Undergraduate Student Perceptions Following Participation in Applied Agricultural Labs 1

Experiential learning in science courses can increase student learning, but connecting students with field-scale agricultural production in a major city can be challenging. A new course teaching agronomic topics required the development of new laboratory experiences. The objective of this study was...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:NACTA journal 2019-11, Vol.64 (2), p.448-459
1. Verfasser: Lindsey, A J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 459
container_issue 2
container_start_page 448
container_title NACTA journal
container_volume 64
creator Lindsey, A J
description Experiential learning in science courses can increase student learning, but connecting students with field-scale agricultural production in a major city can be challenging. A new course teaching agronomic topics required the development of new laboratory experiences. The objective of this study was to assess student perceptions of two new laboratory activities (related to crop harvest and planter meter evaluation) from three offerings of the course (20172019). Upon completion of these experiential labs, students were surveyed regarding the efficacy of each experience. Survey respondents (43 to 46% response rate) agreed or strongly agreed that they gained skills related to each laboratory activity (4.18 to 4.81/5.00, where 5 is strongly agree). Respondents agreed they enjoyed the laboratory activities (4.47 to 4.81) and gained an appreciation for how planter meter units are evaluated (4.63). All students that completed the open response question related to whether the lab should be repeated in the future agreed that both labs should be continued. These results suggest the laboratory activities were effective at increasing perceived knowledge, and were perceived positively. Future work should look to adapt these activities using alternate practices to allow for use in locations without the capacity for large-scale field operations.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2535885032</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2535885032</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_25358850323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNyr0KwjAUQOEMCtafd7jgXEjaBtqxiMXBQVDBrcQmlpSQxJsEX18FH8DpDN-ZkYyyqsmrhtEFWYYwUVqwouEZuV2tVDiikElEBeeYpLIRTgoH5aN2NkDnjHEvbUc4CYx60F58AbSF1nujlYR2RD0kExMKA0dxD8DWZP4QJqjNryuy7faX3SH36J5JhdhPLqH9UF_wktc1p2VR_ne9AXWrQbQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2535885032</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Undergraduate Student Perceptions Following Participation in Applied Agricultural Labs 1</title><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Lindsey, A J</creator><creatorcontrib>Lindsey, A J</creatorcontrib><description>Experiential learning in science courses can increase student learning, but connecting students with field-scale agricultural production in a major city can be challenging. A new course teaching agronomic topics required the development of new laboratory experiences. The objective of this study was to assess student perceptions of two new laboratory activities (related to crop harvest and planter meter evaluation) from three offerings of the course (20172019). Upon completion of these experiential labs, students were surveyed regarding the efficacy of each experience. Survey respondents (43 to 46% response rate) agreed or strongly agreed that they gained skills related to each laboratory activity (4.18 to 4.81/5.00, where 5 is strongly agree). Respondents agreed they enjoyed the laboratory activities (4.47 to 4.81) and gained an appreciation for how planter meter units are evaluated (4.63). All students that completed the open response question related to whether the lab should be repeated in the future agreed that both labs should be continued. These results suggest the laboratory activities were effective at increasing perceived knowledge, and were perceived positively. Future work should look to adapt these activities using alternate practices to allow for use in locations without the capacity for large-scale field operations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0149-4910</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Twin Falls: North American Colleges and Teachers of Agriculture</publisher><subject>Agricultural production ; Agronomy ; Behavioral Objectives ; Calibration ; Crops ; Enrollments ; Evaluation ; Experiential learning ; Harvest ; Laboratories ; Learning ; Learning Processes ; Learning Theories ; Natural resources ; Perceptions ; Physiology ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Science Curriculum ; Seeds ; Soybeans ; Student attitudes ; Students ; Teaching ; Undergraduate Students ; Undergraduate study</subject><ispartof>NACTA journal, 2019-11, Vol.64 (2), p.448-459</ispartof><rights>Copyright North American Colleges and Teachers of Agriculture Nov 2019-Oct 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lindsey, A J</creatorcontrib><title>Undergraduate Student Perceptions Following Participation in Applied Agricultural Labs 1</title><title>NACTA journal</title><description>Experiential learning in science courses can increase student learning, but connecting students with field-scale agricultural production in a major city can be challenging. A new course teaching agronomic topics required the development of new laboratory experiences. The objective of this study was to assess student perceptions of two new laboratory activities (related to crop harvest and planter meter evaluation) from three offerings of the course (20172019). Upon completion of these experiential labs, students were surveyed regarding the efficacy of each experience. Survey respondents (43 to 46% response rate) agreed or strongly agreed that they gained skills related to each laboratory activity (4.18 to 4.81/5.00, where 5 is strongly agree). Respondents agreed they enjoyed the laboratory activities (4.47 to 4.81) and gained an appreciation for how planter meter units are evaluated (4.63). All students that completed the open response question related to whether the lab should be repeated in the future agreed that both labs should be continued. These results suggest the laboratory activities were effective at increasing perceived knowledge, and were perceived positively. Future work should look to adapt these activities using alternate practices to allow for use in locations without the capacity for large-scale field operations.</description><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Agronomy</subject><subject>Behavioral Objectives</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Enrollments</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Experiential learning</subject><subject>Harvest</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning Processes</subject><subject>Learning Theories</subject><subject>Natural resources</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Science Curriculum</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><subject>Soybeans</subject><subject>Student attitudes</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><subject>Undergraduate study</subject><issn>0149-4910</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNyr0KwjAUQOEMCtafd7jgXEjaBtqxiMXBQVDBrcQmlpSQxJsEX18FH8DpDN-ZkYyyqsmrhtEFWYYwUVqwouEZuV2tVDiikElEBeeYpLIRTgoH5aN2NkDnjHEvbUc4CYx60F58AbSF1nujlYR2RD0kExMKA0dxD8DWZP4QJqjNryuy7faX3SH36J5JhdhPLqH9UF_wktc1p2VR_ne9AXWrQbQ</recordid><startdate>20191101</startdate><enddate>20191101</enddate><creator>Lindsey, A J</creator><general>North American Colleges and Teachers of Agriculture</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191101</creationdate><title>Undergraduate Student Perceptions Following Participation in Applied Agricultural Labs 1</title><author>Lindsey, A J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_25358850323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Agronomy</topic><topic>Behavioral Objectives</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Enrollments</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Experiential learning</topic><topic>Harvest</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning Processes</topic><topic>Learning Theories</topic><topic>Natural resources</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Science Curriculum</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><topic>Soybeans</topic><topic>Student attitudes</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><topic>Undergraduate study</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lindsey, A J</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Education Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>NACTA journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lindsey, A J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Undergraduate Student Perceptions Following Participation in Applied Agricultural Labs 1</atitle><jtitle>NACTA journal</jtitle><date>2019-11-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>448</spage><epage>459</epage><pages>448-459</pages><issn>0149-4910</issn><abstract>Experiential learning in science courses can increase student learning, but connecting students with field-scale agricultural production in a major city can be challenging. A new course teaching agronomic topics required the development of new laboratory experiences. The objective of this study was to assess student perceptions of two new laboratory activities (related to crop harvest and planter meter evaluation) from three offerings of the course (20172019). Upon completion of these experiential labs, students were surveyed regarding the efficacy of each experience. Survey respondents (43 to 46% response rate) agreed or strongly agreed that they gained skills related to each laboratory activity (4.18 to 4.81/5.00, where 5 is strongly agree). Respondents agreed they enjoyed the laboratory activities (4.47 to 4.81) and gained an appreciation for how planter meter units are evaluated (4.63). All students that completed the open response question related to whether the lab should be repeated in the future agreed that both labs should be continued. These results suggest the laboratory activities were effective at increasing perceived knowledge, and were perceived positively. Future work should look to adapt these activities using alternate practices to allow for use in locations without the capacity for large-scale field operations.</abstract><cop>Twin Falls</cop><pub>North American Colleges and Teachers of Agriculture</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0149-4910
ispartof NACTA journal, 2019-11, Vol.64 (2), p.448-459
issn 0149-4910
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2535885032
source EBSCOhost Education Source; JSTOR
subjects Agricultural production
Agronomy
Behavioral Objectives
Calibration
Crops
Enrollments
Evaluation
Experiential learning
Harvest
Laboratories
Learning
Learning Processes
Learning Theories
Natural resources
Perceptions
Physiology
Polls & surveys
Science Curriculum
Seeds
Soybeans
Student attitudes
Students
Teaching
Undergraduate Students
Undergraduate study
title Undergraduate Student Perceptions Following Participation in Applied Agricultural Labs 1
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T18%3A19%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Undergraduate%20Student%20Perceptions%20Following%20Participation%20in%20Applied%20Agricultural%20Labs%201&rft.jtitle=NACTA%20journal&rft.au=Lindsey,%20A%20J&rft.date=2019-11-01&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=448&rft.epage=459&rft.pages=448-459&rft.issn=0149-4910&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2535885032%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2535885032&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true