Mediator approach and mediator behavior: A secondary data analysis of day of trial and child access mediation in Maryland
Does a mediator's stated approach (Facilitative, Inclusive, Transformative) predict their behavior at the mediation table? This question is explored through analysis of 149 cases from District Court day of trial mediation in four Maryland jurisdictions and 156 Circuit Court Family Division cour...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Conflict resolution quarterly 2021-06, Vol.38 (4), p.371-385 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 385 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 371 |
| container_title | Conflict resolution quarterly |
| container_volume | 38 |
| creator | Harmon‐Darrow, Caroline Charkoudian, Lorig |
| description | Does a mediator's stated approach (Facilitative, Inclusive, Transformative) predict their behavior at the mediation table? This question is explored through analysis of 149 cases from District Court day of trial mediation in four Maryland jurisdictions and 156 Circuit Court Family Division court-referred custody and visitation mediation cases in three Maryland jurisdictions. Through factor analysis and multiple regression analysis, this research found a mediator's stated approach does not fully predict their behavior at the mediation table, and that some self-reported approaches are more predictive of certain actual mediator behaviors (e.g., reflecting, eliciting, offering opinions) than others. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/crq.21302 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_rmit_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2535017682</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><informt_id>10.3316/agispt.20210609048038</informt_id><sourcerecordid>2535017682</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3912-670470985f383477c8738c84d35352d51bdd3e0daf803031aba433b11b82ea5d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkcFu1DAQhiMEEqVw4A0sceKQdsaOEy-3agUUaauqCM7WxHYaV9k4tVNQ3h5nt3tCHDiNNfrm08zvoniPcIEA_NLExwuOAviL4gxlhSVKUC_Xt6hLKRW-Lt6k9ACAG5D8rFhunPU0h8hommIg0zMaLdufuq3r6ZcP8RO7YsmZMFqKC7M0U-ZoWJJPLHS5saxljp6Gg8D0frCMjHEpPdt8GJkf2U0WDBl5W7zqaEju3XM9L35--fxje13ubr9-217tSiM2yMu6gaqBjZKdUKJqGqMaoYyqrJBCciuxtVY4sNQpECCQWqqEaBFbxR1JK86LD0dvPu_xyaVZP4SnmHdPmmcFYFMrnqmPR8rEkFJ0nZ6i3-dVNYJek9U5WX1INrOXR_a3H9zyb1Bvv9-dJq6PE3HvZ033Pk2zTo6i6bUfu3Boh3ivbfCrRwisTxgHjlDDBqp8oMqq3d-qfp6npNdf-V_dH7kZrNY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2535017682</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mediator approach and mediator behavior: A secondary data analysis of day of trial and child access mediation in Maryland</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Harmon‐Darrow, Caroline ; Charkoudian, Lorig</creator><creatorcontrib>Harmon‐Darrow, Caroline ; Charkoudian, Lorig</creatorcontrib><description>Does a mediator's stated approach (Facilitative, Inclusive, Transformative) predict their behavior at the mediation table? This question is explored through analysis of 149 cases from District Court day of trial mediation in four Maryland jurisdictions and 156 Circuit Court Family Division court-referred custody and visitation mediation cases in three Maryland jurisdictions. Through factor analysis and multiple regression analysis, this research found a mediator's stated approach does not fully predict their behavior at the mediation table, and that some self-reported approaches are more predictive of certain actual mediator behaviors (e.g., reflecting, eliciting, offering opinions) than others.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1536-5581</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1541-1508</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/crq.21302</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: Wiley Periodicals, Inc</publisher><subject>Behavior ; CHILD CUSTODY ; Courts ; Custody of children ; Domestic relations ; Factor analysis ; FAMILY LAW ; Family mediation ; MEDIATION ; Mediators ; Mediators (Persons) ; PSYCHOLOGY ; Regression analysis ; Trials ; Visitation</subject><ispartof>Conflict resolution quarterly, 2021-06, Vol.38 (4), p.371-385</ispartof><rights>2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3912-670470985f383477c8738c84d35352d51bdd3e0daf803031aba433b11b82ea5d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5553-1034</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fcrq.21302$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fcrq.21302$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27843,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Harmon‐Darrow, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charkoudian, Lorig</creatorcontrib><title>Mediator approach and mediator behavior: A secondary data analysis of day of trial and child access mediation in Maryland</title><title>Conflict resolution quarterly</title><description>Does a mediator's stated approach (Facilitative, Inclusive, Transformative) predict their behavior at the mediation table? This question is explored through analysis of 149 cases from District Court day of trial mediation in four Maryland jurisdictions and 156 Circuit Court Family Division court-referred custody and visitation mediation cases in three Maryland jurisdictions. Through factor analysis and multiple regression analysis, this research found a mediator's stated approach does not fully predict their behavior at the mediation table, and that some self-reported approaches are more predictive of certain actual mediator behaviors (e.g., reflecting, eliciting, offering opinions) than others.</description><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>CHILD CUSTODY</subject><subject>Courts</subject><subject>Custody of children</subject><subject>Domestic relations</subject><subject>Factor analysis</subject><subject>FAMILY LAW</subject><subject>Family mediation</subject><subject>MEDIATION</subject><subject>Mediators</subject><subject>Mediators (Persons)</subject><subject>PSYCHOLOGY</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Trials</subject><subject>Visitation</subject><issn>1536-5581</issn><issn>1541-1508</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkcFu1DAQhiMEEqVw4A0sceKQdsaOEy-3agUUaauqCM7WxHYaV9k4tVNQ3h5nt3tCHDiNNfrm08zvoniPcIEA_NLExwuOAviL4gxlhSVKUC_Xt6hLKRW-Lt6k9ACAG5D8rFhunPU0h8hommIg0zMaLdufuq3r6ZcP8RO7YsmZMFqKC7M0U-ZoWJJPLHS5saxljp6Gg8D0frCMjHEpPdt8GJkf2U0WDBl5W7zqaEju3XM9L35--fxje13ubr9-217tSiM2yMu6gaqBjZKdUKJqGqMaoYyqrJBCciuxtVY4sNQpECCQWqqEaBFbxR1JK86LD0dvPu_xyaVZP4SnmHdPmmcFYFMrnqmPR8rEkFJ0nZ6i3-dVNYJek9U5WX1INrOXR_a3H9zyb1Bvv9-dJq6PE3HvZ033Pk2zTo6i6bUfu3Boh3ivbfCrRwisTxgHjlDDBqp8oMqq3d-qfp6npNdf-V_dH7kZrNY</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>Harmon‐Darrow, Caroline</creator><creator>Charkoudian, Lorig</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</general><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K7.</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5553-1034</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>Mediator approach and mediator behavior: A secondary data analysis of day of trial and child access mediation in Maryland</title><author>Harmon‐Darrow, Caroline ; Charkoudian, Lorig</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3912-670470985f383477c8738c84d35352d51bdd3e0daf803031aba433b11b82ea5d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>CHILD CUSTODY</topic><topic>Courts</topic><topic>Custody of children</topic><topic>Domestic relations</topic><topic>Factor analysis</topic><topic>FAMILY LAW</topic><topic>Family mediation</topic><topic>MEDIATION</topic><topic>Mediators</topic><topic>Mediators (Persons)</topic><topic>PSYCHOLOGY</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Trials</topic><topic>Visitation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Harmon‐Darrow, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charkoudian, Lorig</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Conflict resolution quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Harmon‐Darrow, Caroline</au><au>Charkoudian, Lorig</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mediator approach and mediator behavior: A secondary data analysis of day of trial and child access mediation in Maryland</atitle><jtitle>Conflict resolution quarterly</jtitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>371</spage><epage>385</epage><pages>371-385</pages><issn>1536-5581</issn><eissn>1541-1508</eissn><abstract>Does a mediator's stated approach (Facilitative, Inclusive, Transformative) predict their behavior at the mediation table? This question is explored through analysis of 149 cases from District Court day of trial mediation in four Maryland jurisdictions and 156 Circuit Court Family Division court-referred custody and visitation mediation cases in three Maryland jurisdictions. Through factor analysis and multiple regression analysis, this research found a mediator's stated approach does not fully predict their behavior at the mediation table, and that some self-reported approaches are more predictive of certain actual mediator behaviors (e.g., reflecting, eliciting, offering opinions) than others.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/crq.21302</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5553-1034</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1536-5581 |
| ispartof | Conflict resolution quarterly, 2021-06, Vol.38 (4), p.371-385 |
| issn | 1536-5581 1541-1508 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2535017682 |
| source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; PAIS Index; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Business Source Complete |
| subjects | Behavior CHILD CUSTODY Courts Custody of children Domestic relations Factor analysis FAMILY LAW Family mediation MEDIATION Mediators Mediators (Persons) PSYCHOLOGY Regression analysis Trials Visitation |
| title | Mediator approach and mediator behavior: A secondary data analysis of day of trial and child access mediation in Maryland |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T05%3A39%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_rmit_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mediator%20approach%20and%20mediator%20behavior:%20A%20secondary%20data%20analysis%20of%20day%20of%20trial%20and%20child%20access%20mediation%20in%20Maryland&rft.jtitle=Conflict%20resolution%20quarterly&rft.au=Harmon%E2%80%90Darrow,%20Caroline&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=371&rft.epage=385&rft.pages=371-385&rft.issn=1536-5581&rft.eissn=1541-1508&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/crq.21302&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_rmit_%3E2535017682%3C/proquest_rmit_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2535017682&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_informt_id=10.3316/agispt.20210609048038&rfr_iscdi=true |