The effect of vegetation barriers at reducing the transmission of Salmonella and Escherichia coli from animal operations to fresh produce

Due to the recent outbreaks of Salmonella and Escherichia coli in fresh produce in the United States, the transfer of foodborne pathogens between animal feeding operations and fresh produce continues to be a considerable risk. The purpose of this study was to determine if the establishment of a vege...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of food microbiology 2021-06, Vol.347, p.109196, Article 109196
Hauptverfasser: Glaize, Ayanna, Young, Morgan, Harden, Lyndy, Gutierrez-Rodriguez, Eduardo, Thakur, Siddhartha
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 109196
container_title International journal of food microbiology
container_volume 347
creator Glaize, Ayanna
Young, Morgan
Harden, Lyndy
Gutierrez-Rodriguez, Eduardo
Thakur, Siddhartha
description Due to the recent outbreaks of Salmonella and Escherichia coli in fresh produce in the United States, the transfer of foodborne pathogens between animal feeding operations and fresh produce continues to be a considerable risk. The purpose of this study was to determine if the establishment of a vegetation barrier (VB) on small-scale sustainable farms could prevent the transmission of Salmonella and E. coli to nearby fresh produce fields. A 5-layer VB (31 × 49 m) was constructed between a dairy farm, a poultry farm, and a nearby produce field. Fresh produce (i.e., romaine lettuce and tomato), animal feces, and environmental (i.e., air, soil, and barrier) samples were collected for 15 months from 2018 to 2019. Four replicates of soil and fresh produce samples were taken from three plots located 10 m, 61 m, and 122 m away from the respective animal locations and processed for Salmonella and E. coli. Air and vegetative strip samples were sampled at 15-day intervals. Multiple colonies were processed from each positive sample, and a total of 143 positive Salmonella (n = 15) and E. coli (n = 128) isolates were retrieved from the soil, produce, air, and fecal samples. Interestingly, 18.2% of the Salmonella and E. coli isolates (n = 26) were recovered from fresh produce (n = 9) samples. Surprisingly, Salmonella isolates (n = 9) were only found in fecal (n = 3) samples collected from the dairy pasture. Data analysis suggests that the VB is an effective tool at reducing the transmission of E. coli and Salmonella from animal farms to fresh produce fields. However, based on phenotypic and genotypic testing, it is clear that fecal samples from animal farms are not the only source of pathogen contamination. This indicates that the environment (e.g., soil and wind), as well as the initial setup of the farm (e.g., proximity to service roads and produce plot placement), can contribute to the contamination of fresh produce. Our study recommends the need for more effective bioremediation and prevention control measures to use in conjunction with VBs to reduce pathogen transmission. •Vegetation barriers can be used to reduce the transmission of foodborne pathogens.•Vegetation barriers did not act as a sink for foodborne pathogens.•Prevalence of E. coli and Salmonella increase during the Spring and Summer.•E. coli and Salmonella were recovered on lettuce rather than tomato samples.•Vegetation barrier need to be used in conjunction with soil remediation techniques.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2021.109196
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2539557925</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0168160521001550</els_id><sourcerecordid>2539557925</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-b69f41eabb916e17d6350187a61a77006dd4a969c51cc5d8d7bcae1cef21f1e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUcFqGzEUFCEhdp38QlDJeV3Ju9Jax2KSthDoIb4LrfQUa9ldOZJs6Cfkr_tcpyXHnh68N_OGmSHkM2dLzrj80i9D72N0Y7ApLldsxXGvuJIXZM7XrarqRrJLMkfsuuKSiRn5lHPPGBN1za7JrK4Vk6wRc_K23QEF78EWGj09wgsUU0KcaGdSCpAyNYUmcAcbphdaEF2SmfIYcj6hkPNshjFOMAyGmsnRh2x3kILdBUNtHAL1KY54CaMZaNxD-vM-0xLxAnlH9ynid7ghV94MGW7f54JsHx-2m-_V089vPzZfnyrbCFmqTirfcDBdp7gE3jpZC4amjeSmbRmTzjVGSWUFt1a4tWs7a4Bb8CvuOdQLcn9-i7KvB8hF9_GQJlTUK1ErIVqFc0HUGYUB55zA631CA-mX5kyfOtC9_tCBPnWgzx0g9-5d4dCN4P4x_4aOgM0ZAGjziBnrbANMFlxI2IN2MfyHzG9LfqEc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2539557925</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of vegetation barriers at reducing the transmission of Salmonella and Escherichia coli from animal operations to fresh produce</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Glaize, Ayanna ; Young, Morgan ; Harden, Lyndy ; Gutierrez-Rodriguez, Eduardo ; Thakur, Siddhartha</creator><creatorcontrib>Glaize, Ayanna ; Young, Morgan ; Harden, Lyndy ; Gutierrez-Rodriguez, Eduardo ; Thakur, Siddhartha</creatorcontrib><description>Due to the recent outbreaks of Salmonella and Escherichia coli in fresh produce in the United States, the transfer of foodborne pathogens between animal feeding operations and fresh produce continues to be a considerable risk. The purpose of this study was to determine if the establishment of a vegetation barrier (VB) on small-scale sustainable farms could prevent the transmission of Salmonella and E. coli to nearby fresh produce fields. A 5-layer VB (31 × 49 m) was constructed between a dairy farm, a poultry farm, and a nearby produce field. Fresh produce (i.e., romaine lettuce and tomato), animal feces, and environmental (i.e., air, soil, and barrier) samples were collected for 15 months from 2018 to 2019. Four replicates of soil and fresh produce samples were taken from three plots located 10 m, 61 m, and 122 m away from the respective animal locations and processed for Salmonella and E. coli. Air and vegetative strip samples were sampled at 15-day intervals. Multiple colonies were processed from each positive sample, and a total of 143 positive Salmonella (n = 15) and E. coli (n = 128) isolates were retrieved from the soil, produce, air, and fecal samples. Interestingly, 18.2% of the Salmonella and E. coli isolates (n = 26) were recovered from fresh produce (n = 9) samples. Surprisingly, Salmonella isolates (n = 9) were only found in fecal (n = 3) samples collected from the dairy pasture. Data analysis suggests that the VB is an effective tool at reducing the transmission of E. coli and Salmonella from animal farms to fresh produce fields. However, based on phenotypic and genotypic testing, it is clear that fecal samples from animal farms are not the only source of pathogen contamination. This indicates that the environment (e.g., soil and wind), as well as the initial setup of the farm (e.g., proximity to service roads and produce plot placement), can contribute to the contamination of fresh produce. Our study recommends the need for more effective bioremediation and prevention control measures to use in conjunction with VBs to reduce pathogen transmission. •Vegetation barriers can be used to reduce the transmission of foodborne pathogens.•Vegetation barriers did not act as a sink for foodborne pathogens.•Prevalence of E. coli and Salmonella increase during the Spring and Summer.•E. coli and Salmonella were recovered on lettuce rather than tomato samples.•Vegetation barrier need to be used in conjunction with soil remediation techniques.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0168-1605</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3460</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2021.109196</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33906045</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Access roads ; Animals ; Bioremediation ; Cattle ; Contamination ; Dairy ; Dairy farms ; Dairying ; Data analysis ; Distance ; E coli ; Escherichia coli ; Escherichia coli - growth &amp; development ; Escherichia coli - isolation &amp; purification ; Escherichia coli Infections - transmission ; Escherichia coli Infections - veterinary ; Farms ; Feces ; Feces - microbiology ; Foodborne pathogens ; Lactuca - microbiology ; Pasture ; Pathogens ; Poultry ; Poultry - microbiology ; Poultry farming ; Repetitive PCR ; Salmonella ; Salmonella - growth &amp; development ; Salmonella - isolation &amp; purification ; Salmonella Infections, Animal - transmission ; Seasonality ; Soil contamination ; Soils ; Solanum lycopersicum - microbiology ; Sustainable agriculture ; Tomatoes ; Vegetation ; Vegetation effects ; Wind</subject><ispartof>International journal of food microbiology, 2021-06, Vol.347, p.109196, Article 109196</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Jun 2, 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-b69f41eabb916e17d6350187a61a77006dd4a969c51cc5d8d7bcae1cef21f1e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-b69f41eabb916e17d6350187a61a77006dd4a969c51cc5d8d7bcae1cef21f1e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2021.109196$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33906045$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Glaize, Ayanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, Morgan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harden, Lyndy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gutierrez-Rodriguez, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thakur, Siddhartha</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of vegetation barriers at reducing the transmission of Salmonella and Escherichia coli from animal operations to fresh produce</title><title>International journal of food microbiology</title><addtitle>Int J Food Microbiol</addtitle><description>Due to the recent outbreaks of Salmonella and Escherichia coli in fresh produce in the United States, the transfer of foodborne pathogens between animal feeding operations and fresh produce continues to be a considerable risk. The purpose of this study was to determine if the establishment of a vegetation barrier (VB) on small-scale sustainable farms could prevent the transmission of Salmonella and E. coli to nearby fresh produce fields. A 5-layer VB (31 × 49 m) was constructed between a dairy farm, a poultry farm, and a nearby produce field. Fresh produce (i.e., romaine lettuce and tomato), animal feces, and environmental (i.e., air, soil, and barrier) samples were collected for 15 months from 2018 to 2019. Four replicates of soil and fresh produce samples were taken from three plots located 10 m, 61 m, and 122 m away from the respective animal locations and processed for Salmonella and E. coli. Air and vegetative strip samples were sampled at 15-day intervals. Multiple colonies were processed from each positive sample, and a total of 143 positive Salmonella (n = 15) and E. coli (n = 128) isolates were retrieved from the soil, produce, air, and fecal samples. Interestingly, 18.2% of the Salmonella and E. coli isolates (n = 26) were recovered from fresh produce (n = 9) samples. Surprisingly, Salmonella isolates (n = 9) were only found in fecal (n = 3) samples collected from the dairy pasture. Data analysis suggests that the VB is an effective tool at reducing the transmission of E. coli and Salmonella from animal farms to fresh produce fields. However, based on phenotypic and genotypic testing, it is clear that fecal samples from animal farms are not the only source of pathogen contamination. This indicates that the environment (e.g., soil and wind), as well as the initial setup of the farm (e.g., proximity to service roads and produce plot placement), can contribute to the contamination of fresh produce. Our study recommends the need for more effective bioremediation and prevention control measures to use in conjunction with VBs to reduce pathogen transmission. •Vegetation barriers can be used to reduce the transmission of foodborne pathogens.•Vegetation barriers did not act as a sink for foodborne pathogens.•Prevalence of E. coli and Salmonella increase during the Spring and Summer.•E. coli and Salmonella were recovered on lettuce rather than tomato samples.•Vegetation barrier need to be used in conjunction with soil remediation techniques.</description><subject>Access roads</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bioremediation</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Contamination</subject><subject>Dairy</subject><subject>Dairy farms</subject><subject>Dairying</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Distance</subject><subject>E coli</subject><subject>Escherichia coli</subject><subject>Escherichia coli - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Escherichia coli - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Escherichia coli Infections - transmission</subject><subject>Escherichia coli Infections - veterinary</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Feces</subject><subject>Feces - microbiology</subject><subject>Foodborne pathogens</subject><subject>Lactuca - microbiology</subject><subject>Pasture</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Poultry</subject><subject>Poultry - microbiology</subject><subject>Poultry farming</subject><subject>Repetitive PCR</subject><subject>Salmonella</subject><subject>Salmonella - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Salmonella - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Salmonella Infections, Animal - transmission</subject><subject>Seasonality</subject><subject>Soil contamination</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Solanum lycopersicum - microbiology</subject><subject>Sustainable agriculture</subject><subject>Tomatoes</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Vegetation effects</subject><subject>Wind</subject><issn>0168-1605</issn><issn>1879-3460</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUcFqGzEUFCEhdp38QlDJeV3Ju9Jax2KSthDoIb4LrfQUa9ldOZJs6Cfkr_tcpyXHnh68N_OGmSHkM2dLzrj80i9D72N0Y7ApLldsxXGvuJIXZM7XrarqRrJLMkfsuuKSiRn5lHPPGBN1za7JrK4Vk6wRc_K23QEF78EWGj09wgsUU0KcaGdSCpAyNYUmcAcbphdaEF2SmfIYcj6hkPNshjFOMAyGmsnRh2x3kILdBUNtHAL1KY54CaMZaNxD-vM-0xLxAnlH9ynid7ghV94MGW7f54JsHx-2m-_V089vPzZfnyrbCFmqTirfcDBdp7gE3jpZC4amjeSmbRmTzjVGSWUFt1a4tWs7a4Bb8CvuOdQLcn9-i7KvB8hF9_GQJlTUK1ErIVqFc0HUGYUB55zA631CA-mX5kyfOtC9_tCBPnWgzx0g9-5d4dCN4P4x_4aOgM0ZAGjziBnrbANMFlxI2IN2MfyHzG9LfqEc</recordid><startdate>20210602</startdate><enddate>20210602</enddate><creator>Glaize, Ayanna</creator><creator>Young, Morgan</creator><creator>Harden, Lyndy</creator><creator>Gutierrez-Rodriguez, Eduardo</creator><creator>Thakur, Siddhartha</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210602</creationdate><title>The effect of vegetation barriers at reducing the transmission of Salmonella and Escherichia coli from animal operations to fresh produce</title><author>Glaize, Ayanna ; Young, Morgan ; Harden, Lyndy ; Gutierrez-Rodriguez, Eduardo ; Thakur, Siddhartha</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-b69f41eabb916e17d6350187a61a77006dd4a969c51cc5d8d7bcae1cef21f1e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Access roads</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bioremediation</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Contamination</topic><topic>Dairy</topic><topic>Dairy farms</topic><topic>Dairying</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Distance</topic><topic>E coli</topic><topic>Escherichia coli</topic><topic>Escherichia coli - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Escherichia coli - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Escherichia coli Infections - transmission</topic><topic>Escherichia coli Infections - veterinary</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Feces</topic><topic>Feces - microbiology</topic><topic>Foodborne pathogens</topic><topic>Lactuca - microbiology</topic><topic>Pasture</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Poultry</topic><topic>Poultry - microbiology</topic><topic>Poultry farming</topic><topic>Repetitive PCR</topic><topic>Salmonella</topic><topic>Salmonella - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Salmonella - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Salmonella Infections, Animal - transmission</topic><topic>Seasonality</topic><topic>Soil contamination</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Solanum lycopersicum - microbiology</topic><topic>Sustainable agriculture</topic><topic>Tomatoes</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Vegetation effects</topic><topic>Wind</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Glaize, Ayanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, Morgan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harden, Lyndy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gutierrez-Rodriguez, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thakur, Siddhartha</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>International journal of food microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Glaize, Ayanna</au><au>Young, Morgan</au><au>Harden, Lyndy</au><au>Gutierrez-Rodriguez, Eduardo</au><au>Thakur, Siddhartha</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of vegetation barriers at reducing the transmission of Salmonella and Escherichia coli from animal operations to fresh produce</atitle><jtitle>International journal of food microbiology</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Food Microbiol</addtitle><date>2021-06-02</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>347</volume><spage>109196</spage><pages>109196-</pages><artnum>109196</artnum><issn>0168-1605</issn><eissn>1879-3460</eissn><abstract>Due to the recent outbreaks of Salmonella and Escherichia coli in fresh produce in the United States, the transfer of foodborne pathogens between animal feeding operations and fresh produce continues to be a considerable risk. The purpose of this study was to determine if the establishment of a vegetation barrier (VB) on small-scale sustainable farms could prevent the transmission of Salmonella and E. coli to nearby fresh produce fields. A 5-layer VB (31 × 49 m) was constructed between a dairy farm, a poultry farm, and a nearby produce field. Fresh produce (i.e., romaine lettuce and tomato), animal feces, and environmental (i.e., air, soil, and barrier) samples were collected for 15 months from 2018 to 2019. Four replicates of soil and fresh produce samples were taken from three plots located 10 m, 61 m, and 122 m away from the respective animal locations and processed for Salmonella and E. coli. Air and vegetative strip samples were sampled at 15-day intervals. Multiple colonies were processed from each positive sample, and a total of 143 positive Salmonella (n = 15) and E. coli (n = 128) isolates were retrieved from the soil, produce, air, and fecal samples. Interestingly, 18.2% of the Salmonella and E. coli isolates (n = 26) were recovered from fresh produce (n = 9) samples. Surprisingly, Salmonella isolates (n = 9) were only found in fecal (n = 3) samples collected from the dairy pasture. Data analysis suggests that the VB is an effective tool at reducing the transmission of E. coli and Salmonella from animal farms to fresh produce fields. However, based on phenotypic and genotypic testing, it is clear that fecal samples from animal farms are not the only source of pathogen contamination. This indicates that the environment (e.g., soil and wind), as well as the initial setup of the farm (e.g., proximity to service roads and produce plot placement), can contribute to the contamination of fresh produce. Our study recommends the need for more effective bioremediation and prevention control measures to use in conjunction with VBs to reduce pathogen transmission. •Vegetation barriers can be used to reduce the transmission of foodborne pathogens.•Vegetation barriers did not act as a sink for foodborne pathogens.•Prevalence of E. coli and Salmonella increase during the Spring and Summer.•E. coli and Salmonella were recovered on lettuce rather than tomato samples.•Vegetation barrier need to be used in conjunction with soil remediation techniques.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>33906045</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2021.109196</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0168-1605
ispartof International journal of food microbiology, 2021-06, Vol.347, p.109196, Article 109196
issn 0168-1605
1879-3460
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2539557925
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Access roads
Animals
Bioremediation
Cattle
Contamination
Dairy
Dairy farms
Dairying
Data analysis
Distance
E coli
Escherichia coli
Escherichia coli - growth & development
Escherichia coli - isolation & purification
Escherichia coli Infections - transmission
Escherichia coli Infections - veterinary
Farms
Feces
Feces - microbiology
Foodborne pathogens
Lactuca - microbiology
Pasture
Pathogens
Poultry
Poultry - microbiology
Poultry farming
Repetitive PCR
Salmonella
Salmonella - growth & development
Salmonella - isolation & purification
Salmonella Infections, Animal - transmission
Seasonality
Soil contamination
Soils
Solanum lycopersicum - microbiology
Sustainable agriculture
Tomatoes
Vegetation
Vegetation effects
Wind
title The effect of vegetation barriers at reducing the transmission of Salmonella and Escherichia coli from animal operations to fresh produce
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T03%3A50%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20vegetation%20barriers%20at%20reducing%20the%20transmission%20of%20Salmonella%20and%20Escherichia%20coli%20from%20animal%20operations%20to%20fresh%20produce&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20food%20microbiology&rft.au=Glaize,%20Ayanna&rft.date=2021-06-02&rft.volume=347&rft.spage=109196&rft.pages=109196-&rft.artnum=109196&rft.issn=0168-1605&rft.eissn=1879-3460&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2021.109196&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2539557925%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2539557925&rft_id=info:pmid/33906045&rft_els_id=S0168160521001550&rfr_iscdi=true