Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale – Version IV (FACES IV): Validation Study in the Portuguese Population

The present study addresses the psychometric properties of the Portuguese translation and adaptation of the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale – version IV (FACES IV). The sample included 1083 individuals from 387 nuclear families, with an average age of 36 years. Besides its sociodem...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of child and family studies 2021-07, Vol.30 (7), p.1650-1663
Hauptverfasser: Sequeira, Joana, Vicente, Henrique Testa, Daniel, Fernanda, Cerveira, Cátia, Silva, Maria Inês, Neves, Sónia, Santo, Helena Espírito, Guadalupe, Sónia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1663
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1650
container_title Journal of child and family studies
container_volume 30
creator Sequeira, Joana
Vicente, Henrique Testa
Daniel, Fernanda
Cerveira, Cátia
Silva, Maria Inês
Neves, Sónia
Santo, Helena Espírito
Guadalupe, Sónia
description The present study addresses the psychometric properties of the Portuguese translation and adaptation of the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale – version IV (FACES IV). The sample included 1083 individuals from 387 nuclear families, with an average age of 36 years. Besides its sociodemographic heterogeneity, the sample also included participants in various family life cycle stages and belonging to different family subsystems. We found overall good to moderate psychometric properties, namely adequate internal consistency, convergent validity, and discriminant ability. However, rigid and enmeshed scales presented weaker results. Normative expectations and cultural bias are discussed. FACES IV appears to be a valid and reliable measure of family dynamics, suitable for research and clinical purposes within the Portuguese context. However, further studies need to be carried out regarding the instruments’ properties in tapping extremely high cohesion (enmeshment) and low flexibility (rigidity) levels. Highlights The Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale - version IV (FACES IV) validation with a large and heterogeneous sample of the Portuguese population. Limitations of previous Portuguese validation efforts were addressed, namely sample homogeneity and lack of adequate measures to address convergent validity. Portuguese FACES IV measures reliably and validly cohesion and flexibility. Family functioning assessed according to different stages of the family life cycle and family subsystem membership.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10826-021-01941-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2539745525</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A664837626</galeid><sourcerecordid>A664837626</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-12493f064a4edb3f221a30967717bd469496cd971eebc7aa1b05eec59c41afb93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1KAzEUhYMoWKsv4CogiC5G8zdJ464MrRYKCtVuQ2Ym006ZztQkI9aV7-Ab-iSmHcGdq3vgfuf-cAA4x-gGIyRuHUYDwiNEcISwZDiiB6CHY0EjMmD0MGjESYQRYcfgxLkVQkgOiOyBj7Fel9UWDnO98Totq9Jvoa5zmDRL48qmhqM3XbXa7-Qs05WB359fcG7svjmZw6vxMBnNgrq-g3Ndlfkv69t8C8sa-qWBT4317aI1bic3bbVHTsFRoStnzn5rH7yMR8_JQzR9vJ8kw2mUUcl8hAmTtECcaWbylBaEYE2R5EJgkeaMSyZ5lkuBjUkzoTVOUWxMFsuMYV2kkvbBRTd3Y5vXcINXq6a1dVipSEylYHEcah9cdtQi_KjKOmtqb979QrfOKTXknA2o4IQHkHRgZhvnrCnUxpZrbbcKI7ULQ3VhqBCG2oehaDDRzuQCXC-M_bvhH9cP3f2MSw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2539745525</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale – Version IV (FACES IV): Validation Study in the Portuguese Population</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Education Source (EBSCOhost)</source><source>SpringerLink_现刊</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Sequeira, Joana ; Vicente, Henrique Testa ; Daniel, Fernanda ; Cerveira, Cátia ; Silva, Maria Inês ; Neves, Sónia ; Santo, Helena Espírito ; Guadalupe, Sónia</creator><creatorcontrib>Sequeira, Joana ; Vicente, Henrique Testa ; Daniel, Fernanda ; Cerveira, Cátia ; Silva, Maria Inês ; Neves, Sónia ; Santo, Helena Espírito ; Guadalupe, Sónia</creatorcontrib><description>The present study addresses the psychometric properties of the Portuguese translation and adaptation of the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale – version IV (FACES IV). The sample included 1083 individuals from 387 nuclear families, with an average age of 36 years. Besides its sociodemographic heterogeneity, the sample also included participants in various family life cycle stages and belonging to different family subsystems. We found overall good to moderate psychometric properties, namely adequate internal consistency, convergent validity, and discriminant ability. However, rigid and enmeshed scales presented weaker results. Normative expectations and cultural bias are discussed. FACES IV appears to be a valid and reliable measure of family dynamics, suitable for research and clinical purposes within the Portuguese context. However, further studies need to be carried out regarding the instruments’ properties in tapping extremely high cohesion (enmeshment) and low flexibility (rigidity) levels. Highlights The Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale - version IV (FACES IV) validation with a large and heterogeneous sample of the Portuguese population. Limitations of previous Portuguese validation efforts were addressed, namely sample homogeneity and lack of adequate measures to address convergent validity. Portuguese FACES IV measures reliably and validly cohesion and flexibility. Family functioning assessed according to different stages of the family life cycle and family subsystem membership.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1062-1024</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2843</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10826-021-01941-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Adaptability ; Adequacy ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Child and School Psychology ; Clinical research ; Convergent validity ; Domestic relations ; Ethnocentrism ; Evaluation ; Expectations ; Families &amp; family life ; Family ; Family Life ; Family relations ; Flexibility ; Homogeneity ; Life cycles ; Measures ; Original Paper ; Psychology ; Psychometrics ; Quantitative psychology ; Social cohesion ; Social Sciences ; Sociodemographics ; Sociology ; Translating and interpreting ; Translation ; Validation studies ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Journal of child and family studies, 2021-07, Vol.30 (7), p.1650-1663</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Springer</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-12493f064a4edb3f221a30967717bd469496cd971eebc7aa1b05eec59c41afb93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-12493f064a4edb3f221a30967717bd469496cd971eebc7aa1b05eec59c41afb93</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2202-1123 ; 0000-0003-4898-3942 ; 0000-0003-2625-3754 ; 0000-0002-5635-2385 ; 0000-0001-5571-9168</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10826-021-01941-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10826-021-01941-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12846,27344,27924,27925,30999,33774,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sequeira, Joana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vicente, Henrique Testa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daniel, Fernanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cerveira, Cátia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Maria Inês</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neves, Sónia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santo, Helena Espírito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guadalupe, Sónia</creatorcontrib><title>Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale – Version IV (FACES IV): Validation Study in the Portuguese Population</title><title>Journal of child and family studies</title><addtitle>J Child Fam Stud</addtitle><description>The present study addresses the psychometric properties of the Portuguese translation and adaptation of the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale – version IV (FACES IV). The sample included 1083 individuals from 387 nuclear families, with an average age of 36 years. Besides its sociodemographic heterogeneity, the sample also included participants in various family life cycle stages and belonging to different family subsystems. We found overall good to moderate psychometric properties, namely adequate internal consistency, convergent validity, and discriminant ability. However, rigid and enmeshed scales presented weaker results. Normative expectations and cultural bias are discussed. FACES IV appears to be a valid and reliable measure of family dynamics, suitable for research and clinical purposes within the Portuguese context. However, further studies need to be carried out regarding the instruments’ properties in tapping extremely high cohesion (enmeshment) and low flexibility (rigidity) levels. Highlights The Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale - version IV (FACES IV) validation with a large and heterogeneous sample of the Portuguese population. Limitations of previous Portuguese validation efforts were addressed, namely sample homogeneity and lack of adequate measures to address convergent validity. Portuguese FACES IV measures reliably and validly cohesion and flexibility. Family functioning assessed according to different stages of the family life cycle and family subsystem membership.</description><subject>Adaptability</subject><subject>Adequacy</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Child and School Psychology</subject><subject>Clinical research</subject><subject>Convergent validity</subject><subject>Domestic relations</subject><subject>Ethnocentrism</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Expectations</subject><subject>Families &amp; family life</subject><subject>Family</subject><subject>Family Life</subject><subject>Family relations</subject><subject>Flexibility</subject><subject>Homogeneity</subject><subject>Life cycles</subject><subject>Measures</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Social cohesion</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Sociodemographics</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Translating and interpreting</subject><subject>Translation</subject><subject>Validation studies</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>1062-1024</issn><issn>1573-2843</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1KAzEUhYMoWKsv4CogiC5G8zdJ464MrRYKCtVuQ2Ym006ZztQkI9aV7-Ab-iSmHcGdq3vgfuf-cAA4x-gGIyRuHUYDwiNEcISwZDiiB6CHY0EjMmD0MGjESYQRYcfgxLkVQkgOiOyBj7Fel9UWDnO98Totq9Jvoa5zmDRL48qmhqM3XbXa7-Qs05WB359fcG7svjmZw6vxMBnNgrq-g3Ndlfkv69t8C8sa-qWBT4317aI1bic3bbVHTsFRoStnzn5rH7yMR8_JQzR9vJ8kw2mUUcl8hAmTtECcaWbylBaEYE2R5EJgkeaMSyZ5lkuBjUkzoTVOUWxMFsuMYV2kkvbBRTd3Y5vXcINXq6a1dVipSEylYHEcah9cdtQi_KjKOmtqb979QrfOKTXknA2o4IQHkHRgZhvnrCnUxpZrbbcKI7ULQ3VhqBCG2oehaDDRzuQCXC-M_bvhH9cP3f2MSw</recordid><startdate>20210701</startdate><enddate>20210701</enddate><creator>Sequeira, Joana</creator><creator>Vicente, Henrique Testa</creator><creator>Daniel, Fernanda</creator><creator>Cerveira, Cátia</creator><creator>Silva, Maria Inês</creator><creator>Neves, Sónia</creator><creator>Santo, Helena Espírito</creator><creator>Guadalupe, Sónia</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2202-1123</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4898-3942</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2625-3754</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5635-2385</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5571-9168</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210701</creationdate><title>Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale – Version IV (FACES IV): Validation Study in the Portuguese Population</title><author>Sequeira, Joana ; Vicente, Henrique Testa ; Daniel, Fernanda ; Cerveira, Cátia ; Silva, Maria Inês ; Neves, Sónia ; Santo, Helena Espírito ; Guadalupe, Sónia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-12493f064a4edb3f221a30967717bd469496cd971eebc7aa1b05eec59c41afb93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adaptability</topic><topic>Adequacy</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Child and School Psychology</topic><topic>Clinical research</topic><topic>Convergent validity</topic><topic>Domestic relations</topic><topic>Ethnocentrism</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Expectations</topic><topic>Families &amp; family life</topic><topic>Family</topic><topic>Family Life</topic><topic>Family relations</topic><topic>Flexibility</topic><topic>Homogeneity</topic><topic>Life cycles</topic><topic>Measures</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Social cohesion</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Sociodemographics</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Translating and interpreting</topic><topic>Translation</topic><topic>Validation studies</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sequeira, Joana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vicente, Henrique Testa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daniel, Fernanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cerveira, Cátia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Maria Inês</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neves, Sónia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santo, Helena Espírito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guadalupe, Sónia</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Education Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of child and family studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sequeira, Joana</au><au>Vicente, Henrique Testa</au><au>Daniel, Fernanda</au><au>Cerveira, Cátia</au><au>Silva, Maria Inês</au><au>Neves, Sónia</au><au>Santo, Helena Espírito</au><au>Guadalupe, Sónia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale – Version IV (FACES IV): Validation Study in the Portuguese Population</atitle><jtitle>Journal of child and family studies</jtitle><stitle>J Child Fam Stud</stitle><date>2021-07-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1650</spage><epage>1663</epage><pages>1650-1663</pages><issn>1062-1024</issn><eissn>1573-2843</eissn><abstract>The present study addresses the psychometric properties of the Portuguese translation and adaptation of the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale – version IV (FACES IV). The sample included 1083 individuals from 387 nuclear families, with an average age of 36 years. Besides its sociodemographic heterogeneity, the sample also included participants in various family life cycle stages and belonging to different family subsystems. We found overall good to moderate psychometric properties, namely adequate internal consistency, convergent validity, and discriminant ability. However, rigid and enmeshed scales presented weaker results. Normative expectations and cultural bias are discussed. FACES IV appears to be a valid and reliable measure of family dynamics, suitable for research and clinical purposes within the Portuguese context. However, further studies need to be carried out regarding the instruments’ properties in tapping extremely high cohesion (enmeshment) and low flexibility (rigidity) levels. Highlights The Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale - version IV (FACES IV) validation with a large and heterogeneous sample of the Portuguese population. Limitations of previous Portuguese validation efforts were addressed, namely sample homogeneity and lack of adequate measures to address convergent validity. Portuguese FACES IV measures reliably and validly cohesion and flexibility. Family functioning assessed according to different stages of the family life cycle and family subsystem membership.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10826-021-01941-3</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2202-1123</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4898-3942</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2625-3754</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5635-2385</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5571-9168</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1062-1024
ispartof Journal of child and family studies, 2021-07, Vol.30 (7), p.1650-1663
issn 1062-1024
1573-2843
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2539745525
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Education Source (EBSCOhost); SpringerLink_现刊; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Adaptability
Adequacy
Behavioral Science and Psychology
Child and School Psychology
Clinical research
Convergent validity
Domestic relations
Ethnocentrism
Evaluation
Expectations
Families & family life
Family
Family Life
Family relations
Flexibility
Homogeneity
Life cycles
Measures
Original Paper
Psychology
Psychometrics
Quantitative psychology
Social cohesion
Social Sciences
Sociodemographics
Sociology
Translating and interpreting
Translation
Validation studies
Validity
title Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale – Version IV (FACES IV): Validation Study in the Portuguese Population
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T05%3A14%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Family%20Adaptability%20and%20Cohesion%20Evaluation%20Scale%20%E2%80%93%20Version%20IV%20(FACES%20IV):%20Validation%20Study%20in%20the%20Portuguese%20Population&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20child%20and%20family%20studies&rft.au=Sequeira,%20Joana&rft.date=2021-07-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1650&rft.epage=1663&rft.pages=1650-1663&rft.issn=1062-1024&rft.eissn=1573-2843&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10826-021-01941-3&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA664837626%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2539745525&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A664837626&rfr_iscdi=true