Effect of time and space partitioning strategies of samples on regional landslide susceptibility modelling
Assessment of the spatial probability of future landslide occurrences for disaster risk reduction is done through landslide susceptibility modelling. In this study, we investigated the effect of time and space partitioning strategies of samples on the performance of regional landslide susceptibility...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Landslides 2021-06, Vol.18 (6), p.2281-2294 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2294 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 2281 |
container_title | Landslides |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Khanna, Kirti Martha, Tapas R. Roy, Priyom Kumar, K. Vinod |
description | Assessment of the spatial probability of future landslide occurrences for disaster risk reduction is done through landslide susceptibility modelling. In this study, we investigated the effect of time and space partitioning strategies of samples on the performance of regional landslide susceptibility models on macro-scale mapping in the state of Mizoram, India, covering 21,087 km
2
area. We used landslide inventory data of 2014 and 2017 periods consisting of 1205 and 2265 landslides, respectively, to train and test the models with four sampling strategies such as spatial, temporal, temporal (size constrained) and temporal (geographic constrained). We used five commonly inherited models such as multiclass weighted overlay (MCWO), information value (IV), weights of evidence (WoE), logistic regression (LR) and artificial neural network (ANN) to evaluate the effect of sampling strategies on the model performance for regional landslide susceptibility mapping. Validation of model performance was done using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Traditional spatial sampling strategy applied to landslides in 2014 with a random split in 70:30 proportion provided a high performance of all the five models but failed to predict landslides in 2017. The landslide incidences in 2017, when used for model validation either entirely or in different split conditions (both size and geographic constrained), provided consistent performance, even though the testing sample size is large or have a different spatial disposition, if the training was carried out with non-linear susceptibility models such as LR and ANN using landslide incidences in 2014. Results show the importance of sample selection during validation of landslide susceptibility models on a regional scale. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10346-021-01627-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2533987049</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2533987049</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a342t-7ec8be623f3074bc7f3b3dc16a1d2dbb5f1eadc4ccc53b2ead1cb2a09c1c661d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhQdRsFb_gKuA69HcZB6dpZT6AMGNgruQZ0nJPMxNF_33po7ozlUO4TuHy1cU10BvgdL2DoHyqikpg5JCw9qSnxQLaICVNcDq9DfTj_PiAnFHKeso7xbFbuOc1YmMjiTfWyIHQ3CS2pJJxuSTHwc_bAmmKJPdeotHEmU_hWMcSMyf4yADCbmJwRtLcI_aTskrH3w6kH40NoQ8clmcORnQXv28y-L9YfO2fipfXh-f1_cvpeQVS2Vr9UrZhnHHaVsp3TquuNHQSDDMKFU7sNLoSmtdc8VyBq2YpJ0G3TRg-LK4mXenOH7uLSaxG_cx34iC1Zx3q5ZWXabYTOk4IkbrxBR9L-NBABVHp2J2KrJT8e1U8FzicwkzPGxt_Jv-p_UFU4x9Hw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2533987049</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of time and space partitioning strategies of samples on regional landslide susceptibility modelling</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Khanna, Kirti ; Martha, Tapas R. ; Roy, Priyom ; Kumar, K. Vinod</creator><creatorcontrib>Khanna, Kirti ; Martha, Tapas R. ; Roy, Priyom ; Kumar, K. Vinod</creatorcontrib><description>Assessment of the spatial probability of future landslide occurrences for disaster risk reduction is done through landslide susceptibility modelling. In this study, we investigated the effect of time and space partitioning strategies of samples on the performance of regional landslide susceptibility models on macro-scale mapping in the state of Mizoram, India, covering 21,087 km
2
area. We used landslide inventory data of 2014 and 2017 periods consisting of 1205 and 2265 landslides, respectively, to train and test the models with four sampling strategies such as spatial, temporal, temporal (size constrained) and temporal (geographic constrained). We used five commonly inherited models such as multiclass weighted overlay (MCWO), information value (IV), weights of evidence (WoE), logistic regression (LR) and artificial neural network (ANN) to evaluate the effect of sampling strategies on the model performance for regional landslide susceptibility mapping. Validation of model performance was done using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Traditional spatial sampling strategy applied to landslides in 2014 with a random split in 70:30 proportion provided a high performance of all the five models but failed to predict landslides in 2017. The landslide incidences in 2017, when used for model validation either entirely or in different split conditions (both size and geographic constrained), provided consistent performance, even though the testing sample size is large or have a different spatial disposition, if the training was carried out with non-linear susceptibility models such as LR and ANN using landslide incidences in 2014. Results show the importance of sample selection during validation of landslide susceptibility models on a regional scale.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1612-510X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1612-5118</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10346-021-01627-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Artificial neural networks ; Civil Engineering ; Disaster management ; Disaster risk ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Emergency preparedness ; Geography ; Landslides ; Landslides & mudslides ; Mapping ; Modelling ; Natural Hazards ; Neural networks ; Partitioning ; Probability theory ; Risk management ; Risk reduction ; Sampling ; Statistical analysis ; Susceptibility ; Technical Note ; Training</subject><ispartof>Landslides, 2021-06, Vol.18 (6), p.2281-2294</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021. corrected publication 2021</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021. corrected publication 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a342t-7ec8be623f3074bc7f3b3dc16a1d2dbb5f1eadc4ccc53b2ead1cb2a09c1c661d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a342t-7ec8be623f3074bc7f3b3dc16a1d2dbb5f1eadc4ccc53b2ead1cb2a09c1c661d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7761-9800</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10346-021-01627-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10346-021-01627-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Khanna, Kirti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martha, Tapas R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roy, Priyom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, K. Vinod</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of time and space partitioning strategies of samples on regional landslide susceptibility modelling</title><title>Landslides</title><addtitle>Landslides</addtitle><description>Assessment of the spatial probability of future landslide occurrences for disaster risk reduction is done through landslide susceptibility modelling. In this study, we investigated the effect of time and space partitioning strategies of samples on the performance of regional landslide susceptibility models on macro-scale mapping in the state of Mizoram, India, covering 21,087 km
2
area. We used landslide inventory data of 2014 and 2017 periods consisting of 1205 and 2265 landslides, respectively, to train and test the models with four sampling strategies such as spatial, temporal, temporal (size constrained) and temporal (geographic constrained). We used five commonly inherited models such as multiclass weighted overlay (MCWO), information value (IV), weights of evidence (WoE), logistic regression (LR) and artificial neural network (ANN) to evaluate the effect of sampling strategies on the model performance for regional landslide susceptibility mapping. Validation of model performance was done using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Traditional spatial sampling strategy applied to landslides in 2014 with a random split in 70:30 proportion provided a high performance of all the five models but failed to predict landslides in 2017. The landslide incidences in 2017, when used for model validation either entirely or in different split conditions (both size and geographic constrained), provided consistent performance, even though the testing sample size is large or have a different spatial disposition, if the training was carried out with non-linear susceptibility models such as LR and ANN using landslide incidences in 2014. Results show the importance of sample selection during validation of landslide susceptibility models on a regional scale.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Artificial neural networks</subject><subject>Civil Engineering</subject><subject>Disaster management</subject><subject>Disaster risk</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Emergency preparedness</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Landslides</subject><subject>Landslides & mudslides</subject><subject>Mapping</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Natural Hazards</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Partitioning</subject><subject>Probability theory</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Risk reduction</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Susceptibility</subject><subject>Technical Note</subject><subject>Training</subject><issn>1612-510X</issn><issn>1612-5118</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhQdRsFb_gKuA69HcZB6dpZT6AMGNgruQZ0nJPMxNF_33po7ozlUO4TuHy1cU10BvgdL2DoHyqikpg5JCw9qSnxQLaICVNcDq9DfTj_PiAnFHKeso7xbFbuOc1YmMjiTfWyIHQ3CS2pJJxuSTHwc_bAmmKJPdeotHEmU_hWMcSMyf4yADCbmJwRtLcI_aTskrH3w6kH40NoQ8clmcORnQXv28y-L9YfO2fipfXh-f1_cvpeQVS2Vr9UrZhnHHaVsp3TquuNHQSDDMKFU7sNLoSmtdc8VyBq2YpJ0G3TRg-LK4mXenOH7uLSaxG_cx34iC1Zx3q5ZWXabYTOk4IkbrxBR9L-NBABVHp2J2KrJT8e1U8FzicwkzPGxt_Jv-p_UFU4x9Hw</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>Khanna, Kirti</creator><creator>Martha, Tapas R.</creator><creator>Roy, Priyom</creator><creator>Kumar, K. Vinod</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7761-9800</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>Effect of time and space partitioning strategies of samples on regional landslide susceptibility modelling</title><author>Khanna, Kirti ; Martha, Tapas R. ; Roy, Priyom ; Kumar, K. Vinod</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a342t-7ec8be623f3074bc7f3b3dc16a1d2dbb5f1eadc4ccc53b2ead1cb2a09c1c661d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Artificial neural networks</topic><topic>Civil Engineering</topic><topic>Disaster management</topic><topic>Disaster risk</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Emergency preparedness</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Landslides</topic><topic>Landslides & mudslides</topic><topic>Mapping</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Natural Hazards</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Partitioning</topic><topic>Probability theory</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Risk reduction</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Susceptibility</topic><topic>Technical Note</topic><topic>Training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Khanna, Kirti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martha, Tapas R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roy, Priyom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, K. Vinod</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Landslides</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Khanna, Kirti</au><au>Martha, Tapas R.</au><au>Roy, Priyom</au><au>Kumar, K. Vinod</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of time and space partitioning strategies of samples on regional landslide susceptibility modelling</atitle><jtitle>Landslides</jtitle><stitle>Landslides</stitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2281</spage><epage>2294</epage><pages>2281-2294</pages><issn>1612-510X</issn><eissn>1612-5118</eissn><abstract>Assessment of the spatial probability of future landslide occurrences for disaster risk reduction is done through landslide susceptibility modelling. In this study, we investigated the effect of time and space partitioning strategies of samples on the performance of regional landslide susceptibility models on macro-scale mapping in the state of Mizoram, India, covering 21,087 km
2
area. We used landslide inventory data of 2014 and 2017 periods consisting of 1205 and 2265 landslides, respectively, to train and test the models with four sampling strategies such as spatial, temporal, temporal (size constrained) and temporal (geographic constrained). We used five commonly inherited models such as multiclass weighted overlay (MCWO), information value (IV), weights of evidence (WoE), logistic regression (LR) and artificial neural network (ANN) to evaluate the effect of sampling strategies on the model performance for regional landslide susceptibility mapping. Validation of model performance was done using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Traditional spatial sampling strategy applied to landslides in 2014 with a random split in 70:30 proportion provided a high performance of all the five models but failed to predict landslides in 2017. The landslide incidences in 2017, when used for model validation either entirely or in different split conditions (both size and geographic constrained), provided consistent performance, even though the testing sample size is large or have a different spatial disposition, if the training was carried out with non-linear susceptibility models such as LR and ANN using landslide incidences in 2014. Results show the importance of sample selection during validation of landslide susceptibility models on a regional scale.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s10346-021-01627-3</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7761-9800</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1612-510X |
ispartof | Landslides, 2021-06, Vol.18 (6), p.2281-2294 |
issn | 1612-510X 1612-5118 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2533987049 |
source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Agriculture Artificial neural networks Civil Engineering Disaster management Disaster risk Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Emergency preparedness Geography Landslides Landslides & mudslides Mapping Modelling Natural Hazards Neural networks Partitioning Probability theory Risk management Risk reduction Sampling Statistical analysis Susceptibility Technical Note Training |
title | Effect of time and space partitioning strategies of samples on regional landslide susceptibility modelling |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T02%3A40%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20time%20and%20space%20partitioning%20strategies%20of%20samples%20on%20regional%20landslide%20susceptibility%20modelling&rft.jtitle=Landslides&rft.au=Khanna,%20Kirti&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2281&rft.epage=2294&rft.pages=2281-2294&rft.issn=1612-510X&rft.eissn=1612-5118&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10346-021-01627-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2533987049%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2533987049&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |