Fine‐scale environmental heterogeneity and conservation management: Beach‐cast wrack creates microhabitats for thermoregulation in shorebirds
Conservation management to protect coastal ecosystems sometimes overlooks site‐specific fine‐scale heterogeneity. For example, while habitat loss is a known key driver of population declines in many shorebirds, these birds are also dependent on high‐quality habitats to maximize energy stores. Here w...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of applied ecology 2021-06, Vol.58 (6), p.1291-1301 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1301 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1291 |
container_title | The Journal of applied ecology |
container_volume | 58 |
creator | Davis, Timothy John Keppel, Gunnar |
description | Conservation management to protect coastal ecosystems sometimes overlooks site‐specific fine‐scale heterogeneity. For example, while habitat loss is a known key driver of population declines in many shorebirds, these birds are also dependent on high‐quality habitats to maximize energy stores. Here we describe the microhabitats provided by beach‐cast wrack (washed up macroalgae and seagrasses), a resource threatened by harvesting and beach cleaning, and how shorebirds utilize these.
We measured the temperature and absolute humidity at 10 cm above three substrates (fresh wrack, aged wrack and sand) and then related bird behaviour (roosting vs. foraging) to climatic and environmental data.
Freshly beach‐cast wrack mostly provided cooler and less humid habitats, but warmer temperatures than aged wrack or sand in the early mornings. Microtopography created by shelter from prevailing winds and wrack depth modified these general trends.
Generally, temperature predicted where shorebirds overall and the two most common species, the double‐banded plover Charadrius bicinctus and red‐necked stint Calidris ruficollis, were observed. During most of the day, foraging and roosting were more likely to occur on the warmer aged wrack. In the early morning, when fresh wrack provided the warmer temperatures, birds tended to roost and forage on fresh wrack.
Synthesis and Applications. Beach‐cast wrack creates a complex mosaic of unique microclimates varying in space and time, which allows shorebirds to minimize energy expenditure by selecting the thermally most favourable habitats for roosting and foraging. Removal of beach‐cast wrack for commercial and aesthetic reasons thus reduces habitat quality and increases energy expenditure in shorebirds. Associated declines in energy stores may be contributing to declines in shorebird populations. Management of coastal ecosystems and shorebirds therefore needs to consider and maintain fine‐scale environmental heterogeneity at local scales.
Beach‐cast wrack creates a complex mosaic of unique microclimates varying in space and time, which allows shorebirds to minimize energy expenditure by selecting the thermally most favourable habitats for roosting and foraging. Removal of beach‐cast wrack for commercial and aesthetic reasons thus reduces habitat quality and increases energy expenditure in shorebirds. Associated declines in energy stores may be contributing to declines in shorebird populations. Management of coastal ecosystems and shor |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/1365-2664.13865 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2535644244</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2535644244</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3565-4fd83c75c229d2ee1d5a8dda18ecc68b94d3a6f58fe21cfc169d8f2c62cc2ba63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUE1P3DAQtSqQulDOvVrqeSF2YjfhVhC0VEjtAc7W7HiyMSQ22F7Q3voT2r_YX4K3QVw7l5Ge3ofeY-yjqI5FuRNRa7WUWjfHom61escWb8geW1SVFMu2q8R7dpDSXVVVnarrBftz6Tz9_fU7IYzEyT-5GPxEPsPIB8oUw5o8ubzl4C3H4BPFJ8gueD6BhzXtuKf8jACHYoOQMn-OgPccI0GmxCeHMQywchly4n2IPA8UpxBpvRlnJ-d5GgqwctGmD2y_hzHR0es_ZLeXFzfn35bXP75enX-5XmKtSq-mt22NnxVK2VlJJKyC1loQLSHqdtU1tgbdq7YnKbBHoTvb9hK1RJQr0PUh-zT7PsTwuKGUzV3YRF8ijVQlomlk0xTWycwqJVKK1JuH6CaIWyMqs9vd7FY2u5XNv92LQs2KZzfS9n908_3nxax7AfqCi88</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2535644244</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fine‐scale environmental heterogeneity and conservation management: Beach‐cast wrack creates microhabitats for thermoregulation in shorebirds</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><creator>Davis, Timothy John ; Keppel, Gunnar</creator><creatorcontrib>Davis, Timothy John ; Keppel, Gunnar</creatorcontrib><description>Conservation management to protect coastal ecosystems sometimes overlooks site‐specific fine‐scale heterogeneity. For example, while habitat loss is a known key driver of population declines in many shorebirds, these birds are also dependent on high‐quality habitats to maximize energy stores. Here we describe the microhabitats provided by beach‐cast wrack (washed up macroalgae and seagrasses), a resource threatened by harvesting and beach cleaning, and how shorebirds utilize these.
We measured the temperature and absolute humidity at 10 cm above three substrates (fresh wrack, aged wrack and sand) and then related bird behaviour (roosting vs. foraging) to climatic and environmental data.
Freshly beach‐cast wrack mostly provided cooler and less humid habitats, but warmer temperatures than aged wrack or sand in the early mornings. Microtopography created by shelter from prevailing winds and wrack depth modified these general trends.
Generally, temperature predicted where shorebirds overall and the two most common species, the double‐banded plover Charadrius bicinctus and red‐necked stint Calidris ruficollis, were observed. During most of the day, foraging and roosting were more likely to occur on the warmer aged wrack. In the early morning, when fresh wrack provided the warmer temperatures, birds tended to roost and forage on fresh wrack.
Synthesis and Applications. Beach‐cast wrack creates a complex mosaic of unique microclimates varying in space and time, which allows shorebirds to minimize energy expenditure by selecting the thermally most favourable habitats for roosting and foraging. Removal of beach‐cast wrack for commercial and aesthetic reasons thus reduces habitat quality and increases energy expenditure in shorebirds. Associated declines in energy stores may be contributing to declines in shorebird populations. Management of coastal ecosystems and shorebirds therefore needs to consider and maintain fine‐scale environmental heterogeneity at local scales.
Beach‐cast wrack creates a complex mosaic of unique microclimates varying in space and time, which allows shorebirds to minimize energy expenditure by selecting the thermally most favourable habitats for roosting and foraging. Removal of beach‐cast wrack for commercial and aesthetic reasons thus reduces habitat quality and increases energy expenditure in shorebirds. Associated declines in energy stores may be contributing to declines in shorebird populations. Management of coastal ecosystems and shorebirds therefore needs to consider and maintain fine‐scale environmental heterogeneity at local scales.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8901</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2664</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.13865</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Absolute humidity ; Algae ; Aquatic birds ; Beaches ; beach‐cast wrack harvest ; Birds ; coastal ; Coastal ecosystems ; Coastal management ; Conservation ; Ecosystem management ; Energy expenditure ; Environmental management ; Environmental quality ; fine‐scale environmental heterogeneity ; Foraging behavior ; Foraging habitats ; Habitat loss ; habitat quality ; Habitats ; Heterogeneity ; Microclimate ; microclimate and microhabitats ; Microhabitats ; microtopography ; migratory shorebirds ; Population decline ; Sand ; Seagrasses ; Seaweeds ; Strategic management ; Substrates ; Thermoregulation</subject><ispartof>The Journal of applied ecology, 2021-06, Vol.58 (6), p.1291-1301</ispartof><rights>2021 British Ecological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3565-4fd83c75c229d2ee1d5a8dda18ecc68b94d3a6f58fe21cfc169d8f2c62cc2ba63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3565-4fd83c75c229d2ee1d5a8dda18ecc68b94d3a6f58fe21cfc169d8f2c62cc2ba63</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7092-6149</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1365-2664.13865$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1365-2664.13865$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,1428,27905,27906,45555,45556,46390,46814</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Davis, Timothy John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keppel, Gunnar</creatorcontrib><title>Fine‐scale environmental heterogeneity and conservation management: Beach‐cast wrack creates microhabitats for thermoregulation in shorebirds</title><title>The Journal of applied ecology</title><description>Conservation management to protect coastal ecosystems sometimes overlooks site‐specific fine‐scale heterogeneity. For example, while habitat loss is a known key driver of population declines in many shorebirds, these birds are also dependent on high‐quality habitats to maximize energy stores. Here we describe the microhabitats provided by beach‐cast wrack (washed up macroalgae and seagrasses), a resource threatened by harvesting and beach cleaning, and how shorebirds utilize these.
We measured the temperature and absolute humidity at 10 cm above three substrates (fresh wrack, aged wrack and sand) and then related bird behaviour (roosting vs. foraging) to climatic and environmental data.
Freshly beach‐cast wrack mostly provided cooler and less humid habitats, but warmer temperatures than aged wrack or sand in the early mornings. Microtopography created by shelter from prevailing winds and wrack depth modified these general trends.
Generally, temperature predicted where shorebirds overall and the two most common species, the double‐banded plover Charadrius bicinctus and red‐necked stint Calidris ruficollis, were observed. During most of the day, foraging and roosting were more likely to occur on the warmer aged wrack. In the early morning, when fresh wrack provided the warmer temperatures, birds tended to roost and forage on fresh wrack.
Synthesis and Applications. Beach‐cast wrack creates a complex mosaic of unique microclimates varying in space and time, which allows shorebirds to minimize energy expenditure by selecting the thermally most favourable habitats for roosting and foraging. Removal of beach‐cast wrack for commercial and aesthetic reasons thus reduces habitat quality and increases energy expenditure in shorebirds. Associated declines in energy stores may be contributing to declines in shorebird populations. Management of coastal ecosystems and shorebirds therefore needs to consider and maintain fine‐scale environmental heterogeneity at local scales.
Beach‐cast wrack creates a complex mosaic of unique microclimates varying in space and time, which allows shorebirds to minimize energy expenditure by selecting the thermally most favourable habitats for roosting and foraging. Removal of beach‐cast wrack for commercial and aesthetic reasons thus reduces habitat quality and increases energy expenditure in shorebirds. Associated declines in energy stores may be contributing to declines in shorebird populations. Management of coastal ecosystems and shorebirds therefore needs to consider and maintain fine‐scale environmental heterogeneity at local scales.</description><subject>Absolute humidity</subject><subject>Algae</subject><subject>Aquatic birds</subject><subject>Beaches</subject><subject>beach‐cast wrack harvest</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>coastal</subject><subject>Coastal ecosystems</subject><subject>Coastal management</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Ecosystem management</subject><subject>Energy expenditure</subject><subject>Environmental management</subject><subject>Environmental quality</subject><subject>fine‐scale environmental heterogeneity</subject><subject>Foraging behavior</subject><subject>Foraging habitats</subject><subject>Habitat loss</subject><subject>habitat quality</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Microclimate</subject><subject>microclimate and microhabitats</subject><subject>Microhabitats</subject><subject>microtopography</subject><subject>migratory shorebirds</subject><subject>Population decline</subject><subject>Sand</subject><subject>Seagrasses</subject><subject>Seaweeds</subject><subject>Strategic management</subject><subject>Substrates</subject><subject>Thermoregulation</subject><issn>0021-8901</issn><issn>1365-2664</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUE1P3DAQtSqQulDOvVrqeSF2YjfhVhC0VEjtAc7W7HiyMSQ22F7Q3voT2r_YX4K3QVw7l5Ge3ofeY-yjqI5FuRNRa7WUWjfHom61escWb8geW1SVFMu2q8R7dpDSXVVVnarrBftz6Tz9_fU7IYzEyT-5GPxEPsPIB8oUw5o8ubzl4C3H4BPFJ8gueD6BhzXtuKf8jACHYoOQMn-OgPccI0GmxCeHMQywchly4n2IPA8UpxBpvRlnJ-d5GgqwctGmD2y_hzHR0es_ZLeXFzfn35bXP75enX-5XmKtSq-mt22NnxVK2VlJJKyC1loQLSHqdtU1tgbdq7YnKbBHoTvb9hK1RJQr0PUh-zT7PsTwuKGUzV3YRF8ijVQlomlk0xTWycwqJVKK1JuH6CaIWyMqs9vd7FY2u5XNv92LQs2KZzfS9n908_3nxax7AfqCi88</recordid><startdate>202106</startdate><enddate>202106</enddate><creator>Davis, Timothy John</creator><creator>Keppel, Gunnar</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7092-6149</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202106</creationdate><title>Fine‐scale environmental heterogeneity and conservation management: Beach‐cast wrack creates microhabitats for thermoregulation in shorebirds</title><author>Davis, Timothy John ; Keppel, Gunnar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3565-4fd83c75c229d2ee1d5a8dda18ecc68b94d3a6f58fe21cfc169d8f2c62cc2ba63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Absolute humidity</topic><topic>Algae</topic><topic>Aquatic birds</topic><topic>Beaches</topic><topic>beach‐cast wrack harvest</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>coastal</topic><topic>Coastal ecosystems</topic><topic>Coastal management</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Ecosystem management</topic><topic>Energy expenditure</topic><topic>Environmental management</topic><topic>Environmental quality</topic><topic>fine‐scale environmental heterogeneity</topic><topic>Foraging behavior</topic><topic>Foraging habitats</topic><topic>Habitat loss</topic><topic>habitat quality</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Microclimate</topic><topic>microclimate and microhabitats</topic><topic>Microhabitats</topic><topic>microtopography</topic><topic>migratory shorebirds</topic><topic>Population decline</topic><topic>Sand</topic><topic>Seagrasses</topic><topic>Seaweeds</topic><topic>Strategic management</topic><topic>Substrates</topic><topic>Thermoregulation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Davis, Timothy John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keppel, Gunnar</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of applied ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Davis, Timothy John</au><au>Keppel, Gunnar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fine‐scale environmental heterogeneity and conservation management: Beach‐cast wrack creates microhabitats for thermoregulation in shorebirds</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of applied ecology</jtitle><date>2021-06</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1291</spage><epage>1301</epage><pages>1291-1301</pages><issn>0021-8901</issn><eissn>1365-2664</eissn><abstract>Conservation management to protect coastal ecosystems sometimes overlooks site‐specific fine‐scale heterogeneity. For example, while habitat loss is a known key driver of population declines in many shorebirds, these birds are also dependent on high‐quality habitats to maximize energy stores. Here we describe the microhabitats provided by beach‐cast wrack (washed up macroalgae and seagrasses), a resource threatened by harvesting and beach cleaning, and how shorebirds utilize these.
We measured the temperature and absolute humidity at 10 cm above three substrates (fresh wrack, aged wrack and sand) and then related bird behaviour (roosting vs. foraging) to climatic and environmental data.
Freshly beach‐cast wrack mostly provided cooler and less humid habitats, but warmer temperatures than aged wrack or sand in the early mornings. Microtopography created by shelter from prevailing winds and wrack depth modified these general trends.
Generally, temperature predicted where shorebirds overall and the two most common species, the double‐banded plover Charadrius bicinctus and red‐necked stint Calidris ruficollis, were observed. During most of the day, foraging and roosting were more likely to occur on the warmer aged wrack. In the early morning, when fresh wrack provided the warmer temperatures, birds tended to roost and forage on fresh wrack.
Synthesis and Applications. Beach‐cast wrack creates a complex mosaic of unique microclimates varying in space and time, which allows shorebirds to minimize energy expenditure by selecting the thermally most favourable habitats for roosting and foraging. Removal of beach‐cast wrack for commercial and aesthetic reasons thus reduces habitat quality and increases energy expenditure in shorebirds. Associated declines in energy stores may be contributing to declines in shorebird populations. Management of coastal ecosystems and shorebirds therefore needs to consider and maintain fine‐scale environmental heterogeneity at local scales.
Beach‐cast wrack creates a complex mosaic of unique microclimates varying in space and time, which allows shorebirds to minimize energy expenditure by selecting the thermally most favourable habitats for roosting and foraging. Removal of beach‐cast wrack for commercial and aesthetic reasons thus reduces habitat quality and increases energy expenditure in shorebirds. Associated declines in energy stores may be contributing to declines in shorebird populations. Management of coastal ecosystems and shorebirds therefore needs to consider and maintain fine‐scale environmental heterogeneity at local scales.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/1365-2664.13865</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7092-6149</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8901 |
ispartof | The Journal of applied ecology, 2021-06, Vol.58 (6), p.1291-1301 |
issn | 0021-8901 1365-2664 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2535644244 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Wiley Free Content |
subjects | Absolute humidity Algae Aquatic birds Beaches beach‐cast wrack harvest Birds coastal Coastal ecosystems Coastal management Conservation Ecosystem management Energy expenditure Environmental management Environmental quality fine‐scale environmental heterogeneity Foraging behavior Foraging habitats Habitat loss habitat quality Habitats Heterogeneity Microclimate microclimate and microhabitats Microhabitats microtopography migratory shorebirds Population decline Sand Seagrasses Seaweeds Strategic management Substrates Thermoregulation |
title | Fine‐scale environmental heterogeneity and conservation management: Beach‐cast wrack creates microhabitats for thermoregulation in shorebirds |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T18%3A44%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fine%E2%80%90scale%20environmental%20heterogeneity%20and%20conservation%20management:%20Beach%E2%80%90cast%20wrack%20creates%20microhabitats%20for%20thermoregulation%20in%20shorebirds&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20applied%20ecology&rft.au=Davis,%20Timothy%20John&rft.date=2021-06&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1291&rft.epage=1301&rft.pages=1291-1301&rft.issn=0021-8901&rft.eissn=1365-2664&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1365-2664.13865&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2535644244%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2535644244&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |