Building on the ruins of empire: the Uganda Railway and the LAPSSET corridor in Kenya
This article explores colonial (dis-)continuities between the planned Lamu Port-South Sudan-Ethiopia Transport (LAPSSET) development corridor and the Uganda Railway (UR). The historical approach to infrastructure studies highlights the effects of large-scale infrastructures beyond their immediate ma...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Third world quarterly 2021-05, Vol.42 (5), p.996-1013 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1013 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 996 |
container_title | Third world quarterly |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Aalders, Johannes Theodor |
description | This article explores colonial (dis-)continuities between the planned Lamu Port-South Sudan-Ethiopia Transport (LAPSSET) development corridor and the Uganda Railway (UR). The historical approach to infrastructure studies highlights the effects of large-scale infrastructures beyond their immediate material impact, and reveals their potential power to structure mobilities, historicities and politics of scale. With reference to relational theories, it is argued that the two projects gain their respective significance not only through their ability to connect distant places, but also by blocking and severing other competing ways of being mobile. Particularly, both infrastructure projects create technologies enabling easier and faster flow of capital and commodities but limit previously prevalent mobilities practised by caravans and semi-nomadic people in the region. Both projects, furthermore, produce particular ways of remembering the past and anticipating the future. The article identifies a major discontinuity in the politics of scale they respectively imply: while the UR aimed at producing a clear scalar hierarchy between empire and colony, the LAPSSET alleges to dissolve hard boundaries between scalar instances. This article is based on qualitative data collected during fieldwork along the proposed route of the LAPSSET corridor, as well as archive work regarding the UR. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/01436597.2020.1741345 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2533582788</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2533582788</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-adcc68338ffde60cbe04d2219b92e1aa3808f0293c5607c738fb806b644ca7e03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMoOD9-ghDwuvPko23qlVPmBw4Ut12HNE1npEtq0jL27-2ceunV4bw85-XwIHRBYExAwBUQzrK0yMcU6BDlnDCeHqARYRkklHJyiEY7JtlBx-gkxg8AyLgQI7S87W1TWbfC3uHu3eDQWxexr7FZtzaY6-9wuVKuUvhN2WajtnhYvuPZ5HU-ny6w9iHYygdsHX42bqvO0FGtmmjOf-YpWt5PF3ePyezl4eluMks0p6xLVKV1JhgTdV2ZDHRpgFeUkqIsqCFKMQGiBlownWaQ63wASwFZmXGuVW6AnaJk3xs3pu1L2Qa7VmErvbJy1bdyiFa9jEbSgvKcD_zlnm-D_-xN7OSH74MbXpQ0ZSwVNBdioNI9pYOPMZj6r5eA3BmXv8blzrj8MT7c3ezvrKt9WKuND00lO7VtfKiDctpGyf6v-ALdFoZp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2533582788</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Building on the ruins of empire: the Uganda Railway and the LAPSSET corridor in Kenya</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><creator>Aalders, Johannes Theodor</creator><creatorcontrib>Aalders, Johannes Theodor</creatorcontrib><description>This article explores colonial (dis-)continuities between the planned Lamu Port-South Sudan-Ethiopia Transport (LAPSSET) development corridor and the Uganda Railway (UR). The historical approach to infrastructure studies highlights the effects of large-scale infrastructures beyond their immediate material impact, and reveals their potential power to structure mobilities, historicities and politics of scale. With reference to relational theories, it is argued that the two projects gain their respective significance not only through their ability to connect distant places, but also by blocking and severing other competing ways of being mobile. Particularly, both infrastructure projects create technologies enabling easier and faster flow of capital and commodities but limit previously prevalent mobilities practised by caravans and semi-nomadic people in the region. Both projects, furthermore, produce particular ways of remembering the past and anticipating the future. The article identifies a major discontinuity in the politics of scale they respectively imply: while the UR aimed at producing a clear scalar hierarchy between empire and colony, the LAPSSET alleges to dissolve hard boundaries between scalar instances. This article is based on qualitative data collected during fieldwork along the proposed route of the LAPSSET corridor, as well as archive work regarding the UR.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0143-6597</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1360-2241</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1360-2241</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2020.1741345</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Routledge</publisher><subject>Blocking ; Capital ; Caravans ; Colonialism ; Commodities ; development ; Discontinuity ; Empires ; Ethnology ; Etnologi ; Fieldwork ; History of Technology ; Human Geography ; Infrastructure ; Kulturgeografi ; new mobilities paradigm ; Nomads ; Politics ; politics of scale ; Power structure ; Social Anthropology ; Socialantropologi ; Teknikhistoria</subject><ispartof>Third world quarterly, 2021-05, Vol.42 (5), p.996-1013</ispartof><rights>2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. 2020</rights><rights>2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial – No Derivatives License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-adcc68338ffde60cbe04d2219b92e1aa3808f0293c5607c738fb806b644ca7e03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-adcc68338ffde60cbe04d2219b92e1aa3808f0293c5607c738fb806b644ca7e03</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0035-6985</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,33774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://gup.ub.gu.se/publication/292474$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aalders, Johannes Theodor</creatorcontrib><title>Building on the ruins of empire: the Uganda Railway and the LAPSSET corridor in Kenya</title><title>Third world quarterly</title><description>This article explores colonial (dis-)continuities between the planned Lamu Port-South Sudan-Ethiopia Transport (LAPSSET) development corridor and the Uganda Railway (UR). The historical approach to infrastructure studies highlights the effects of large-scale infrastructures beyond their immediate material impact, and reveals their potential power to structure mobilities, historicities and politics of scale. With reference to relational theories, it is argued that the two projects gain their respective significance not only through their ability to connect distant places, but also by blocking and severing other competing ways of being mobile. Particularly, both infrastructure projects create technologies enabling easier and faster flow of capital and commodities but limit previously prevalent mobilities practised by caravans and semi-nomadic people in the region. Both projects, furthermore, produce particular ways of remembering the past and anticipating the future. The article identifies a major discontinuity in the politics of scale they respectively imply: while the UR aimed at producing a clear scalar hierarchy between empire and colony, the LAPSSET alleges to dissolve hard boundaries between scalar instances. This article is based on qualitative data collected during fieldwork along the proposed route of the LAPSSET corridor, as well as archive work regarding the UR.</description><subject>Blocking</subject><subject>Capital</subject><subject>Caravans</subject><subject>Colonialism</subject><subject>Commodities</subject><subject>development</subject><subject>Discontinuity</subject><subject>Empires</subject><subject>Ethnology</subject><subject>Etnologi</subject><subject>Fieldwork</subject><subject>History of Technology</subject><subject>Human Geography</subject><subject>Infrastructure</subject><subject>Kulturgeografi</subject><subject>new mobilities paradigm</subject><subject>Nomads</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>politics of scale</subject><subject>Power structure</subject><subject>Social Anthropology</subject><subject>Socialantropologi</subject><subject>Teknikhistoria</subject><issn>0143-6597</issn><issn>1360-2241</issn><issn>1360-2241</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMoOD9-ghDwuvPko23qlVPmBw4Ut12HNE1npEtq0jL27-2ceunV4bw85-XwIHRBYExAwBUQzrK0yMcU6BDlnDCeHqARYRkklHJyiEY7JtlBx-gkxg8AyLgQI7S87W1TWbfC3uHu3eDQWxexr7FZtzaY6-9wuVKuUvhN2WajtnhYvuPZ5HU-ny6w9iHYygdsHX42bqvO0FGtmmjOf-YpWt5PF3ePyezl4eluMks0p6xLVKV1JhgTdV2ZDHRpgFeUkqIsqCFKMQGiBlownWaQ63wASwFZmXGuVW6AnaJk3xs3pu1L2Qa7VmErvbJy1bdyiFa9jEbSgvKcD_zlnm-D_-xN7OSH74MbXpQ0ZSwVNBdioNI9pYOPMZj6r5eA3BmXv8blzrj8MT7c3ezvrKt9WKuND00lO7VtfKiDctpGyf6v-ALdFoZp</recordid><startdate>20210511</startdate><enddate>20210511</enddate><creator>Aalders, Johannes Theodor</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>F1U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0035-6985</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210511</creationdate><title>Building on the ruins of empire: the Uganda Railway and the LAPSSET corridor in Kenya</title><author>Aalders, Johannes Theodor</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-adcc68338ffde60cbe04d2219b92e1aa3808f0293c5607c738fb806b644ca7e03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Blocking</topic><topic>Capital</topic><topic>Caravans</topic><topic>Colonialism</topic><topic>Commodities</topic><topic>development</topic><topic>Discontinuity</topic><topic>Empires</topic><topic>Ethnology</topic><topic>Etnologi</topic><topic>Fieldwork</topic><topic>History of Technology</topic><topic>Human Geography</topic><topic>Infrastructure</topic><topic>Kulturgeografi</topic><topic>new mobilities paradigm</topic><topic>Nomads</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>politics of scale</topic><topic>Power structure</topic><topic>Social Anthropology</topic><topic>Socialantropologi</topic><topic>Teknikhistoria</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aalders, Johannes Theodor</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor & Francis Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Göteborgs universitet</collection><jtitle>Third world quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aalders, Johannes Theodor</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Building on the ruins of empire: the Uganda Railway and the LAPSSET corridor in Kenya</atitle><jtitle>Third world quarterly</jtitle><date>2021-05-11</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>996</spage><epage>1013</epage><pages>996-1013</pages><issn>0143-6597</issn><issn>1360-2241</issn><eissn>1360-2241</eissn><abstract>This article explores colonial (dis-)continuities between the planned Lamu Port-South Sudan-Ethiopia Transport (LAPSSET) development corridor and the Uganda Railway (UR). The historical approach to infrastructure studies highlights the effects of large-scale infrastructures beyond their immediate material impact, and reveals their potential power to structure mobilities, historicities and politics of scale. With reference to relational theories, it is argued that the two projects gain their respective significance not only through their ability to connect distant places, but also by blocking and severing other competing ways of being mobile. Particularly, both infrastructure projects create technologies enabling easier and faster flow of capital and commodities but limit previously prevalent mobilities practised by caravans and semi-nomadic people in the region. Both projects, furthermore, produce particular ways of remembering the past and anticipating the future. The article identifies a major discontinuity in the politics of scale they respectively imply: while the UR aimed at producing a clear scalar hierarchy between empire and colony, the LAPSSET alleges to dissolve hard boundaries between scalar instances. This article is based on qualitative data collected during fieldwork along the proposed route of the LAPSSET corridor, as well as archive work regarding the UR.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/01436597.2020.1741345</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0035-6985</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0143-6597 |
ispartof | Third world quarterly, 2021-05, Vol.42 (5), p.996-1013 |
issn | 0143-6597 1360-2241 1360-2241 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2533582788 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Business Source Complete; Sociological Abstracts; EBSCOhost Political Science Complete |
subjects | Blocking Capital Caravans Colonialism Commodities development Discontinuity Empires Ethnology Etnologi Fieldwork History of Technology Human Geography Infrastructure Kulturgeografi new mobilities paradigm Nomads Politics politics of scale Power structure Social Anthropology Socialantropologi Teknikhistoria |
title | Building on the ruins of empire: the Uganda Railway and the LAPSSET corridor in Kenya |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T08%3A31%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Building%20on%20the%20ruins%20of%20empire:%20the%20Uganda%20Railway%20and%20the%20LAPSSET%20corridor%20in%20Kenya&rft.jtitle=Third%20world%20quarterly&rft.au=Aalders,%20Johannes%20Theodor&rft.date=2021-05-11&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=996&rft.epage=1013&rft.pages=996-1013&rft.issn=0143-6597&rft.eissn=1360-2241&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/01436597.2020.1741345&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2533582788%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2533582788&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |