksHOjCG4yDdn5wmKjz9FV7vcIt-oE-oHHJBZ9oG5G2fR8xJeyP1DToNOgNnYd9RrIlx6YhRD1k_ppcWL1JOP7tV2Tx9PgxnRXzt-eXaTsvDAAfCtCVKoXgJdi6FgJUo3XNLFilpLbLyvIlCNboupGQsR7QaGlMhbysGyV7uCK3p9xdDJ_7fL9bh330-WQnSlBHQZmpyYla6Q12ztswRG1y9bh1Jni0Lu_bWoGoQAqeDXcng4khpYi220W31fG746w7Pr77ezz8AIU9c3k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2539999935</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Review of How Uncertainties in Management Decisions Are Addressed in Coastal Louisiana Restoration</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Freeman, Angelina M. ; Pahl, James W. ; White, Eric D. ; Langlois, Summer ; Lindquist, David C. ; Raynie, Richard C. ; Sharp, Leigh Anne</creator><creatorcontrib>Freeman, Angelina M. ; Pahl, James W. ; White, Eric D. ; Langlois, Summer ; Lindquist, David C. ; Raynie, Richard C. ; Sharp, Leigh Anne</creatorcontrib><description>Louisiana has lost over 4800 km2 of coastal land since 1932, and a large-scale effort to restore coastal Louisiana is underway, guided by Louisiana’s Comprehensive Master Plan for a Sustainable Coast. This paper reviews science-based planning processes to address uncertainties in management decisions, and determine the most effective combination of restoration and flood risk reduction projects to reduce land loss, maintain and restore coastal environments, and sustain communities. The large-scale effort to restore coastal Louisiana is made more challenging by uncertainties in sediment in the Mississippi River, rising sea levels, subsidence, storms, oil and gas activities, flood-control levees, and navigation infrastructure. To inform decision making, CPRA uses structured approaches to incorporate science at all stages of restoration project planning and implementation to: (1) identify alternative management actions, (2) select the management action based on the best available science, and (3) assess performance of the implemented management decisions. Applied science and synthesis initiatives are critical for solving scientific and technical uncertainties in the successive stages of program and project management, from planning, implementation, operations, to monitoring and assessment. The processes developed and lessons learned from planning and implementing restoration in coastal Louisiana are relevant to other vulnerable coastal regions around the globe.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2073-4441</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2073-4441</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/w13111528</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Coastal environments ; Coastal zone ; Dams ; Decision making ; Environmental economics ; Environmental risk ; Flood control ; Floods ; Fluvial sediments ; Gulf of Mexico ; Levees ; Management decisions ; Management science ; Natural resources ; Netherlands ; Project management ; Project planning ; Risk management ; Risk reduction ; River ecology ; Rivers ; Sea level ; Sea level rise ; Sediments ; Sediments (Geology) ; Storms ; Uncertainty</subject><ispartof>Water (Basel), 2021-06, Vol.13 (11), p.1528</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-3a69522153f7722398aa70f3f994afb6f1b3208a7843221d3eca4cc6e157894d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-3a69522153f7722398aa70f3f994afb6f1b3208a7843221d3eca4cc6e157894d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9747-8320 ; 0000-0003-3568-2286 ; 0000-0003-4555-1503</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Freeman, Angelina M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pahl, James W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Eric D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langlois, Summer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindquist, David C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raynie, Richard C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharp, Leigh Anne</creatorcontrib><title>A Review of How Uncertainties in Management Decisions Are Addressed in Coastal Louisiana Restoration</title><title>Water (Basel)</title><description>Louisiana has lost over 4800 km2 of coastal land since 1932, and a large-scale effort to restore coastal Louisiana is underway, guided by Louisiana’s Comprehensive Master Plan for a Sustainable Coast. This paper reviews science-based planning processes to address uncertainties in management decisions, and determine the most effective combination of restoration and flood risk reduction projects to reduce land loss, maintain and restore coastal environments, and sustain communities. The large-scale effort to restore coastal Louisiana is made more challenging by uncertainties in sediment in the Mississippi River, rising sea levels, subsidence, storms, oil and gas activities, flood-control levees, and navigation infrastructure. To inform decision making, CPRA uses structured approaches to incorporate science at all stages of restoration project planning and implementation to: (1) identify alternative management actions, (2) select the management action based on the best available science, and (3) assess performance of the implemented management decisions. Applied science and synthesis initiatives are critical for solving scientific and technical uncertainties in the successive stages of program and project management, from planning, implementation, operations, to monitoring and assessment. The processes developed and lessons learned from planning and implementing restoration in coastal Louisiana are relevant to other vulnerable coastal regions around the globe.</description><subject>Coastal environments</subject><subject>Coastal zone</subject><subject>Dams</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Environmental economics</subject><subject>Environmental risk</subject><subject>Flood control</subject><subject>Floods</subject><subject>Fluvial sediments</subject><subject>Gulf of Mexico</subject><subject>Levees</subject><subject>Management decisions</subject><subject>Management science</subject><subject>Natural resources</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Project management</subject><subject>Project planning</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Risk reduction</subject><subject>River ecology</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Sea level</subject><subject>Sea level rise</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Sediments (Geology)</subject><subject>Storms</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><issn>2073-4441</issn><issn>2073-4441</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkE1LAzEQhoMoWLQH_0HAk4etSSb7keNSPypUBLHnJc1OSkqb1GRr8d-bUhHfOcwwPO87MITccDYBUOz-wIFzXormjIwEq6GQUvLzf_MlGae0ZllSNU3JRqRv6Tt-OTzQYOksHOjCG4yDdn5wmKjz9FV7vcIt-oE-oHHJBZ9oG5G2fR8xJeyP1DToNOgNnYd9RrIlx6YhRD1k_ppcWL1JOP7tV2Tx9PgxnRXzt-eXaTsvDAAfCtCVKoXgJdi6FgJUo3XNLFilpLbLyvIlCNboupGQsR7QaGlMhbysGyV7uCK3p9xdDJ_7fL9bh330-WQnSlBHQZmpyYla6Q12ztswRG1y9bh1Jni0Lu_bWoGoQAqeDXcng4khpYi220W31fG746w7Pr77ezz8AIU9c3k</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>Freeman, Angelina M.</creator><creator>Pahl, James W.</creator><creator>White, Eric D.</creator><creator>Langlois, Summer</creator><creator>Lindquist, David C.</creator><creator>Raynie, Richard C.</creator><creator>Sharp, Leigh Anne</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9747-8320</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3568-2286</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4555-1503</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>A Review of How Uncertainties in Management Decisions Are Addressed in Coastal Louisiana Restoration</title><author>Freeman, Angelina M. ; Pahl, James W. ; White, Eric D. ; Langlois, Summer ; Lindquist, David C. ; Raynie, Richard C. ; Sharp, Leigh Anne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-3a69522153f7722398aa70f3f994afb6f1b3208a7843221d3eca4cc6e157894d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Coastal environments</topic><topic>Coastal zone</topic><topic>Dams</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Environmental economics</topic><topic>Environmental risk</topic><topic>Flood control</topic><topic>Floods</topic><topic>Fluvial sediments</topic><topic>Gulf of Mexico</topic><topic>Levees</topic><topic>Management decisions</topic><topic>Management science</topic><topic>Natural resources</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Project management</topic><topic>Project planning</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Risk reduction</topic><topic>River ecology</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Sea level</topic><topic>Sea level rise</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Sediments (Geology)</topic><topic>Storms</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Freeman, Angelina M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pahl, James W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Eric D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langlois, Summer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindquist, David C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raynie, Richard C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharp, Leigh Anne</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Water (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Freeman, Angelina M.</au><au>Pahl, James W.</au><au>White, Eric D.</au><au>Langlois, Summer</au><au>Lindquist, David C.</au><au>Raynie, Richard C.</au><au>Sharp, Leigh Anne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Review of How Uncertainties in Management Decisions Are Addressed in Coastal Louisiana Restoration</atitle><jtitle>Water (Basel)</jtitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1528</spage><pages>1528-</pages><issn>2073-4441</issn><eissn>2073-4441</eissn><abstract>Louisiana has lost over 4800 km2 of coastal land since 1932, and a large-scale effort to restore coastal Louisiana is underway, guided by Louisiana’s Comprehensive Master Plan for a Sustainable Coast. This paper reviews science-based planning processes to address uncertainties in management decisions, and determine the most effective combination of restoration and flood risk reduction projects to reduce land loss, maintain and restore coastal environments, and sustain communities. The large-scale effort to restore coastal Louisiana is made more challenging by uncertainties in sediment in the Mississippi River, rising sea levels, subsidence, storms, oil and gas activities, flood-control levees, and navigation infrastructure. To inform decision making, CPRA uses structured approaches to incorporate science at all stages of restoration project planning and implementation to: (1) identify alternative management actions, (2) select the management action based on the best available science, and (3) assess performance of the implemented management decisions. Applied science and synthesis initiatives are critical for solving scientific and technical uncertainties in the successive stages of program and project management, from planning, implementation, operations, to monitoring and assessment. The processes developed and lessons learned from planning and implementing restoration in coastal Louisiana are relevant to other vulnerable coastal regions around the globe.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/w13111528</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9747-8320</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3568-2286</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4555-1503</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2073-4441
ispartof Water (Basel), 2021-06, Vol.13 (11), p.1528
issn 2073-4441
2073-4441
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2539999935
source MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Coastal environments
Coastal zone
Dams
Decision making
Environmental economics
Environmental risk
Flood control
Floods
Fluvial sediments
Gulf of Mexico
Levees
Management decisions
Management science
Natural resources
Netherlands
Project management
Project planning
Risk management
Risk reduction
River ecology
Rivers
Sea level
Sea level rise
Sediments
Sediments (Geology)
Storms
Uncertainty
title A Review of How Uncertainties in Management Decisions Are Addressed in Coastal Louisiana Restoration
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T19%3A22%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Review%20of%20How%20Uncertainties%20in%20Management%20Decisions%20Are%20Addressed%20in%20Coastal%20Louisiana%20Restoration&rft.jtitle=Water%20(Basel)&rft.au=Freeman,%20Angelina%20M.&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1528&rft.pages=1528-&rft.issn=2073-4441&rft.eissn=2073-4441&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/w13111528&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA793263421%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2539999935&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A793263421&rfr_iscdi=true