Concurrent validity of the MacArthur communicative development inventory, the Ages and Stages Questionnaires and the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development: A study in rural China
We aimed to evaluate the validity of the Ages and Stages Questionnaires Edition 3 (ASQ‐3) and the MacArthur communicative development inventory (CDI) as a screening measure for children at risk of language development delay in western rural China, by comparing them to the Bayley Scales of Infant and...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Infant and child development 2021-05, Vol.30 (3), p.n/a |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | n/a |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | |
| container_title | Infant and child development |
| container_volume | 30 |
| creator | Yue, Ai Luo, Xia Jia, Miqi Wang, Boya Gao, Qiufeng Shi, Yaojiang Wang, Shun |
| description | We aimed to evaluate the validity of the Ages and Stages Questionnaires Edition 3 (ASQ‐3) and the MacArthur communicative development inventory (CDI) as a screening measure for children at risk of language development delay in western rural China, by comparing them to the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (BSID‐III). We administered the BSID‐III on 1,079 children (aged 8–24 months) and administered the ASQ‐3 and the CDI to their caregivers. We found a significant, low‐to‐moderate correlation between the three scales. Further, correlation strength increased with age of the child and was stronger when the mother was the primary caregiver. We also found that the sensitivity and specificity of the ASQ‐3 ranged widely. The overall findings suggest that the ASQ‐3 and the CDI may not be very accurate screening tools for identifying language development delays in children, especially those under 17 months or whose primary caregiver is not their mother.
Highlights
We evaluated the accuracy of language sections of three scales (CDI, ASQ‐3 and BSID‐III) for rural children in western China.
Multiple methods were utilized and showed a significant, low‐to‐moderate correlation between the three scales.
Our findings revealed that both ASQ‐3 and CDI are not accurate screening tools for identifying language development delays in children. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/icd.2219 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2537713506</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1296946</ericid><sourcerecordid>2537713506</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3159-d08ec77ac19c057d3d700d120c62f9f4bfca2a12bfe45340cd2fb886c4a5f0e03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UctOwzAQjBBIlIfEDyBZ4sKBwNpJmoZbSQsUFSFEOUdbP6hRahcnKcq_8XE4FJUTpx15Zme0niA4oXBJAdiV5uKSMZrtBD2aMBamHu9uMUv3g4OqegeALKPQC75ya3jjnDQ1WWOpha5bYhWpF5I8Ih-6etE4wu1y2RjNsdZrSYRcy9Kult2ONms_rGsvflaGb7IiaAR5qbGDz42sam2NQe1-mU52g20pW_LCsfSvPm5iFHq3jp9ZIUrpyOgv5ZoMSVU3ovVxxDUOS5IvtMGjYE9hWcnj33kYvN6OZ_l9OH26m-TDacgjmmShgIHkaYqcZhySVEQiBRCUAe8zlal4rjgypGyuZJxEMXDB1Hww6PMYEwUSosPgbOO7cvaju6h4t40zPrJgSZSmNEqg71XnGxV3tqqcVMXK6SW6tqBQdN0Uvpui68ZLTzdS6TTfysYPlGX9LO6swg3_qf0__etTTPLRj983K1Sc8A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2537713506</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Concurrent validity of the MacArthur communicative development inventory, the Ages and Stages Questionnaires and the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development: A study in rural China</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Yue, Ai ; Luo, Xia ; Jia, Miqi ; Wang, Boya ; Gao, Qiufeng ; Shi, Yaojiang ; Wang, Shun</creator><creatorcontrib>Yue, Ai ; Luo, Xia ; Jia, Miqi ; Wang, Boya ; Gao, Qiufeng ; Shi, Yaojiang ; Wang, Shun</creatorcontrib><description>We aimed to evaluate the validity of the Ages and Stages Questionnaires Edition 3 (ASQ‐3) and the MacArthur communicative development inventory (CDI) as a screening measure for children at risk of language development delay in western rural China, by comparing them to the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (BSID‐III). We administered the BSID‐III on 1,079 children (aged 8–24 months) and administered the ASQ‐3 and the CDI to their caregivers. We found a significant, low‐to‐moderate correlation between the three scales. Further, correlation strength increased with age of the child and was stronger when the mother was the primary caregiver. We also found that the sensitivity and specificity of the ASQ‐3 ranged widely. The overall findings suggest that the ASQ‐3 and the CDI may not be very accurate screening tools for identifying language development delays in children, especially those under 17 months or whose primary caregiver is not their mother.
Highlights
We evaluated the accuracy of language sections of three scales (CDI, ASQ‐3 and BSID‐III) for rural children in western China.
Multiple methods were utilized and showed a significant, low‐to‐moderate correlation between the three scales.
Our findings revealed that both ASQ‐3 and CDI are not accurate screening tools for identifying language development delays in children.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1522-7227</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-7219</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/icd.2219</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: Wiley</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Age Differences ; ASQ‐3 ; At risk populations ; Bayley‐III ; Caregivers ; CDI ; Child Development ; Children ; Correlation ; Delayed language acquisition ; Developmental Delays ; Disability Identification ; Foreign Countries ; Infants ; Language acquisition ; language development ; Language Impairments ; Language Skills ; Measures (Individuals) ; Mothers ; Parent Influence ; Questionnaires ; Rural Areas ; rural China ; Screening Tests ; Toddlers ; Validity ; validity test ; Young Children</subject><ispartof>Infant and child development, 2021-05, Vol.30 (3), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2021 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</rights><rights>2021 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3159-d08ec77ac19c057d3d700d120c62f9f4bfca2a12bfe45340cd2fb886c4a5f0e03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3159-d08ec77ac19c057d3d700d120c62f9f4bfca2a12bfe45340cd2fb886c4a5f0e03</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6497-7521</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Ficd.2219$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Ficd.2219$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27922,27923,30997,45572,45573</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1296946$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yue, Ai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Xia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jia, Miqi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Boya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Qiufeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Yaojiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Shun</creatorcontrib><title>Concurrent validity of the MacArthur communicative development inventory, the Ages and Stages Questionnaires and the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development: A study in rural China</title><title>Infant and child development</title><description>We aimed to evaluate the validity of the Ages and Stages Questionnaires Edition 3 (ASQ‐3) and the MacArthur communicative development inventory (CDI) as a screening measure for children at risk of language development delay in western rural China, by comparing them to the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (BSID‐III). We administered the BSID‐III on 1,079 children (aged 8–24 months) and administered the ASQ‐3 and the CDI to their caregivers. We found a significant, low‐to‐moderate correlation between the three scales. Further, correlation strength increased with age of the child and was stronger when the mother was the primary caregiver. We also found that the sensitivity and specificity of the ASQ‐3 ranged widely. The overall findings suggest that the ASQ‐3 and the CDI may not be very accurate screening tools for identifying language development delays in children, especially those under 17 months or whose primary caregiver is not their mother.
Highlights
We evaluated the accuracy of language sections of three scales (CDI, ASQ‐3 and BSID‐III) for rural children in western China.
Multiple methods were utilized and showed a significant, low‐to‐moderate correlation between the three scales.
Our findings revealed that both ASQ‐3 and CDI are not accurate screening tools for identifying language development delays in children.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Age Differences</subject><subject>ASQ‐3</subject><subject>At risk populations</subject><subject>Bayley‐III</subject><subject>Caregivers</subject><subject>CDI</subject><subject>Child Development</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Delayed language acquisition</subject><subject>Developmental Delays</subject><subject>Disability Identification</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Infants</subject><subject>Language acquisition</subject><subject>language development</subject><subject>Language Impairments</subject><subject>Language Skills</subject><subject>Measures (Individuals)</subject><subject>Mothers</subject><subject>Parent Influence</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Rural Areas</subject><subject>rural China</subject><subject>Screening Tests</subject><subject>Toddlers</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>validity test</subject><subject>Young Children</subject><issn>1522-7227</issn><issn>1522-7219</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UctOwzAQjBBIlIfEDyBZ4sKBwNpJmoZbSQsUFSFEOUdbP6hRahcnKcq_8XE4FJUTpx15Zme0niA4oXBJAdiV5uKSMZrtBD2aMBamHu9uMUv3g4OqegeALKPQC75ya3jjnDQ1WWOpha5bYhWpF5I8Ih-6etE4wu1y2RjNsdZrSYRcy9Kult2ONms_rGsvflaGb7IiaAR5qbGDz42sam2NQe1-mU52g20pW_LCsfSvPm5iFHq3jp9ZIUrpyOgv5ZoMSVU3ovVxxDUOS5IvtMGjYE9hWcnj33kYvN6OZ_l9OH26m-TDacgjmmShgIHkaYqcZhySVEQiBRCUAe8zlal4rjgypGyuZJxEMXDB1Hww6PMYEwUSosPgbOO7cvaju6h4t40zPrJgSZSmNEqg71XnGxV3tqqcVMXK6SW6tqBQdN0Uvpui68ZLTzdS6TTfysYPlGX9LO6swg3_qf0__etTTPLRj983K1Sc8A</recordid><startdate>202105</startdate><enddate>202105</enddate><creator>Yue, Ai</creator><creator>Luo, Xia</creator><creator>Jia, Miqi</creator><creator>Wang, Boya</creator><creator>Gao, Qiufeng</creator><creator>Shi, Yaojiang</creator><creator>Wang, Shun</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7T9</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6497-7521</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202105</creationdate><title>Concurrent validity of the MacArthur communicative development inventory, the Ages and Stages Questionnaires and the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development: A study in rural China</title><author>Yue, Ai ; Luo, Xia ; Jia, Miqi ; Wang, Boya ; Gao, Qiufeng ; Shi, Yaojiang ; Wang, Shun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3159-d08ec77ac19c057d3d700d120c62f9f4bfca2a12bfe45340cd2fb886c4a5f0e03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Age Differences</topic><topic>ASQ‐3</topic><topic>At risk populations</topic><topic>Bayley‐III</topic><topic>Caregivers</topic><topic>CDI</topic><topic>Child Development</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Delayed language acquisition</topic><topic>Developmental Delays</topic><topic>Disability Identification</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Infants</topic><topic>Language acquisition</topic><topic>language development</topic><topic>Language Impairments</topic><topic>Language Skills</topic><topic>Measures (Individuals)</topic><topic>Mothers</topic><topic>Parent Influence</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Rural Areas</topic><topic>rural China</topic><topic>Screening Tests</topic><topic>Toddlers</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>validity test</topic><topic>Young Children</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yue, Ai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Xia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jia, Miqi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Boya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Qiufeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Yaojiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Shun</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Infant and child development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yue, Ai</au><au>Luo, Xia</au><au>Jia, Miqi</au><au>Wang, Boya</au><au>Gao, Qiufeng</au><au>Shi, Yaojiang</au><au>Wang, Shun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1296946</ericid><atitle>Concurrent validity of the MacArthur communicative development inventory, the Ages and Stages Questionnaires and the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development: A study in rural China</atitle><jtitle>Infant and child development</jtitle><date>2021-05</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>3</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>1522-7227</issn><eissn>1522-7219</eissn><abstract>We aimed to evaluate the validity of the Ages and Stages Questionnaires Edition 3 (ASQ‐3) and the MacArthur communicative development inventory (CDI) as a screening measure for children at risk of language development delay in western rural China, by comparing them to the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (BSID‐III). We administered the BSID‐III on 1,079 children (aged 8–24 months) and administered the ASQ‐3 and the CDI to their caregivers. We found a significant, low‐to‐moderate correlation between the three scales. Further, correlation strength increased with age of the child and was stronger when the mother was the primary caregiver. We also found that the sensitivity and specificity of the ASQ‐3 ranged widely. The overall findings suggest that the ASQ‐3 and the CDI may not be very accurate screening tools for identifying language development delays in children, especially those under 17 months or whose primary caregiver is not their mother.
Highlights
We evaluated the accuracy of language sections of three scales (CDI, ASQ‐3 and BSID‐III) for rural children in western China.
Multiple methods were utilized and showed a significant, low‐to‐moderate correlation between the three scales.
Our findings revealed that both ASQ‐3 and CDI are not accurate screening tools for identifying language development delays in children.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1002/icd.2219</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6497-7521</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1522-7227 |
| ispartof | Infant and child development, 2021-05, Vol.30 (3), p.n/a |
| issn | 1522-7227 1522-7219 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2537713506 |
| source | Wiley-Blackwell Journals; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
| subjects | Accuracy Age Differences ASQ‐3 At risk populations Bayley‐III Caregivers CDI Child Development Children Correlation Delayed language acquisition Developmental Delays Disability Identification Foreign Countries Infants Language acquisition language development Language Impairments Language Skills Measures (Individuals) Mothers Parent Influence Questionnaires Rural Areas rural China Screening Tests Toddlers Validity validity test Young Children |
| title | Concurrent validity of the MacArthur communicative development inventory, the Ages and Stages Questionnaires and the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development: A study in rural China |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T15%3A30%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Concurrent%20validity%20of%20the%20MacArthur%20communicative%20development%20inventory,%20the%20Ages%20and%20Stages%20Questionnaires%20and%20the%20Bayley%20Scales%20of%20Infant%20and%20Toddler%20Development:%20A%20study%20in%20rural%20China&rft.jtitle=Infant%20and%20child%20development&rft.au=Yue,%20Ai&rft.date=2021-05&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=3&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=1522-7227&rft.eissn=1522-7219&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/icd.2219&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2537713506%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2537713506&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1296946&rfr_iscdi=true |