What does resilience imply for development practice? Tools for more coherent programming and evaluation of resilience
Motivation The concept of resilience is widely embraced by practitioners and analysts concerned with development and humanitarian aid. It is less clear how to apply the concept in practice. Purpose Two questions are addressed: What makes resilience programmes distinctive or different? How should eva...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Development policy review 2021-07, Vol.39 (4), p.588-603 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 603 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 588 |
container_title | Development policy review |
container_volume | 39 |
creator | Constas, Mark A. Mattioli, Laura Russo, Luca |
description | Motivation
The concept of resilience is widely embraced by practitioners and analysts concerned with development and humanitarian aid. It is less clear how to apply the concept in practice.
Purpose
Two questions are addressed: What makes resilience programmes distinctive or different? How should evaluations of resilience be conducted?
Approach and Methods
A typology of applications of resilience to development programming and evaluations is proposed. From considering the requirements of the different uses, two practical tools have been devised: the resilience programming matrix (RPM) and the resilience evaluation matrix (REM).
Results or Findings
The RPM defines six features of programming for resilience, covering concepts and implementation. The REM defines ten features by which to evaluate resilience, covering evaluation design, data analysis, and reporting. Together they aim to foster greater coherence and consistency in applications of resilience.
Conclusions and Policy Implications
The two heuristic tools offered should foster more dialogue among programme staff, reviewers and evaluators about resilience programming and evaluation. The conceptual frameworks highlight the distinctive features of the concept of resilience. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/dpr.12518 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2536514467</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2536514467</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3658-92bba76d24fc5340ea46b98285fc7ace2043a58b6e977d60b0a8d699d14edebc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EEqUw8A8sMTGktRPHTiaEyqdUCYSKGC3HvrSpkjjYSVH_PaZhYMHLDX7u3rsHoUtKZjS8uencjMYpzY7QhDIuIsFFfowmJE9JxAVnp-jM-y0hhCWMT9DwsVE9NhY8duCruoJWA66art7j0jpsYAe17Rpoe9w5pftKww1eWVv7w39jHWBtN-BGwq6dapqqXWPVGgw7VQ-qr2yLbfkn4BydlKr2cPFbp-j94X61eIqWL4_Pi9tlpBOeZlEeF4US3MSs1GnCCCjGizyLs7TUQmmIwxEqzQoOuRCGk4KozPA8N5SBgUInU3Q1zg2LfQ7ge7m1g2tDpIzTEEFZUBSo65HSznrvoJSdqxrl9pIS-WNVBqvyYDWw85H9qmrY_w_Ku9e3seMbJI57iw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2536514467</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What does resilience imply for development practice? Tools for more coherent programming and evaluation of resilience</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><creator>Constas, Mark A. ; Mattioli, Laura ; Russo, Luca</creator><creatorcontrib>Constas, Mark A. ; Mattioli, Laura ; Russo, Luca</creatorcontrib><description>Motivation
The concept of resilience is widely embraced by practitioners and analysts concerned with development and humanitarian aid. It is less clear how to apply the concept in practice.
Purpose
Two questions are addressed: What makes resilience programmes distinctive or different? How should evaluations of resilience be conducted?
Approach and Methods
A typology of applications of resilience to development programming and evaluations is proposed. From considering the requirements of the different uses, two practical tools have been devised: the resilience programming matrix (RPM) and the resilience evaluation matrix (REM).
Results or Findings
The RPM defines six features of programming for resilience, covering concepts and implementation. The REM defines ten features by which to evaluate resilience, covering evaluation design, data analysis, and reporting. Together they aim to foster greater coherence and consistency in applications of resilience.
Conclusions and Policy Implications
The two heuristic tools offered should foster more dialogue among programme staff, reviewers and evaluators about resilience programming and evaluation. The conceptual frameworks highlight the distinctive features of the concept of resilience.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0950-6764</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-7679</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/dpr.12518</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>aid practice ; Coherence ; Concepts ; Data analysis ; Development programs ; evaluation ; Heuristic ; Humanitarian aid ; Motivation ; programming ; Resilience</subject><ispartof>Development policy review, 2021-07, Vol.39 (4), p.588-603</ispartof><rights>2021 Overseas Development Institute</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Overseas Development Institute</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3658-92bba76d24fc5340ea46b98285fc7ace2043a58b6e977d60b0a8d699d14edebc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3658-92bba76d24fc5340ea46b98285fc7ace2043a58b6e977d60b0a8d699d14edebc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fdpr.12518$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fdpr.12518$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27845,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Constas, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mattioli, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russo, Luca</creatorcontrib><title>What does resilience imply for development practice? Tools for more coherent programming and evaluation of resilience</title><title>Development policy review</title><description>Motivation
The concept of resilience is widely embraced by practitioners and analysts concerned with development and humanitarian aid. It is less clear how to apply the concept in practice.
Purpose
Two questions are addressed: What makes resilience programmes distinctive or different? How should evaluations of resilience be conducted?
Approach and Methods
A typology of applications of resilience to development programming and evaluations is proposed. From considering the requirements of the different uses, two practical tools have been devised: the resilience programming matrix (RPM) and the resilience evaluation matrix (REM).
Results or Findings
The RPM defines six features of programming for resilience, covering concepts and implementation. The REM defines ten features by which to evaluate resilience, covering evaluation design, data analysis, and reporting. Together they aim to foster greater coherence and consistency in applications of resilience.
Conclusions and Policy Implications
The two heuristic tools offered should foster more dialogue among programme staff, reviewers and evaluators about resilience programming and evaluation. The conceptual frameworks highlight the distinctive features of the concept of resilience.</description><subject>aid practice</subject><subject>Coherence</subject><subject>Concepts</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Development programs</subject><subject>evaluation</subject><subject>Heuristic</subject><subject>Humanitarian aid</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>programming</subject><subject>Resilience</subject><issn>0950-6764</issn><issn>1467-7679</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EEqUw8A8sMTGktRPHTiaEyqdUCYSKGC3HvrSpkjjYSVH_PaZhYMHLDX7u3rsHoUtKZjS8uencjMYpzY7QhDIuIsFFfowmJE9JxAVnp-jM-y0hhCWMT9DwsVE9NhY8duCruoJWA66art7j0jpsYAe17Rpoe9w5pftKww1eWVv7w39jHWBtN-BGwq6dapqqXWPVGgw7VQ-qr2yLbfkn4BydlKr2cPFbp-j94X61eIqWL4_Pi9tlpBOeZlEeF4US3MSs1GnCCCjGizyLs7TUQmmIwxEqzQoOuRCGk4KozPA8N5SBgUInU3Q1zg2LfQ7ge7m1g2tDpIzTEEFZUBSo65HSznrvoJSdqxrl9pIS-WNVBqvyYDWw85H9qmrY_w_Ku9e3seMbJI57iw</recordid><startdate>202107</startdate><enddate>202107</enddate><creator>Constas, Mark A.</creator><creator>Mattioli, Laura</creator><creator>Russo, Luca</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202107</creationdate><title>What does resilience imply for development practice? Tools for more coherent programming and evaluation of resilience</title><author>Constas, Mark A. ; Mattioli, Laura ; Russo, Luca</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3658-92bba76d24fc5340ea46b98285fc7ace2043a58b6e977d60b0a8d699d14edebc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>aid practice</topic><topic>Coherence</topic><topic>Concepts</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Development programs</topic><topic>evaluation</topic><topic>Heuristic</topic><topic>Humanitarian aid</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>programming</topic><topic>Resilience</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Constas, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mattioli, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russo, Luca</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Development policy review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Constas, Mark A.</au><au>Mattioli, Laura</au><au>Russo, Luca</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What does resilience imply for development practice? Tools for more coherent programming and evaluation of resilience</atitle><jtitle>Development policy review</jtitle><date>2021-07</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>588</spage><epage>603</epage><pages>588-603</pages><issn>0950-6764</issn><eissn>1467-7679</eissn><abstract>Motivation
The concept of resilience is widely embraced by practitioners and analysts concerned with development and humanitarian aid. It is less clear how to apply the concept in practice.
Purpose
Two questions are addressed: What makes resilience programmes distinctive or different? How should evaluations of resilience be conducted?
Approach and Methods
A typology of applications of resilience to development programming and evaluations is proposed. From considering the requirements of the different uses, two practical tools have been devised: the resilience programming matrix (RPM) and the resilience evaluation matrix (REM).
Results or Findings
The RPM defines six features of programming for resilience, covering concepts and implementation. The REM defines ten features by which to evaluate resilience, covering evaluation design, data analysis, and reporting. Together they aim to foster greater coherence and consistency in applications of resilience.
Conclusions and Policy Implications
The two heuristic tools offered should foster more dialogue among programme staff, reviewers and evaluators about resilience programming and evaluation. The conceptual frameworks highlight the distinctive features of the concept of resilience.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/dpr.12518</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0950-6764 |
ispartof | Development policy review, 2021-07, Vol.39 (4), p.588-603 |
issn | 0950-6764 1467-7679 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2536514467 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; PAIS Index; Political Science Complete |
subjects | aid practice Coherence Concepts Data analysis Development programs evaluation Heuristic Humanitarian aid Motivation programming Resilience |
title | What does resilience imply for development practice? Tools for more coherent programming and evaluation of resilience |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T16%3A16%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20does%20resilience%20imply%20for%20development%20practice?%20Tools%20for%20more%20coherent%20programming%20and%20evaluation%20of%20resilience&rft.jtitle=Development%20policy%20review&rft.au=Constas,%20Mark%20A.&rft.date=2021-07&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=588&rft.epage=603&rft.pages=588-603&rft.issn=0950-6764&rft.eissn=1467-7679&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/dpr.12518&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2536514467%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2536514467&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |