Does choice of estimators influence conclusions from true metabolizable energy feeding trials?
True metabolizable energy (TME) is a measure of avian dietary quality that accounts for metabolic fecal and endogenous urinary energy losses (EL) of non-dietary origin. The TME is calculated using a bird fed the test diet and an estimate of EL derived from another bird (Paired Bird Correction), the...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal für Ornithologie 2005, Vol.146 (4), p.383-389 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 389 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 383 |
| container_title | Journal für Ornithologie |
| container_volume | 146 |
| creator | Sherfy, Mark H Kirkpatrick, Roy L Webb, Kenneth E. Jr |
| description | True metabolizable energy (TME) is a measure of avian dietary quality that accounts for metabolic fecal and endogenous urinary energy losses (EL) of non-dietary origin. The TME is calculated using a bird fed the test diet and an estimate of EL derived from another bird (Paired Bird Correction), the same bird (Self Correction), or several other birds (Group Mean Correction). We evaluated precision of these estimators by using each to calculate TME of three seed diets in blue-winged teal (Anas discors). The TME varied by |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10336-005-0094-5 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2539905998</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2539905998</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-f9bd74e0263eb2e4a28a5a0afef01e5ec6f37fd1e62e9f8882cbfb94b124ba83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwAzhhiXNg_UriE0K8pUocKFcsO12XVGlc7ORQfj2uwmE10mpmV_MRcsnghgFUt4mBEGUBoPJoWagjMmNS6AJEyY7JDICzohaVOiVnKW0gG4XkM_L1GDDR5ju0DdLgKaah3dohxETb3ncj9nnfhL7pxtSGPlEfw5YOcUS6xcG60LW_1nVIsce43lOPuGr7dXa0tkt35-TEZ8WLf52T5fPT8uG1WLy_vD3cL4pGSBgKr92qkgi8FOg4SstrqyxYjx4YKmxKLyq_Ylhy1L6ua94477R0jEtnazEn19PZXQw_Y-5gNmGMff5ouBJag9L64GKTq4khpYje7GIuG_eGgTlQNBNFk-GYA0WjcuZqyngbjF3HNpnPDw5MANRSl0KJP6WRcHc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2539905998</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does choice of estimators influence conclusions from true metabolizable energy feeding trials?</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Sherfy, Mark H ; Kirkpatrick, Roy L ; Webb, Kenneth E. Jr</creator><creatorcontrib>Sherfy, Mark H ; Kirkpatrick, Roy L ; Webb, Kenneth E. Jr</creatorcontrib><description>True metabolizable energy (TME) is a measure of avian dietary quality that accounts for metabolic fecal and endogenous urinary energy losses (EL) of non-dietary origin. The TME is calculated using a bird fed the test diet and an estimate of EL derived from another bird (Paired Bird Correction), the same bird (Self Correction), or several other birds (Group Mean Correction). We evaluated precision of these estimators by using each to calculate TME of three seed diets in blue-winged teal (Anas discors). The TME varied by <2% among estimators for all three diets, and Self Correction produced the least variable TMEs for each. The TME did not differ between estimators in nine paired comparisons within diets, but variation between estimators within individual birds was sufficient to be of practical consequence. Although differences in precision among methods were slight, Self Correction required the lowest sample size to achieve a given precision. Feeding trial methods that minimize variation among individuals have several desirable properties, including higher precision of TME estimates and more rigorous experimental control. Consequently, we believe that Self Correction is most likely to accurately represent nutritional value of food items and should be considered the standard method for TME feeding trials.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8375</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2193-7192</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-0361</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2193-7206</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10336-005-0094-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Anas discors ; Avian dietary quality ; Diet ; Energy ; Energy loss ; Feeding trial ; Feeding trials ; Nutritive value ; True metabolizable energy</subject><ispartof>Journal für Ornithologie, 2005, Vol.146 (4), p.383-389</ispartof><rights>Dt. Ornithologen-Gesellschaft e.V. 2005.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-f9bd74e0263eb2e4a28a5a0afef01e5ec6f37fd1e62e9f8882cbfb94b124ba83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-f9bd74e0263eb2e4a28a5a0afef01e5ec6f37fd1e62e9f8882cbfb94b124ba83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sherfy, Mark H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirkpatrick, Roy L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Webb, Kenneth E. Jr</creatorcontrib><title>Does choice of estimators influence conclusions from true metabolizable energy feeding trials?</title><title>Journal für Ornithologie</title><description>True metabolizable energy (TME) is a measure of avian dietary quality that accounts for metabolic fecal and endogenous urinary energy losses (EL) of non-dietary origin. The TME is calculated using a bird fed the test diet and an estimate of EL derived from another bird (Paired Bird Correction), the same bird (Self Correction), or several other birds (Group Mean Correction). We evaluated precision of these estimators by using each to calculate TME of three seed diets in blue-winged teal (Anas discors). The TME varied by <2% among estimators for all three diets, and Self Correction produced the least variable TMEs for each. The TME did not differ between estimators in nine paired comparisons within diets, but variation between estimators within individual birds was sufficient to be of practical consequence. Although differences in precision among methods were slight, Self Correction required the lowest sample size to achieve a given precision. Feeding trial methods that minimize variation among individuals have several desirable properties, including higher precision of TME estimates and more rigorous experimental control. Consequently, we believe that Self Correction is most likely to accurately represent nutritional value of food items and should be considered the standard method for TME feeding trials.</description><subject>Anas discors</subject><subject>Avian dietary quality</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy loss</subject><subject>Feeding trial</subject><subject>Feeding trials</subject><subject>Nutritive value</subject><subject>True metabolizable energy</subject><issn>0021-8375</issn><issn>2193-7192</issn><issn>1439-0361</issn><issn>2193-7206</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwAzhhiXNg_UriE0K8pUocKFcsO12XVGlc7ORQfj2uwmE10mpmV_MRcsnghgFUt4mBEGUBoPJoWagjMmNS6AJEyY7JDICzohaVOiVnKW0gG4XkM_L1GDDR5ju0DdLgKaah3dohxETb3ncj9nnfhL7pxtSGPlEfw5YOcUS6xcG60LW_1nVIsce43lOPuGr7dXa0tkt35-TEZ8WLf52T5fPT8uG1WLy_vD3cL4pGSBgKr92qkgi8FOg4SstrqyxYjx4YKmxKLyq_Ylhy1L6ua94477R0jEtnazEn19PZXQw_Y-5gNmGMff5ouBJag9L64GKTq4khpYje7GIuG_eGgTlQNBNFk-GYA0WjcuZqyngbjF3HNpnPDw5MANRSl0KJP6WRcHc</recordid><startdate>2005</startdate><enddate>2005</enddate><creator>Sherfy, Mark H</creator><creator>Kirkpatrick, Roy L</creator><creator>Webb, Kenneth E. Jr</creator><general>Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2005</creationdate><title>Does choice of estimators influence conclusions from true metabolizable energy feeding trials?</title><author>Sherfy, Mark H ; Kirkpatrick, Roy L ; Webb, Kenneth E. Jr</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-f9bd74e0263eb2e4a28a5a0afef01e5ec6f37fd1e62e9f8882cbfb94b124ba83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Anas discors</topic><topic>Avian dietary quality</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy loss</topic><topic>Feeding trial</topic><topic>Feeding trials</topic><topic>Nutritive value</topic><topic>True metabolizable energy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sherfy, Mark H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirkpatrick, Roy L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Webb, Kenneth E. Jr</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal für Ornithologie</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sherfy, Mark H</au><au>Kirkpatrick, Roy L</au><au>Webb, Kenneth E. Jr</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does choice of estimators influence conclusions from true metabolizable energy feeding trials?</atitle><jtitle>Journal für Ornithologie</jtitle><date>2005</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>146</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>383</spage><epage>389</epage><pages>383-389</pages><issn>0021-8375</issn><issn>2193-7192</issn><eissn>1439-0361</eissn><eissn>2193-7206</eissn><abstract>True metabolizable energy (TME) is a measure of avian dietary quality that accounts for metabolic fecal and endogenous urinary energy losses (EL) of non-dietary origin. The TME is calculated using a bird fed the test diet and an estimate of EL derived from another bird (Paired Bird Correction), the same bird (Self Correction), or several other birds (Group Mean Correction). We evaluated precision of these estimators by using each to calculate TME of three seed diets in blue-winged teal (Anas discors). The TME varied by <2% among estimators for all three diets, and Self Correction produced the least variable TMEs for each. The TME did not differ between estimators in nine paired comparisons within diets, but variation between estimators within individual birds was sufficient to be of practical consequence. Although differences in precision among methods were slight, Self Correction required the lowest sample size to achieve a given precision. Feeding trial methods that minimize variation among individuals have several desirable properties, including higher precision of TME estimates and more rigorous experimental control. Consequently, we believe that Self Correction is most likely to accurately represent nutritional value of food items and should be considered the standard method for TME feeding trials.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s10336-005-0094-5</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0021-8375 |
| ispartof | Journal für Ornithologie, 2005, Vol.146 (4), p.383-389 |
| issn | 0021-8375 2193-7192 1439-0361 2193-7206 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2539905998 |
| source | SpringerNature Journals |
| subjects | Anas discors Avian dietary quality Diet Energy Energy loss Feeding trial Feeding trials Nutritive value True metabolizable energy |
| title | Does choice of estimators influence conclusions from true metabolizable energy feeding trials? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T13%3A33%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20choice%20of%20estimators%20influence%20conclusions%20from%20true%20metabolizable%20energy%20feeding%20trials?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20f%C3%BCr%20Ornithologie&rft.au=Sherfy,%20Mark%20H&rft.date=2005&rft.volume=146&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=383&rft.epage=389&rft.pages=383-389&rft.issn=0021-8375&rft.eissn=1439-0361&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10336-005-0094-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2539905998%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2539905998&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |