Prioritisation of factors contributing to human error for airworthiness management strategy with ANP
Purpose Airline business management is set on airworthy strategy. Airline sustainability depends upon corporate-based airworthy strategy as airworthiness is the base to any airline business management and strategy. An airline can ensize its corporate sustainability if it has airworthiness strategy a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Aircraft engineering 2019-01, Vol.91 (1), p.78-93 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 93 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 78 |
container_title | Aircraft engineering |
container_volume | 91 |
creator | Yazgan, Ebru Yilmaz, Ayşe Kucuk |
description | Purpose
Airline business management is set on airworthy strategy. Airline sustainability depends upon corporate-based airworthy strategy as airworthiness is the base to any airline business management and strategy. An airline can ensize its corporate sustainability if it has airworthiness strategy and risk management. The main condition to survive in the airline business is to maintain airworthiness with the fleet, maintenance and corporate-risk management. Aircraft maintenance technician (AMT) has a dual role in aircraft maintenance system as the source of failure in maintenance process via his volatility and unmanageable qualifications and secondly source of manager of maintain airworthiness of the aircrafts in airline. Situational awareness of managers about both limitations and qualifications of human factors is vital determinant to the decision-making process in aviation. Although continuously improving in related literature, one of the biggest weaknesses of the current methods of AMT error or performance is that the ability to model the reciprocal effects of the factors affecting the fault is limited. For this reason, this study aims to develop an analytic network process (ANP) model that takes into account the effects of mutual dependences among factors.
Design/methodology/approach
Firstly, with the help of experts and extensive literature, 67 factors that contributed to AMT error are identified and grouped. Then, the factors identified as eligible criteria and sub-criteria that contributed to the AMT errors are determined. In this study, the weights of identified criteria that have influence on AMT error try to determine by using ANP method. ANP is the common method to solve multi-criteria decision-making problems and is used to calculate priorities of factors. Criteria determined in this study are classified into three main clusters: “individual-related criteria”, “working environment-related criteria” and “organisational-related criteria”. These main clusters include 15 sub criteria such as communication, documentation (quality/updating/availability) and peer pressure.
Findings
The result of this study shows that time pressure, organisational culture, safety culture and supervision are the most important criteria that contributed to AMT error. Their weights are 0.207, 0.172, 0.102 and 0.094, respectively.
Originality/value
There are many difficulties and limitations in measuring the factors that have an influence on AMT errors. For this reason, t |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/AEAT-11-2017-0245 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2534621184</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2534621184</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-afaa3d794fc9cfb48c33ca2a6a31660ce4594aa94faac736f86856cb343738683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkE1LAzEQhhdRsH78AG8Bz9Fkk82mx6XUDyjaQz0v0zRpU9pNnWQp_fdmqRfBwzAvvPPOME9RPHD2xDnTz820WVDOacl4TVkpq4tixOtKU1lycTloqanWsrwubmLcMsZVxcSoWM3RB_TJR0g-dCQ44sCkgJGY0CX0yz75bk1SIJt-Dx2xiAGJywUejwHTxnc2RpI9WNu97RKJCSHZ9YkcfdqQ5mN-V1w52EV7_9tvi6-X6WLyRmefr--TZkaN4DJRcABiVY-lM2PjllIbIQyUoEBwpZixshpLgOwDmFoop5WulFkKKWqRtbgtHs97Dxi-extTuw09dvlkW1ZCqpJzLfMUP08ZDDGide0B_R7w1HLWDjDbAWZW7QCzHWDmDDtn8ocIu9W_kT_8xQ90CXe7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2534621184</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prioritisation of factors contributing to human error for airworthiness management strategy with ANP</title><source>Emerald Journals</source><creator>Yazgan, Ebru ; Yilmaz, Ayşe Kucuk</creator><creatorcontrib>Yazgan, Ebru ; Yilmaz, Ayşe Kucuk</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
Airline business management is set on airworthy strategy. Airline sustainability depends upon corporate-based airworthy strategy as airworthiness is the base to any airline business management and strategy. An airline can ensize its corporate sustainability if it has airworthiness strategy and risk management. The main condition to survive in the airline business is to maintain airworthiness with the fleet, maintenance and corporate-risk management. Aircraft maintenance technician (AMT) has a dual role in aircraft maintenance system as the source of failure in maintenance process via his volatility and unmanageable qualifications and secondly source of manager of maintain airworthiness of the aircrafts in airline. Situational awareness of managers about both limitations and qualifications of human factors is vital determinant to the decision-making process in aviation. Although continuously improving in related literature, one of the biggest weaknesses of the current methods of AMT error or performance is that the ability to model the reciprocal effects of the factors affecting the fault is limited. For this reason, this study aims to develop an analytic network process (ANP) model that takes into account the effects of mutual dependences among factors.
Design/methodology/approach
Firstly, with the help of experts and extensive literature, 67 factors that contributed to AMT error are identified and grouped. Then, the factors identified as eligible criteria and sub-criteria that contributed to the AMT errors are determined. In this study, the weights of identified criteria that have influence on AMT error try to determine by using ANP method. ANP is the common method to solve multi-criteria decision-making problems and is used to calculate priorities of factors. Criteria determined in this study are classified into three main clusters: “individual-related criteria”, “working environment-related criteria” and “organisational-related criteria”. These main clusters include 15 sub criteria such as communication, documentation (quality/updating/availability) and peer pressure.
Findings
The result of this study shows that time pressure, organisational culture, safety culture and supervision are the most important criteria that contributed to AMT error. Their weights are 0.207, 0.172, 0.102 and 0.094, respectively.
Originality/value
There are many difficulties and limitations in measuring the factors that have an influence on AMT errors. For this reason, the weights of criteria and sub-criteria necessary are determined using ANP, and in this manner, it is possible to make better decisions in this process as ANP is a multi-criteria decision-making technique that considers qualitative factors in decision-making problems. The factors’ taxonomy determined as a result of the expert opinions and the extensive literature and the ANP model developed taking into account the dependencies between the factors will contribute to the literature.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1748-8842</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-4213</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/AEAT-11-2017-0245</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Air traffic control ; Aircraft accidents & safety ; Aircraft maintenance ; Aircraft reliability ; Airlines ; Aviation ; Business administration ; Clusters ; Commercial aircraft ; Composite materials ; Culture ; Decision analysis ; Decision making ; Design factors ; Human error ; Human factors ; Human factors research ; Human performance ; Investigations ; Multiple criterion ; Physiology ; Risk management ; Situational awareness ; Strategy ; Supervision ; Sustainability ; Task analysis ; Taxonomy ; Work environment ; Working conditions</subject><ispartof>Aircraft engineering, 2019-01, Vol.91 (1), p.78-93</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-afaa3d794fc9cfb48c33ca2a6a31660ce4594aa94faac736f86856cb343738683</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-afaa3d794fc9cfb48c33ca2a6a31660ce4594aa94faac736f86856cb343738683</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,967,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yazgan, Ebru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yilmaz, Ayşe Kucuk</creatorcontrib><title>Prioritisation of factors contributing to human error for airworthiness management strategy with ANP</title><title>Aircraft engineering</title><description>Purpose
Airline business management is set on airworthy strategy. Airline sustainability depends upon corporate-based airworthy strategy as airworthiness is the base to any airline business management and strategy. An airline can ensize its corporate sustainability if it has airworthiness strategy and risk management. The main condition to survive in the airline business is to maintain airworthiness with the fleet, maintenance and corporate-risk management. Aircraft maintenance technician (AMT) has a dual role in aircraft maintenance system as the source of failure in maintenance process via his volatility and unmanageable qualifications and secondly source of manager of maintain airworthiness of the aircrafts in airline. Situational awareness of managers about both limitations and qualifications of human factors is vital determinant to the decision-making process in aviation. Although continuously improving in related literature, one of the biggest weaknesses of the current methods of AMT error or performance is that the ability to model the reciprocal effects of the factors affecting the fault is limited. For this reason, this study aims to develop an analytic network process (ANP) model that takes into account the effects of mutual dependences among factors.
Design/methodology/approach
Firstly, with the help of experts and extensive literature, 67 factors that contributed to AMT error are identified and grouped. Then, the factors identified as eligible criteria and sub-criteria that contributed to the AMT errors are determined. In this study, the weights of identified criteria that have influence on AMT error try to determine by using ANP method. ANP is the common method to solve multi-criteria decision-making problems and is used to calculate priorities of factors. Criteria determined in this study are classified into three main clusters: “individual-related criteria”, “working environment-related criteria” and “organisational-related criteria”. These main clusters include 15 sub criteria such as communication, documentation (quality/updating/availability) and peer pressure.
Findings
The result of this study shows that time pressure, organisational culture, safety culture and supervision are the most important criteria that contributed to AMT error. Their weights are 0.207, 0.172, 0.102 and 0.094, respectively.
Originality/value
There are many difficulties and limitations in measuring the factors that have an influence on AMT errors. For this reason, the weights of criteria and sub-criteria necessary are determined using ANP, and in this manner, it is possible to make better decisions in this process as ANP is a multi-criteria decision-making technique that considers qualitative factors in decision-making problems. The factors’ taxonomy determined as a result of the expert opinions and the extensive literature and the ANP model developed taking into account the dependencies between the factors will contribute to the literature.</description><subject>Air traffic control</subject><subject>Aircraft accidents & safety</subject><subject>Aircraft maintenance</subject><subject>Aircraft reliability</subject><subject>Airlines</subject><subject>Aviation</subject><subject>Business administration</subject><subject>Clusters</subject><subject>Commercial aircraft</subject><subject>Composite materials</subject><subject>Culture</subject><subject>Decision analysis</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Design factors</subject><subject>Human error</subject><subject>Human factors</subject><subject>Human factors research</subject><subject>Human performance</subject><subject>Investigations</subject><subject>Multiple criterion</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Situational awareness</subject><subject>Strategy</subject><subject>Supervision</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Task analysis</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><subject>Work environment</subject><subject>Working conditions</subject><issn>1748-8842</issn><issn>1758-4213</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNptkE1LAzEQhhdRsH78AG8Bz9Fkk82mx6XUDyjaQz0v0zRpU9pNnWQp_fdmqRfBwzAvvPPOME9RPHD2xDnTz820WVDOacl4TVkpq4tixOtKU1lycTloqanWsrwubmLcMsZVxcSoWM3RB_TJR0g-dCQ44sCkgJGY0CX0yz75bk1SIJt-Dx2xiAGJywUejwHTxnc2RpI9WNu97RKJCSHZ9YkcfdqQ5mN-V1w52EV7_9tvi6-X6WLyRmefr--TZkaN4DJRcABiVY-lM2PjllIbIQyUoEBwpZixshpLgOwDmFoop5WulFkKKWqRtbgtHs97Dxi-extTuw09dvlkW1ZCqpJzLfMUP08ZDDGide0B_R7w1HLWDjDbAWZW7QCzHWDmDDtn8ocIu9W_kT_8xQ90CXe7</recordid><startdate>20190130</startdate><enddate>20190130</enddate><creator>Yazgan, Ebru</creator><creator>Yilmaz, Ayşe Kucuk</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M0F</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190130</creationdate><title>Prioritisation of factors contributing to human error for airworthiness management strategy with ANP</title><author>Yazgan, Ebru ; Yilmaz, Ayşe Kucuk</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-afaa3d794fc9cfb48c33ca2a6a31660ce4594aa94faac736f86856cb343738683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Air traffic control</topic><topic>Aircraft accidents & safety</topic><topic>Aircraft maintenance</topic><topic>Aircraft reliability</topic><topic>Airlines</topic><topic>Aviation</topic><topic>Business administration</topic><topic>Clusters</topic><topic>Commercial aircraft</topic><topic>Composite materials</topic><topic>Culture</topic><topic>Decision analysis</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Design factors</topic><topic>Human error</topic><topic>Human factors</topic><topic>Human factors research</topic><topic>Human performance</topic><topic>Investigations</topic><topic>Multiple criterion</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Situational awareness</topic><topic>Strategy</topic><topic>Supervision</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Task analysis</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><topic>Work environment</topic><topic>Working conditions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yazgan, Ebru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yilmaz, Ayşe Kucuk</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Aircraft engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yazgan, Ebru</au><au>Yilmaz, Ayşe Kucuk</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prioritisation of factors contributing to human error for airworthiness management strategy with ANP</atitle><jtitle>Aircraft engineering</jtitle><date>2019-01-30</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>91</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>78</spage><epage>93</epage><pages>78-93</pages><issn>1748-8842</issn><eissn>1758-4213</eissn><abstract>Purpose
Airline business management is set on airworthy strategy. Airline sustainability depends upon corporate-based airworthy strategy as airworthiness is the base to any airline business management and strategy. An airline can ensize its corporate sustainability if it has airworthiness strategy and risk management. The main condition to survive in the airline business is to maintain airworthiness with the fleet, maintenance and corporate-risk management. Aircraft maintenance technician (AMT) has a dual role in aircraft maintenance system as the source of failure in maintenance process via his volatility and unmanageable qualifications and secondly source of manager of maintain airworthiness of the aircrafts in airline. Situational awareness of managers about both limitations and qualifications of human factors is vital determinant to the decision-making process in aviation. Although continuously improving in related literature, one of the biggest weaknesses of the current methods of AMT error or performance is that the ability to model the reciprocal effects of the factors affecting the fault is limited. For this reason, this study aims to develop an analytic network process (ANP) model that takes into account the effects of mutual dependences among factors.
Design/methodology/approach
Firstly, with the help of experts and extensive literature, 67 factors that contributed to AMT error are identified and grouped. Then, the factors identified as eligible criteria and sub-criteria that contributed to the AMT errors are determined. In this study, the weights of identified criteria that have influence on AMT error try to determine by using ANP method. ANP is the common method to solve multi-criteria decision-making problems and is used to calculate priorities of factors. Criteria determined in this study are classified into three main clusters: “individual-related criteria”, “working environment-related criteria” and “organisational-related criteria”. These main clusters include 15 sub criteria such as communication, documentation (quality/updating/availability) and peer pressure.
Findings
The result of this study shows that time pressure, organisational culture, safety culture and supervision are the most important criteria that contributed to AMT error. Their weights are 0.207, 0.172, 0.102 and 0.094, respectively.
Originality/value
There are many difficulties and limitations in measuring the factors that have an influence on AMT errors. For this reason, the weights of criteria and sub-criteria necessary are determined using ANP, and in this manner, it is possible to make better decisions in this process as ANP is a multi-criteria decision-making technique that considers qualitative factors in decision-making problems. The factors’ taxonomy determined as a result of the expert opinions and the extensive literature and the ANP model developed taking into account the dependencies between the factors will contribute to the literature.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/AEAT-11-2017-0245</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1748-8842 |
ispartof | Aircraft engineering, 2019-01, Vol.91 (1), p.78-93 |
issn | 1748-8842 1758-4213 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2534621184 |
source | Emerald Journals |
subjects | Air traffic control Aircraft accidents & safety Aircraft maintenance Aircraft reliability Airlines Aviation Business administration Clusters Commercial aircraft Composite materials Culture Decision analysis Decision making Design factors Human error Human factors Human factors research Human performance Investigations Multiple criterion Physiology Risk management Situational awareness Strategy Supervision Sustainability Task analysis Taxonomy Work environment Working conditions |
title | Prioritisation of factors contributing to human error for airworthiness management strategy with ANP |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T22%3A37%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prioritisation%20of%20factors%20contributing%20to%20human%20error%20for%20airworthiness%20management%20strategy%20with%20ANP&rft.jtitle=Aircraft%20engineering&rft.au=Yazgan,%20Ebru&rft.date=2019-01-30&rft.volume=91&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=78&rft.epage=93&rft.pages=78-93&rft.issn=1748-8842&rft.eissn=1758-4213&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/AEAT-11-2017-0245&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E2534621184%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2534621184&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |