Risk Quantization by Magnitude and Propensity
We propose a novel approach in the assessment of a random risk variable \(X\) by introducing magnitude-propensity risk measures \((m_X,p_X)\). This bivariate measure intends to account for the dual aspect of risk, where the magnitudes \(x\) of \(X\) tell how hign are the losses incurred, whereas the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | arXiv.org 2021-05 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | arXiv.org |
container_volume | |
creator | Faugeras, Olivier P Pagès, Gilles |
description | We propose a novel approach in the assessment of a random risk variable \(X\) by introducing magnitude-propensity risk measures \((m_X,p_X)\). This bivariate measure intends to account for the dual aspect of risk, where the magnitudes \(x\) of \(X\) tell how hign are the losses incurred, whereas the probabilities \(P(X=x)\) reveal how often one has to expect to suffer such losses. The basic idea is to simultaneously quantify both the severity \(m_X\) and the propensity \(p_X\) of the real-valued risk \(X\). This is to be contrasted with traditional univariate risk measures, like VaR or Expected shortfall, which typically conflate both effects. In its simplest form, \((m_X,p_X)\) is obtained by mass transportation in Wasserstein metric of the law \(P^X\) of \(X\) to a two-points \(\{0, m_X\}\) discrete distribution with mass \(p_X\) at \(m_X\). The approach can also be formulated as a constrained optimal quantization problem. This allows for an informative comparison of risks on both the magnitude and propensity scales. Several examples illustrate the proposed approach. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2533582272</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2533582272</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_25335822723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0MjY21LUwMTLiYOAtLs4yMDAwMjM3MjU15mTQDcoszlYILE3MK8msSizJzM9TSKpU8E1Mz8ssKU1JVUjMS1EIKMovSM0rziyp5GFgTUvMKU7lhdLcDMpuriHOHroFRfmFpanFJfFZ-aVFeUCpeCNTY2NTCyMjcyNj4lQBANELMik</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2533582272</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Risk Quantization by Magnitude and Propensity</title><source>Freely Accessible Journals</source><creator>Faugeras, Olivier P ; Pagès, Gilles</creator><creatorcontrib>Faugeras, Olivier P ; Pagès, Gilles</creatorcontrib><description>We propose a novel approach in the assessment of a random risk variable \(X\) by introducing magnitude-propensity risk measures \((m_X,p_X)\). This bivariate measure intends to account for the dual aspect of risk, where the magnitudes \(x\) of \(X\) tell how hign are the losses incurred, whereas the probabilities \(P(X=x)\) reveal how often one has to expect to suffer such losses. The basic idea is to simultaneously quantify both the severity \(m_X\) and the propensity \(p_X\) of the real-valued risk \(X\). This is to be contrasted with traditional univariate risk measures, like VaR or Expected shortfall, which typically conflate both effects. In its simplest form, \((m_X,p_X)\) is obtained by mass transportation in Wasserstein metric of the law \(P^X\) of \(X\) to a two-points \(\{0, m_X\}\) discrete distribution with mass \(p_X\) at \(m_X\). The approach can also be formulated as a constrained optimal quantization problem. This allows for an informative comparison of risks on both the magnitude and propensity scales. Several examples illustrate the proposed approach.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Bivariate analysis ; Measurement</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2021-05</ispartof><rights>2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Faugeras, Olivier P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pagès, Gilles</creatorcontrib><title>Risk Quantization by Magnitude and Propensity</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>We propose a novel approach in the assessment of a random risk variable \(X\) by introducing magnitude-propensity risk measures \((m_X,p_X)\). This bivariate measure intends to account for the dual aspect of risk, where the magnitudes \(x\) of \(X\) tell how hign are the losses incurred, whereas the probabilities \(P(X=x)\) reveal how often one has to expect to suffer such losses. The basic idea is to simultaneously quantify both the severity \(m_X\) and the propensity \(p_X\) of the real-valued risk \(X\). This is to be contrasted with traditional univariate risk measures, like VaR or Expected shortfall, which typically conflate both effects. In its simplest form, \((m_X,p_X)\) is obtained by mass transportation in Wasserstein metric of the law \(P^X\) of \(X\) to a two-points \(\{0, m_X\}\) discrete distribution with mass \(p_X\) at \(m_X\). The approach can also be formulated as a constrained optimal quantization problem. This allows for an informative comparison of risks on both the magnitude and propensity scales. Several examples illustrate the proposed approach.</description><subject>Bivariate analysis</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYuA0MjY21LUwMTLiYOAtLs4yMDAwMjM3MjU15mTQDcoszlYILE3MK8msSizJzM9TSKpU8E1Mz8ssKU1JVUjMS1EIKMovSM0rziyp5GFgTUvMKU7lhdLcDMpuriHOHroFRfmFpanFJfFZ-aVFeUCpeCNTY2NTCyMjcyNj4lQBANELMik</recordid><startdate>20210527</startdate><enddate>20210527</enddate><creator>Faugeras, Olivier P</creator><creator>Pagès, Gilles</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210527</creationdate><title>Risk Quantization by Magnitude and Propensity</title><author>Faugeras, Olivier P ; Pagès, Gilles</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_25335822723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Bivariate analysis</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Faugeras, Olivier P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pagès, Gilles</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Faugeras, Olivier P</au><au>Pagès, Gilles</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>Risk Quantization by Magnitude and Propensity</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2021-05-27</date><risdate>2021</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>We propose a novel approach in the assessment of a random risk variable \(X\) by introducing magnitude-propensity risk measures \((m_X,p_X)\). This bivariate measure intends to account for the dual aspect of risk, where the magnitudes \(x\) of \(X\) tell how hign are the losses incurred, whereas the probabilities \(P(X=x)\) reveal how often one has to expect to suffer such losses. The basic idea is to simultaneously quantify both the severity \(m_X\) and the propensity \(p_X\) of the real-valued risk \(X\). This is to be contrasted with traditional univariate risk measures, like VaR or Expected shortfall, which typically conflate both effects. In its simplest form, \((m_X,p_X)\) is obtained by mass transportation in Wasserstein metric of the law \(P^X\) of \(X\) to a two-points \(\{0, m_X\}\) discrete distribution with mass \(p_X\) at \(m_X\). The approach can also be formulated as a constrained optimal quantization problem. This allows for an informative comparison of risks on both the magnitude and propensity scales. Several examples illustrate the proposed approach.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 2331-8422 |
ispartof | arXiv.org, 2021-05 |
issn | 2331-8422 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2533582272 |
source | Freely Accessible Journals |
subjects | Bivariate analysis Measurement |
title | Risk Quantization by Magnitude and Propensity |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T10%3A10%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=Risk%20Quantization%20by%20Magnitude%20and%20Propensity&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Faugeras,%20Olivier%20P&rft.date=2021-05-27&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2533582272%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2533582272&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |