Dyadic coping and discrete emotions during COVID-19: Connecting the communication theory of resilience with relational uncertainty
The current study applies the communication theory of resilience (CTR) to assess married individuals’ utilization of resilience communication during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. This study examines pathways between communicative resilience processes, relational uncertainty, discrete emot...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of social and personal relationships 2021-06, Vol.38 (6), p.1844-1868 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1868 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 1844 |
| container_title | Journal of social and personal relationships |
| container_volume | 38 |
| creator | Lillie, Helen M. Chernichky-Karcher, Skye Venetis, Maria K. |
| description | The current study applies the communication theory of resilience (CTR) to assess married individuals’ utilization of resilience communication during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. This study examines pathways between communicative resilience processes, relational uncertainty, discrete emotions, and evaluations of dyadic coping. Married individuals (n = 561) were surveyed during April 21–April 29, 2020 using Qualtrics panels. Structural equation analyses revealed that most of the resilience communication processes impacted evaluations of dyadic coping via three indirect pathways, including (a) relational uncertainty, (b) relational uncertainty → anger, and (c) relational uncertainty → fear. The alternative logic of humor did not impact dyadic coping through these indirect pathways, but instead directly, positively impacted dyadic coping. Theoretical and practical implications, limitations, and future research directions are discussed. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/02654075211009302 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2537087700</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_02654075211009302</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2537087700</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-5cef266e21fe1315e3404462a02ac717b6c114319af74b5961d6f9386abc58a13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwANwscU7x2rGdcEMtP5Uq9QJcI9dxWldJXGxHKFeenIQicUCcVjvzzWo1CF0DmQFIeUuo4CmRnAIQkjNCT9AEUkESJkh2iiajn4zAOboIYU8IMMryCfpc9Kq0Gmt3sO0Wq7bEpQ3am2iwaVy0rg247Pxoztdvy0UC-R2eu7Y1Oo5i3Jkh3DRda7Ua8VFxvseuwt4EW1vTaoM_bNwNe_2NqBp3g-ijsm3sL9FZpepgrn7mFL0-PrzMn5PV-mk5v18lmnEeE65NRYUwFCoDDLhhKUlTQRWhSkuQG6EBUga5qmS64bmAUlQ5y4TaaJ4pYFN0c7x78O69MyEWe9f54ZlQUM4kyaQkZKDgSGnvQvCmKg7eNsr3BZBirLr4U_WQmR0zQW3N79X_A1-LmH67</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2537087700</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dyadic coping and discrete emotions during COVID-19: Connecting the communication theory of resilience with relational uncertainty</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Lillie, Helen M. ; Chernichky-Karcher, Skye ; Venetis, Maria K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lillie, Helen M. ; Chernichky-Karcher, Skye ; Venetis, Maria K.</creatorcontrib><description>The current study applies the communication theory of resilience (CTR) to assess married individuals’ utilization of resilience communication during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. This study examines pathways between communicative resilience processes, relational uncertainty, discrete emotions, and evaluations of dyadic coping. Married individuals (n = 561) were surveyed during April 21–April 29, 2020 using Qualtrics panels. Structural equation analyses revealed that most of the resilience communication processes impacted evaluations of dyadic coping via three indirect pathways, including (a) relational uncertainty, (b) relational uncertainty → anger, and (c) relational uncertainty → fear. The alternative logic of humor did not impact dyadic coping through these indirect pathways, but instead directly, positively impacted dyadic coping. Theoretical and practical implications, limitations, and future research directions are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0265-4075</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-3608</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/02654075211009302</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Anger ; Communication ; Communication theory ; Coping ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; Dyads ; Emotions ; Humor ; Marriage ; Pandemics ; Resilience ; Uncertainty</subject><ispartof>Journal of social and personal relationships, 2021-06, Vol.38 (6), p.1844-1868</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-5cef266e21fe1315e3404462a02ac717b6c114319af74b5961d6f9386abc58a13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-5cef266e21fe1315e3404462a02ac717b6c114319af74b5961d6f9386abc58a13</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4355-0929</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/02654075211009302$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/02654075211009302$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,33774,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lillie, Helen M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chernichky-Karcher, Skye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Venetis, Maria K.</creatorcontrib><title>Dyadic coping and discrete emotions during COVID-19: Connecting the communication theory of resilience with relational uncertainty</title><title>Journal of social and personal relationships</title><description>The current study applies the communication theory of resilience (CTR) to assess married individuals’ utilization of resilience communication during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. This study examines pathways between communicative resilience processes, relational uncertainty, discrete emotions, and evaluations of dyadic coping. Married individuals (n = 561) were surveyed during April 21–April 29, 2020 using Qualtrics panels. Structural equation analyses revealed that most of the resilience communication processes impacted evaluations of dyadic coping via three indirect pathways, including (a) relational uncertainty, (b) relational uncertainty → anger, and (c) relational uncertainty → fear. The alternative logic of humor did not impact dyadic coping through these indirect pathways, but instead directly, positively impacted dyadic coping. Theoretical and practical implications, limitations, and future research directions are discussed.</description><subject>Anger</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Communication theory</subject><subject>Coping</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Dyads</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Humor</subject><subject>Marriage</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Resilience</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><issn>0265-4075</issn><issn>1460-3608</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwANwscU7x2rGdcEMtP5Uq9QJcI9dxWldJXGxHKFeenIQicUCcVjvzzWo1CF0DmQFIeUuo4CmRnAIQkjNCT9AEUkESJkh2iiajn4zAOboIYU8IMMryCfpc9Kq0Gmt3sO0Wq7bEpQ3am2iwaVy0rg247Pxoztdvy0UC-R2eu7Y1Oo5i3Jkh3DRda7Ua8VFxvseuwt4EW1vTaoM_bNwNe_2NqBp3g-ijsm3sL9FZpepgrn7mFL0-PrzMn5PV-mk5v18lmnEeE65NRYUwFCoDDLhhKUlTQRWhSkuQG6EBUga5qmS64bmAUlQ5y4TaaJ4pYFN0c7x78O69MyEWe9f54ZlQUM4kyaQkZKDgSGnvQvCmKg7eNsr3BZBirLr4U_WQmR0zQW3N79X_A1-LmH67</recordid><startdate>202106</startdate><enddate>202106</enddate><creator>Lillie, Helen M.</creator><creator>Chernichky-Karcher, Skye</creator><creator>Venetis, Maria K.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4355-0929</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202106</creationdate><title>Dyadic coping and discrete emotions during COVID-19: Connecting the communication theory of resilience with relational uncertainty</title><author>Lillie, Helen M. ; Chernichky-Karcher, Skye ; Venetis, Maria K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-5cef266e21fe1315e3404462a02ac717b6c114319af74b5961d6f9386abc58a13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Anger</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Communication theory</topic><topic>Coping</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Dyads</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Humor</topic><topic>Marriage</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Resilience</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lillie, Helen M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chernichky-Karcher, Skye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Venetis, Maria K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of social and personal relationships</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lillie, Helen M.</au><au>Chernichky-Karcher, Skye</au><au>Venetis, Maria K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dyadic coping and discrete emotions during COVID-19: Connecting the communication theory of resilience with relational uncertainty</atitle><jtitle>Journal of social and personal relationships</jtitle><date>2021-06</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1844</spage><epage>1868</epage><pages>1844-1868</pages><issn>0265-4075</issn><eissn>1460-3608</eissn><abstract>The current study applies the communication theory of resilience (CTR) to assess married individuals’ utilization of resilience communication during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. This study examines pathways between communicative resilience processes, relational uncertainty, discrete emotions, and evaluations of dyadic coping. Married individuals (n = 561) were surveyed during April 21–April 29, 2020 using Qualtrics panels. Structural equation analyses revealed that most of the resilience communication processes impacted evaluations of dyadic coping via three indirect pathways, including (a) relational uncertainty, (b) relational uncertainty → anger, and (c) relational uncertainty → fear. The alternative logic of humor did not impact dyadic coping through these indirect pathways, but instead directly, positively impacted dyadic coping. Theoretical and practical implications, limitations, and future research directions are discussed.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/02654075211009302</doi><tpages>25</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4355-0929</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0265-4075 |
| ispartof | Journal of social and personal relationships, 2021-06, Vol.38 (6), p.1844-1868 |
| issn | 0265-4075 1460-3608 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2537087700 |
| source | Access via SAGE; Sociological Abstracts |
| subjects | Anger Communication Communication theory Coping Coronaviruses COVID-19 Dyads Emotions Humor Marriage Pandemics Resilience Uncertainty |
| title | Dyadic coping and discrete emotions during COVID-19: Connecting the communication theory of resilience with relational uncertainty |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T05%3A56%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dyadic%20coping%20and%20discrete%20emotions%20during%20COVID-19:%20Connecting%20the%20communication%20theory%20of%20resilience%20with%20relational%20uncertainty&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20social%20and%20personal%20relationships&rft.au=Lillie,%20Helen%20M.&rft.date=2021-06&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1844&rft.epage=1868&rft.pages=1844-1868&rft.issn=0265-4075&rft.eissn=1460-3608&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/02654075211009302&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2537087700%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2537087700&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_02654075211009302&rfr_iscdi=true |