Risk Quantization by Magnitude and Propensity

We propose a novel approach in the assessment of a random risk variable \(X\) by introducing magnitude-propensity risk measures \((m_X,p_X)\). This bivariate measure intends to account for the dual aspect of risk, where the magnitudes \(x\) of \(X\) tell how hign are the losses incurred, whereas the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:arXiv.org 2021-05
Hauptverfasser: Faugeras, Olivier P, Pagès, Gilles
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title arXiv.org
container_volume
creator Faugeras, Olivier P
Pagès, Gilles
description We propose a novel approach in the assessment of a random risk variable \(X\) by introducing magnitude-propensity risk measures \((m_X,p_X)\). This bivariate measure intends to account for the dual aspect of risk, where the magnitudes \(x\) of \(X\) tell how hign are the losses incurred, whereas the probabilities \(P(X=x)\) reveal how often one has to expect to suffer such losses. The basic idea is to simultaneously quantify both the severity \(m_X\) and the propensity \(p_X\) of the real-valued risk \(X\). This is to be contrasted with traditional univariate risk measures, like VaR or Expected shortfall, which typically conflate both effects. In its simplest form, \((m_X,p_X)\) is obtained by mass transportation in Wasserstein metric of the law \(P^X\) of \(X\) to a two-points \(\{0, m_X\}\) discrete distribution with mass \(p_X\) at \(m_X\). The approach can also be formulated as a constrained optimal quantization problem. This allows for an informative comparison of risks on both the magnitude and propensity scales. Several examples illustrate the proposed approach.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2533582272</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2533582272</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_25335822723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0MjY21LUwMTLiYOAtLs4yMDAwMjM3MjU15mTQDcoszlYILE3MK8msSizJzM9TSKpU8E1Mz8ssKU1JVUjMS1EIKMovSM0rziyp5GFgTUvMKU7lhdLcDMpuriHOHroFRfmFpanFJfFZ-aVFeUCpeCNTY2NTCyMjcyNj4lQBANELMik</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2533582272</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Risk Quantization by Magnitude and Propensity</title><source>Freely Accessible Journals</source><creator>Faugeras, Olivier P ; Pagès, Gilles</creator><creatorcontrib>Faugeras, Olivier P ; Pagès, Gilles</creatorcontrib><description>We propose a novel approach in the assessment of a random risk variable \(X\) by introducing magnitude-propensity risk measures \((m_X,p_X)\). This bivariate measure intends to account for the dual aspect of risk, where the magnitudes \(x\) of \(X\) tell how hign are the losses incurred, whereas the probabilities \(P(X=x)\) reveal how often one has to expect to suffer such losses. The basic idea is to simultaneously quantify both the severity \(m_X\) and the propensity \(p_X\) of the real-valued risk \(X\). This is to be contrasted with traditional univariate risk measures, like VaR or Expected shortfall, which typically conflate both effects. In its simplest form, \((m_X,p_X)\) is obtained by mass transportation in Wasserstein metric of the law \(P^X\) of \(X\) to a two-points \(\{0, m_X\}\) discrete distribution with mass \(p_X\) at \(m_X\). The approach can also be formulated as a constrained optimal quantization problem. This allows for an informative comparison of risks on both the magnitude and propensity scales. Several examples illustrate the proposed approach.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Bivariate analysis ; Measurement</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2021-05</ispartof><rights>2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Faugeras, Olivier P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pagès, Gilles</creatorcontrib><title>Risk Quantization by Magnitude and Propensity</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>We propose a novel approach in the assessment of a random risk variable \(X\) by introducing magnitude-propensity risk measures \((m_X,p_X)\). This bivariate measure intends to account for the dual aspect of risk, where the magnitudes \(x\) of \(X\) tell how hign are the losses incurred, whereas the probabilities \(P(X=x)\) reveal how often one has to expect to suffer such losses. The basic idea is to simultaneously quantify both the severity \(m_X\) and the propensity \(p_X\) of the real-valued risk \(X\). This is to be contrasted with traditional univariate risk measures, like VaR or Expected shortfall, which typically conflate both effects. In its simplest form, \((m_X,p_X)\) is obtained by mass transportation in Wasserstein metric of the law \(P^X\) of \(X\) to a two-points \(\{0, m_X\}\) discrete distribution with mass \(p_X\) at \(m_X\). The approach can also be formulated as a constrained optimal quantization problem. This allows for an informative comparison of risks on both the magnitude and propensity scales. Several examples illustrate the proposed approach.</description><subject>Bivariate analysis</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYuA0MjY21LUwMTLiYOAtLs4yMDAwMjM3MjU15mTQDcoszlYILE3MK8msSizJzM9TSKpU8E1Mz8ssKU1JVUjMS1EIKMovSM0rziyp5GFgTUvMKU7lhdLcDMpuriHOHroFRfmFpanFJfFZ-aVFeUCpeCNTY2NTCyMjcyNj4lQBANELMik</recordid><startdate>20210527</startdate><enddate>20210527</enddate><creator>Faugeras, Olivier P</creator><creator>Pagès, Gilles</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210527</creationdate><title>Risk Quantization by Magnitude and Propensity</title><author>Faugeras, Olivier P ; Pagès, Gilles</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_25335822723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Bivariate analysis</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Faugeras, Olivier P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pagès, Gilles</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Faugeras, Olivier P</au><au>Pagès, Gilles</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>Risk Quantization by Magnitude and Propensity</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2021-05-27</date><risdate>2021</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>We propose a novel approach in the assessment of a random risk variable \(X\) by introducing magnitude-propensity risk measures \((m_X,p_X)\). This bivariate measure intends to account for the dual aspect of risk, where the magnitudes \(x\) of \(X\) tell how hign are the losses incurred, whereas the probabilities \(P(X=x)\) reveal how often one has to expect to suffer such losses. The basic idea is to simultaneously quantify both the severity \(m_X\) and the propensity \(p_X\) of the real-valued risk \(X\). This is to be contrasted with traditional univariate risk measures, like VaR or Expected shortfall, which typically conflate both effects. In its simplest form, \((m_X,p_X)\) is obtained by mass transportation in Wasserstein metric of the law \(P^X\) of \(X\) to a two-points \(\{0, m_X\}\) discrete distribution with mass \(p_X\) at \(m_X\). The approach can also be formulated as a constrained optimal quantization problem. This allows for an informative comparison of risks on both the magnitude and propensity scales. Several examples illustrate the proposed approach.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2331-8422
ispartof arXiv.org, 2021-05
issn 2331-8422
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2533582272
source Freely Accessible Journals
subjects Bivariate analysis
Measurement
title Risk Quantization by Magnitude and Propensity
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T10%3A10%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=Risk%20Quantization%20by%20Magnitude%20and%20Propensity&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Faugeras,%20Olivier%20P&rft.date=2021-05-27&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2533582272%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2533582272&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true