Psychosocial Assessment in the Emergency Department: The Experiences of People Presenting With Self-Harm and Suicidality
Background: In the United Kingdom, suicide risk is assessed in the emergency department (ED) in a face-to-face assessment with psychiatric liaison practitioners. This study aimed to explore patient experiences of psychosocial assessment after presenting with self-harm/suicidality. Method: A total of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Crisis : the journal of crisis intervention and suicide prevention 2022-07, Vol.43 (4), p.299-306 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 306 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 299 |
container_title | Crisis : the journal of crisis intervention and suicide prevention |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | Xanthopoulou, Penny Ryan, Mary Lomas, Matthew McCabe, Rose |
description | Background: In the United Kingdom, suicide risk is assessed in
the emergency department (ED) in a face-to-face assessment with psychiatric
liaison practitioners. This study aimed to explore patient experiences of
psychosocial assessment after presenting with self-harm/suicidality.
Method: A total of 28 patients were interviewed within 2
weeks of ED attendance for self-harm/suicidality. Interviews were transcribed
and analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. Results: People
described two different experiences. A therapeutic interaction was about the
"person" and made people feel their life mattered and instilled
hope for the future. This was characterized by: unscripted conversation; warmth
promoting disclosure; psychological exploration of feelings; validation of
distress; and a coproduced care plan. A formulaic assessment was about the
"risk" and made people feel their life did not matter and hopeless
about the future. This was characterized by: feeling judged and not worthy of
help; a focus on risk and form filling; a trivial treatment plan; and loss of
trust in services. Limitations: Our study comprised a single ED
and used a non-diverse sample. Conclusion: Psychosocial
assessment in the ED impacts on hope for people in crisis. A focus on
therapeutic communication that is about the person, as well as the risk,
improves patient experience, decreases distress, and instills hope that life is
worth living. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1027/0227-5910/a000786 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2536591717</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2536591717</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a261t-51c03055b358b1b5f17ed3d4aee97dd8965f0a0a18c24611b4000140923e9f703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwANwicUShu3Ycx8eqlB-pEhzgbDnOhqZqk2Cnh749jlJx2sPM7O43jN0jPCFwtQDOVSo1wsICgCryCzbjKDHlQueXbPavX7ObEHYAWBRSz5j4DCe37ULnGrtPliFQCAdqh6Rpk2FLyfpA_odad0qeqbd-GLVbdlXbfaC785yz75f11-ot3Xy8vq-Wm9TyHIdUogMBUpZCFiWWskZFlagyS6RVVRU6lzVYsFg4nuWIZRY_xww0F6RrBWLOHqa9ve9-jxQGs-uOvo0nDZcijzQKVXTh5HK-C8FTbXrfHKw_GQQzdmNGdjOym3M3MfM4ZWxvTR8biGSN21NwR-8joXG-MZkwmeFaiz87xGST</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2536591717</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Psychosocial Assessment in the Emergency Department: The Experiences of People Presenting With Self-Harm and Suicidality</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>PsyJOURNALS</source><creator>Xanthopoulou, Penny ; Ryan, Mary ; Lomas, Matthew ; McCabe, Rose</creator><creatorcontrib>Xanthopoulou, Penny ; Ryan, Mary ; Lomas, Matthew ; McCabe, Rose</creatorcontrib><description>Background: In the United Kingdom, suicide risk is assessed in
the emergency department (ED) in a face-to-face assessment with psychiatric
liaison practitioners. This study aimed to explore patient experiences of
psychosocial assessment after presenting with self-harm/suicidality.
Method: A total of 28 patients were interviewed within 2
weeks of ED attendance for self-harm/suicidality. Interviews were transcribed
and analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. Results: People
described two different experiences. A therapeutic interaction was about the
"person" and made people feel their life mattered and instilled
hope for the future. This was characterized by: unscripted conversation; warmth
promoting disclosure; psychological exploration of feelings; validation of
distress; and a coproduced care plan. A formulaic assessment was about the
"risk" and made people feel their life did not matter and hopeless
about the future. This was characterized by: feeling judged and not worthy of
help; a focus on risk and form filling; a trivial treatment plan; and loss of
trust in services. Limitations: Our study comprised a single ED
and used a non-diverse sample. Conclusion: Psychosocial
assessment in the ED impacts on hope for people in crisis. A focus on
therapeutic communication that is about the person, as well as the risk,
improves patient experience, decreases distress, and instills hope that life is
worth living.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0227-5910</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2151-2396</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000786</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hogrefe Publishing</publisher><subject>Consultation Liaison Psychiatry ; Distress ; Emergency Services ; Emotions ; Female ; Human ; Male ; Nonsuicidal Self-Injury ; Psychosocial Assessment ; Suicidality ; Suicide</subject><ispartof>Crisis : the journal of crisis intervention and suicide prevention, 2022-07, Vol.43 (4), p.299-306</ispartof><rights>2021 Hogrefe Publishing</rights><rights>2021, Hogrefe Publishing</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a261t-51c03055b358b1b5f17ed3d4aee97dd8965f0a0a18c24611b4000140923e9f703</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1510-3382</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27926,27927</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Xanthopoulou, Penny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lomas, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCabe, Rose</creatorcontrib><title>Psychosocial Assessment in the Emergency Department: The Experiences of People Presenting With Self-Harm and Suicidality</title><title>Crisis : the journal of crisis intervention and suicide prevention</title><description>Background: In the United Kingdom, suicide risk is assessed in
the emergency department (ED) in a face-to-face assessment with psychiatric
liaison practitioners. This study aimed to explore patient experiences of
psychosocial assessment after presenting with self-harm/suicidality.
Method: A total of 28 patients were interviewed within 2
weeks of ED attendance for self-harm/suicidality. Interviews were transcribed
and analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. Results: People
described two different experiences. A therapeutic interaction was about the
"person" and made people feel their life mattered and instilled
hope for the future. This was characterized by: unscripted conversation; warmth
promoting disclosure; psychological exploration of feelings; validation of
distress; and a coproduced care plan. A formulaic assessment was about the
"risk" and made people feel their life did not matter and hopeless
about the future. This was characterized by: feeling judged and not worthy of
help; a focus on risk and form filling; a trivial treatment plan; and loss of
trust in services. Limitations: Our study comprised a single ED
and used a non-diverse sample. Conclusion: Psychosocial
assessment in the ED impacts on hope for people in crisis. A focus on
therapeutic communication that is about the person, as well as the risk,
improves patient experience, decreases distress, and instills hope that life is
worth living.</description><subject>Consultation Liaison Psychiatry</subject><subject>Distress</subject><subject>Emergency Services</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Nonsuicidal Self-Injury</subject><subject>Psychosocial Assessment</subject><subject>Suicidality</subject><subject>Suicide</subject><issn>0227-5910</issn><issn>2151-2396</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwANwicUShu3Ycx8eqlB-pEhzgbDnOhqZqk2Cnh749jlJx2sPM7O43jN0jPCFwtQDOVSo1wsICgCryCzbjKDHlQueXbPavX7ObEHYAWBRSz5j4DCe37ULnGrtPliFQCAdqh6Rpk2FLyfpA_odad0qeqbd-GLVbdlXbfaC785yz75f11-ot3Xy8vq-Wm9TyHIdUogMBUpZCFiWWskZFlagyS6RVVRU6lzVYsFg4nuWIZRY_xww0F6RrBWLOHqa9ve9-jxQGs-uOvo0nDZcijzQKVXTh5HK-C8FTbXrfHKw_GQQzdmNGdjOym3M3MfM4ZWxvTR8biGSN21NwR-8joXG-MZkwmeFaiz87xGST</recordid><startdate>20220701</startdate><enddate>20220701</enddate><creator>Xanthopoulou, Penny</creator><creator>Ryan, Mary</creator><creator>Lomas, Matthew</creator><creator>McCabe, Rose</creator><general>Hogrefe Publishing</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1510-3382</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220701</creationdate><title>Psychosocial Assessment in the Emergency Department</title><author>Xanthopoulou, Penny ; Ryan, Mary ; Lomas, Matthew ; McCabe, Rose</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a261t-51c03055b358b1b5f17ed3d4aee97dd8965f0a0a18c24611b4000140923e9f703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Consultation Liaison Psychiatry</topic><topic>Distress</topic><topic>Emergency Services</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Nonsuicidal Self-Injury</topic><topic>Psychosocial Assessment</topic><topic>Suicidality</topic><topic>Suicide</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Xanthopoulou, Penny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lomas, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCabe, Rose</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Access via APA PsycArticles® (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Crisis : the journal of crisis intervention and suicide prevention</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Xanthopoulou, Penny</au><au>Ryan, Mary</au><au>Lomas, Matthew</au><au>McCabe, Rose</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Psychosocial Assessment in the Emergency Department: The Experiences of People Presenting With Self-Harm and Suicidality</atitle><jtitle>Crisis : the journal of crisis intervention and suicide prevention</jtitle><date>2022-07-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>299</spage><epage>306</epage><pages>299-306</pages><issn>0227-5910</issn><eissn>2151-2396</eissn><abstract>Background: In the United Kingdom, suicide risk is assessed in
the emergency department (ED) in a face-to-face assessment with psychiatric
liaison practitioners. This study aimed to explore patient experiences of
psychosocial assessment after presenting with self-harm/suicidality.
Method: A total of 28 patients were interviewed within 2
weeks of ED attendance for self-harm/suicidality. Interviews were transcribed
and analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. Results: People
described two different experiences. A therapeutic interaction was about the
"person" and made people feel their life mattered and instilled
hope for the future. This was characterized by: unscripted conversation; warmth
promoting disclosure; psychological exploration of feelings; validation of
distress; and a coproduced care plan. A formulaic assessment was about the
"risk" and made people feel their life did not matter and hopeless
about the future. This was characterized by: feeling judged and not worthy of
help; a focus on risk and form filling; a trivial treatment plan; and loss of
trust in services. Limitations: Our study comprised a single ED
and used a non-diverse sample. Conclusion: Psychosocial
assessment in the ED impacts on hope for people in crisis. A focus on
therapeutic communication that is about the person, as well as the risk,
improves patient experience, decreases distress, and instills hope that life is
worth living.</abstract><pub>Hogrefe Publishing</pub><doi>10.1027/0227-5910/a000786</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1510-3382</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0227-5910 |
ispartof | Crisis : the journal of crisis intervention and suicide prevention, 2022-07, Vol.43 (4), p.299-306 |
issn | 0227-5910 2151-2396 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2536591717 |
source | APA PsycARTICLES; PsyJOURNALS |
subjects | Consultation Liaison Psychiatry Distress Emergency Services Emotions Female Human Male Nonsuicidal Self-Injury Psychosocial Assessment Suicidality Suicide |
title | Psychosocial Assessment in the Emergency Department: The Experiences of People Presenting With Self-Harm and Suicidality |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T08%3A32%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Psychosocial%20Assessment%20in%20the%20Emergency%20Department:%20The%20Experiences%20of%20People%20Presenting%20With%20Self-Harm%20and%20Suicidality&rft.jtitle=Crisis%20:%20the%20journal%20of%20crisis%20intervention%20and%20suicide%20prevention&rft.au=Xanthopoulou,%20Penny&rft.date=2022-07-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=299&rft.epage=306&rft.pages=299-306&rft.issn=0227-5910&rft.eissn=2151-2396&rft_id=info:doi/10.1027/0227-5910/a000786&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2536591717%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2536591717&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |