Evaluating a low‐cost salt mixture in brackish water intensive shrimp (litopenaeus vannamei) production systems

Inland production of marine shrimp provides high‐quality shrimp to consumers. Artificial sea salts are added to local water to provide the essential minerals required by shrimp; however, commercial salts are expensive. An experiment evaluated different combinations of a homemade, least‐cost salt mix...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Aquaculture research 2021-07, Vol.52 (7), p.3087-3092
Hauptverfasser: Tierney, Thomas W., Fleckenstein, Leo J., Ray, Andrew J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3092
container_issue 7
container_start_page 3087
container_title Aquaculture research
container_volume 52
creator Tierney, Thomas W.
Fleckenstein, Leo J.
Ray, Andrew J.
description Inland production of marine shrimp provides high‐quality shrimp to consumers. Artificial sea salts are added to local water to provide the essential minerals required by shrimp; however, commercial salts are expensive. An experiment evaluated different combinations of a homemade, least‐cost salt mixture (LCS) and a common commercial sea salt (CSS). The LCS formulation was made using six salts: NaCl, MgSO4, MgCl2, CaCl2, KCl, and NaHCO3. The five treatments in this study were as follows: 100% LCS, 75/25% LCS/CSS, 50/50% LCS/CSS, 25/75% LCS/CSS, and 100% CSS; each treatment was randomly assigned to four 1 m3 tanks. There were some significant differences between treatments in DO, pH, and nitrite concentration, but these differences were subtle. There were no significant differences in mean weight, growth rate, FCR, biomass, or survival of shrimp. The 100% LCS salt formulation was 65% less expensive than the CSS mixture by weight, and the cost per kg of shrimp produced was 57% lower using the LCS. In fact, even the 50/50% treatment had a significantly (p ≤ 0.05) lower cost kg‐1 shrimp than the 100% CSS treatment. These results indicate that this LCS formulation is suitable for intensive shrimp production, and the cost savings may be substantial.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/are.15152
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2539483328</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2539483328</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3322-962629cb71d161d91d27de1aa3de3aae2fc8407281e1fb96a22d09c05d1b4dbe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM9OwzAMxisEEmNw4A0icWGHjjhtuvY4TeOPNAkJgcStchuPZXRtl6Qbu_EIPCNPQsa44ost62d_9hcEl8CH4OMGDQ1BghRHQQ-iRIYCeHa8r6UMpRy9ngZn1i45h5hH0AvW0w1WHTpdvzFkVbP9_vwqG-uYxcqxlf5wnSGma1YYLN-1XbAtOjK-46i2ekPMLoxetey60q5pqUbqLNtgXeOK9IC1plFd6XRTM7uzjlb2PDiZY2Xp4i_3g5fb6fPkPpw93j1MxrOwjCIhwiwRicjKYgQKElAZKDFSBIiRogiRxLxMYz4SKRDMiyxBIRTPSi4VFLEqKOoHV4e9_oR1R9bly6YztZfMhYyyOPUyqacGB6o0jbWG5nnr30Gzy4Hne0dz72j-66hnbw7sVle0-x_Mx0_Tw8QPSTN69w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2539483328</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating a low‐cost salt mixture in brackish water intensive shrimp (litopenaeus vannamei) production systems</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Tierney, Thomas W. ; Fleckenstein, Leo J. ; Ray, Andrew J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tierney, Thomas W. ; Fleckenstein, Leo J. ; Ray, Andrew J.</creatorcontrib><description>Inland production of marine shrimp provides high‐quality shrimp to consumers. Artificial sea salts are added to local water to provide the essential minerals required by shrimp; however, commercial salts are expensive. An experiment evaluated different combinations of a homemade, least‐cost salt mixture (LCS) and a common commercial sea salt (CSS). The LCS formulation was made using six salts: NaCl, MgSO4, MgCl2, CaCl2, KCl, and NaHCO3. The five treatments in this study were as follows: 100% LCS, 75/25% LCS/CSS, 50/50% LCS/CSS, 25/75% LCS/CSS, and 100% CSS; each treatment was randomly assigned to four 1 m3 tanks. There were some significant differences between treatments in DO, pH, and nitrite concentration, but these differences were subtle. There were no significant differences in mean weight, growth rate, FCR, biomass, or survival of shrimp. The 100% LCS salt formulation was 65% less expensive than the CSS mixture by weight, and the cost per kg of shrimp produced was 57% lower using the LCS. In fact, even the 50/50% treatment had a significantly (p ≤ 0.05) lower cost kg‐1 shrimp than the 100% CSS treatment. These results indicate that this LCS formulation is suitable for intensive shrimp production, and the cost savings may be substantial.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1355-557X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2109</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/are.15152</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Hindawi Limited</publisher><subject>Brackish water ; Calcium chloride ; Cost control ; Growth rate ; hybrid systems ; inland marine aquaculture ; intensive production ; Litopenaeus vannamei ; Magnesium chloride ; Minerals ; Potassium chloride ; RAS ; salt formulation ; Salts ; Shellfish ; shrimp ; Sodium bicarbonate ; Sodium chloride ; Survival ; Tanks ; Weight</subject><ispartof>Aquaculture research, 2021-07, Vol.52 (7), p.3087-3092</ispartof><rights>2021 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3322-962629cb71d161d91d27de1aa3de3aae2fc8407281e1fb96a22d09c05d1b4dbe3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3322-962629cb71d161d91d27de1aa3de3aae2fc8407281e1fb96a22d09c05d1b4dbe3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2235-2624</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fare.15152$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fare.15152$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tierney, Thomas W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fleckenstein, Leo J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ray, Andrew J.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating a low‐cost salt mixture in brackish water intensive shrimp (litopenaeus vannamei) production systems</title><title>Aquaculture research</title><description>Inland production of marine shrimp provides high‐quality shrimp to consumers. Artificial sea salts are added to local water to provide the essential minerals required by shrimp; however, commercial salts are expensive. An experiment evaluated different combinations of a homemade, least‐cost salt mixture (LCS) and a common commercial sea salt (CSS). The LCS formulation was made using six salts: NaCl, MgSO4, MgCl2, CaCl2, KCl, and NaHCO3. The five treatments in this study were as follows: 100% LCS, 75/25% LCS/CSS, 50/50% LCS/CSS, 25/75% LCS/CSS, and 100% CSS; each treatment was randomly assigned to four 1 m3 tanks. There were some significant differences between treatments in DO, pH, and nitrite concentration, but these differences were subtle. There were no significant differences in mean weight, growth rate, FCR, biomass, or survival of shrimp. The 100% LCS salt formulation was 65% less expensive than the CSS mixture by weight, and the cost per kg of shrimp produced was 57% lower using the LCS. In fact, even the 50/50% treatment had a significantly (p ≤ 0.05) lower cost kg‐1 shrimp than the 100% CSS treatment. These results indicate that this LCS formulation is suitable for intensive shrimp production, and the cost savings may be substantial.</description><subject>Brackish water</subject><subject>Calcium chloride</subject><subject>Cost control</subject><subject>Growth rate</subject><subject>hybrid systems</subject><subject>inland marine aquaculture</subject><subject>intensive production</subject><subject>Litopenaeus vannamei</subject><subject>Magnesium chloride</subject><subject>Minerals</subject><subject>Potassium chloride</subject><subject>RAS</subject><subject>salt formulation</subject><subject>Salts</subject><subject>Shellfish</subject><subject>shrimp</subject><subject>Sodium bicarbonate</subject><subject>Sodium chloride</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Tanks</subject><subject>Weight</subject><issn>1355-557X</issn><issn>1365-2109</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM9OwzAMxisEEmNw4A0icWGHjjhtuvY4TeOPNAkJgcStchuPZXRtl6Qbu_EIPCNPQsa44ost62d_9hcEl8CH4OMGDQ1BghRHQQ-iRIYCeHa8r6UMpRy9ngZn1i45h5hH0AvW0w1WHTpdvzFkVbP9_vwqG-uYxcqxlf5wnSGma1YYLN-1XbAtOjK-46i2ekPMLoxetey60q5pqUbqLNtgXeOK9IC1plFd6XRTM7uzjlb2PDiZY2Xp4i_3g5fb6fPkPpw93j1MxrOwjCIhwiwRicjKYgQKElAZKDFSBIiRogiRxLxMYz4SKRDMiyxBIRTPSi4VFLEqKOoHV4e9_oR1R9bly6YztZfMhYyyOPUyqacGB6o0jbWG5nnr30Gzy4Hne0dz72j-66hnbw7sVle0-x_Mx0_Tw8QPSTN69w</recordid><startdate>202107</startdate><enddate>202107</enddate><creator>Tierney, Thomas W.</creator><creator>Fleckenstein, Leo J.</creator><creator>Ray, Andrew J.</creator><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>H99</scope><scope>L.F</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2235-2624</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202107</creationdate><title>Evaluating a low‐cost salt mixture in brackish water intensive shrimp (litopenaeus vannamei) production systems</title><author>Tierney, Thomas W. ; Fleckenstein, Leo J. ; Ray, Andrew J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3322-962629cb71d161d91d27de1aa3de3aae2fc8407281e1fb96a22d09c05d1b4dbe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Brackish water</topic><topic>Calcium chloride</topic><topic>Cost control</topic><topic>Growth rate</topic><topic>hybrid systems</topic><topic>inland marine aquaculture</topic><topic>intensive production</topic><topic>Litopenaeus vannamei</topic><topic>Magnesium chloride</topic><topic>Minerals</topic><topic>Potassium chloride</topic><topic>RAS</topic><topic>salt formulation</topic><topic>Salts</topic><topic>Shellfish</topic><topic>shrimp</topic><topic>Sodium bicarbonate</topic><topic>Sodium chloride</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Tanks</topic><topic>Weight</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tierney, Thomas W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fleckenstein, Leo J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ray, Andrew J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Aquaculture research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tierney, Thomas W.</au><au>Fleckenstein, Leo J.</au><au>Ray, Andrew J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating a low‐cost salt mixture in brackish water intensive shrimp (litopenaeus vannamei) production systems</atitle><jtitle>Aquaculture research</jtitle><date>2021-07</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>3087</spage><epage>3092</epage><pages>3087-3092</pages><issn>1355-557X</issn><eissn>1365-2109</eissn><abstract>Inland production of marine shrimp provides high‐quality shrimp to consumers. Artificial sea salts are added to local water to provide the essential minerals required by shrimp; however, commercial salts are expensive. An experiment evaluated different combinations of a homemade, least‐cost salt mixture (LCS) and a common commercial sea salt (CSS). The LCS formulation was made using six salts: NaCl, MgSO4, MgCl2, CaCl2, KCl, and NaHCO3. The five treatments in this study were as follows: 100% LCS, 75/25% LCS/CSS, 50/50% LCS/CSS, 25/75% LCS/CSS, and 100% CSS; each treatment was randomly assigned to four 1 m3 tanks. There were some significant differences between treatments in DO, pH, and nitrite concentration, but these differences were subtle. There were no significant differences in mean weight, growth rate, FCR, biomass, or survival of shrimp. The 100% LCS salt formulation was 65% less expensive than the CSS mixture by weight, and the cost per kg of shrimp produced was 57% lower using the LCS. In fact, even the 50/50% treatment had a significantly (p ≤ 0.05) lower cost kg‐1 shrimp than the 100% CSS treatment. These results indicate that this LCS formulation is suitable for intensive shrimp production, and the cost savings may be substantial.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Hindawi Limited</pub><doi>10.1111/are.15152</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2235-2624</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1355-557X
ispartof Aquaculture research, 2021-07, Vol.52 (7), p.3087-3092
issn 1355-557X
1365-2109
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2539483328
source Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Brackish water
Calcium chloride
Cost control
Growth rate
hybrid systems
inland marine aquaculture
intensive production
Litopenaeus vannamei
Magnesium chloride
Minerals
Potassium chloride
RAS
salt formulation
Salts
Shellfish
shrimp
Sodium bicarbonate
Sodium chloride
Survival
Tanks
Weight
title Evaluating a low‐cost salt mixture in brackish water intensive shrimp (litopenaeus vannamei) production systems
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T07%3A15%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20a%20low%E2%80%90cost%20salt%20mixture%20in%20brackish%20water%20intensive%20shrimp%20(litopenaeus%20vannamei)%20production%20systems&rft.jtitle=Aquaculture%20research&rft.au=Tierney,%20Thomas%20W.&rft.date=2021-07&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=3087&rft.epage=3092&rft.pages=3087-3092&rft.issn=1355-557X&rft.eissn=1365-2109&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/are.15152&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2539483328%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2539483328&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true