Evolution without History?
This essay is a response to Denis Noble’s argument that the evolutionary synthesis was based on illusory science and that it itself is a kind of illusion. The response includes an historical examination of the relationship between evolutionary biology and molecular biology, along with the importance...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Biosemiotics 2021-04, Vol.14 (1), p.131-134 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 134 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 131 |
| container_title | Biosemiotics |
| container_volume | 14 |
| creator | Smocovitis, Vassiliki Betty |
| description | This essay is a response to Denis Noble’s argument that the evolutionary synthesis was based on illusory science and that it itself is a kind of illusion. The response includes an historical examination of the relationship between evolutionary biology and molecular biology, along with the importance of history in evolutionary biology, which is an historical science. It raises concerns about adherence to one standard evolutionary theory, and urges the reader to consider a more contextualist and historicist approach, one that adopts a more pluralistic view of evolutionary theory. It ends with the provocative question of what evolution would mean if it had no history. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12304-021-09427-x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2539405850</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2539405850</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-1c5ccbd7fad603bb45067150a25870105e0f37262e982ae24c8607573123234d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kLFOwzAQhi0EEqXwAp0qMRvOZzt2JoSq0iJVYoHZShwHUpW62A60b48hCDamu-H__jt9hEwYXDEAdR0ZchAUkFEoBSq6PyIjppWkjEs4_t0FnpKzGNcABTKuR2Qyf_ebPnV-O_3o0ovv03TZxeTD4eacnLTVJrqLnzkmT3fzx9mSrh4W97PbFbWclYkyK62tG9VWTQG8roWEQjEJFUqtgIF00HKFBbpSY-VQWF2Akornl5GLho_J5dC7C_6tdzGZte_DNp80KHkpQGoJOYVDygYfY3Ct2YXutQoHw8B8OTCDA5MdmG8HZp8hPkAxh7fPLvxV_0N9An-CXIA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2539405850</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evolution without History?</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Smocovitis, Vassiliki Betty</creator><creatorcontrib>Smocovitis, Vassiliki Betty</creatorcontrib><description>This essay is a response to Denis Noble’s argument that the evolutionary synthesis was based on illusory science and that it itself is a kind of illusion. The response includes an historical examination of the relationship between evolutionary biology and molecular biology, along with the importance of history in evolutionary biology, which is an historical science. It raises concerns about adherence to one standard evolutionary theory, and urges the reader to consider a more contextualist and historicist approach, one that adopts a more pluralistic view of evolutionary theory. It ends with the provocative question of what evolution would mean if it had no history.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1875-1342</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1875-1350</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12304-021-09427-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Artificial Intelligence ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Commentary ; Evolution ; Evolutionary Biology ; Life Sciences ; Linguistics ; Philosophy of Science ; Psychology</subject><ispartof>Biosemiotics, 2021-04, Vol.14 (1), p.131-134</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-1c5ccbd7fad603bb45067150a25870105e0f37262e982ae24c8607573123234d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-1c5ccbd7fad603bb45067150a25870105e0f37262e982ae24c8607573123234d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12304-021-09427-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12304-021-09427-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smocovitis, Vassiliki Betty</creatorcontrib><title>Evolution without History?</title><title>Biosemiotics</title><addtitle>Biosemiotics</addtitle><description>This essay is a response to Denis Noble’s argument that the evolutionary synthesis was based on illusory science and that it itself is a kind of illusion. The response includes an historical examination of the relationship between evolutionary biology and molecular biology, along with the importance of history in evolutionary biology, which is an historical science. It raises concerns about adherence to one standard evolutionary theory, and urges the reader to consider a more contextualist and historicist approach, one that adopts a more pluralistic view of evolutionary theory. It ends with the provocative question of what evolution would mean if it had no history.</description><subject>Artificial Intelligence</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Commentary</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Evolutionary Biology</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Philosophy of Science</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><issn>1875-1342</issn><issn>1875-1350</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kLFOwzAQhi0EEqXwAp0qMRvOZzt2JoSq0iJVYoHZShwHUpW62A60b48hCDamu-H__jt9hEwYXDEAdR0ZchAUkFEoBSq6PyIjppWkjEs4_t0FnpKzGNcABTKuR2Qyf_ebPnV-O_3o0ovv03TZxeTD4eacnLTVJrqLnzkmT3fzx9mSrh4W97PbFbWclYkyK62tG9VWTQG8roWEQjEJFUqtgIF00HKFBbpSY-VQWF2Akornl5GLho_J5dC7C_6tdzGZte_DNp80KHkpQGoJOYVDygYfY3Ct2YXutQoHw8B8OTCDA5MdmG8HZp8hPkAxh7fPLvxV_0N9An-CXIA</recordid><startdate>20210401</startdate><enddate>20210401</enddate><creator>Smocovitis, Vassiliki Betty</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210401</creationdate><title>Evolution without History?</title><author>Smocovitis, Vassiliki Betty</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-1c5ccbd7fad603bb45067150a25870105e0f37262e982ae24c8607573123234d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Artificial Intelligence</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Commentary</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Evolutionary Biology</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Philosophy of Science</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smocovitis, Vassiliki Betty</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Biosemiotics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smocovitis, Vassiliki Betty</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evolution without History?</atitle><jtitle>Biosemiotics</jtitle><stitle>Biosemiotics</stitle><date>2021-04-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>131</spage><epage>134</epage><pages>131-134</pages><issn>1875-1342</issn><eissn>1875-1350</eissn><abstract>This essay is a response to Denis Noble’s argument that the evolutionary synthesis was based on illusory science and that it itself is a kind of illusion. The response includes an historical examination of the relationship between evolutionary biology and molecular biology, along with the importance of history in evolutionary biology, which is an historical science. It raises concerns about adherence to one standard evolutionary theory, and urges the reader to consider a more contextualist and historicist approach, one that adopts a more pluralistic view of evolutionary theory. It ends with the provocative question of what evolution would mean if it had no history.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s12304-021-09427-x</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1875-1342 |
| ispartof | Biosemiotics, 2021-04, Vol.14 (1), p.131-134 |
| issn | 1875-1342 1875-1350 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2539405850 |
| source | SpringerNature Journals |
| subjects | Artificial Intelligence Biomedical and Life Sciences Commentary Evolution Evolutionary Biology Life Sciences Linguistics Philosophy of Science Psychology |
| title | Evolution without History? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T12%3A58%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evolution%20without%20History?&rft.jtitle=Biosemiotics&rft.au=Smocovitis,%20Vassiliki%20Betty&rft.date=2021-04-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=131&rft.epage=134&rft.pages=131-134&rft.issn=1875-1342&rft.eissn=1875-1350&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12304-021-09427-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2539405850%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2539405850&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |