Undergraduate Student Perceptions Following Participation in Applied Agricultural Labs 1
Experiential learning in science courses can increase student learning, but connecting students with field-scale agricultural production in a major city can be challenging. A new course teaching agronomic topics required the development of new laboratory experiences. The objective of this study was...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | NACTA journal 2019-11, Vol.64 (2), p.448-459 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 459 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 448 |
container_title | NACTA journal |
container_volume | 64 |
creator | Lindsey, A J |
description | Experiential learning in science courses can increase student learning, but connecting students with field-scale agricultural production in a major city can be challenging. A new course teaching agronomic topics required the development of new laboratory experiences. The objective of this study was to assess student perceptions of two new laboratory activities (related to crop harvest and planter meter evaluation) from three offerings of the course (20172019). Upon completion of these experiential labs, students were surveyed regarding the efficacy of each experience. Survey respondents (43 to 46% response rate) agreed or strongly agreed that they gained skills related to each laboratory activity (4.18 to 4.81/5.00, where 5 is strongly agree). Respondents agreed they enjoyed the laboratory activities (4.47 to 4.81) and gained an appreciation for how planter meter units are evaluated (4.63). All students that completed the open response question related to whether the lab should be repeated in the future agreed that both labs should be continued. These results suggest the laboratory activities were effective at increasing perceived knowledge, and were perceived positively. Future work should look to adapt these activities using alternate practices to allow for use in locations without the capacity for large-scale field operations. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2535885032</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2535885032</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_25358850323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNyr0KwjAUQOEMCtafd7jgXEjaBtqxiMXBQVDBrcQmlpSQxJsEX18FH8DpDN-ZkYyyqsmrhtEFWYYwUVqwouEZuV2tVDiikElEBeeYpLIRTgoH5aN2NkDnjHEvbUc4CYx60F58AbSF1nujlYR2RD0kExMKA0dxD8DWZP4QJqjNryuy7faX3SH36J5JhdhPLqH9UF_wktc1p2VR_ne9AXWrQbQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2535885032</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Undergraduate Student Perceptions Following Participation in Applied Agricultural Labs 1</title><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Lindsey, A J</creator><creatorcontrib>Lindsey, A J</creatorcontrib><description>Experiential learning in science courses can increase student learning, but connecting students with field-scale agricultural production in a major city can be challenging. A new course teaching agronomic topics required the development of new laboratory experiences. The objective of this study was to assess student perceptions of two new laboratory activities (related to crop harvest and planter meter evaluation) from three offerings of the course (20172019). Upon completion of these experiential labs, students were surveyed regarding the efficacy of each experience. Survey respondents (43 to 46% response rate) agreed or strongly agreed that they gained skills related to each laboratory activity (4.18 to 4.81/5.00, where 5 is strongly agree). Respondents agreed they enjoyed the laboratory activities (4.47 to 4.81) and gained an appreciation for how planter meter units are evaluated (4.63). All students that completed the open response question related to whether the lab should be repeated in the future agreed that both labs should be continued. These results suggest the laboratory activities were effective at increasing perceived knowledge, and were perceived positively. Future work should look to adapt these activities using alternate practices to allow for use in locations without the capacity for large-scale field operations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0149-4910</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Twin Falls: North American Colleges and Teachers of Agriculture</publisher><subject>Agricultural production ; Agronomy ; Behavioral Objectives ; Calibration ; Crops ; Enrollments ; Evaluation ; Experiential learning ; Harvest ; Laboratories ; Learning ; Learning Processes ; Learning Theories ; Natural resources ; Perceptions ; Physiology ; Polls & surveys ; Science Curriculum ; Seeds ; Soybeans ; Student attitudes ; Students ; Teaching ; Undergraduate Students ; Undergraduate study</subject><ispartof>NACTA journal, 2019-11, Vol.64 (2), p.448-459</ispartof><rights>Copyright North American Colleges and Teachers of Agriculture Nov 2019-Oct 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lindsey, A J</creatorcontrib><title>Undergraduate Student Perceptions Following Participation in Applied Agricultural Labs 1</title><title>NACTA journal</title><description>Experiential learning in science courses can increase student learning, but connecting students with field-scale agricultural production in a major city can be challenging. A new course teaching agronomic topics required the development of new laboratory experiences. The objective of this study was to assess student perceptions of two new laboratory activities (related to crop harvest and planter meter evaluation) from three offerings of the course (20172019). Upon completion of these experiential labs, students were surveyed regarding the efficacy of each experience. Survey respondents (43 to 46% response rate) agreed or strongly agreed that they gained skills related to each laboratory activity (4.18 to 4.81/5.00, where 5 is strongly agree). Respondents agreed they enjoyed the laboratory activities (4.47 to 4.81) and gained an appreciation for how planter meter units are evaluated (4.63). All students that completed the open response question related to whether the lab should be repeated in the future agreed that both labs should be continued. These results suggest the laboratory activities were effective at increasing perceived knowledge, and were perceived positively. Future work should look to adapt these activities using alternate practices to allow for use in locations without the capacity for large-scale field operations.</description><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Agronomy</subject><subject>Behavioral Objectives</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Enrollments</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Experiential learning</subject><subject>Harvest</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning Processes</subject><subject>Learning Theories</subject><subject>Natural resources</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Science Curriculum</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><subject>Soybeans</subject><subject>Student attitudes</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><subject>Undergraduate study</subject><issn>0149-4910</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNyr0KwjAUQOEMCtafd7jgXEjaBtqxiMXBQVDBrcQmlpSQxJsEX18FH8DpDN-ZkYyyqsmrhtEFWYYwUVqwouEZuV2tVDiikElEBeeYpLIRTgoH5aN2NkDnjHEvbUc4CYx60F58AbSF1nujlYR2RD0kExMKA0dxD8DWZP4QJqjNryuy7faX3SH36J5JhdhPLqH9UF_wktc1p2VR_ne9AXWrQbQ</recordid><startdate>20191101</startdate><enddate>20191101</enddate><creator>Lindsey, A J</creator><general>North American Colleges and Teachers of Agriculture</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191101</creationdate><title>Undergraduate Student Perceptions Following Participation in Applied Agricultural Labs 1</title><author>Lindsey, A J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_25358850323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Agronomy</topic><topic>Behavioral Objectives</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Enrollments</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Experiential learning</topic><topic>Harvest</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning Processes</topic><topic>Learning Theories</topic><topic>Natural resources</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Science Curriculum</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><topic>Soybeans</topic><topic>Student attitudes</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><topic>Undergraduate study</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lindsey, A J</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Education Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>NACTA journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lindsey, A J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Undergraduate Student Perceptions Following Participation in Applied Agricultural Labs 1</atitle><jtitle>NACTA journal</jtitle><date>2019-11-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>448</spage><epage>459</epage><pages>448-459</pages><issn>0149-4910</issn><abstract>Experiential learning in science courses can increase student learning, but connecting students with field-scale agricultural production in a major city can be challenging. A new course teaching agronomic topics required the development of new laboratory experiences. The objective of this study was to assess student perceptions of two new laboratory activities (related to crop harvest and planter meter evaluation) from three offerings of the course (20172019). Upon completion of these experiential labs, students were surveyed regarding the efficacy of each experience. Survey respondents (43 to 46% response rate) agreed or strongly agreed that they gained skills related to each laboratory activity (4.18 to 4.81/5.00, where 5 is strongly agree). Respondents agreed they enjoyed the laboratory activities (4.47 to 4.81) and gained an appreciation for how planter meter units are evaluated (4.63). All students that completed the open response question related to whether the lab should be repeated in the future agreed that both labs should be continued. These results suggest the laboratory activities were effective at increasing perceived knowledge, and were perceived positively. Future work should look to adapt these activities using alternate practices to allow for use in locations without the capacity for large-scale field operations.</abstract><cop>Twin Falls</cop><pub>North American Colleges and Teachers of Agriculture</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0149-4910 |
ispartof | NACTA journal, 2019-11, Vol.64 (2), p.448-459 |
issn | 0149-4910 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2535885032 |
source | EBSCOhost Education Source; JSTOR |
subjects | Agricultural production Agronomy Behavioral Objectives Calibration Crops Enrollments Evaluation Experiential learning Harvest Laboratories Learning Learning Processes Learning Theories Natural resources Perceptions Physiology Polls & surveys Science Curriculum Seeds Soybeans Student attitudes Students Teaching Undergraduate Students Undergraduate study |
title | Undergraduate Student Perceptions Following Participation in Applied Agricultural Labs 1 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T18%3A19%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Undergraduate%20Student%20Perceptions%20Following%20Participation%20in%20Applied%20Agricultural%20Labs%201&rft.jtitle=NACTA%20journal&rft.au=Lindsey,%20A%20J&rft.date=2019-11-01&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=448&rft.epage=459&rft.pages=448-459&rft.issn=0149-4910&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2535885032%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2535885032&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |