Divided National Identity and COVID-19: How China Has Become a Symbol of Major Political Cleavage in the Czech Republic
The COVID-19 pandemic has been discussed as strengthening nationalist as opposed to globalist forces around the world. While this may be the case in some countries, in others we can observe an increasing political polarization between the "globalists" and "nationalists" rather than a unification aga...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | China review (Hong Kong, China : 1991) China : 1991), 2021-05, Vol.21 (2), p.35-63 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 63 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 35 |
container_title | China review (Hong Kong, China : 1991) |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Martin Sebeňa Richard Q. Turcsányi |
description | The COVID-19 pandemic has been discussed as strengthening nationalist as opposed to globalist forces around the world. While this may be the case in some countries, in others we can observe an increasing political polarization between the "globalists" and "nationalists" rather than a unification against an "outside enemy." The article presents a case study of the Czech Republic, which has long had a turbulent relationship with China. We show how the coronavirus pandemic has escalated the polarization of Czech politics, in which China has become a symbol of the major political fault line. We argue, first, that the vastly different attitudes of Czech officials vis-à-vis China are not the result of their changing opinions in time. Instead, the electoral reshufflings elevate politicians with significantly different views of China. Second, we argue that although the political division may today appear to be symbolized by its approach toward the Communist legacy, the division actually goes to the 19th-century debate about the Czech national identity. Eventually, we end up with a discussion on how the image of China in a faraway country is being formed to a large extent following the domestic political dynamics rather than being driven by the significantly more powerful China. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2537158028</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><airiti_id>P20181114001_202105_202106070003_202106070003_35_63</airiti_id><jstor_id>27019009</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27019009</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a280t-c8f498ebe02f0320edb8930078c96f9ceaf8331272ffe457c9574aeceae2fa963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkdtu1DAQhiMEEqXtIyCNxHWk8SGxzR2k0F3Uk2jhNvI6Y9ZRNl4Sb6vl6fFqEVWv5vTPJ80_r4oThqwq6xrV65zXGkuOjL8t3s1zjyhlrdhJ8XQRHkNHHdzYFOJoB1h2NKaQ9mDHDprbn8uLkpmPsIhP0KzDaGFhZ_hMLm4ILNzvN6s4QPRwbfs4wV0cQgouc5qB7KP9RRBGSGuC5g-5NXyn7W41BHdWvPF2mOn8Xzwtfnz98tAsyqvby2Xz6aq0XGMqnfbSaFoRco-CI3UrbQSi0s7U3jiyXgvBuOLek6yUM5WSlnKfuLemFqfFhyN3O8XfO5pT28fdlO-cW14JxSqNXGeV_K_qyaXNbqZnoTJSGtXeH_w82MkZR0Ru8tr741o_pzi12yls7LRvuUJmEA_zb8e5DVN25Zl4lz-hGWMSkbUcOcPqGDI9o8XLQlRtLcRfVUSFPw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2537158028</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Divided National Identity and COVID-19: How China Has Become a Symbol of Major Political Cleavage in the Czech Republic</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Martin Sebeňa ; Richard Q. Turcsányi</creator><creatorcontrib>Martin Sebeňa ; Richard Q. Turcsányi</creatorcontrib><description>The COVID-19 pandemic has been discussed as strengthening nationalist as opposed to globalist forces around the world. While this may be the case in some countries, in others we can observe an increasing political polarization between the "globalists" and "nationalists" rather than a unification against an "outside enemy." The article presents a case study of the Czech Republic, which has long had a turbulent relationship with China. We show how the coronavirus pandemic has escalated the polarization of Czech politics, in which China has become a symbol of the major political fault line. We argue, first, that the vastly different attitudes of Czech officials vis-à-vis China are not the result of their changing opinions in time. Instead, the electoral reshufflings elevate politicians with significantly different views of China. Second, we argue that although the political division may today appear to be symbolized by its approach toward the Communist legacy, the division actually goes to the 19th-century debate about the Czech national identity. Eventually, we end up with a discussion on how the image of China in a faraway country is being formed to a large extent following the domestic political dynamics rather than being driven by the significantly more powerful China.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1680-2012</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1015-6607</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hong Kong: 中文大學出版社</publisher><subject>19th century ; Attitudes ; Camps ; Case studies ; Cleavage ; Communism ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; Czech language ; Elections ; Foreign policy ; National identity ; Nationalism ; Pandemics ; Polarization ; Political attitudes ; Political polarization ; Politicians ; Politics ; Public opinion surveys ; Special Issue</subject><ispartof>China review (Hong Kong, China : 1991), 2021-05, Vol.21 (2), p.35-63</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Chinese University of Hong Kong</rights><rights>Copyright Chinese University Press May 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27019009$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27019009$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27866,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Martin Sebeňa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richard Q. Turcsányi</creatorcontrib><title>Divided National Identity and COVID-19: How China Has Become a Symbol of Major Political Cleavage in the Czech Republic</title><title>China review (Hong Kong, China : 1991)</title><description>The COVID-19 pandemic has been discussed as strengthening nationalist as opposed to globalist forces around the world. While this may be the case in some countries, in others we can observe an increasing political polarization between the "globalists" and "nationalists" rather than a unification against an "outside enemy." The article presents a case study of the Czech Republic, which has long had a turbulent relationship with China. We show how the coronavirus pandemic has escalated the polarization of Czech politics, in which China has become a symbol of the major political fault line. We argue, first, that the vastly different attitudes of Czech officials vis-à-vis China are not the result of their changing opinions in time. Instead, the electoral reshufflings elevate politicians with significantly different views of China. Second, we argue that although the political division may today appear to be symbolized by its approach toward the Communist legacy, the division actually goes to the 19th-century debate about the Czech national identity. Eventually, we end up with a discussion on how the image of China in a faraway country is being formed to a large extent following the domestic political dynamics rather than being driven by the significantly more powerful China.</description><subject>19th century</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Camps</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Cleavage</subject><subject>Communism</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Czech language</subject><subject>Elections</subject><subject>Foreign policy</subject><subject>National identity</subject><subject>Nationalism</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Polarization</subject><subject>Political attitudes</subject><subject>Political polarization</subject><subject>Politicians</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Public opinion surveys</subject><subject>Special Issue</subject><issn>1680-2012</issn><issn>1015-6607</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkdtu1DAQhiMEEqXtIyCNxHWk8SGxzR2k0F3Uk2jhNvI6Y9ZRNl4Sb6vl6fFqEVWv5vTPJ80_r4oThqwq6xrV65zXGkuOjL8t3s1zjyhlrdhJ8XQRHkNHHdzYFOJoB1h2NKaQ9mDHDprbn8uLkpmPsIhP0KzDaGFhZ_hMLm4ILNzvN6s4QPRwbfs4wV0cQgouc5qB7KP9RRBGSGuC5g-5NXyn7W41BHdWvPF2mOn8Xzwtfnz98tAsyqvby2Xz6aq0XGMqnfbSaFoRco-CI3UrbQSi0s7U3jiyXgvBuOLek6yUM5WSlnKfuLemFqfFhyN3O8XfO5pT28fdlO-cW14JxSqNXGeV_K_qyaXNbqZnoTJSGtXeH_w82MkZR0Ru8tr741o_pzi12yls7LRvuUJmEA_zb8e5DVN25Zl4lz-hGWMSkbUcOcPqGDI9o8XLQlRtLcRfVUSFPw</recordid><startdate>20210501</startdate><enddate>20210501</enddate><creator>Martin Sebeňa</creator><creator>Richard Q. Turcsányi</creator><general>中文大學出版社</general><general>Chinese University of Hong Kong Press</general><general>The Chinese University of Hong Kong Press</general><general>Chinese University Press</general><scope>188</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RO</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AI</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AXJJW</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BVBZV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FREBS</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210501</creationdate><title>Divided National Identity and COVID-19: How China Has Become a Symbol of Major Political Cleavage in the Czech Republic</title><author>Martin Sebeňa ; Richard Q. Turcsányi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a280t-c8f498ebe02f0320edb8930078c96f9ceaf8331272ffe457c9574aeceae2fa963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>19th century</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Camps</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Cleavage</topic><topic>Communism</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Czech language</topic><topic>Elections</topic><topic>Foreign policy</topic><topic>National identity</topic><topic>Nationalism</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Polarization</topic><topic>Political attitudes</topic><topic>Political polarization</topic><topic>Politicians</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Public opinion surveys</topic><topic>Special Issue</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Martin Sebeňa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richard Q. Turcsányi</creatorcontrib><collection>Airiti Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Asian Business Database</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Asian Business Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>East & South Asia Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>China review (Hong Kong, China : 1991)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Martin Sebeňa</au><au>Richard Q. Turcsányi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Divided National Identity and COVID-19: How China Has Become a Symbol of Major Political Cleavage in the Czech Republic</atitle><jtitle>China review (Hong Kong, China : 1991)</jtitle><date>2021-05-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>35</spage><epage>63</epage><pages>35-63</pages><issn>1680-2012</issn><eissn>1015-6607</eissn><abstract>The COVID-19 pandemic has been discussed as strengthening nationalist as opposed to globalist forces around the world. While this may be the case in some countries, in others we can observe an increasing political polarization between the "globalists" and "nationalists" rather than a unification against an "outside enemy." The article presents a case study of the Czech Republic, which has long had a turbulent relationship with China. We show how the coronavirus pandemic has escalated the polarization of Czech politics, in which China has become a symbol of the major political fault line. We argue, first, that the vastly different attitudes of Czech officials vis-à-vis China are not the result of their changing opinions in time. Instead, the electoral reshufflings elevate politicians with significantly different views of China. Second, we argue that although the political division may today appear to be symbolized by its approach toward the Communist legacy, the division actually goes to the 19th-century debate about the Czech national identity. Eventually, we end up with a discussion on how the image of China in a faraway country is being formed to a large extent following the domestic political dynamics rather than being driven by the significantly more powerful China.</abstract><cop>Hong Kong</cop><pub>中文大學出版社</pub><tpages>29</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1680-2012 |
ispartof | China review (Hong Kong, China : 1991), 2021-05, Vol.21 (2), p.35-63 |
issn | 1680-2012 1015-6607 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2537158028 |
source | PAIS Index; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | 19th century Attitudes Camps Case studies Cleavage Communism Coronaviruses COVID-19 Czech language Elections Foreign policy National identity Nationalism Pandemics Polarization Political attitudes Political polarization Politicians Politics Public opinion surveys Special Issue |
title | Divided National Identity and COVID-19: How China Has Become a Symbol of Major Political Cleavage in the Czech Republic |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T14%3A37%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Divided%20National%20Identity%20and%20COVID-19:%20How%20China%20Has%20Become%20a%20Symbol%20of%20Major%20Political%20Cleavage%20in%20the%20Czech%20Republic&rft.jtitle=China%20review%20(Hong%20Kong,%20China%20:%201991)&rft.au=Martin%20Sebe%C5%88a&rft.date=2021-05-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=35&rft.epage=63&rft.pages=35-63&rft.issn=1680-2012&rft.eissn=1015-6607&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E27019009%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2537158028&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_airiti_id=P20181114001_202105_202106070003_202106070003_35_63&rft_jstor_id=27019009&rfr_iscdi=true |