What does resilience imply for development practice? Tools for more coherent programming and evaluation of resilience

Motivation The concept of resilience is widely embraced by practitioners and analysts concerned with development and humanitarian aid. It is less clear how to apply the concept in practice. Purpose Two questions are addressed: What makes resilience programmes distinctive or different? How should eva...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Development policy review 2021-07, Vol.39 (4), p.588-603
Hauptverfasser: Constas, Mark A., Mattioli, Laura, Russo, Luca
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 603
container_issue 4
container_start_page 588
container_title Development policy review
container_volume 39
creator Constas, Mark A.
Mattioli, Laura
Russo, Luca
description Motivation The concept of resilience is widely embraced by practitioners and analysts concerned with development and humanitarian aid. It is less clear how to apply the concept in practice. Purpose Two questions are addressed: What makes resilience programmes distinctive or different? How should evaluations of resilience be conducted? Approach and Methods A typology of applications of resilience to development programming and evaluations is proposed. From considering the requirements of the different uses, two practical tools have been devised: the resilience programming matrix (RPM) and the resilience evaluation matrix (REM). Results or Findings The RPM defines six features of programming for resilience, covering concepts and implementation. The REM defines ten features by which to evaluate resilience, covering evaluation design, data analysis, and reporting. Together they aim to foster greater coherence and consistency in applications of resilience. Conclusions and Policy Implications The two heuristic tools offered should foster more dialogue among programme staff, reviewers and evaluators about resilience programming and evaluation. The conceptual frameworks highlight the distinctive features of the concept of resilience.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/dpr.12518
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2536514467</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2536514467</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3658-92bba76d24fc5340ea46b98285fc7ace2043a58b6e977d60b0a8d699d14edebc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EEqUw8A8sMTGktRPHTiaEyqdUCYSKGC3HvrSpkjjYSVH_PaZhYMHLDX7u3rsHoUtKZjS8uencjMYpzY7QhDIuIsFFfowmJE9JxAVnp-jM-y0hhCWMT9DwsVE9NhY8duCruoJWA66art7j0jpsYAe17Rpoe9w5pftKww1eWVv7w39jHWBtN-BGwq6dapqqXWPVGgw7VQ-qr2yLbfkn4BydlKr2cPFbp-j94X61eIqWL4_Pi9tlpBOeZlEeF4US3MSs1GnCCCjGizyLs7TUQmmIwxEqzQoOuRCGk4KozPA8N5SBgUInU3Q1zg2LfQ7ge7m1g2tDpIzTEEFZUBSo65HSznrvoJSdqxrl9pIS-WNVBqvyYDWw85H9qmrY_w_Ku9e3seMbJI57iw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2536514467</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What does resilience imply for development practice? Tools for more coherent programming and evaluation of resilience</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><creator>Constas, Mark A. ; Mattioli, Laura ; Russo, Luca</creator><creatorcontrib>Constas, Mark A. ; Mattioli, Laura ; Russo, Luca</creatorcontrib><description>Motivation The concept of resilience is widely embraced by practitioners and analysts concerned with development and humanitarian aid. It is less clear how to apply the concept in practice. Purpose Two questions are addressed: What makes resilience programmes distinctive or different? How should evaluations of resilience be conducted? Approach and Methods A typology of applications of resilience to development programming and evaluations is proposed. From considering the requirements of the different uses, two practical tools have been devised: the resilience programming matrix (RPM) and the resilience evaluation matrix (REM). Results or Findings The RPM defines six features of programming for resilience, covering concepts and implementation. The REM defines ten features by which to evaluate resilience, covering evaluation design, data analysis, and reporting. Together they aim to foster greater coherence and consistency in applications of resilience. Conclusions and Policy Implications The two heuristic tools offered should foster more dialogue among programme staff, reviewers and evaluators about resilience programming and evaluation. The conceptual frameworks highlight the distinctive features of the concept of resilience.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0950-6764</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-7679</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/dpr.12518</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>aid practice ; Coherence ; Concepts ; Data analysis ; Development programs ; evaluation ; Heuristic ; Humanitarian aid ; Motivation ; programming ; Resilience</subject><ispartof>Development policy review, 2021-07, Vol.39 (4), p.588-603</ispartof><rights>2021 Overseas Development Institute</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Overseas Development Institute</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3658-92bba76d24fc5340ea46b98285fc7ace2043a58b6e977d60b0a8d699d14edebc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3658-92bba76d24fc5340ea46b98285fc7ace2043a58b6e977d60b0a8d699d14edebc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fdpr.12518$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fdpr.12518$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27845,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Constas, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mattioli, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russo, Luca</creatorcontrib><title>What does resilience imply for development practice? Tools for more coherent programming and evaluation of resilience</title><title>Development policy review</title><description>Motivation The concept of resilience is widely embraced by practitioners and analysts concerned with development and humanitarian aid. It is less clear how to apply the concept in practice. Purpose Two questions are addressed: What makes resilience programmes distinctive or different? How should evaluations of resilience be conducted? Approach and Methods A typology of applications of resilience to development programming and evaluations is proposed. From considering the requirements of the different uses, two practical tools have been devised: the resilience programming matrix (RPM) and the resilience evaluation matrix (REM). Results or Findings The RPM defines six features of programming for resilience, covering concepts and implementation. The REM defines ten features by which to evaluate resilience, covering evaluation design, data analysis, and reporting. Together they aim to foster greater coherence and consistency in applications of resilience. Conclusions and Policy Implications The two heuristic tools offered should foster more dialogue among programme staff, reviewers and evaluators about resilience programming and evaluation. The conceptual frameworks highlight the distinctive features of the concept of resilience.</description><subject>aid practice</subject><subject>Coherence</subject><subject>Concepts</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Development programs</subject><subject>evaluation</subject><subject>Heuristic</subject><subject>Humanitarian aid</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>programming</subject><subject>Resilience</subject><issn>0950-6764</issn><issn>1467-7679</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EEqUw8A8sMTGktRPHTiaEyqdUCYSKGC3HvrSpkjjYSVH_PaZhYMHLDX7u3rsHoUtKZjS8uencjMYpzY7QhDIuIsFFfowmJE9JxAVnp-jM-y0hhCWMT9DwsVE9NhY8duCruoJWA66art7j0jpsYAe17Rpoe9w5pftKww1eWVv7w39jHWBtN-BGwq6dapqqXWPVGgw7VQ-qr2yLbfkn4BydlKr2cPFbp-j94X61eIqWL4_Pi9tlpBOeZlEeF4US3MSs1GnCCCjGizyLs7TUQmmIwxEqzQoOuRCGk4KozPA8N5SBgUInU3Q1zg2LfQ7ge7m1g2tDpIzTEEFZUBSo65HSznrvoJSdqxrl9pIS-WNVBqvyYDWw85H9qmrY_w_Ku9e3seMbJI57iw</recordid><startdate>202107</startdate><enddate>202107</enddate><creator>Constas, Mark A.</creator><creator>Mattioli, Laura</creator><creator>Russo, Luca</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202107</creationdate><title>What does resilience imply for development practice? Tools for more coherent programming and evaluation of resilience</title><author>Constas, Mark A. ; Mattioli, Laura ; Russo, Luca</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3658-92bba76d24fc5340ea46b98285fc7ace2043a58b6e977d60b0a8d699d14edebc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>aid practice</topic><topic>Coherence</topic><topic>Concepts</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Development programs</topic><topic>evaluation</topic><topic>Heuristic</topic><topic>Humanitarian aid</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>programming</topic><topic>Resilience</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Constas, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mattioli, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russo, Luca</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Development policy review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Constas, Mark A.</au><au>Mattioli, Laura</au><au>Russo, Luca</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What does resilience imply for development practice? Tools for more coherent programming and evaluation of resilience</atitle><jtitle>Development policy review</jtitle><date>2021-07</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>588</spage><epage>603</epage><pages>588-603</pages><issn>0950-6764</issn><eissn>1467-7679</eissn><abstract>Motivation The concept of resilience is widely embraced by practitioners and analysts concerned with development and humanitarian aid. It is less clear how to apply the concept in practice. Purpose Two questions are addressed: What makes resilience programmes distinctive or different? How should evaluations of resilience be conducted? Approach and Methods A typology of applications of resilience to development programming and evaluations is proposed. From considering the requirements of the different uses, two practical tools have been devised: the resilience programming matrix (RPM) and the resilience evaluation matrix (REM). Results or Findings The RPM defines six features of programming for resilience, covering concepts and implementation. The REM defines ten features by which to evaluate resilience, covering evaluation design, data analysis, and reporting. Together they aim to foster greater coherence and consistency in applications of resilience. Conclusions and Policy Implications The two heuristic tools offered should foster more dialogue among programme staff, reviewers and evaluators about resilience programming and evaluation. The conceptual frameworks highlight the distinctive features of the concept of resilience.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/dpr.12518</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0950-6764
ispartof Development policy review, 2021-07, Vol.39 (4), p.588-603
issn 0950-6764
1467-7679
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2536514467
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; PAIS Index; Political Science Complete
subjects aid practice
Coherence
Concepts
Data analysis
Development programs
evaluation
Heuristic
Humanitarian aid
Motivation
programming
Resilience
title What does resilience imply for development practice? Tools for more coherent programming and evaluation of resilience
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T16%3A16%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20does%20resilience%20imply%20for%20development%20practice?%20Tools%20for%20more%20coherent%20programming%20and%20evaluation%20of%20resilience&rft.jtitle=Development%20policy%20review&rft.au=Constas,%20Mark%20A.&rft.date=2021-07&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=588&rft.epage=603&rft.pages=588-603&rft.issn=0950-6764&rft.eissn=1467-7679&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/dpr.12518&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2536514467%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2536514467&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true